Re: [digitalradio] Vista

2008-03-29 Thread Ken Meinken

Actually, the Mac OS is based on Linux.

FWIW, after using PCs since 1982, I'm now using a Mac.  I got tired  
of all the virus (and anti-virus) hassles with the Windows environment.


Ken WA8JXM

On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Howard Brown wrote:



It appears your opinion is shared by others:

http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS8541837412.html? 
kc=EWKNLNAV032408STR4


An excerpt:

For the first time in ages, the sale of new PCs with Windows as a  
percentage of the PC market is declining sharply. The new winner is  
the Mac, but, while no one does a good job of tracking the still- 
new, pre-installed Linux desktop market, it's also clear that Linux  
is finally making impressive inroads into Windows' once  
unchallenged market share.






Re: [digitalradio] RFI-Free PCs?

2008-03-25 Thread Ken Meinken
Turn off your main circuit breakers for the house.  That will quickly  
tell you if the problem is in your house or not.

Run the CB and 10m units off of a battery for the test.

Ken WA8JXM


On Mar 22, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Rodney wrote:

I've turned off all my cordless phones, computers and anything else  
I can think of that would cause this, but it still exists.


I live in a residential area so there are houses all around me.   
I'm HOPING that the problem is in MY house and not in someone  
else's house, that way I can locate and fix the problem!




Re: [digitalradio] MARS WinLink in Tennessee Storms

2008-02-27 Thread Ken Meinken
Rick,

Do you really mean that anyone should be able to use whatever they 
want?  Are you really suggesting that fast scan, wideband TV should be 
allowed on 20 meters?  What about wideband FM?

Seems to me that bandwidth and co channel interference need to be 
restricted, otherwise we will have chaos and the bands will be useless 
to all except those running max power with big antennas.

Ken WA8JXM

Rick wrote:
  From my perspective, any group should be allowed to use whatever 
 equipment they want on the ham bands, provided that they ID so that 
 anyone can determine who they are, and that they are not obscuring the 
 information and it can at least be monitored by anyone with similar 
 equipment. Winlink 2000 does have some problems with respect to those 
 perspectives of mine (and probably most hams).

 73,



Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

Check our other Yahoo Groups
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Re: [digitalradio] MARS WinLink in Tennessee Storms

2008-02-27 Thread Ken Meinken
Dave,

First of all, I will be the first to admit that I'm not up on all the 
latest technology.

BUT, I have felt for a long time (34 years to be exact), that the heyday 
of amateur radio emergency communications is long past. 

If we look back to the 1930's and so, radio communications was rare and 
hams could provide extraordinary communications during an emergency 
compared to anything else available.  Even in the 1950's and 60's, local 
governments could be easily isolated and would have to depend upon ham 
radio in an emergency.

But during the 1970's and later, police, fire and other government 
agencies greatly expanded their ability to communicate even during 
emergencies.  Individuals hams with a portable station were able to 
contribute less and less.  A modern fire chief at a disaster isn't going 
to accept a ham with a hand held trying to get communications through to 
a certain heavy rescue truck or mutual aid unit.  By the time Katrina 
came along, government agencies were expecting internet bandwidth and 
cell phone capabilities and that is certainly far beyond the realm of 
individual hams or even local ham organizations. 

Modern communications and the government's need for same has gone far 
beyond the scope and abilities of ham radio. 

I was very active with AREC and RACES during the late 60's and early 
70's, (county EC and RACES Radio Officer) but I realized then that if I 
wanted to contribute to the community, I could do a million times more 
as a volunteer firefighter.  Ham radio could only make minor 
contributions while trying to relive the glory days of earlier decades.  
Those days are long gone, I'm afraid.

OTOH, perhaps it's good to see MARS actually doing something productive 
in this area.  I was very active MARS in the 60's but was dismayed that 
it did nothing to follow fulfill it's  charter of providing emergency 
communications. 

Ken

David Little wrote:

 It is interesting , isn't it?

 MARS doesn't hold contests.

 MARS doesn't allow stations to intentionally interfere with other 
 stations.

 MARS doesn't promote awards for the number of contacts you can make in a
 minute and not say anything.

 MARS doesn't get their panties wadded up when information is exchanged
 without being interfered by contesters, QRN or jammers.

 Army MARS offers training during 90% of it's net operations.

 MARS has requirements for membership.

 MARS promotes discipline and efficient operation.

 MARS gets to play on NTIA spectrum and doesn't have to subject itself 
 to the
 bonfire of vanities experienced on ham frequencies.

 Kid of sets a precedent, doesn't it.

 This probably goes as far as any other single example to explain why the
 ARRL relegated the Amateur Radio community to the realm of last mile (VHF)
 communications in support of emergency communications and abdicated the HF
 realm to the Tri Service MARS organizations. Bread and Circuses has worked
 since Roman times; why should this be any different.

 The ARRL knew when to throw in the towel, and had a pretty good idea about
 the quality of their members; as well as their devotion level to do the
 tasks traditionally required of the Amateur Radio Service in exchange for
 the spectrum they enjoy. The operation has been a success; the patient is
 definitely dying

 Pactor III is probably more effective than CW ever was as a 'filter to
 determine the dedication level of emergency communicators.

 But, you have to consider that there is not a HF rig less than $500.00 
 new,
 and entry level for a HF rig that utilizes the best of 20th century
 technology starts around $1200.00

 With that said, you can begin to appreciate that the $900.00 cost of a
 Pactor III controller (taking advantage of the 10% discount for Emergency
 Communicators) will deliver the mail, with the cheapest HF rig. A PTC-IIex
 controller connected to an Icom IC-718 cost about what an IC-7000 or a
 little less than a TS-2000 costs; in a field of choices that can cost 
 up to
 $15,000.00 for a HF rig alone.

 The Contest Grade of transceivers that go north of ten grand will 
 clog up
 the airwaves and render them unusable by others far more often than Pactor
 III and WL2K.

 Anyone saying that frequency usage during a contest is less adversely
 affected than by WL2K transmissions using Pactor III is sadly being less
 than truthful with their self and others, and there is simply no room for
 discussion to the contrary. A little intellectual honesty will trump knee
 jerk reaction every time

 Emergency Preparedness in our county in Glynn County, GA currently 
 includes
 8 SCS Pactor III controllers. At least 4 more are scheduled for purchase
 prior to Hurricane season.

 The reason for this is that nothing else will come close to the throughput
 and devotion of the WL2K system when other infrastructure is down.

 The county services have now learned the importance of owning their own
 amateur radio equipment and promoting operators from within their