[digitalradio] New SDR from Flex Radio
The Flex 1500 will soon be available. The first one has rolled off prototype line and you can see it (in operation) at the Orlando Hamcation if you are going (this weekend). If is a BCB through 54 MHz 5 watt TRANSCEIVER with control, etc. run via the USB 2.0 connection. If it were not for the 5 watt amplifier, it would power itself completely from the USB 2.0 cable. It will be run by PowerSDR 2.0 (soon to be released). It comes with full support for CAT and 3rd party digital programs without the use of cables (both supported virtually). http://www.flex-radio.com/Products.aspx?topic=F1.5k_features The cost is $580 for the time being. Bob N4HY -- (Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. “All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent" -Thomas Jefferson Active: Facebook,Twitter,LinkedIn Try Hamspots, PSKreporter, and K3UK Sked Page http://www.obriensweb.com/skedpskr4.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] New SDR available
Very impressive! I will strongly consider buying one. Anyone own the LD1? Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html - Original Message - From: "Peter" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 1:46 PM Subject: [digitalradio] New SDR available Hi, all. I'm offering a new SDR, inspired by the Softrock-40 but with some significant improvements. Instead of a crystal LO, it uses two Analog Devices DDS chips, and has 5 selectable preselector filters. It also feature USB control. Anyone who's interested can find the details at http://www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1home.htm and at my blog, www.garage-shoppe.com. 73, Pete, NI9N
Re: [digitalradio] DM 780
Up to 4. On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:11 PM, phil williams wrote: > > > What rates if any, are available in DM 780 for THROB and THROBX? > > PhilW de KA1GMN > > >
RE: [digitalradio] ALE and "protected frequencies" in the USA
think someone has had a couple too many ALEs, or "wobblys" as they are known as in cow country. ALE activity has all but disappeared on 14109, except for a few diehards . paranoia strikes again John VE5MU From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy obrien Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:58 PM To: digitalradio Subject: [digitalradio] ALE and "protected frequencies" in the USA I have received three emails in the past 3-4 weeks suggesting that the FCC has an application to "protect" certain HF frequencies and reserve for exclusive ALE use. Two emails also suggest that people operating on ALE frequencies have received emails asking them to NOT use the frequencies . Is this just "junk" information ? Has anyone else heard from people objecting to others using frequencies commonly used by ALE operators. ? Can anyone verify that the FCC is considering an application to exclude non-ALE stations from certain frequencies ? Andy K3UK
RE: [digitalradio] Generator Interference
Chris all those are very good questions. Since I was at the EOC, I'll as Jim to please provide the answers. Jim in addition what is the make, model and size of the generator? I realize that this was an impromptu test, but was the generator grounded in any way? Jim if you are not registered with the digitalradio mail list, just send the response to me and I'll post it. TNX & 73, Dave N0EOP 31033 _ From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Robinson Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 8:23 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Generator Interference What methods did you use to test for the generator interference? Can you give any specs on the generator such as a trailer-ed unit. When was last maintenance done to the generator, and what? I suspect that you have a faulty plug or a bad shield somewhere in the unit. I would also suspect that when the D-Rat is connected to battery or other stable power source there is no known problems. I am curious though to hear more on this as we have been discussing a D-STAR/RAT, but have wondered about the pitfalls and the ability to fix them in the field much like legacy systems! On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Dave Sloan mailto:desl...@earthlink.net> net> wrote: Hello All, I live in Colorado Springs, Colorado. We are getting ready for a 4 county mass causality exercise. This last Saturday we were doing some training, antenna work, and testing at the EOC. One of the tests involved was deploying our mobile command post about 30 miles out into the county. We were able to work 2 meter voice simplex without any problem. However, digital wasn't a good. We were using D-Rats and we could see the other stations without any problem. But, when we tried to send a message it would fail. The generator was causing some sort of hash to be generated and it was causing the digital to fail when passing a message. We could go keyboard to keyboard without any problems. What sort of suppression kit could we install on the generator to eliminate the interference? TNX & 73, Dave N0EOP 31033 -- Mr.C.Robinson 73 DE KF6NFW
Re: [digitalradio] Generator Interference
What methods did you use to test for the generator interference? Can you give any specs on the generator such as a trailer-ed unit. When was last maintenance done to the generator, and what? I suspect that you have a faulty plug or a bad shield somewhere in the unit. I would also suspect that when the D-Rat is connected to battery or other stable power source there is no known problems. I am curious though to hear more on this as we have been discussing a D-STAR/RAT, but have wondered about the pitfalls and the ability to fix them in the field much like legacy systems! On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Dave Sloan wrote: > > > Hello All, > I live in Colorado Springs, Colorado. We are getting ready for a 4 county > mass causality exercise. This last Saturday we were doing some training, > antenna work, and testing at the EOC. One of the tests involved was > deploying our mobile command post about 30 miles out into the county. We > were able to work 2 meter voice simplex without any problem. However, > digital wasn't a good. We were using D-Rats and we could see the other > stations without any problem. But, when we tried to send a message it would > fail. The generator was causing some sort of hash to be generated and it > was > causing the digital to fail when passing a message. We could go keyboard to > keyboard without any problems. What sort of suppression kit could we > install > on the generator to eliminate the interference? > > TNX & 73, > Dave N0EOP > 31033 > > > -- Mr.C.Robinson 73 DE KF6NFW
[digitalradio] DM 780
What rates if any, are available in DM 780 for THROB and THROBX? PhilW de KA1GMN
[digitalradio] Re: New SDR available
The better the soundcard, the better the results will be as with any soundcard-based sdr. I use a Creative SB-1090, which you can get for $50 - $80 if you shop around, and I am very satisfied. I have not tried one of the high-end cards, but understand the performance might be even better. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien wrote: > > This seems like an astonishingly low price. What are the bandwidth > capabilities of this device? Can you do 100 Khz, 200 , more ? Does it > require a high end soundcard ? > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Peter wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, all. I'm offering a new SDR, inspired by the Softrock-40 but with some > > significant improvements. Instead of a crystal LO, it uses two Analog > > Devices DDS chips, and has 5 selectable preselector filters. It also feature > > USB control. Anyone who's interested can find the details at > > http://www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1home.htm and at my blog, > > www.garage-shoppe.com. > > > > 73, > > > > Pete, NI9N > > > > > > >
Re: [digitalradio] ALE and "protected frequencies" in the USA
Tony wrote: > > > Sounds fishy to me Andy... I'm heavily involved in Worldwide ALE activity & hflink.net operations and can tell you I have no awareness of any such thing. I suspect it's residual FUD (fear, uncertainty & doubt) flowing over from QRZ.com. :-) Have fun, Alan km4ba
[digitalradio] LD1 with Multipsk ?
Pete, I think your SDR would be great for digital mode enthusiasts looking for a way to do broadband decode with RS ID and digital modes with Multipsk. Multipsk has the ability to up to 192 Khz of monitoring with an SDR but one issue is that Multipsk will not work with an SDR that needs a "start" command to activate the SDR receiver. It seems that these start commands are specific to each SDR and Patrick has not programmed the SDR's in to his options, yet. If possible, it would be nice to see you work with Patrick , when both of you have time, and set-up the LD1 so that it can be started within Multipsk without any other software. That way, it would take less computer resources. Just a thought, Andy K3UK --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Peter" wrote: > > Hi, all. I'm offering a new SDR, inspired by the Softrock-40 but with some > significant improvements. Instead of a crystal LO, it uses two Analog > Devices DDS chips, and has 5 selectable preselector filters. It also feature > USB control. Anyone who's interested can find the details at > http://www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1home.htm and at my blog, > www.garage-shoppe.com. > > 73, > > Pete, NI9N >
Re: [digitalradio] New SDR available
This seems like an astonishingly low price. What are the bandwidth capabilities of this device? Can you do 100 Khz, 200 , more ? Does it require a high end soundcard ? On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Peter wrote: > > > Hi, all. I'm offering a new SDR, inspired by the Softrock-40 but with some > significant improvements. Instead of a crystal LO, it uses two Analog > Devices DDS chips, and has 5 selectable preselector filters. It also feature > USB control. Anyone who's interested can find the details at > http://www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1home.htm and at my blog, > www.garage-shoppe.com. > > 73, > > Pete, NI9N > > >
Re: [digitalradio] ALE and "protected frequencies" in the USA
From the regulations: Sec. 97.101 General standards. (a) In all respects not specifically covered by FCC Rules each amateur station must be operated in accordance with good engineering and good amateur practice. (b) Each station licensee and each control operator must cooperate in selecting transmitting channels and in making the most effective use of the amateur service frequencies. _No frequency will be assigned for the exclusive use of any station._ 73 - Skip KH6TY phil williams wrote: I have head in the past of folks of 'reminded' using the ALE frequencies for other modes is frowned upon. I personally never heeded the advice as I am of the opinion that if the frequency in not in use, then it's up for grabs. I have not heard about any proposal on the table about a proposal to exclude non-ALE station from certain frequencies. I am sure that if this was a fact, the flames wars would already be in progress. This seems to be a festering wound in need of a doctor. PhilW de KA1GMN On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 18:57 -0500, Andy obrien wrote: > > I have received three emails in the past 3-4 weeks suggesting that the > FCC has an application to "protect" certain HF frequencies and > reserve for exclusive ALE use. Two emails also suggest that people > operating on ALE frequencies have received emails asking them to NOT > use the frequencies . Is this just "junk" information ? Has anyone > else heard from people objecting to others using frequencies commonly > used by ALE operators. ? Can anyone verify that the FCC is > considering an application to exclude non-ALE stations from certain > frequencies ? > > Andy K3UK > > > >
[digitalradio] Generator Interference
Hello All, I live in Colorado Springs, Colorado. We are getting ready for a 4 county mass causality exercise. This last Saturday we were doing some training, antenna work, and testing at the EOC. One of the tests involved was deploying our mobile command post about 30 miles out into the county. We were able to work 2 meter voice simplex without any problem. However, digital wasn't a good. We were using D-Rats and we could see the other stations without any problem. But, when we tried to send a message it would fail. The generator was causing some sort of hash to be generated and it was causing the digital to fail when passing a message. We could go keyboard to keyboard without any problems. What sort of suppression kit could we install on the generator to eliminate the interference? TNX & 73, Dave N0EOP 31033
Re: [digitalradio] ALE and "protected frequencies" in the USA
Sounds fishy to me Andy... Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 6:57 PM Subject: [digitalradio] ALE and "protected frequencies" in the USA I have received three emails in the past 3-4 weeks suggesting that the FCC has an application to "protect" certain HF frequencies and reserve for exclusive ALE use. Two emails also suggest that people operating on ALE frequencies have received emails asking them to NOT use the frequencies . Is this just "junk" information ? Has anyone else heard from people objecting to others using frequencies commonly used by ALE operators. ? Can anyone verify that the FCC is considering an application to exclude non-ALE stations from certain frequencies ? Andy K3UK
Re: [digitalradio] ALE and "protected frequencies" in the USA
I have head in the past of folks of 'reminded' using the ALE frequencies for other modes is frowned upon. I personally never heeded the advice as I am of the opinion that if the frequency in not in use, then it's up for grabs. I have not heard about any proposal on the table about a proposal to exclude non-ALE station from certain frequencies. I am sure that if this was a fact, the flames wars would already be in progress. This seems to be a festering wound in need of a doctor. PhilW de KA1GMN On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 18:57 -0500, Andy obrien wrote: > > I have received three emails in the past 3-4 weeks suggesting that the > FCC has an application to "protect" certain HF frequencies and > reserve for exclusive ALE use. Two emails also suggest that people > operating on ALE frequencies have received emails asking them to NOT > use the frequencies . Is this just "junk" information ? Has anyone > else heard from people objecting to others using frequencies commonly > used by ALE operators. ? Can anyone verify that the FCC is > considering an application to exclude non-ALE stations from certain > frequencies ? > > Andy K3UK > > > >
[digitalradio] New SDR available
Hi, all. I'm offering a new SDR, inspired by the Softrock-40 but with some significant improvements. Instead of a crystal LO, it uses two Analog Devices DDS chips, and has 5 selectable preselector filters. It also feature USB control. Anyone who's interested can find the details at http://www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1home.htm and at my blog, www.garage-shoppe.com. 73, Pete, NI9N
[digitalradio] ALE and "protected frequencies" in the USA
I have received three emails in the past 3-4 weeks suggesting that the FCC has an application to "protect" certain HF frequencies and reserve for exclusive ALE use. Two emails also suggest that people operating on ALE frequencies have received emails asking them to NOT use the frequencies . Is this just "junk" information ? Has anyone else heard from people objecting to others using frequencies commonly used by ALE operators. ? Can anyone verify that the FCC is considering an application to exclude non-ALE stations from certain frequencies ? Andy K3UK
