[Issue 401] add more std.gc APIs, e.g. std.gc.allocatedMemory();
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |D2 --
[Issue 401] add more std.gc APIs, e.g. std.gc.allocatedMemory();
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Is this still being planned to be added? Could it become cumbersome for some GC implementations to expose such an API (e.g. if it's not a O(1) operation but something way more expensive)? If so then maybe it's best not to try exposing such operations. --
[Issue 401] add more std.gc APIs, e.g. std.gc.allocatedMemory();
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401 --- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com --- This looks more like a task than an enhancecement request. @Sean okay to remove it for now? --
[Issue 401] add more std.gc APIs, e.g. std.gc.allocatedMemory();
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401 --- Comment #4 from Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org --- Please do. --
[Issue 401] add more std.gc APIs, e.g. std.gc.allocatedMemory();
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |LATER --