Re: [digitalradio] Pactor3

2008-01-05 Thread Simon Brown
Hi,

Yes - Patrick's idea is on the to-do list along with PSF63F. At the moment I 
am working on SSTV with the aim of having a beta inside three weeks. 
Although SSTV is analogue it's a great weak-signal DX mode and really quite 
interesting from a retro-viewpoint.

Simon Brown, HB9DRV

- Original Message - 
From: Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I was wondering if you had thought about including Patrick's Reed Solomon
 detection feature in DM780?
 I realize DM780 doesn't have all the modes MultiPSK has, and DM780 has
 Throb-X 4 baud which MultiPSK doesn't - but if you just had the 
 recognition
 part for the modes in common I think it would help a lot of beginners to 
 the
 digi modes understand what they are seeing/hearing.




RE: [digitalradio] Pactor3

2008-01-04 Thread dalite01
Simon,
 
While not exactly what you were asking, the SCS website claims to own the
trademark Pactor, and gives limitations on the amount of connects their
product allows on P3 before user has to purchase a license.
 
They consider themselves the Pactor creators, and state it on thier site.  
 
http://www.scs-ptc.com/registration.html
 
Don't know if this helps,
 
David
KD4NUE
(owner of SCS PTC IIex with Pactor 3 license)
 
their info from site:
 

  _  


Contact us

Address: SCS
Special Communications Systems GmbH  Co. KG
Roentgenstr. 36 
63454 Hanau
Germany 
Tel: +49-6181-85 00 00
9:00 - 12:00 and 14:00 - 18:00 German time (CET)
Current time in Germany:
Fax: +49-6181-99 02 38  
E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
VAT ID No.:  DE 218002556   
Banking: 
Bank:Postbank Frankfurt 
Account No.: 555 836 600
Banking Code:500 100 60 
IBAN:DE25 5001 0060 0555 8366 00
BIC/SWIFT:   PBNKDEFF   

PACTORR is a registered trademark of SCS, Germany.

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Simon Brown
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 9:57 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Pactor3





Can anyone point me at a page or reference to programmers / other hams not
being allowed to add Pactor 3 to their software?
 
This is a serious request, part of an attempt to remove Pactor 3 from our
bands on the basis of it being a 'closed system'.
 
Simon Brown, HB9DRV



 



Re: [digitalradio] Pactor3

2008-01-04 Thread Sholto Fisher
Hi Simon,

I was wondering if you had thought about including Patrick's Reed Solomon
detection feature in DM780?
I realize DM780 doesn't have all the modes MultiPSK has, and DM780 has
Throb-X 4 baud which MultiPSK doesn't - but if you just had the recognition
part for the modes in common I think it would help a lot of beginners to the
digi modes understand what they are seeing/hearing.

73 Sholto
KE7HPV.



- Original Message - 
From: Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 6:56 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Pactor3


Can anyone point me at a page or reference to programmers / other hams not
being allowed to add Pactor 3 to their software?

This is a serious request, part of an attempt to remove Pactor 3 from our
bands on the basis of it being a 'closed system'.

Simon Brown, HB9DRV



Re: [digitalradio] Pactor3

2008-01-04 Thread Jack Chomley

At 09:01 AM 1/5/2008, Sholto wrote:


Hi Simon,

I was wondering if you had thought about including Patrick's Reed Solomon
detection feature in DM780?
I realize DM780 doesn't have all the modes MultiPSK has, and DM780 has
Throb-X 4 baud which MultiPSK doesn't - but if you just had the recognition
part for the modes in common I think it would help a lot of beginners to the
digi modes understand what they are seeing/hearing.

73 Sholto
KE7HPV.

- Original Message -
From: Simon Brown mailto:simon.brown%40kns.ch[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 6:56 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Pactor3

Can anyone point me at a page or reference to programmers / other hams not
being allowed to add Pactor 3 to their software?

This is a serious request, part of an attempt to remove Pactor 3 from our
bands on the basis of it being a 'closed system'.

Simon Brown, HB9DRV


Maybe an add on module to a program that is a decoder, for signal 
mode identification purposes only.
Remove Pactor 3?  Whilst it maybe a good idea, I see another WinLink 
skirmish coming.;-)


73s

Jack VK4JRC