[digitalradio] Re: HRD Utilities/TQSL LoTW/JT65

[David Wright]

I apologize for this, but I found the solution.  After Googling this for 
sometime and finally asking the group, the very next link I clicked on had the 
answer.

If anyone else is having this problem, simply google ARRL Cert.tq6 and download 
the file (https://p1k.arrl.org/lotw/config.tq6).  Double click on it to run it, 
and all is fixed. 

Dave




On Mar 24, 2010, at 2:11 AM, David Wright wrote:

> All,
> 
> Apologize the cross-post, but this problem may cross several lines. 
> 
> Before my reinstall of WinXP this past weekend, I was using WSJT to operate 
> JT65, the logbook in HRD/DM780 to log the exchanges, and HRD Utilities to 
> upload automatically to LoTW.  I had no problems with this, but suddenly 
> after the OS reinstall I can no longer upload "JT65" as a valid mode.  
> 
> In my LoTW QSO listing, I have 42 entries all with "JT65" as the mode, so I 
> know that it can accept it although a lot of the FAQs say that it should just 
> be "data". 
> 
> Any ideas what happened on my end to cause this, and most especially, what I 
> should do to get back the ability to upload "JT65" as the mode?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Dave
> 
> Dave
> K3DCW
> 
> Real radio bounces off the sky
> 
> 
> 


Dave
K3DCW

Real radio bounces off the sky

[digitalradio] HRD Utilities/TQSL LoTW/JT65

[David Wright]

All,

Apologize the cross-post, but this problem may cross several lines. 

Before my reinstall of WinXP this past weekend, I was using WSJT to operate 
JT65, the logbook in HRD/DM780 to log the exchanges, and HRD Utilities to 
upload automatically to LoTW.  I had no problems with this, but suddenly after 
the OS reinstall I can no longer upload "JT65" as a valid mode.  

In my LoTW QSO listing, I have 42 entries all with "JT65" as the mode, so I 
know that it can accept it although a lot of the FAQs say that it should just 
be "data". 

Any ideas what happened on my end to cause this, and most especially, what I 
should do to get back the ability to upload "JT65" as the mode?

Thanks in advance,

Dave

Dave
K3DCW

Real radio bounces off the sky

[digitalradio] Another plug for JT65A ... the spectrum efficient mode

[Andy obrien]

I know many are already aware of this, but take a look

N9DSJ-1 (EN52ti) Heard N6TE(DM12) on 3576.23 KHz -8dB at 03:32:00Z using JT65A
N9DSJ-1 (EN52ti) Heard K3UK(FN02) on 3575.99 KHz -5dB at 03:32:00Z using JT65A

Bill N9DSJ decoded two stations within 24 Hz of each other, how is
that for spectrum efficiency?  I was transmitting 5 watts,

Andy K3UK

[digitalradio] Re: Using JT65A and W4CQZ RB for radiation pattern studies.

[Rudy]

I call it the Meat Computer.

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jon Maguire  wrote:
>
> Julian,
> 
> I didn't consider the brain. Oh my :-) Excellent information. Brain 1 
> computer 0.
> 
> 73... Jon W1MNK
> 
> g4ilo wrote:
> >  
> >
> > My own brain, pencil and paper. :) I just average out the reports from 
> > different stations. I use two different transmitters to send two WSPR 
> > transmissions at the same time and using the same power on different 
> > frequencies using the antenna under test and the one I am comparing it to.
> >
> > Julian, G4ILO
> >
> > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
> > , Jon Maguire  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Julian,
> > >
> > > What are you using to analyze the WSPR data after downloading? Thank 
> > you.
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Using JT65A and W4CQZ RB for radiation pattern studies.

[Jon Maguire]

Julian,

I didn't consider the brain. Oh my :-) Excellent information. Brain 1 
computer 0.


73... Jon W1MNK

g4ilo wrote:
 

My own brain, pencil and paper. :) I just average out the reports from 
different stations. I use two different transmitters to send two WSPR 
transmissions at the same time and using the same power on different 
frequencies using the antenna under test and the one I am comparing it to.


Julian, G4ILO

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
, Jon Maguire  wrote:

>
> Hi Julian,
>
> What are you using to analyze the WSPR data after downloading? Thank 
you.

>

[digitalradio] Re: Using JT65A and W4CQZ RB for radiation pattern studies.

[g4ilo]

My own brain, pencil and paper. :) I just average out the reports from 
different stations. I use two different transmitters to send two WSPR 
transmissions at the same time and using the same power on different 
frequencies using the antenna under test and the one I am comparing it to.

Julian, G4ILO

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jon Maguire  wrote:
>
> Hi Julian,
> 
> What are you using to analyze the WSPR data after downloading? Thank you.
> 

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Using JT65A and W4CQZ RB for radiation pattern studies.

[Jon Maguire]

Hi Julian,

What are you using to analyze the WSPR data after downloading? Thank you.

73... Jon W1MNK

g4ilo wrote:
 

I don't think you can impute anything meaningful from one set of 
reports. Normal QSB will make a difference of from several to many dB 
which can only be averaged out over a period of time.


WSPR is much better IMO for this sort of thing. You can leave it 
running, go and do something interesting, then come back later and 
download all the spots and take an average. You can also transmit 
simultaneously on two different frequencies using the test antenna and 
a reference one and compare the reports each one gets. (You have to 
start the transmit cycles manually in that case, there is no facility 
in the software for two copies of the program to use the same pattern 
of transmissions.)


Julian, G4ILO

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
, Andy obrien  wrote:

>
> While transmitting on 20M today , using JT65HF software and
> monitoring the W4CQZ "Reverse Beacons" for JT65A,, I was lucky enough
> to get 9 stations report my signal strength from one 45 second
> transmission. Take a look at the report each station noted at 2136
> Europe. I was using my home made ground plane vertical mounted at
> 17ft (1/4 wave). Southern US stations (mostly SW of me) averaged
> several dB better signals from me than the Europeans. So can I assume
> anything meaningful aabout the radiation pattern from this antenna or
> is the key factor to examine the distance ? The Europeans were twice
> as far away from my QTH.
>
> ES2MA-1 (KO29HI) Heard K3UK on 14076.12 KHz -19dB at 21:36:00Z using
> JT65A (6755 kms)
> G4ENZ-1 (IO81vv) Heard K3UK on 14076.11 KHz -17dB at 21:36:00Z using
> JT65A (3514 miles)
> F6DKQ-1 (JN37BI) Heard K3UK on 14076.13 KHz -11dB at 21:36:00Z using
> JT65A (3986 miles)
>
> Southern USA
> KD5JGA-1 (EM16rb) Heard K3UK on 14076.11 KHz -10dB at 21:36:00Z 
using JT65A

> N5LYJ-1 (EM03rv) Heard K3UK on 14076.08 KHz -9dB at 21:36:00Z using
> JT65A (1191 miles)
> KC5NYJ-1 (EL09rn) Heard K3UK on 14076.11 KHz -11dB at 21:36:00Z using
> JT65A (1380 miles)
> N4ABN-1 (DM59pd) Heard K3UK on 14076.10 KHz -17dB at 21:36:00Z using
> JT65A (1545 miles)
> WY5R-1 (DM95be) Heard K3UK on 14076.11 KHz -7dB at 21:36:00Z using
> JT65A (1307 miles)
>
> Local
> VE3CDX-1 (DM26ic) Heard K3UK on 14076.09 KHz -9dB at 21:36:00Z using
> JT65A (30 miles)
>
> Andy K3UK
>

Re: [digitalradio] Ros posts rebuttal of Olivia / Ros test results

[KH6TY]

Perhaps Tony, K2MO, can make some pathsim comparisons of ROS 8 baud with 
Olivia 32-1000.


73 - Skip KH6TY




g4ilo wrote:
 

http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/03/21/the-ros-numbers 



Julian, G4ILO

[digitalradio] Ros posts rebuttal of Olivia / Ros test results

[g4ilo]

http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/03/21/the-ros-numbers

Julian, G4ILO