Re: [digitalradio] Weebly-warbly on 80m?

2010-08-30 Thread Rudy Benner
IT WORKED !! This is part of a sinister plot to take over the world. First it 
puts you to sleep ... z... then I take over. BEWARE !!

I assume you were on LSB? Could have been WISP on 3.5926 USB which puts the 
carrier on 35941 +/- a couple hundred kc. It almost sounds like a steady tone, 
you have to listen carefully to detect that it is not. 

It would also have been JT-65 on 3.576 USB, +/- a few hundred kcs. Lots of 
activity on JT-65 around 14.076 USB. All data modes use USB.

JT-65 and WISP sound very different from each other.

Time to adjust your (foil) hat.

ve3bdr


From: Ian Wade G3NRW 
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 5:51 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [digitalradio] Weebly-warbly on 80m?


  
Listening this morning (Monday) in the UK on 3633 kHz at around 0300 
UTC, I heard a strange weebly-warbly digital signal that continued for 
at least 15 minutes without a break (then it sent me to sleep).

The striking characteristic of the signal was that the data rate was 
very low (a few bits per second?), and the transition between the tones 
wasn't sharp -- it seemed as if each tone glided gracefully up/down to 
the next.

At first I thought it was ROS, but I haven't heard ROS like this before.

Any ideas on provenance?

-- 
73
Ian, G3NRW






Re: [digitalradio] Weebly-warbly on 80m?

2010-08-30 Thread Ian Wade G3NRW
From: Rudy Benner ben...@vianet.ca
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010   Time: 06:13:31

IT WORKED !! This is part of a sinister plot to take over the world. First it
puts you to sleep ... z... then I take over. BEWARE !!
 
I assume you were on LSB? Could have been WISP on 3.5926 USB which
puts the carrier on 35941 +/- a couple hundred kc. It almost sounds like a
steady tone, you have to listen carefully to detect that it is not.
 
It would also have been JT-65 on 3.576 USB, +/- a few hundred kcs. Lots
of activity on JT-65 around 14.076 USB. All data modes use USB.
 
JT-65 and WISP sound very different from each other.
 
Time to adjust your (foil) hat.
 
ve3bdr


Yes, Rudy, it was LSB, but it was neither WSPR nor JT-65. It was the 
distinctive gliding from one tone to another that made it stand out from 
anything I have heard before.

-- 
73
Ian, G3NRW



































Re: [digitalradio] Weebly-warbly on 80m?

2010-08-30 Thread Andy obrien
MFSK8?

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Ian Wade G3NRW g3...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:



 From: Rudy Benner ben...@vianet.ca benner%40vianet.ca
 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 Time: 06:13:31




 Yes, Rudy, it was LSB, but it was neither WSPR nor JT-65. It was the
 distinctive gliding from one tone to another that made it stand out from
 anything I have heard before.

 --
 73
 Ian, G3NRW

  
   Replg3...@yahoo.co.uk?subject=re:+%5Bdigitalradio%5D+Weebly-warbly+on+80m?