Re: [digitalradio] Re: IF someone PURPOSELY has tried to mislead me
Agree Andy la5vna Steinar On 07.03.2010 00:49, obrienaj wrote: > I disagree , the software seems good to me...the person is the issue. > > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "pd4u_dares" wrote: > >> PSE react to the software, not the person Julian... >> >> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Jose A. Amador" wrote: >> >>> El 05/03/2010 13:15, g4ilo escribi�: >>> Someone really should try to find out whether_this_ Jose has a call. Because if he isn't a licensed ham he hasn't much to lose by any trouble he causes. >> > > >
[digitalradio] Re: IF someone PURPOSELY has tried to mislead me
I disagree , the software seems good to me...the person is the issue. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "pd4u_dares" wrote: > > PSE react to the software, not the person Julian... > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Jose A. Amador" wrote: > > > > El 05/03/2010 13:15, g4ilo escribi�: > > > Someone really should try to find out whether_this_ Jose has a call. > > > Because if he isn't a licensed ham he hasn't much to lose by any trouble > > > he causes. > > > >
[digitalradio] Re: IF someone PURPOSELY has tried to mislead me
PSE react to the software, not the person Julian... --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Jose A. Amador" wrote: > > El 05/03/2010 13:15, g4ilo escribió: > > Someone really should try to find out whether_this_ Jose has a call. > > Because if he isn't a licensed ham he hasn't much to lose by any trouble he > > causes. > >
Re: [digitalradio] Re: IF someone PURPOSELY has tried to mislead me
I did a "Bing" search of his name. It came back with a Windows Live Profile page for him with a picture. States he is 29, and a telecommunications engineer. Don KA5DON
Re: [digitalradio] Re: IF someone PURPOSELY has tried to mislead me
El 05/03/2010 13:15, g4ilo escribió: Someone really should try to find out whether_this_ Jose has a call. Because if he isn't a licensed ham he hasn't much to lose by any trouble he causes. I did try, but failed. But if he has a call, why does he keep it a secret? Julian, G4ILO No, that is no secret, he has no callsign. 73, Jose A. Amador, CO2JA --- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:59:50 + (GMT) From: jose alberto nieto ros Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Consensus? Is ROS Legal in US?` To: "Jose A. Amador" In-Reply-To: <4b848deb.9080...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1835158209-1267005590=:11831" X-RCPT-TO: Status: U X-UIDL: 520590980 --0-1835158209-1267005590=:11831 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Soy Ingenerio de Telecomunicaciones pero no soy radioaficionado ni trabajo en ninguna Universidad.
[digitalradio] Re: IF someone PURPOSELY has tried to mislead me
Someone really should try to find out whether this Jose has a call. Because if he isn't a licensed ham he hasn't much to lose by any trouble he causes. I did try, but failed. But if he has a call, why does he keep it a secret? Julian, G4ILO --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland wrote: > > Bill , > > I don't know who has assess to this web site, but IF someone PURPOSELY > has tried to mislead me and my fellow HAM friends I will be furious. > That I will not tolerate at all :( > > LA5VNA Steinar >