Re: How to use Vector Extensions in an opBinary
On Sunday, 17 April 2022 at 11:16:25 UTC, HuskyNator wrote: As a small disclaimer; I don't know to what extent the compiler already automates these kind of operations, and mostly want to use this as a learning experience. For your particular case, it is very likely LDC and GDC will be able to optimize your loops using SIMD.
Re: How to use Vector Extensions in an opBinary
On Thursday, 21 April 2022 at 15:31:04 UTC, HuskyNator wrote: On Sunday, 17 April 2022 at 17:04:57 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote: You might want to have a look at https://code.dlang.org/packages/intel-intrinsics — Bastiaan. This does not discuss core.simd or __vector type, or did I miss/mininterpret something? It wraps `core.simd` with an eye on portability. I haven’t used it myself, but my impression is that if you’re interested in `core.simd`, intel-intrinsics may be a better option. I think there is also better documentation. There is a video of a DConf presentation that you may want to watch. — Bastiaan.
Re: How to use Vector Extensions in an opBinary
On Sunday, 17 April 2022 at 17:04:57 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote: On Sunday, 17 April 2022 at 11:16:25 UTC, HuskyNator wrote: I recently found out there is [support for vector extensions](https://dlang.org/spec/simd.html) But I have found I don't really understand how to use it, not even mentioning the more complex stuff. I couldn't find any good examples either. You might want to have a look at https://code.dlang.org/packages/intel-intrinsics — Bastiaan. This does not discuss core.simd or __vector type, or did I miss/mininterpret something?
Re: How to use Vector Extensions in an opBinary
On Sunday, 17 April 2022 at 11:16:25 UTC, HuskyNator wrote: I recently found out there is [support for vector extensions](https://dlang.org/spec/simd.html) But I have found I don't really understand how to use it, not even mentioning the more complex stuff. I couldn't find any good examples either. You might want to have a look at https://code.dlang.org/packages/intel-intrinsics — Bastiaan.
Re: How to use Vector Extensions in an opBinary
On Sunday, 17 April 2022 at 11:16:25 UTC, HuskyNator wrote:
I recently found out there is [support for vector
extensions](https://dlang.org/spec/simd.html)
But I have found I don't really understand how to use it, not
even mentioning the more complex stuff. I couldn't find any
good examples either.
I'm trying to figure out how to implement the following
opBinary using vector extensions.
```dlang
alias MatType = typeof(this);
union{
T[rows*columns] vec;
T[rows][columns] mat;
}
MatType opBinary(string op, T)(const T right) const {
MatType result = this;
mixin("result.vec[] = this.vec[] " ~ op ~ " right;");
return result;
}
```
Or alternatively, as I'm not sure which is more
efficient/faster:
```dlang
MatType opBinary(string op, T)(const T right) const {
MatType result;
static foreach(i; 0..rows*columns)
mixin("result.vec[i] = this.vec[i] " ~ op ~ " right;");
return result;
}
```
But going off the documentation, I have no idea how to use
vector extensions to achieve something like this.
As a small disclaimer; I don't know to what extent the compiler
already automates these kind of operations, and mostly want to
use this as a learning experience.
Kind regards, HN
I'd experiment with CompilerExplorer. For example
[this](https://godbolt.org/z/a51r8GEv4) shows that the codegen is
identical for both opBinary version for "+".
About time spent to compile, `static foreach` is known not to
scale well.
