[Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3155 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|future |D2 --
[Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155 Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #12 from Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com 2011-12-12 23:17:34 GMT --- I'm closing this at the patch is amazingly out of date. For an up-to-date druntime for ldc, see: https://github.com/ldc-developers/druntime. More information, including how to build can be found at https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/wiki -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com --- Comment #11 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2010-07-16 10:13:21 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Yeah, I think gdc is also gradually approaching 2.020 where druntime was introduced and will face the same problem. They are currently upgrading to 2.016. As of today, they are at 2.019. (http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/changesets/) Perhaps this should be up-prioritized because I assume it's going to be a blocker of further progress. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155 Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@me.com --- Comment #9 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2010-06-30 12:49:14 PDT --- Why not just use the approach Tango uses? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155 --- Comment #10 from Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org 2010-06-30 22:42:56 PDT --- Druntime used to, but it's a very complicated structure. And even the Tango runtime was intended to originally provide only a template. The hope was that compiler writers would eventually each maintain their own runtime, and it doesn't really make sense that every compiler runtime would live in the same SVN. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155 --- Comment #4 from Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org 2010-02-09 09:46:41 PST --- The correct approach may be to have a separate Druntime for each compiler. This is a bit less granular than the previous design where multiple compiler runtimes could be plugged into the same SVN tree, but that design was a pain to deal with from a maintenance perspective (though it's still functionally feasible). I don't really like that it would mean code merges for the GC and core code however. Suggestions welcome. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bra...@puremagic.com --- Comment #5 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-02-09 11:04:04 PST --- A separate runtime per compiler seems very wrong to me. I can understand that the current code bases look fairly far apart due to the length of time they've been allowed to drift, but really, shouldn't they be very very similar for the vast majority of the code? I recognize that ldc has introduced additional compiler emited function calls, but there's no reason that those can't be included in druntime. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155 --- Comment #7 from Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org 2010-02-09 17:45:04 PST --- They were in their own folder, in fact, there was a 'compiler' folder with subfolders for each compiler, but the structure was deemed unnecessarily complicated when the only compiler supported was DMD. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155 --- Comment #3 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2010-02-05 12:04:44 PST --- Yeah, I think gdc is also gradually approaching 2.020 where druntime was introduced and will face the same problem. They are currently upgrading to 2.016. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
