Cross-module inlining with separate compilation?
Is there a way to have cross-module inlining but with separate compilation? Like with link-time generation in C++ compilers.
Re: Cross-module inlining with separate compilation?
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:07:06 + ponce via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote: Is there a way to have cross-module inlining but with separate compilation? Like with link-time generation in C++ compilers. i think that turning your functions into templates should do the trick. i.e. int myfunc (int n) -- int myfunc() (int n). but this is a hack, of course. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Cross-module inlining with separate compilation?
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 04:34:39 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:07:06 + ponce via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote: Is there a way to have cross-module inlining but with separate compilation? Like with link-time generation in C++ compilers. i think that turning your functions into templates should do the trick. i.e. int myfunc (int n) -- int myfunc() (int n). but this is a hack, of course. No template hack needed now. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
Re: Cross-module inlining with separate compilation?
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:49:17 + hane via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote: No template hack needed now. unless you using gdc, for example. ;-) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
