[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|future |D2 --
[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #8 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-02-28 04:10:25 PST --- On OSX 10.5.2 the XCode3.0 linker (ld64-77) still crashes when handling debug_line sections with an empty line table because it calculates the wrong minimal section length. This bug is still present on ld64-134.9 but they fixed the symptom by adding a NULL check in ld64-87. http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/ld64/ld64-97.2/ChangeLog 2008-07-18 Nick Kledzikkled...@apple.com * src/MachOReaderRelocatable.hpp: don't crash if debug_line section has no line table -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 --- Comment #9 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-02-28 04:14:37 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1196) ld64-77 patch -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1196|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #10 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-02-28 04:28:15 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1197) ld64-77 patch -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 --- Comment #7 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2013-02-26 23:59:17 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) Why do we check for the OS version to workaround linker bugs? If there really is no other way we should at least check the linker/gcc-toolchain version. How would you do that during runtime? If I understood the changes correctly then the 10.6 linker segfaults when linking empty segments, right? What's the issue with 10.5? Yes, I think so. The changes to fix 10.6 broke the 10.5 support. I just added back the code that worked in 10.5, depending on what version the compiler is running. If I use the same compiler and build a binary on 10.6 it runs on 10.6 but not on 10.5. Maybe not perfect but at least it's better. What has happened here? Isn't all of this completely unnecessary now that we use onAddImage/getSection? I don't know, maybe. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #6 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-02-26 17:02:50 PST --- Why do we check for the OS version to workaround linker bugs? If there really is no other way we should at least check the linker/gcc-toolchain version. If I understood the changes correctly then the 10.6 linker segfaults when linking empty segments, right? What's the issue with 10.5? If I use the same compiler and build a binary on 10.6 it runs on 10.6 but not on 10.5. Maybe not perfect but at least it's better. What has happened here? Isn't all of this completely unnecessary now that we use onAddImage/getSection? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-12-06 00:47:53 PST --- Fixed dmd 1.053 and 2.037 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2009-12-04 02:52:12 PST --- I'm closing this one now, it seems to work, don't know what I did the first time -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-12-02 15:28:12 PST --- I installed the 10.4 sdk from the OSX 10.6 sdk. Unfortunately, now the .4u sdk seems to be missing stdarg.h (it was there with 10.5's version of the .4u sdk). I changed it to the .5 sdk, and now it builds. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 --- Comment #2 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2009-11-14 03:19:19 PST --- Yes I tried, it doesn't work, bus error. If I build the compiler with this patch on 10.5 and build a binary on 10.5 it runs on 10.5 and 10.6. If I use the same compiler and build a binary on 10.6 it runs on 10.6 but not on 10.5. Maybe not perfect but at least it's better. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3502] Fix for dropped Mac OS X 10.5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3502 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-11-13 15:59:40 PST --- I don't think the changes to machobj.c are necessary. Did you try it without them? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
