[Issue 4385] Uncaught exceptions should call abort() at the place where the exception was thrown

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4385

Vladimir Panteleev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Panteleev  ---
I think this is already possible by setting rt_trapExceptions=0 (BEFORE the
runtime is initialized, i.e. from a debugger), then breakpointing abort() /
rt.deh_win64_posix.terminate() / etc. Reopen if this is still an issue. I've
filed a related issue 15886.

--

[Issue 4385] Uncaught exceptions should call abort() at the place where the exception was thrown

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4385

Vladimir Panteleev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh
   ||ow_bug.cgi?id=15886

--

[Issue 4385] Uncaught exceptions should call abort() at the place where the exception was thrown

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4385

Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|D1  D2 |D2

--

[Issue 4385] Uncaught exceptions should call abort() at the place where the exception was thrown

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4385



--- Comment #5 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2011-12-22 15:37:17 
PST ---
FYI I have it working perfectly in Tango/D1 (I even print a stack trace). If
you're interested I can share the code.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 4385] Uncaught exceptions should call abort() at the place where the exception was thrown

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4385



--- Comment #4 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2010-08-03 
20:13:11 PDT ---
Why not call abort from onAssertError function?

(In reply to comment #2)
 What I don't get is why this works with
 object dtors that are run as the stack unwinds though.

If I remember it correctly, objects are destructed during the catch phase. I
think, this won't work with sjlj exceptions.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---