Re: [digitalradio] FCC Petition to Re-Establish Narrowbnad RTTY/Data Subband Comment Period Open

2007-12-29 Thread Mark Miller
At 11:28 AM 12/28/2007, you wrote:

Hi Mark,

How would this kill various digital modes with a bandwidth of 1500 hertz
or less? I operate Oliva mostly at 500 hertz wide and sometimes and
1000 hertz wide.

73, tom n4zpt

If a mode's bandwidth is 1500 Hz or less, then there would be no 
change in authorization.  It is as simple as that.

73,
Mark N5RFX 




Re: [digitalradio] FCC Petition to Re-Establish Narrowbnad RTTY/Data Subband Comment Period Open

2007-12-28 Thread Tom Azlin, N4ZPT
Hi Mark,

How would this kill various digital modes with a bandwidth of 1500 hertz 
or less?  I operate Oliva mostly at 500 hertz wide and sometimes and 
1000 hertz wide.

73, tom n4zpt

Mark Miller wrote:
 The FCC has released 
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6519820340
  
 Public Notice report 2828-Correction establishing a new comment 
 period for 
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6519008574
  
 RM-11392.
 
 RM11392 asks the FCC to re-establish the narrowband nature of the 
 RTTY/Data subbands in the 80 through 10-meter bands.  Emissions have 
 crept into the narrowband RTTY/Data subbands in the 80 through 
 10-meter bands that are not appropriate for the RTTY/Data subbands. 
 Stations under automatic control have taken advantage of loopholes 
 created by terminology in the commission's rules that is not 
 applicable to new operating modes.
 
 Please read RM-11392 . and make comments to the FCC.  Here are the steps.
 
 1.  Read 
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6519008574
  
 RM-11392 part 1 and 
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6519008575
  
 RM-11392 part 2.
 2.  Look at the other comments filed.  To do this go to 
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi  FCC EFCS Search 
 for Filed Commentsand enter RM-11392 in box 1 labeled proceeding.
 3.  Enter your own comments by going to 
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi  FCC Electronic 
 Comment File Submission page.
 
 73,
 Mark N5RFX
 
 
 
 
 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php
 
 
 View the DRCC numbers database at 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 


[digitalradio] FCC Petition to Re-Establish Narrowbnad RTTY/Data Subband Comment Period Open

2007-12-25 Thread Mark Miller
The FCC has released 
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6519820340
 
Public Notice report 2828-Correction establishing a new comment 
period for 
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6519008574
 
RM-11392.

RM11392 asks the FCC to re-establish the narrowband nature of the 
RTTY/Data subbands in the 80 through 10-meter bands.  Emissions have 
crept into the narrowband RTTY/Data subbands in the 80 through 
10-meter bands that are not appropriate for the RTTY/Data subbands. 
Stations under automatic control have taken advantage of loopholes 
created by terminology in the commission's rules that is not 
applicable to new operating modes.

Please read RM-11392 . and make comments to the FCC.  Here are the steps.

1.  Read 
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6519008574
 
RM-11392 part 1 and 
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6519008575
 
RM-11392 part 2.
2.  Look at the other comments filed.  To do this go to 
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi  FCC EFCS Search 
for Filed Commentsand enter RM-11392 in box 1 labeled proceeding.
3.  Enter your own comments by going to 
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi  FCC Electronic 
Comment File Submission page.

73,
Mark N5RFX




Re: [digitalradio] FCC Petition to Re-Establish Narrowbnad RTTY/Data Subband Comment Period Open

2007-12-25 Thread Rick
This is a very well thought out solution to a on-going vexing problem on 
the HF RTTY/data bands. I have submitted my comments to the FCC in 
concurrence with Mark's petition and I strongly suggest that those who 
agree or those who disagree with the petition, submit your comments.

If the petition was to be accepted, the wider digital modes such as 2 
kHz MT-63, Olivia, and the wide form of ALE, would no longer be 
permitted to operate in most of the HF RTTY/data sub bands. Of course 
the wide form of ALE can still operate in the voice portions for 
signaling purposes which is probably a more appropriate use and other 
wide modes can also operate there for the purpose of sending image/fax.

73,

Rick, KV9U



Mark Miller wrote:

 RM11392 asks the FCC to re-establish the narrowband nature of the 
 RTTY/Data subbands in the 80 through 10-meter bands.  Emissions have 
 crept into the narrowband RTTY/Data subbands in the 80 through 
 10-meter bands that are not appropriate for the RTTY/Data subbands. 
 Stations under automatic control have taken advantage of loopholes 
 created by terminology in the commission's rules that is not 
 applicable to new operating modes.

 Please read RM-11392 . and make comments to the FCC.  Here are the steps.

 1.  Read 
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6519008574
  
 RM-11392 part 1 and 
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6519008575
  
 RM-11392 part 2.
 2.  Look at the other comments filed.  To do this go to 
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi  FCC EFCS Search 
 for Filed Commentsand enter RM-11392 in box 1 labeled proceeding.
 3.  Enter your own comments by going to 
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi  FCC Electronic 
 Comment File Submission page.

 73,
 Mark N5RFX