Re: What is the D equivalent of C++'s method pointers?
On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 12:04:01 UTC, Paul Backus wrote: https://digitalmars.com/articles/b68.html Thank you very much :D
Re: What is the D equivalent of C++'s method pointers?
On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 11:53:42 UTC, Tejas wrote:
Given a class ```Employee``` , if I have the following code
```
int (Employee::*methodPtr) () const { ::getSalary };
Employee employee { "John", "Doe" };
cout << (employee.*methodPtr)() << endl;
```
What is the equivalent D code?
Ditto for pointer to class instances:
```
int (Employee::*methodPtr) () const { ::getSalary };
Employee* employee { new Employee { "John", "Doe" } };
cout << (employee->*methodPtr)() << endl;
```
https://digitalmars.com/articles/b68.html
Re: What is the D equivalent of C++'s method pointers?
On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 11:53:42 UTC, Tejas wrote:
Given a class ```Employee``` , if I have the following code
```
int (Employee::*methodPtr) () const { ::getSalary };
Employee employee { "John", "Doe" };
cout << (employee.*methodPtr)() << endl;
```
What is the equivalent D code?
Ditto for pointer to class instances:
```
int (Employee::*methodPtr) () const { ::getSalary };
Employee* employee { new Employee { "John", "Doe" } };
cout << (employee->*methodPtr)() << endl;
```
All I found was this post from 2005(!):
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/dfhe54$1ipt$1...@digitaldaemon.com
What is the D equivalent of C++'s method pointers?
Given a class ```Employee``` , if I have the following code
```
int (Employee::*methodPtr) () const { ::getSalary };
Employee employee { "John", "Doe" };
cout << (employee.*methodPtr)() << endl;
```
What is the equivalent D code?
Ditto for pointer to class instances:
```
int (Employee::*methodPtr) () const { ::getSalary };
Employee* employee { new Employee { "John", "Doe" } };
cout << (employee->*methodPtr)() << endl;
```
