[Issue 8956] Ability to break typesystem with constructor/postblit/destructor (e.g. modify immutable)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8956 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2013-07-10 08:29:36 PDT --- It was fixed in 2.063 (now ctor attributes should correspond to those in variable declarations). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8956] Ability to break typesystem with constructor/postblit/destructor (e.g. modify immutable)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8956 Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid CC||s...@iname.com Blocks||2573 --- Comment #2 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-11-04 16:52:41 PST --- this(int* i) has no const/immutable qualifier. As such, if I remember correctly, the compiler should not be allowing it to be used to construct an immutable instance. In any case, it's a bug that it accepts the call to it to construct an immutable without having first checked that it's still valid when the this pointer is immutable. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8956] Ability to break typesystem with constructor/postblit/destructor (e.g. modify immutable)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8956 Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||8958 --- Comment #1 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-03 18:01:11 MSK --- The first fix proposal: Issue 8958 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
