Re: [tdf-discuss] Calc AutoFilter change is a regression in usability
Stefan Weigel wrote (06-11-12 12:04) Thanks. "type-ahead" at least would be a big improvement. However, one has still to uncheck "all" and to click "OK". Formerly this all was only one click. I know that last time that I looked at it, there were some problems with key bindings. E.g. Alt-A for All did not work. But it was too distant from my regular activities to have a clue about improving that. Cheers, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org - www.librelex.org -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Calc AutoFilter change is a regression in usability
Hi Cor, Am 06.11.2012 11:48, schrieb Cor Nouws: >> I have several users, also heavily complaining about the new >> AutoFilter. In fact, for the very most use cases the new AutoFilter >> is much more time consuming than it was before. > > The new one is getting better. See > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=e3250b90677fc7ae449cb3ff887ed3da35b4532f Thanks. "type-ahead" at least would be a big improvement. However, one has still to uncheck "all" and to click "OK". Formerly this all was only one click. Cheers, Stefan -- LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir! -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Calc AutoFilter change is a regression in usability
Hi Stefan, Stefan Weigel wrote (06-11-12 11:33) I have several users, also heavily complaining about the new AutoFilter. In fact, for the very most use cases the new AutoFilter is much more time consuming than it was before. The new one is getting better. See http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=e3250b90677fc7ae449cb3ff887ed3da35b4532f So this can be tested in the daylies. I've not checked / seen if it is lined up for the 3.6.x too. Cheers, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org - www.librelex.org -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Calc AutoFilter change is a regression in usability
Hi, On 16.03.2012 16:31, Shari wrote on us...@global.libreoffice.org: > [...] AutoFilter is or should be a /quick > /way to drill down information. Not a tickbox with multiple choices, > that's more in line with the standard filter. > > Below shows the increase in steps, however the time increase when > you are working with over 600 rows of independent data means I'm > going from a second to seconds, which adds up quickly when you do > this hundreds of times in a day. [...] > Again I appreciate the redesign, I just think it replaced the wrong > thing. Quick easy access is what the autofilter is for. Add an > additional filter, or replace the standard filter with the new one. > This update has decreased my functionality, and ADDED unnecessary > time to my workday. Full message from Shari: http://go.mail-archive.com/xMTPpkUAErWFw1bdGFiFCHkq6EQ= I have several users, also heavily complaining about the new AutoFilter. In fact, for the very most use cases the new AutoFilter is much more time consuming than it was before. Unfortunately I do not have the time and skills to start a serious initiative for reintroducing the old version of AutoFilter. Is anyone around who follows the opinion on the new AutoFilter and is able and willing to file a bug and promote an improvement by reconstituting the well-proven old version of AutoFilter? ...or at least forward this to the appropriate mailing list, if this should be wrong here. ;-) Thanks, Stefan -- LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir! -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
