Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW
Hi Dave, Hi Tony.have you tried fldigi.. MT63 Yes I have. The simulator says it decodes about as well as IZ8BLY's software. Tony, K2MO - Original Message - From: David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 7:34 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW Hi Tony.have you tried fldigi...it is available from http://w1hkj.com in both Windows XP and Vista as well as Linux. it has MT63 500,1000 and 2000 73 David VK4BDJ Tony wrote: All, There seems to be some difference between Mutlipsk, MixW and IZ8BLY's software when it comes to decoding MT63. I ran all three programs simultaneously with a path simulator in line and the SNR set above the decode threshold. The results were the same whether I ran the programs one at a time or simultaneously. Not sure why this is; would appreciate it if someone can shed some light on this. I plan to run each program on-the-air to see if the results change. Tony, K2MO Test #1: SNR -6db selective fading Test #2: SNR -3db selective fading Test #3: SNR -3db selective fading / lightning static Test #1 IZ8BLY MT63 Terminal TH QUICK BRAOWN FOX JUOPS OVER THE LAZY [OG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPSOVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWNFOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW TH QUI4 M)9Nd3/ANjV (UT$ExLZY UG THE QUICK BRmWN 1OX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUIK BROWN F9XFJUmPS VER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk YhlU+ O~^ FlX JUiPSkOVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK{BOovFV!D.M]y5xVr| +v75UX7ØOpL{ z]p?Bx~i6GzV$cSNVDcTH: LØZY DOG]mOT* _ Test #2 MT63 Terminal THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW THF QUIaK BRORNdFOX J$MPS ?[7@ TWE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk THE QUICK BROWN FOX JM8; O5Es HE LAZY DG THe*QICK BROWN F+X JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG __ Test #3 IZ8BLY MT63 TERMINAL RON FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MIXW HE QUIAn BROWtF?X:J+MPS v)rR TE L/ZY DOG THE QUICK BRKWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BRO9 FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MULTIPSK $Xiu(L Kka?SO?m)#-ap^jtOu{+^d4,-`Ø$P{8YAZY O) ,njl'KuBRja _J(/S VØRU!H5N(1=YDOG THE QUIkK B}O9g OY4JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZYØDOG
Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW/Olivia
unlike PSK31 that mostly utilize the same 'core, other modes my well require comparison tests to determine which is consistently better. Andy K3UK Very interesting Andy. Patrick (F6CTE) motioned that sound card sampling accuracy plays a role with MT63. Tony, K2MO
Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW
Rick, When I have done some crude comparisons with actual off air tests between different programs, there is usually not a lot of difference I'm interested in your test method. Tony, K2MO
Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW
Patrick, The sound card was already calibrated, but the offsets were not locked. Locking them seems to have made a difference. I repeated the same tests and decoding did improve with Multipsk (see below). As for one program having an advantage over another, I guess it could be due to the slight sensitivity advantage Nino's program seems to have. Minimum SNR (errorr-free throughput) is -8db for IZ8BLY and -6db for Mutlipsk. This seems to show-up in test #1 where the selective fading may be causing the signal to dip below the -6db decode threshold for Multipsk. Nino's software has a 2db buffer with this test. In test #3 where there's selective fading and lightning static, things improve with Multipsk when the SNR is inceased to +3db from -3db: Multipsk Test #3 SNR +3db THE QUIK BROW FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BRWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG SNR -3db HE QUIK3,ROWS F'XexMn OVER THE L/ZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY D+G THE QUICK BRWg FOX JMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Thanks for all Patrick. Tony, K2MO ++ Test #1: SNR -6db selective fading IZ8BLY TH; QUICK BAOWN FOX JUOPS OVrR THE LAZY [OG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWNFOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW 2Hx QU/8qvB,4YNn}mGbSI*+OenJX|Y aO| TH3N$aaK RptNWFOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUIcK BROWN FOXFJUmPS VER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk THN QUICKFB;OW ZX JP OVXR THErL,ZY RG THE [UICK BROW FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Test #2: SNR -3db selective fading IZ8BLY THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUOPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW THE AUICKROWN F:X JUMPS ,VER THE L/ZY [OG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG ___ Test #3: SNR -3db selective fading / lightning static IZ8BLY THE QUCIK BROWq FOX JUMPS OVrR THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW THH mUICK0I\OWm iZM JUMPS ,VER THE 2AZYzDOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX xUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BRO9N FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk HE QUIK3,ROWS F'XexMn OVER THE L/ZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY D+G THE QUICK BRWg FOX JMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG ___ Test #4 SNR -9db IZ8BLY TH QUICK BROWN FOX_UMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW UHE qU4C? BROWN 9GX'JUMPS OVE THE LAZY DOG THE QUI^d BnCWNlFOX JUMPS OVERDTHE LAZY OGj HEs%#IC BRWN FOX JUMS OV5R THE LAZYBDOG THE QrCK BROWN FBX UXPS OVER {HELAZpHDOG Multipsk TH\ QUIF,RO\[ F(U'xM S OV:R THE LAZY DOG THE QUICKBRON FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BRKWN FO { MPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG - Original Message - From: Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 7:04 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW Hello Tony, About Multipsk, could you first (if not done) the MT63 sampling calibration by clicking on Sampling freq. and start the automatic calibration. Note: in Multipsk there is a double correction: * determination of the sampling frequency offset between the TX and the RX sound cards. This function does not belong to the original soft nor Mixw, * determination of the frequency offset. If you do a comparizon, click on the first lock to 0 (to avoid the determination of the sampling frequency offset, function which needs a good MT63 signal). However, the original soft could be much better (I wrote an independant MT63 decoding code and I don't know the way the original soft decodes). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Tony To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 12:35 AM Subject: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW All, There seems to be some difference between Mutlipsk, MixW and IZ8BLY's software when it comes to decoding MT63. I ran all three programs
Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW
Hello Tony, The sound card was already calibrated, but the offsets were not locked. Locking them seems to have made a difference. I repeated the Yes the locking of the sampling frequency, at least, must be done to compare. Note: I did this complex automatic shift sampling determination because MT63 has a problem which is inherent to the exagerated number of carriers (64). The more you have carriers the more the calibration must be precise. MT63 was done for almost perfect sound cards (Sound Blaster or equivalent). For the on-board sound cards, there is a problem due to the poor sampling accuracy of these cards, so you can't be sure that the other Ham has a well-calibrated sound card. It's the reason why I propose an automatic sampling autodetermination, by default, working only with good signals (as you saw in the previous tests). I think, aside to the poor average power/peak power ratio (about 0.1), this problem of calibration is an issue which limits the use of MT63 (Hams, in general, use their on-board sound card installed in their PC). have. Minimum SNR (errorr-free throughput) is -8db for IZ8BLY and -6db for Mutlipsk. -6dB for Multipsk seems correct for 10 bauds (I measure -5dB for 10 bauds). I agree that Nino's program has a better decoding program. TKS for all your interesting tests! 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Tony To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW Patrick, The sound card was already calibrated, but the offsets were not locked. Locking them seems to have made a difference. I repeated the same tests and decoding did improve with Multipsk (see below). As for one program having an advantage over another, I guess it could be due to the slight sensitivity advantage Nino's program seems to have. Minimum SNR (errorr-free throughput) is -8db for IZ8BLY and -6db for Mutlipsk. This seems to show-up in test #1 where the selective fading may be causing the signal to dip below the -6db decode threshold for Multipsk. Nino's software has a 2db buffer with this test. In test #3 where there's selective fading and lightning static, things improve with Multipsk when the SNR is inceased to +3db from -3db: Multipsk Test #3 SNR +3db THE QUIK BROW FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BRWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG SNR -3db HE QUIK3,ROWS F'XexMn OVER THE L/ZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY D+G THE QUICK BRWg FOX JMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Thanks for all Patrick. Tony, K2MO ++ Test #1: SNR -6db selective fading IZ8BLY TH; QUICK BAOWN FOX JUOPS OVrR THE LAZY [OG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWNFOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW 2Hx QU/8qvB,4YNn}mGbSI*+OenJX|Y aO| TH3N$aaK RptNWFOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUIcK BROWN FOXFJUmPS VER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk THN QUICKFB;OW ZX JP OVXR THErL,ZY RG THE [UICK BROW FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Test #2: SNR -3db selective fading IZ8BLY THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUOPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW THE AUICKROWN F:X JUMPS ,VER THE L/ZY [OG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG ___ Test #3: SNR -3db selective fading / lightning static IZ8BLY THE QUCIK BROWq FOX JUMPS OVrR THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW THH mUICK0I\OWm iZM JUMPS ,VER THE 2AZYzDOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX xUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BRO9N FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk HE QUIK3,ROWS F'XexMn OVER THE L/ZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY D+G THE QUICK BRWg FOX JMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG ___ Test #4 SNR -9db IZ8BLY TH QUICK BROWN FOX_UMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER
[digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW
All, There seems to be some difference between Mutlipsk, MixW and IZ8BLY's software when it comes to decoding MT63. I ran all three programs simultaneously with a path simulator in line and the SNR set above the decode threshold. The results were the same whether I ran the programs one at a time or simultaneously. Not sure why this is; would appreciate it if someone can shed some light on this. I plan to run each program on-the-air to see if the results change. Tony, K2MO Test #1: SNR -6db selective fading Test #2: SNR -3db selective fading Test #3: SNR -3db selective fading / lightning static Test #1 IZ8BLY MT63 Terminal TH QUICK BRAOWN FOX JUOPS OVER THE LAZY [OG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPSOVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWNFOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW TH QUI4 M)9Nd3/ANjV (UT$ExLZY UG THE QUICK BRmWN 1OX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUIK BROWN F9XFJUmPS VER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk YhlU+ O~^ FlX JUiPSkOVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK{BOovFV!D.M]y5xVr| +v75UX7ØOpL{ z]p?Bx~i6GzV$cSNVDcTH: LØZY DOG]mOT* _ Test #2 MT63 Terminal THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW THF QUIaK BRORNdFOX J$MPS ?[7@ TWE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk THE QUICK BROWN FOX JM8; O5Es HE LAZY DG THe*QICK BROWN F+X JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG __ Test #3 IZ8BLY MT63 TERMINAL RON FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MIXW HE QUIAn BROWtF?X:J+MPS v)rR TE L/ZY DOG THE QUICK BRKWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BRO9 FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MULTIPSK $Xiu(L Kka?SO?m)#-ap^jtOu{+^d4,-`Ø$P{8YAZY O) ,njl'KuBRja _J(/S VØRU!H5N(1=YDOG THE QUIkK B}O9g OY4JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZYØDOG
Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW
Hello Tony, About Multipsk, could you first (if not done) the MT63 sampling calibration by clicking on Sampling freq. and start the automatic calibration. Note: in Multipsk there is a double correction: * determination of the sampling frequency offset between the TX and the RX sound cards. This function does not belong to the original soft nor Mixw, * determination of the frequency offset. If you do a comparizon, click on the first lock to 0 (to avoid the determination of the sampling frequency offset, function which needs a good MT63 signal). However, the original soft could be much better (I wrote an independant MT63 decoding code and I don't know the way the original soft decodes). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Tony To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 12:35 AM Subject: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW All, There seems to be some difference between Mutlipsk, MixW and IZ8BLY's software when it comes to decoding MT63. I ran all three programs simultaneously with a path simulator in line and the SNR set above the decode threshold. The results were the same whether I ran the programs one at a time or simultaneously. Not sure why this is; would appreciate it if someone can shed some light on this. I plan to run each program on-the-air to see if the results change. Tony, K2MO Test #1: SNR -6db selective fading Test #2: SNR -3db selective fading Test #3: SNR -3db selective fading / lightning static Test #1 IZ8BLY MT63 Terminal TH QUICK BRAOWN FOX JUOPS OVER THE LAZY [OG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPSOVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWNFOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW TH QUI4 M)9Nd3/ANjV (UT$ExLZY UG THE QUICK BRmWN 1OX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUIK BROWN F9XFJUmPS VER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk YhlU+ O~^ FlX JUiPSkOVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK{BOovFV!D.M]y5xVr| +v75UX7ØOpL{ z]p?Bx~i6GzV$cSNVDcTH: LØZY DOG]mOT* _ Test #2 MT63 Terminal THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW THF QUIaK BRORNdFOX J$MPS ?[7@ TWE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk THE QUICK BROWN FOX JM8; O5Es HE LAZY DG THe*QICK BROWN F+X JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG __ Test #3 IZ8BLY MT63 TERMINAL RON FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MIXW HE QUIAn BROWtF?X:J+MPS v)rR TE L/ZY DOG THE QUICK BRKWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BRO9 FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MULTIPSK $Xiu(L Kka?SO?m)#-ap^jtOu{+^d4,-`Ø$P{8YAZY O) ,njl'KuBRja _J(/S VØRU!H5N(1=YDOG THE QUIkK B}O9g OY4JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZYØDOG
Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW
Hi Tony.have you tried fldigi...it is available from http://w1hkj.com in both Windows XP and Vista as well as Linux. it has MT63 500,1000 and 2000 73 David VK4BDJ Tony wrote: All, There seems to be some difference between Mutlipsk, MixW and IZ8BLY's software when it comes to decoding MT63. I ran all three programs simultaneously with a path simulator in line and the SNR set above the decode threshold. The results were the same whether I ran the programs one at a time or simultaneously. Not sure why this is; would appreciate it if someone can shed some light on this. I plan to run each program on-the-air to see if the results change. Tony, K2MO Test #1: SNR -6db selective fading Test #2: SNR -3db selective fading Test #3: SNR -3db selective fading / lightning static Test #1 IZ8BLY MT63 Terminal TH QUICK BRAOWN FOX JUOPS OVER THE LAZY [OG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPSOVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWNFOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW TH QUI4 M)9Nd3/ANjV (UT$ExLZY UG THE QUICK BRmWN 1OX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUIK BROWN F9XFJUmPS VER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk YhlU+ O~^ FlX JUiPSkOVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK{BOovFV!D.M]y5xVr| +v75UX7ØOpL{ z]p?Bx~i6GzV$cSNVDcTH: LØZY DOG]mOT* _ Test #2 MT63 Terminal THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MixW THF QUIaK BRORNdFOX J$MPS ?[7@ TWE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG Multipsk THE QUICK BROWN FOX JM8; O5Es HE LAZY DG THe*QICK BROWN F+X JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG __ Test #3 IZ8BLY MT63 TERMINAL RON FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MIXW HE QUIAn BROWtF?X:J+MPS v)rR TE L/ZY DOG THE QUICK BRKWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BRO9 FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG MULTIPSK $Xiu(L Kka?SO?m)#-ap^jtOu{+^d4,-`Ø$P{8YAZY O) ,njl'KuBRja _J(/S VØRU!H5N(1=YDOG THE QUIkK B}O9g OY4JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZYØDOG
Re: [digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW
It would also be very interesting to see if the improved MFSK modes in fldigi works better than in other software, especially when affected by lightning static. My informal tests seemed to suggest not much difference, however, if there was any difference, it might suggest that Multipsk was ever so slightly better. When I have done some crude comparisons with actual off air tests between different programs, there is usually not a lot of difference but sometimes there may be slight variations where in some modes there will certain characters that are correctly displayed in one program, yet other characters are correct in the other program. Thus it is often a wash (no significant total difference). It did seem that Multipsk had the edge in some of my testing and when I mentioned this to an on the air contact, the other ham was adamant that his testing overwhelmingly showed that HRD/DM780 was the best by far. Sound card calibration differences perhaps? 73, Rick, KV9U David wrote: Hi Tony.have you tried fldigi...it is available from http://w1hkj.com in both Windows XP and Vista as well as Linux. it has MT63 500,1000 and 2000 73 David VK4BDJ
[digitalradio] MT63 -- Mutlipsk, IZ8BLY, MixW/Olivia
I have NO clue about this but... Simon Brown shared some interesting findings about his experience in programming Olivia in to DM780. Some of the existing applications that have Olivia in them did not entirely implement Olivia in a manner than Simon thought was consistent with Pavel's original specifications. So, I take from this ,and now Tony's findings, that unlike PSK31 that mostly utilize the same 'core, other modes my well require comparison tests to determine which is consistently better. Simon's observation were just casual comments to me in a private Skype call one day, so I will not give further details. Andy K3UK On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Rick W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would also be very interesting to see if the improved MFSK modes in fldigi works better than in other software, especially when affected by lightning static. My informal tests seemed to suggest not much difference, however, if there was any difference, it might suggest that Multipsk was ever so slightly better. When I have done some crude comparisons with actual off air tests between different programs, there is usually not a lot of difference but sometimes there may be slight variations where in some modes there will certain characters that are correctly displayed in one program, yet other characters are correct in the other program. Thus it is often a wash (no significant total difference). It did seem that Multipsk had the edge in some of my testing and when I mentioned this to an on the air contact, the other ham was adamant that his testing overwhelmingly showed that HRD/DM780 was the best by far. Sound card calibration differences perhaps? 73, Rick, KV9U Da