RE: [digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18 [1 Attachment]
TNX Patrick J i love MULTIPSK,,, 73 Francesco YV4GJN De: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] En nombre de Patrick Lindecker Enviado el: sábado, 04 de septiembre de 2010 02:50 p.m. Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18 Hello Francesco, This is a small bug. To fix it, click on the "Fonts" button on the bottom of the RX/TX screen. Configure the colors as you want. Note: there is a Multipsk Yahoo group for this type of question. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Francesco Piccone <mailto:fpicc...@cantv.net> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 8:00 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18 [1 Attachment] There are all who can help me because? the screen panoramic is black,, tnx Francesco YV4GJN MULTIPSK V4.18
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18
Hello Francesco, This is a small bug. To fix it, click on the "Fonts" button on the bottom of the RX/TX screen. Configure the colors as you want. Note: there is a Multipsk Yahoo group for this type of question. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Francesco Piccone To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 8:00 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18 [1 Attachment] [Attachment(s) from Francesco Piccone included below] There are all who can help me because? the screen panoramic is black,, tnx Francesco YV4GJN MULTIPSK V4.18 Attachment(s) from Francesco Piccone 1 of 1 Photo(s) Multipsk.JPG
Re: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk ???? Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference
TKS Andy. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:57 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference Great. let me know if you nee any help with English words. Andy K3Uk On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Patrick Lindecker wrote: Hello Andy, Yes I could concatenate several papers about RS ID and Call ID and present the result. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:48 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference Hmm, I wonder if Patrick has thought about publishing his work with RS-ID? On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ford, Steve, WB8IMY wrote: Technical papers are solicited for presentation at the 29th Annual ARRL and TAPR Digital Communications Conference to be held September 24-26, 2010 near Portland, Oregon. These papers will also be published in the Conference Proceedings (you do NOT need to attend the conference to have your paper included in the Proceedings). The submission deadline is July 31, 2010. Please send papers to: Maty Weinberg ARRL 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 or you can make your submission via e-mail to: m...@arrl.org Papers will be published exactly as submitted and authors will retain all rights. 73 . . . Steve, WB8IMY ARRL
Re: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk ???? Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference
Great. let me know if you nee any help with English words. Andy K3Uk On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Patrick Lindecker wrote: > > > Hello Andy, > > Yes I could concatenate several papers about RS ID and Call ID and present > the result. > > 73 > Patrick > > > > - Original Message - > *From:* Andy obrien > *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > *Sent:* Friday, July 02, 2010 3:48 AM > *Subject:* [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk Final Call for > Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference > > Hmm, I wonder if Patrick has thought about publishing his work with RS-ID? > > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ford, Steve, WB8IMY wrote: > >> >> >> Technical papers are solicited for presentation at the 29th Annual ARRL >> and TAPR Digital Communications Conference to be held September 24-26, >> 2010 near Portland, Oregon. These papers will also be published in the >> Conference Proceedings (you do NOT need to attend the conference to have >> your paper included in the Proceedings). The submission deadline is July >> 31, 2010. Please send papers to: >> >> Maty Weinberg >> ARRL >> 225 Main St >> Newington, CT 06111 >> >> or you can make your submission via e-mail to: m...@arrl.org >> >> Papers will be published exactly as submitted and authors will retain >> all rights. >> >> 73 . . . Steve, WB8IMY >> ARRL >> >> >> > >
Re: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk ???? Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference
Hello Andy, Yes I could concatenate several papers about RS ID and Call ID and present the result. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:48 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference Hmm, I wonder if Patrick has thought about publishing his work with RS-ID? On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ford, Steve, WB8IMY wrote: Technical papers are solicited for presentation at the 29th Annual ARRL and TAPR Digital Communications Conference to be held September 24-26, 2010 near Portland, Oregon. These papers will also be published in the Conference Proceedings (you do NOT need to attend the conference to have your paper included in the Proceedings). The submission deadline is July 31, 2010. Please send papers to: Maty Weinberg ARRL 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 or you can make your submission via e-mail to: m...@arrl.org Papers will be published exactly as submitted and authors will retain all rights. 73 . . . Steve, WB8IMY ARRL
[digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk ???? Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference
Hmm, I wonder if Patrick has thought about publishing his work with RS-ID? On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ford, Steve, WB8IMY wrote: > > > Technical papers are solicited for presentation at the 29th Annual ARRL > and TAPR Digital Communications Conference to be held September 24-26, > 2010 near Portland, Oregon. These papers will also be published in the > Conference Proceedings (you do NOT need to attend the conference to have > your paper included in the Proceedings). The submission deadline is July > 31, 2010. Please send papers to: > > Maty Weinberg > ARRL > 225 Main St > Newington, CT 06111 > > or you can make your submission via e-mail to: m...@arrl.org > > Papers will be published exactly as submitted and authors will retain > all rights. > > 73 . . . Steve, WB8IMY > ARRL > > >
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
>I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. Yes. If so, control that the sound card appears in the sound card menus. Then select the source in the pseudo-mixer (in fact there is no such mixer as under XP, it is a regression of Vista compared to XP). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: charles <mailto:ac5p...@yahoo.com> standlee To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:13 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. I've sent in a request to join the group Thanks 73, Chuck AC5PW Once a Marine... ...Always a Marine OOORAHHH ! Saepe Expertus - Semper Fidelis - Fratres Aeterni "Often Tested" - "Always Faithful" - "Brothers Forever" _ From: Patrick Lindecker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Cc: multi...@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 2:45:45 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is compulsory with Vista 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "ac5pw10" mailto:ac5pw10%40yahoo.com> > To: mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista > Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with > Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy > > 73, Chuck AC5PW > > > > > > http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html > Chat, Skeds, and "spots" all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
>I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. Yes. If so, control that the sound card appears in the sound card menus. Then select the source in the pseudo-mixer (in fact there is no such mixer as under XP, it is a regression of Vista compared to XP). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: charles standlee To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:13 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. I've sent in a request to join the group Thanks 73, Chuck AC5PW Once a Marine... ...Always a Marine OOORAHHH ! Saepe Expertus - Semper Fidelis - Fratres Aeterni "Often Tested" - "Always Faithful" - "Brothers Forever" -- From: Patrick Lindecker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Cc: multi...@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 2:45:45 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is compulsory with Vista 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "ac5pw10" To: Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista > Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with > Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy > > 73, Chuck AC5PW > > > > > > http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html > Chat, Skeds, and "spots" all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
Chuck, I just validated your memerbship on the Multipsk page, welcome. Andy K3UK Hello Chuck, > > Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. > > Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is > compulsory with Vista > > 73 > Patrick > > - Original Message - > From: "ac5pw10" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM > Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista > > > Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with > > Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy > > > > 73, Chuck AC5PW > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html > >
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. I've sent in a request to join the group Thanks 73, Chuck AC5PW Once a Marine... ...Always a Marine OOORAHHH ! Saepe Expertus - Semper Fidelis - Fratres Aeterni "Often Tested" - "Always Faithful" - "Brothers Forever" From: Patrick Lindecker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Cc: multi...@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 2:45:45 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is compulsory with Vista 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "ac5pw10" To: Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista > Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with > Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy > > 73, Chuck AC5PW > > > > > > http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html > Chat, Skeds, and "spots" all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is compulsory with Vista 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "ac5pw10" To: Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista > Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with > Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy > > 73, Chuck AC5PW > > > > > > http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html > Chat, Skeds, and "spots" all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk
Hello John, You must normally start the Instal.exe to instal Multipsk (which will create and fill the Maps sub-directory). You can also copy the Multipsk Maps sub-directory from another Multipsk implantation. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "jgmags2000" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:54 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk > Hello Group, > Upon starting MultiPsk, I get an error message "No sub-directory Maps!?" > Any way to fix error? > > 73, John KJ1J > > > > > > http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html > Chat, Skeds, and "spots" all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Patrick / Dave... Thank you Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: Patrick Lindecker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 3:34 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Hello Dave, Nice, I will send you the protocol sent by Andy, and, possibly, others in the future if I receive more. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Dave AA6YQ To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 8:33 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. >>>AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 5:30 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Hello Tony, >Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? The SDR feature in Multipsk is only doing a I/Q processing, shifting in base band, in USB or LSB, a selected band (inside the 48, 96 or 192 KHz SdR band). Now as I discovered, thanks to Andy, is that professional SdR are controlled through a defined protocol, something as a Cat system protocol. Perhaps, Dave (AA6YQ) will add, in the future, through Commander, the necessary commands to control the different SdR... >>>Commander has long been able to control PowerSDR. If you send me the protocols you need supported, Patrick, I will extend Commander to support them. 73, Dave, AA6YQ
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Hello Dave, Nice, I will send you the protocol sent by Andy, and, possibly, others in the future if I receive more. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Dave AA6YQ To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 8:33 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. >>>AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 5:30 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Hello Tony, >Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? The SDR feature in Multipsk is only doing a I/Q processing, shifting in base band, in USB or LSB, a selected band (inside the 48, 96 or 192 KHz SdR band). Now as I discovered, thanks to Andy, is that professional SdR are controlled through a defined protocol, something as a Cat system protocol. Perhaps, Dave (AA6YQ) will add, in the future, through Commander, the necessary commands to control the different SdR... >>>Commander has long been able to control PowerSDR. If you send me the protocols you need supported, Patrick, I will extend Commander to support them. 73, Dave, AA6YQ
RE: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
>>>AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 5:30 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Hello Tony, >Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? The SDR feature in Multipsk is only doing a I/Q processing, shifting in base band, in USB or LSB, a selected band (inside the 48, 96 or 192 KHz SdR band). Now as I discovered, thanks to Andy, is that professional SdR are controlled through a defined protocol, something as a Cat system protocol. Perhaps, Dave (AA6YQ) will add, in the future, through Commander, the necessary commands to control the different SdR... >>>Commander has long been able to control PowerSDR. If you send me the protocols you need supported, Patrick, I will extend Commander to support them. 73, Dave, AA6YQ
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Hello Tony, >Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and >SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? The SDR feature in Multipsk is only doing a I/Q processing, shifting in base band, in USB or LSB, a selected band (inside the 48, 96 or 192 KHz SdR band). Now as I discovered, thanks to Andy, is that professional SdR are controlled through a defined protocol, something as a Cat system protocol. Perhaps, Dave (AA6YQ) will add, in the future, through Commander, the necessary commands to control the different SdR... In the next version, I will add possibility to send a COM and EXEC command at initialization/RX/TX/finalization. But for a complex protocol when you are supposed to send/listen/send, it will not be sufficient. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Tony To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 12:04 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Andy, Thanks for posting your CPU test results with Multipsk. Patrick mentioned that he doesn't think RAM is important in this case and adding more than the minimum memory requirement wouldn't change anything; I guess that leaves the processor. It just seems odd that there would be a large disparity in CPU usage since both processors run similar clock speeds (yours is actually faster). My Dell has a Pentium dual core E2200 and I'm wondering if the difference is due to the dual vs. single core? >The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR- >Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:22 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Interesting data , Tony. I am was surprised that our similar computers have so dissimilar results. So , I checked a few things on different PCs here at my location. Here are my results, The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR-Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) . Casual readers of this thread should note that Multipsk under most common scenarios for ham radio, uses much less CPU than below. Shack Computer (Dell Opitiplex GX260 , 2.3 Ghz CPU single core , 1 gig RAM. Windows XP. Multipsk = 95-100+ % (not usable) Home PC (Dell Optiplex GX270 , 2.7 CPU single core , 512 RAM, WIndows XP. Multipsk = 65% , worked well.) Low end Acer Latop , 3 gig RAM, Windows 7. . Multipsk = 75%, worked fine. Ironic that the one PC I want to get Multipsk to work on is the one PC that it does poorly on ! The good news is that when maximizing Multipsk on a basic PC , with not a lot of other things multi-tasking, Multipsk will work. I am especially pleased to see it work well on the Windows 7 laptop which only cost $247.00 So while the desktop computers do not have identical parameters (different system files, ect) , I am intrigued about the 30-35% less CPU demand on the PC with only 512 RAM but .4 Ghz more processing speed . Does .4 ghz more speed usually make that much difference.. Your outcomes , Tony, also intrige me about what difference I might discover if I add another gig of RAM to my 2.3 CPU ham PC. Andy K3UK On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Tony wrote: [Attachment(s) from Tony included below] Andy, I configured Multipsk as you described and the CPU usage seems to average about 5 percent. Panoramic mode is about the same. I've included a few screen shots so you could see the results. Mixw seems to tax the CPU the same way as Multipsk does, but Fldigi needs a bit more to run - CPU usage jumped to 10%. I guess it's the difference in RAM. Would like to hear how the Vista laptop works out. Please let use know. Tony -K2MO PS: We're about the same here Andy, thanks for asking. Still waiting for research to catch up with type-I. Hope all is well with you and yours my friend. - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] SDR-Radio with DM780 20M Digital Band Tony, my shack PC sounds like yours. A Dell P4, 2.3 CPU , but only 1 gig of RAM. Perhaps we can compare current system resource utilization for regular Multipsk ? Regular Multipsk in PSK31 mode with a 4,3 Khz waterfall uses 25 % of CPU. With RS ID on , about the same 25-26% With Panoramic decode.. CPU increases to around 30%. Then Multipsk with Direct I/Q mode invoked , CPU increases to 60% Then RS ID in SDR /IQ direct invoked, Multipsk uses 9
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Andy, In my case, the CPU usage jumps to about 10% with the SDR function running; that's about 2 1/2 times what Multipsk uses when running without SDR. Tony K2MO - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 6:11 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Well, you can run the SDR part of Multipsk (just press SDR I/Q Direct button in the configuration area, then press RX/TX to return to the main screen. Then you will see the SDR waterfall open up. The problem is that without an SDR, you will only get up to khz of signal, same as the regular waterfall. Som other than testing CPU load, it defeats the purpose. I am guessing you are correct about the dual versus single core. I may try to minimize the other items that my PC boots at start up , but they aree not listed by the Task Manager as taking much CPU. Andy On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Tony wrote: Andy, Thanks for posting your CPU test results with Multipsk. Patrick mentioned that he doesn't think RAM is important in this case and adding more than the minimum memory requirement wouldn't change anything; I guess that leaves the processor. It just seems odd that there would be a large disparity in CPU usage since both processors run similar clock speeds (yours is actually faster). My Dell has a Pentium dual core E2200 and I'm wondering if the difference is due to the dual vs. single core? >The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR- >Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? T
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Well, you can run the SDR part of Multipsk (just press SDR I/Q Direct button in the configuration area, then press RX/TX to return to the main screen. Then you will see the SDR waterfall open up. The problem is that without an SDR, you will only get up to khz of signal, same as the regular waterfall. Som other than testing CPU load, it defeats the purpose. I am guessing you are correct about the dual versus single core. I may try to minimize the other items that my PC boots at start up , but they aree not listed by the Task Manager as taking much CPU. Andy On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Tony wrote: > > > Andy, > > Thanks for posting your CPU test results with Multipsk. Patrick mentioned > that he doesn't think RAM is important in this case and adding more than the > minimum memory requirement wouldn't change anything; I guess that leaves the > processor. > > It just seems odd that there would be a large disparity in CPU > usage since both processors run similar clock speeds (yours is actually > faster). My Dell has a Pentium dual core E2200 and I'm wondering if the > difference is due to the dual vs. single core? > > >The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR- > >Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) > > Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having > and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? > > T >
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Andy, Thanks for posting your CPU test results with Multipsk. Patrick mentioned that he doesn't think RAM is important in this case and adding more than the minimum memory requirement wouldn't change anything; I guess that leaves the processor. It just seems odd that there would be a large disparity in CPU usage since both processors run similar clock speeds (yours is actually faster). My Dell has a Pentium dual core E2200 and I'm wondering if the difference is due to the dual vs. single core? >The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks >(SDR- >Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at >4 Khz) Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:22 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Interesting data , Tony. I am was surprised that our similar computers have so dissimilar results. So , I checked a few things on different PCs here at my location. Here are my results, The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR-Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) . Casual readers of this thread should note that Multipsk under most common scenarios for ham radio, uses much less CPU than below. Shack Computer (Dell Opitiplex GX260 , 2.3 Ghz CPU single core , 1 gig RAM. Windows XP. Multipsk = 95-100+ % (not usable) Home PC (Dell Optiplex GX270 , 2.7 CPU single core , 512 RAM, WIndows XP. Multipsk = 65% , worked well.) Low end Acer Latop , 3 gig RAM, Windows 7. . Multipsk = 75%, worked fine. Ironic that the one PC I want to get Multipsk to work on is the one PC that it does poorly on ! The good news is that when maximizing Multipsk on a basic PC , with not a lot of other things multi-tasking, Multipsk will work. I am especially pleased to see it work well on the Windows 7 laptop which only cost $247.00 So while the desktop computers do not have identical parameters (different system files, ect) , I am intrigued about the 30-35% less CPU demand on the PC with only 512 RAM but .4 Ghz more processing speed . Does .4 ghz more speed usually make that much difference.. Your outcomes , Tony, also intrige me about what difference I might discover if I add another gig of RAM to my 2.3 CPU ham PC. Andy K3UK On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Tony wrote: [Attachment(s) from Tony included below] Andy, I configured Multipsk as you described and the CPU usage seems to average about 5 percent. Panoramic mode is about the same. I've included a few screen shots so you could see the results. Mixw seems to tax the CPU the same way as Multipsk does, but Fldigi needs a bit more to run - CPU usage jumped to 10%. I guess it's the difference in RAM. Would like to hear how the Vista laptop works out. Please let use know. Tony -K2MO PS: We're about the same here Andy, thanks for asking. Still waiting for research to catch up with type-I. Hope all is well with you and yours my friend. - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] SDR-Radio with DM780 20M Digital Band Tony, my shack PC sounds like yours. A Dell P4, 2.3 CPU , but only 1 gig of RAM. Perhaps we can compare current system resource utilization for regular Multipsk ? Regular Multipsk in PSK31 mode with a 4,3 Khz waterfall uses 25 % of CPU. With RS ID on , about the same 25-26% With Panoramic decode.. CPU increases to around 30%. Then Multipsk with Direct I/Q mode invoked , CPU increases to 60% Then RS ID in SDR /IQ direct invoked, Multipsk uses 90% of my CPU. The above is JUST Multipsk related, obviously other applications , like a web browser being open, add more demand. My daughter is away skiing this weekend, so I may "borrow" her Vista laptop and do a comparison. I do not know what is realistic for Multipsk with all its SDR receive capability and RS ID. I don;t really understand what actual performance increase one could expect if CPU was 3.0 Ghz rather than 2.3, Also not sure what performance improvement going to a dual core around the same clock speed would produce. On my shack PC, Multipsk seems "close" , I am guessing if I could eek out another 10% it would run just fine. I'm reluctant to put more RAM in to an old machine, but I do have a compatible 1 Gig memory chip that i could pilfer from another PC and see if 2 gigs of RAM ease demand on the CPU. I'm guessing it would not make much difference. I do have plenty of HD space. Hope you and the family are all OK, Andy. Andy On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Tony wrote: Andy, I plan on switching to SDR in the near future. My current PC is a dual CPU 2.2GHz Dell with 3 GHz
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista
Patrick, Unblocked CHM files - all is ok - thank you. Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: "Patrick Lindecker" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista > Hello Tony, > > Here is a solution to this generic Windows problem: > > > The problem with downloaded .CHM files is caused by Windows. Whenever > a .CHM file is downloaded from the Internet, Windows considers it to > be a security risk and blocks it from being executed. You can clear > this block as follows: > > 1. Use Windows Explorer (or My Computer, or My Documents) to find the > file in your file system. > > 2. Right-click on the file with your mouse. > > 3. A pop-up menu will appear. The very last entry in the menu > is "Properties". Click on this menu item. > > 4. You will now see a dialog box titled (filename).chm Properties > (where (filename) is replaced by the name of the file). If the file > has been blocked by Windows, then near the bottom of this dialog box > you will see the following: > > "Security: This file came from another computer and might be blocked > to help protect this computer." > > To the right of this message there will be a button called "Unblock". > Click on this button. > > The file should now start working. > > You will have to repeat this procedure every time you download a new > version of the .CHM file. > > 73 > Patrick > > - Original Message - > From: "Tony" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:52 AM > Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista > > >> All, >> >> Running Vista and having difficulty displaying Multipsk help files. >> >> Error : Navigation to the webpage was canceled >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> Tony -K2MO >> >> >> >> >> >> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at >> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked >> >> Recommended digital mode software: Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or >> Multipsk >> Logging Software: DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe. >> >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> >> > >
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista
Hello Tony, Here is a solution to this generic Windows problem: The problem with downloaded .CHM files is caused by Windows. Whenever a .CHM file is downloaded from the Internet, Windows considers it to be a security risk and blocks it from being executed. You can clear this block as follows: 1. Use Windows Explorer (or My Computer, or My Documents) to find the file in your file system. 2. Right-click on the file with your mouse. 3. A pop-up menu will appear. The very last entry in the menu is "Properties". Click on this menu item. 4. You will now see a dialog box titled (filename).chm Properties (where (filename) is replaced by the name of the file). If the file has been blocked by Windows, then near the bottom of this dialog box you will see the following: "Security: This file came from another computer and might be blocked to help protect this computer." To the right of this message there will be a button called "Unblock". Click on this button. The file should now start working. You will have to repeat this procedure every time you download a new version of the .CHM file. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "Tony" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:52 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista > All, > > Running Vista and having difficulty displaying Multipsk help files. > > Error : Navigation to the webpage was canceled > > Any suggestions? > > Tony -K2MO > > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked > > Recommended digital mode software: Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk > Logging Software: DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe. > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Lock transmit freq
Hello Stan, For this select "Master" in the "Mode" box. A word about Master/Slave mode. In Master: * in RX you follow the drift of the other Ham, * afterwards, in TX you come back to your initial RX frequency, so you impose your frequency and avoid a possible drift along the waterfall. In Slave: * in RX you follow the drift of the other Ham, * afterwards, in TX you start at the final RX frequency. The ideal would be to have only one Master, but you can't know the position (Slave or Master) of the other Ham...More ideal would be to have both stable XCVRs (after one working hour, normally modern XCVRs are stable). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "mhz14071" To: Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:48 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Lock transmit freq > How can I lock the transmit freq when in PSK31 or Oliver > so that my TX does not follow the other station ? > > 73 > Stan N1ZX > > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked > > Recommended digital mode software: Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk > Logging Software: DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe. > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Re: [digitalradio] multipsk
Thank You for your tip,s it is appreciated will let you know results...Ken
--- On Thu, 3/19/09, Patrick Lindecker wrote:
From: Patrick Lindecker
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] multipsk
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Cc: multi...@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 12:26 PM
Hello Ken,
You don't need any licence to use JT65. Below I have added the help part for
JT65 transmission.
To abstract, from the default state, for example, push on the "CQ or QRZ"
button. The transmission will be automatically done.
Here are some hints about Multipsk use. I must add that in JT65, the PC
clock must be adjusted, but you must know it as you success decoding JT65.
73
Patrick
Multipsk hints:
- It is strongly recommended to calibrate the sound-card: click on the
"Adjustments" menu button, then select the "Determination of the RX/TX
sound-card sampling frequencies" option and push on the "Determination of
the 48 KHz RX sampling frequency (test on 3 minutes)" button. At the end of
the test, click on "Return",
Note about the sound level ("Level" indication in % at the top of the
screen): an AF level superior or equal to 10 % is OK. About 50 % is ideal
(but not critical). In case of very low AF level, select "16 bits" in the
"Determination of the RX/TX sound-card sampling frequencies" option
("Adjustments" menu button),
About the help in Multipsk:
- To bring up the text help (contextual sensitive one), click on the right
button of the mouse, with the cursor over the mode button "KISS", for
example).
- Also use the button hints (wait a fraction of second over a button).
JT65 transmission
The JT65 does correct only weak frequency drifts. So, the user will let the
transceiver (XCVR) warms up for one hour and a half to stabilize its
frequency (duration function of you XCVR, as modern XCVR stabilizes
rapidly).
As said before, the text of the message to be transmitted is either
formatted or it is free. In the second case, the message is limited to 13
characters when, in the first case, more characters are transmitted because
the information is compressed, but the Ham is not free to write what he/she
wants.
The message ready to be sent is displayed in a green label, to the right of
"To send:".
It is reminded that there are 3 ways to send a message:
1) immediatly, with the "Automat. TX" button OFF and both "Beacons" button
OFF, if a message is clicked ("CQ or QRZ", for example),
2) automatically at the second 1 (or from the second 1 to the second 7, in
case of Ham delay) , with the "Automat. TX" button ON and the "Beacons"
button OFF, if a message is clicked ("CQ or QRZ", for example) before the
second 8,
3) automatically beaconing at each odd or even minute (at the second 1),
pushing either "Beacon odd/mn" button or "Beacon even/mn" button, if a
message is clicked ("CQ or QRZ", for example). The "Automat. TX" button can
be OFF or ON.
The standard way is the one described in 2).
This is a first VHF (EME) example of minimum QSO (with formatted messages):
1) CQ F6CTE JN18 (key "Escape" or "Esc" for blind Hams)
2) F6CTE F9XYZ JN07 (key "F1" for blind Hams)
3) F9XYZ F6CTE -20 OOO (key "F2" for blind Hams)
4) RO (key "F9" for blind Hams)
5) RRR (key "F10" for blind Hams)
6) 73 (key "F11" for blind Hams)
1) F6CTE calls CQ.
2) F9XYZ answers to F6CTE.
3) F6CTE confirms the reception of the F9XYZ answer adding "OOO" ("Your
signals are weak but I have copied both of our callsigns" or more simply "I
have copied both of our callsigns"). "-20" is the S/N ratio in dB of the
received message (this information is automatically inserted by Multipsk).
4) "RO" is the acknowledgment of F9XYZ.
5) F6CTE sends "RRR" to say that the QSO is finished.
6) F9XYZ sends the traditional "73" to complete the QSO.
The QSO could be enriched with other formatted messages or non-formatted
messages. For more détails, report to the "JT65 TX panel" above.
It is advised to transmit either on the odd minutes or on the even minutes.
This is a second HF example of minimum QSO (with formatted messages):
1) CQ F6CTE JN18 (key "Escape" or "Esc" for blind Hams)
2) F6CTE F9XYZ -JN07 (key "F1" for blind Hams)
3) F9XYZ F6CTE -20 (key "F2" for blind Hams)
4) F6CTE F9XYZ R-18 (key "F3" for blind Hams)
5) F9XYZ F6CTE 73 (key "F4" for blind Hams)
6) F6CTE F9XYZ 73 (key "F4" for blind Hams)
1) F6CTE calls CQ.
2) F9XYZ answers to F6CTE.
Re: [digitalradio] multipsk
Hello Ken,
You don't need any licence to use JT65. Below I have added the help part for
JT65 transmission.
To abstract, from the default state, for example, push on the "CQ or QRZ"
button. The transmission will be automatically done.
Here are some hints about Multipsk use. I must add that in JT65, the PC
clock must be adjusted, but you must know it as you success decoding JT65.
73
Patrick
Multipsk hints:
- It is strongly recommended to calibrate the sound-card: click on the
"Adjustments" menu button, then select the "Determination of the RX/TX
sound-card sampling frequencies" option and push on the "Determination of
the 48 KHz RX sampling frequency (test on 3 minutes)" button. At the end of
the test, click on "Return",
Note about the sound level ("Level" indication in % at the top of the
screen): an AF level superior or equal to 10 % is OK. About 50 % is ideal
(but not critical). In case of very low AF level, select "16 bits" in the
"Determination of the RX/TX sound-card sampling frequencies" option
("Adjustments" menu button),
About the help in Multipsk:
- To bring up the text help (contextual sensitive one), click on the right
button of the mouse, with the cursor over the mode button "KISS", for
example).
- Also use the button hints (wait a fraction of second over a button).
JT65 transmission
The JT65 does correct only weak frequency drifts. So, the user will let the
transceiver (XCVR) warms up for one hour and a half to stabilize its
frequency (duration function of you XCVR, as modern XCVR stabilizes
rapidly).
As said before, the text of the message to be transmitted is either
formatted or it is free. In the second case, the message is limited to 13
characters when, in the first case, more characters are transmitted because
the information is compressed, but the Ham is not free to write what he/she
wants.
The message ready to be sent is displayed in a green label, to the right of
"To send:".
It is reminded that there are 3 ways to send a message:
1) immediatly, with the "Automat. TX" button OFF and both "Beacons" button
OFF, if a message is clicked ("CQ or QRZ", for example),
2) automatically at the second 1 (or from the second 1 to the second 7, in
case of Ham delay) , with the "Automat. TX" button ON and the "Beacons"
button OFF, if a message is clicked ("CQ or QRZ", for example) before the
second 8,
3) automatically beaconing at each odd or even minute (at the second 1),
pushing either "Beacon odd/mn" button or "Beacon even/mn" button, if a
message is clicked ("CQ or QRZ", for example). The "Automat. TX" button can
be OFF or ON.
The standard way is the one described in 2).
This is a first VHF (EME) example of minimum QSO (with formatted messages):
1) CQ F6CTE JN18 (key "Escape" or "Esc" for blind Hams)
2) F6CTE F9XYZ JN07 (key "F1" for blind Hams)
3) F9XYZ F6CTE -20 OOO (key "F2" for blind Hams)
4) RO (key "F9" for blind Hams)
5) RRR (key "F10" for blind Hams)
6) 73 (key "F11" for blind Hams)
1) F6CTE calls CQ.
2) F9XYZ answers to F6CTE.
3) F6CTE confirms the reception of the F9XYZ answer adding "OOO" ("Your
signals are weak but I have copied both of our callsigns" or more simply "I
have copied both of our callsigns"). "-20" is the S/N ratio in dB of the
received message (this information is automatically inserted by Multipsk).
4) "RO" is the acknowledgment of F9XYZ.
5) F6CTE sends "RRR" to say that the QSO is finished.
6) F9XYZ sends the traditional "73" to complete the QSO.
The QSO could be enriched with other formatted messages or non-formatted
messages. For more détails, report to the "JT65 TX panel" above.
It is advised to transmit either on the odd minutes or on the even minutes.
This is a second HF example of minimum QSO (with formatted messages):
1) CQ F6CTE JN18 (key "Escape" or "Esc" for blind Hams)
2) F6CTE F9XYZ -JN07 (key "F1" for blind Hams)
3) F9XYZ F6CTE -20 (key "F2" for blind Hams)
4) F6CTE F9XYZ R-18 (key "F3" for blind Hams)
5) F9XYZ F6CTE 73 (key "F4" for blind Hams)
6) F6CTE F9XYZ 73 (key "F4" for blind Hams)
1) F6CTE calls CQ.
2) F9XYZ answers to F6CTE.
3) F6CTE confirms the reception of the F9XYZ answer. "-20" is the S/N ratio
in dB of the received message (this information is automatically inserted by
Multipsk).
4) F9XYZ answers to F6CTE confirming that he/she received his/her report
("R") and sending the F6CTE report in dB (this information is automatically
inserted by Multipsk).
5) F6CTE sends the traditional "73" to complete the QSO.
6) F9XYZ confirms the end of the QSO with"73".
The QSO could be enriched with other formatted messages or non-formatted
messages. For more détails, report to the "JT65 TX panel" above.
It is advised to transmit either on the odd minutes or on the even minutes.
Specificities in reception and transmission for blind Hams and SWL
First push the "Repetition" button and possibly "Char." (grands caractères).
The following concerns only
Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK and ALE141A
Hello John, Rick and all: For ALE and ALE400 with Multipsk, consult the file ALE_and_ALE400_easy_with_Multipsk.doc: http://f6cte.free.fr/ALE_and_ALE400_easy_with_Multipsk.doc 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "Rick W" To: Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 5:16 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK and ALE141A > Hi John, > > Tried the calls plus HFN and QRZ but the band is closed from SW WI at > 0400Z. > > 73, > > Rick, KV9U > > > John Bradley wrote: >> >> for those of you who may be interested, VE5GPM and VE5MU are currently >> on 14111.0 USB running 141A found on MultiPSK >> >> Please try and transfer small text files (under 3K) to either of these >> stations. They are both programmed to respond to either a HFN or QRZ >> call, so will respond to your sounding. >> >> The idea is to step beyond sending 1 line messages , and into an area >> that might have practical applications, especially if we could >> convince Patrick to >> >> add some “store and forward” ability. >> >> Under reasonable conditions a 1K file can transfer in under 3 minutes. >> Both stations are running TS480SAT transceivers at about 75 watts. >> >> John >> >> VE5MU >> >> >> >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.7/1895 - Release Date: 1/15/2009 >> 7:46 AM >> >> > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK and ALE141A
Hi John, Tried the calls plus HFN and QRZ but the band is closed from SW WI at 0400Z. 73, Rick, KV9U John Bradley wrote: > > for those of you who may be interested, VE5GPM and VE5MU are currently > on 14111.0 USB running 141A found on MultiPSK > > Please try and transfer small text files (under 3K) to either of these > stations. They are both programmed to respond to either a HFN or QRZ > call, so will respond to your sounding. > > The idea is to step beyond sending 1 line messages , and into an area > that might have practical applications, especially if we could > convince Patrick to > > add some “store and forward” ability. > > Under reasonable conditions a 1K file can transfer in under 3 minutes. > Both stations are running TS480SAT transceivers at about 75 watts. > > John > > VE5MU > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.7/1895 - Release Date: 1/15/2009 > 7:46 AM > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com mailto:digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk 4111
Hello Stan, > Should I use it as is. or should I go ahead and register the softwar > for the additional features ?. You use it, first, in the free version first, it is widely enough for all Ham modes. Afterwards, if you need the licensed functions (mainly professional modes decoding as SYNOP/SHIP, ACARS...), you could ask for the licence. > Besides the documentation. Does any one have, or is there a simplified > sequential setup procedure to get this software running and cross over > to DXLabs? There is nothing else that the Help (there is a presentation of Multipsk in http://f6cte.free.fr but it is much more about modes) . Notes about the help in Multipsk: a.. To bring up the text help (contextual one), click on the right button of the mouse, with the focus over the mode button "ALE400", for example). b.. Also use the button hints (wait a fraction of second over a button). Now for precise help about DXLabs you have a Yahoo group. You have also a Yahoo group for Multipsk users (don't hesitate to ask questions in both groups). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "mhz14071" To: Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2008 7:52 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk 4111 > Hello > I am getting started with Multipsk and have the latest 4111. > I have the following questions > Should I use it as is. or should I go ahead and register the softwar > for the additional features ?. > I intend to log and use the features of DXLabs. > My system is a Lsptop PC, Navigator interface, Icom Pro 3. > Besides the documentation. Does any one have, or is there a simplified > sequential setup procedure to get this software running and cross over > to DXLabs? > 73 > Stan N1ZX > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem
Hello Matt, " operation en virgule flottante incorrecte " means that a division by zero accurs somewhere. I will contact you in direct. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: matt gregory To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 2:12 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem Patrick, Good evening sir, and thankyou for your quick response,your software is outstanding this is the first problem I ve had but it could be from on my end. the message reads " operation en virgule flottante incorrecte " it flashes like a strobe but is one error window that closes and reopens very fast. the only way to stop it and regain control of computer is to log off or shut down this only happens when the pactor button is selected. MultiPSK is running out of Wine 0.9.59 GNOME Desktop 2.22.2 LINUX is UBUNTO 8.04 Thankyou for your time and hard work MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Patrick Lindecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:05:20 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem Hello Matt, I'm the author of Multipsk. It is curious no to run correctly Pactor1 FEC. Could you send me (or better to the Multipsk Yahoo group as it can interest other Hams and, moreover, some Hams use Linux) the information about this bug: first the text of the message and then the "scenario" of the bug occurrence. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: matt gregory To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:37 AM Subject: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem hello is anybody using multipsk 4.9 on linux mpsk runs fine until pactor 1 fec is selected then the program locks up flashing a error message in french any ideas thanks MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Mark Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> To: illinoisdigitalham@ yahoogroups. com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] com; digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com; DigitalModes@ yahoogroups. com; PSK_VHF_UHF_ HAMRADIO@ yahoogroups. com; DigitalOnSix Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com; PropNET-Online@ yahoogroups. com; List for people interested in the D Star repeaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED] twinslan. org> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 2:53:40 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Need Articles for TAPR PSR Journal -Original Message- From: Stan Horzepa <[EMAIL PROTECTED] net> Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 6:33 pm Subject: Packet Status Register in the works It is time again to hit the keys and write for TAPR's quarterly newsletter, Packet Status Register (PSR), as the deadline of the Digital Communcations Conference (DCC) issue of PSR fast approaches. You can write about SDR or APRS or LSMFT or anything with or without initials, as long as it is related to ham radio, preferably on the digital side of the hobby. And remember, besides the glory of having your work appear in PSR, your TAPR membership will be automatically extended by three months. Write early and write often! 73, Stan, WA1LOU PSR Editor
Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem
Patrick, Good evening sir, and thankyou for your quick response,your software is outstanding this is the first problem I ve had but it could be from on my end. the message reads " operation en virgule flottante incorrecte " it flashes like a strobe but is one error window that closes and reopens very fast. the only way to stop it and regain control of computer is to log off or shut down this only happens when the pactor button is selected. MultiPSK is running out of Wine 0.9.59 GNOME Desktop 2.22.2 LINUX is UBUNTO 8.04 Thankyou for your time and hard work MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Patrick Lindecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:05:20 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem Hello Matt, I'm the author of Multipsk. It is curious no to run correctly Pactor1 FEC. Could you send me (or better to the Multipsk Yahoo group as it can interest other Hams and, moreover, some Hams use Linux) the information about this bug: first the text of the message and then the "scenario" of the bug occurrence. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: matt gregory To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:37 AM Subject: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem hello is anybody using multipsk 4.9 on linux mpsk runs fine until pactor 1 fec is selected then the program locks up flashing a error message in french any ideas thanks MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Mark Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> To: illinoisdigitalham@ yahoogroups. com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] com; digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com; DigitalModes@ yahoogroups. com; PSK_VHF_UHF_ HAMRADIO@ yahoogroups. com; DigitalOnSix Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com; PropNET-Online@ yahoogroups. com; List for people interested in the D Star repeaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED] twinslan. org> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 2:53:40 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Need Articles for TAPR PSR Journal -Original Message- From: Stan Horzepa <[EMAIL PROTECTED] net> Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 6:33 pm Subject: Packet Status Register in the works It is time again to hit the keys and write for TAPR's quarterly newsletter, Packet Status Register (PSR), as the deadline of the Digital Communcations Conference (DCC) issue of PSR fast approaches. You can write about SDR or APRS or LSMFT or anything with or without initials, as long as it is related to ham radio, preferably on the digital side of the hobby. And remember, besides the glory of having your work appear in PSR, your TAPR membership will be automatically extended by three months. Write early and write often! 73, Stan, WA1LOU PSR Editor
Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem
Hello Matt, I'm the author of Multipsk. It is curious no to run correctly Pactor1 FEC. Could you send me (or better to the Multipsk Yahoo group as it can interest other Hams and, moreover, some Hams use Linux) the information about this bug: first the text of the message and then the "scenario" of the bug occurrence. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: matt gregory To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:37 AM Subject: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem hello is anybody using multipsk 4.9 on linux mpsk runs fine until pactor 1 fec is selected then the program locks up flashing a error message in french any ideas thanks MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Mark Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; DigitalOnSix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; List for people interested in the D Star repeaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 2:53:40 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Need Articles for TAPR PSR Journal -Original Message- From: Stan Horzepa <[EMAIL PROTECTED] net> Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 6:33 pm Subject: Packet Status Register in the works It is time again to hit the keys and write for TAPR's quarterly newsletter, Packet Status Register (PSR), as the deadline of the Digital Communcations Conference (DCC) issue of PSR fast approaches. You can write about SDR or APRS or LSMFT or anything with or without initials, as long as it is related to ham radio, preferably on the digital side of the hobby. And remember, besides the glory of having your work appear in PSR, your TAPR membership will be automatically extended by three months. Write early and write often! 73, Stan, WA1LOU PSR Editor
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk : Macro's in contests
Yes, there IS a way to have separate Multipsk macro buttons just for contests without having to pres CTRL each time. Actually two ways. 1. Have TWO separate folders for Multipsk on you PC. Configure the macros in one folder for regular use, configure the other for contests. When working a contest, book the Multipsk contest folder. 2. Have just one incidence of Multipsk on you PC BUT have two sets of macros. Example, in Multipsk the Macros you use are F1 through F24. Using a text editor, create two copies of each macro you want. F1 for regular use might say "CQ CQ CQ " , F1 for contest use might say "CQ CQ Contest". Save the two sets of macros to a zip file. When you need the contest macros , unzip them to you Multipsk and have then over write you regular macro files. After the contest unzip your regular macros (which you will have also zipped) over the contest macros. This will only take a 3-5 seconds each contest, after initial creation of the two sets of macros.If you want different macro button labels . you will also need to edit N files too. Andy K3UK On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Kevin O'Rorke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Since I have had no reply to this post and it may have gon astray I am > re-posting > > Yesterday I decided that I would give a few numbers to the RTTY contest, > and re-wrote a few of my existing macro's for the exercise. > Is there any way that a second set of macro's (like in mixw) can be > used, or is there any way that the second 12 macro's can be locked on > screen, so that CTRL does not have to be pressed each time? > Is there any macro that can cause the current log entry to be saved.? > Kevin > VK5OA > -- Andy K3UK www.obriensweb.com (QSL via N2RJ)
Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
Hello Dave, If I transmit via the Windows buffering in a tone to the sound card, no problem. If I transmit through the serial port, I need to control the time ellapsed (for a dot or a dash). As under Windows there are no interruptions (sniff), there is no way to know at which moment is the end of the dot (or the dash). So I keep the CPU working in a loop, testing the Windows timer, until the end of the dot. It is not a very elegant method but I don't know an other way to do it. Note: the Delphi system timer is not sufficiently rapid (maximum between 20 to 60 /sec). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:53 AM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW >A 50% cpu load seems really high, Patrick. WinWarbler consumes less than 1% > of a 1.5 ghz Pentium 4 when generating CW via software. It uses ticks from > TimerMM.dll to drive a state machine. What sort of timer are you using? > > 73, > > Dave, AA6YQ > > -Original Message- > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 18:27 PM > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW > > > Hello Bill and Paul, > > Multipsk can directly key the transceiver (I use it this way). However, it > is not advised under Windows XP because it takes about 50 % of the > computing > > power (due to the obligation to manage a pseudo "timer"). > > The most simple to do CW is to do it as PSK31 (in USB). > > 73 > Patrick > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Box SisteenHundred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:36 PM > Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW > > >> That IS cw Paul. >> >> In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW >> >> By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter. >> >> When you say won't do "regular" cw... do you mean >> keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it >> to the key jack of your rig? >> >> 73 >> >> Bill KA8VIT >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://ka8vit.com >> >> >>>From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >>>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >>>Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW >>>Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 - >>> >>> MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR CW,AT LEAST >>> I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM >>> K8PG-Paul >> >> >> >> >> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org >> >> Other areas of interest: >> >> The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ >> DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy >> discussion) >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > > Other areas of interest: > > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy > discussion) > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > > Other areas of interest: > > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy > discussion) > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
A 50% cpu load seems really high, Patrick. WinWarbler consumes less than 1% of a 1.5 ghz Pentium 4 when generating CW via software. It uses ticks from TimerMM.dll to drive a state machine. What sort of timer are you using? 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 18:27 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW Hello Bill and Paul, Multipsk can directly key the transceiver (I use it this way). However, it is not advised under Windows XP because it takes about 50 % of the computing power (due to the obligation to manage a pseudo "timer"). The most simple to do CW is to do it as PSK31 (in USB). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "Box SisteenHundred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:36 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW > That IS cw Paul. > > In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW > > By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter. > > When you say won't do "regular" cw... do you mean > keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it > to the key jack of your rig? > > 73 > > Bill KA8VIT > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://ka8vit.com > > >>From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >>Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW >>Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 - >> >> MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR CW,AT LEAST >> I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM >> K8PG-Paul > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > > Other areas of interest: > > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy > discussion) > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
Hello Bill and Paul, Multipsk can directly key the transceiver (I use it this way). However, it is not advised under Windows XP because it takes about 50 % of the computing power (due to the obligation to manage a pseudo "timer"). The most simple to do CW is to do it as PSK31 (in USB). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "Box SisteenHundred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:36 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW > That IS cw Paul. > > In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW > > By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter. > > When you say won't do "regular" cw... do you mean > keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it > to the key jack of your rig? > > 73 > > Bill KA8VIT > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://ka8vit.com > > >>From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >>Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW >>Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 - >> >> MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR CW,AT LEAST >> I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM >> K8PG-Paul > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > > Other areas of interest: > > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy > discussion) > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
That IS cw Paul. In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter. When you say won't do "regular" cw... do you mean keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it to the key jack of your rig? 73 Bill KA8VIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ka8vit.com >From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW >Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 - > > MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR CW,AT LEAST > I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM > K8PG-Paul Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK problem
Thank you very much, Patrick. This was the "problem." It is so simple ... when you know how:) 73, Rick, KV9U Patrick Lindecker wrote: > Hello Rick, > > You must have selected the "Software mixer" option of the mixer menu > on the > Configuration screen. In that case, the sound card mixer is managed > directly > by the program, this to adjust the optimum level (Automatic Gain > Control). > The problem is the diversity of sound card mixers which don't allow > operation in all sound cards mixers. > > 73 > Patrick > For question about Multipsk, PSE contact the Multipsk Yahoo group > > > - Original Message - > From: "williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:56 AM > Subject: [digitalradio] MultiPSK problem > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK problem
Hello Rick, You must have selected the "Software mixer" option of the mixer menu on the Configuration screen. In that case, the sound card mixer is managed directly by the program, this to adjust the optimum level (Automatic Gain Control). The problem is the diversity of sound card mixers which don't allow operation in all sound cards mixers. 73 Patrick For question about Multipsk, PSE contact the Multipsk Yahoo group - Original Message - From: "williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:56 AM Subject: [digitalradio] MultiPSK problem >I have been using Multipsk for a while now and recently was using it on > a new computer and have found that whenever I switch from one mode to > another mode, or go from tx to rx, the sound card changes the slider to > the maximum on both the Line In and the Wave output. This of course > overdrives the rig and for a while I had difficulty figuring out just > what was going on. > > I tried it with Digipan and the problem does not show up and everything > seems to work correctly. > > Does anyone else have such a problem? I just uploaded version 3.12 and > it is still doing the same thing. > > 73, > > Rick, KV9U > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ > > Other areas of interest: > > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy > discussion) > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK query
Hello Mel, Position the mouse over a macro (sequence), click right, you are in the sequence edition where you will find macros for sending the call and the name of the contacted Ham. There are two set of sequences (with and without ) so 24 possible sequences). For this type of question, the best is to go to the Multipsk Yahoo group. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "Mel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:50 PM Subject: [digitalradio] MultiPSK query > Hello everyone, > > I've been having a look at MultiPSK today, ploughing through the help > pages, and then filling in all the required details. Then came the > confusion. How do I enter the call and name of the other station ? > > I've tried highlighting and dragging and double clicking and I can't > think of anything else except typing the details in. But surely not ! > So can someone enlighten me please, reading the far from user > friendly help pages has already addled my brain ! > > Kind regards, Mel G0GQK > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ > > Other areas of interest: > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > > Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link > below > http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk 311
Hello > There are a lot of mode titles missing. The buttons work ok but fiding Curious, perhaps a bad downloading. Try again, if it continues, PSE send me a snapshot. However, the modes can be selected from the button "Mode". 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "Kevin O'Rorke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Diitalradio" Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 7:25 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk 311 > > Just installed V 3.11 > There are a lot of mode titles missing. The buttons work ok but fiding > the right one is a bit tricky > Anyone else havfe this problem > VK5OA > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ > > Other areas of interest: > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > > Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link > below > http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk 311
Same thing here, I'll try another download later. Jerry WW0E -- -- "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello > There are a lot of mode titles missing. The buttons work ok but fiding Curious, perhaps a bad downloading. Try again, if it continues, PSE send me a snapshot. However, the modes can be selected from the button "Mode". 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "Kevin O'Rorke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Diitalradio" Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 7:25 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk 311 > > Just installed V 3.11 > There are a lot of mode titles missing. The buttons work ok but fiding > the right one is a bit tricky > Anyone else havfe this problem > VK5OA > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ > > Other areas of interest: > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > > Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link > below > http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links ___ Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month! Unlimited Internet Access with 250MB of Email Storage. Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today! Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk ver. 3.11 available with PAX mode
Sure, when ? - Original Message - From: "n3wtus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 2:51 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk ver. 3.11 available with PAX mode > > > New version of Multipsk , ver. 3.11 available now. > > Any one up for a PAX mode connect? > > 73 John, N3WT > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ > > Other areas of interest: > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > > Looking for digital mode software? This group suggests you try either : > > http://www.mixw.net MIWX (many modes) > http://f6cte.free.fr MultiPSK (many modes) > http://www.dxlab.com DXLAB (logging, PSK31/63 and more) > http://www.qsl.net/hamscope Hamscope (many modes) > http://http://xoomer.virgilio.it/aporcino/Chip64 Chip64 > http://www.digipan.net/Digipan Digipan (PSK31 and PSK63 > http://www.kc4elo.com/ Logger32 (logging, PSK31/63 and RTTY) > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? This group suggests you try either : http://www.mixw.net MIWX (many modes) http://f6cte.free.fr MultiPSK (many modes) http://www.dxlab.com DXLAB (logging, PSK31/63 and more) http://www.qsl.net/hamscope Hamscope (many modes) http://http://xoomer.virgilio.it/aporcino/Chip64 Chip64 http://www.digipan.net/Digipan Digipan (PSK31 and PSK63 http://www.kc4elo.com/ Logger32 (logging, PSK31/63 and RTTY) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
