[Issue 6496] Fix std.process.browse per comments in pull request #154

[d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6496

Basile-z  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|b2.t...@gmx.com |

--

[Issue 6496] Fix std.process.browse per comments in pull request #154

[d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6496

Basile B.  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||b2.t...@gmx.com
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Basile B.  ---
Current version of browse shows that comments have been addressed
- windows version use the ShellExecuteW() and not the A anymore
- OSX use open() if the code using $BROWSER didn't work

--

[Issue 6496] Fix std.process.browse per comments in pull request #154

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6496

Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|unspecified |D2

--

[Issue 6496] Fix std.process.browse per comments in pull request #154

[d-bugmail]

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6496



--- Comment #3 from Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com 2014-03-19 21:51:43 
PDT ---
Good point about this bug report.

Since you know the situation better than I, could you please list here which
changes actually need to be made?

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 6496] Fix std.process.browse per comments in pull request #154

[d-bugmail]

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6496



--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2014-03-19 21:45:33 
PDT ---
 Jonathan, did you end up forgetting about this?  :P

Yes, though the bug was created so that we as a community would have a note to
take care of this and thus remember to. Anyone is free to do this. I just
happen to be the one who took the initiative to open the bug report. It's a
weird situation, because I ended up creating a pull request for Walter's code.
But clearly this bug report served its purpose, because you found it and
brought thus brought it up again. It would have been completely forgotten
otherwise.

I still probably should have remembered this and taken care of it by now, but
anyone is free to do so.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 6496] Fix std.process.browse per comments in pull request #154

[d-bugmail]

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6496


Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lt.infiltra...@gmail.com


--- Comment #1 from Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com 2014-03-19 19:22:17 
PDT ---
Jonathan, did you end up forgetting about this?  :P

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---