Re: vibe.de multiple ports.
On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 12:38:10 UTC, seany wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 12:29:06 UTC, Daniel Kozak
wrote:
Dne st 30. 9. 2020 13:25 uživatel seany via
Digitalmars-d-learn < digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com>
napsal:
Hello
I am trying to use this example for a iot application:
https://aberba.com/2018/using-vibe-d-web-interface/
The code i use is:
ushort port = 5504;
void main(char[][] args)
{
auto router = new URLRouter;
router.post("/archive", );
router.get("/archive", );
auto settings = new HTTPServerSettings;
settings.port = port;
settings.bindAddresses = ["::1", "0.0.0.0"];
listenHTTP(settings, router);
runApplication();
}
This is fine. But now that we have ~ 100 IoT devices in the
field, I would like to assign each a new port.
Why? I do not see any reason for that.
to separate the messages from the IoT responses quickly and
forward them to different programs, and to have the capability
in hand, so that when later i have an idea to exploit the
capability, I can also do it.
What you are doing, if I understand you well, is a way of scaling
the server to handle high amount of traffic.
If that's right, then I'm not sure how the number of PORT is the
issue. Irrespective of the port, the server resources remains the
same.
And if that's the case, then you might need a load balancer (or
use nginx or any of the options I've used in my projects). In
that case, you run multiple versions of the server in stateless
environments... scaled up or down on demand.
Been a long while since I wrote some vibe.d tutorials though :)
Re: vibe.de multiple ports.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:40 PM seany via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 12:29:06 UTC, Daniel Kozak
> wrote:
>
> to separate the messages from the IoT responses quickly and
> forward them to different programs, and to have the capability in
> hand, so that when later i have an idea to exploit the
> capability, I can also do it.
>
Ok as Adam said you can do something like this:
void main()
{
immutable ushort startPort = 5500;
import std.range : iota;
foreach (ushort port; iota!(ushort,ushort)(startPort, startPort + 100))
{
auto settings = new HTTPServerSettings;
settings.port = port;
settings.bindAddresses = ["::1", "127.0.0.1"];
listenHTTP(settings, );
}
runApplication();
}
void hello(HTTPServerRequest req, HTTPServerResponse res)
{
import std.conv : to;
res.writeBody(req.fullURL.port.to!string);
}
Re: vibe.de multiple ports.
On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 11:23:59 UTC, seany wrote:
auto router = new URLRouter;
router.post("/archive", );
router.get("/archive", );
auto settings = new HTTPServerSettings;
settings.port = port;
settings.bindAddresses = ["::1", "0.0.0.0"];
listenHTTP(settings, router);
If you loop this section it should listen to each port. This is
just a setup loop, it wouldn't actually be wasteful once it is
running.
(I think, I don't really know vibe super well)
Re: vibe.de multiple ports.
On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 12:29:06 UTC, Daniel Kozak
wrote:
Dne st 30. 9. 2020 13:25 uživatel seany via Digitalmars-d-learn
< digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> napsal:
Hello
I am trying to use this example for a iot application:
https://aberba.com/2018/using-vibe-d-web-interface/
The code i use is:
ushort port = 5504;
void main(char[][] args)
{
auto router = new URLRouter;
router.post("/archive", );
router.get("/archive", );
auto settings = new HTTPServerSettings;
settings.port = port;
settings.bindAddresses = ["::1", "0.0.0.0"];
listenHTTP(settings, router);
runApplication();
}
This is fine. But now that we have ~ 100 IoT devices in the
field, I would like to assign each a new port.
Why? I do not see any reason for that.
to separate the messages from the IoT responses quickly and
forward them to different programs, and to have the capability in
hand, so that when later i have an idea to exploit the
capability, I can also do it.
Re: vibe.de multiple ports.
Dne st 30. 9. 2020 13:25 uživatel seany via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> napsal:
> Hello
>
> I am trying to use this example for a iot application:
> https://aberba.com/2018/using-vibe-d-web-interface/
>
> The code i use is:
>
> ushort port = 5504;
>
> void main(char[][] args)
> {
>
> auto router = new URLRouter;
> router.post("/archive", );
> router.get("/archive", );
>
> auto settings = new HTTPServerSettings;
> settings.port = port;
> settings.bindAddresses = ["::1", "0.0.0.0"];
> listenHTTP(settings, router);
>
> runApplication();
> }
>
>
> This is fine. But now that we have ~ 100 IoT devices in the
> field, I would like to assign each a new port.
>
Why? I do not see any reason for that.
>
vibe.de multiple ports.
Hello
I am trying to use this example for a iot application:
https://aberba.com/2018/using-vibe-d-web-interface/
The code i use is:
ushort port = 5504;
void main(char[][] args)
{
auto router = new URLRouter;
router.post("/archive", );
router.get("/archive", );
auto settings = new HTTPServerSettings;
settings.port = port;
settings.bindAddresses = ["::1", "0.0.0.0"];
listenHTTP(settings, router);
runApplication();
}
This is fine. But now that we have ~ 100 IoT devices in the
field, I would like to assign each a new port. The devices should
be communicating over HTTP as the vendor software running
thereupon uses http.
What is the best practice to make a vibe.d server listen to
multiple ports? Make a loop scanning each loop seems wasteful. Is
there a function in vibe.d that can take multiple ports, and
launch a set of threads assigned to each port?
Thank you
