Re: RE : [tdf-discuss] Re: Mac App Store
Ok that's it last message I read on this thread My impression JAVA = NO APP STORE LIBREOFFICE = JAVA therefore (for the near future) LIBREOFFICE = NO APP STORE Thanks guys , I really hoped this would happen, but, alas life is tough ;) Rogerio 2011/1/7 Robert Holtzman > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 07:22:21PM +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > Larry, > > > > Let me remind you that we expect courtesy on our lists. > > What was posted was in no way discourteous. You're interpreting > bluntness as discourtesy. > > -- > Bob Holtzman > Key ID: 8D549279 > "If you think you're getting free lunch, > check the price of the beer" > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to > discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc
2011/1/6 Jaime R. Garza > Nobody told me, that's the problem, i have been asking a lot about that, > and > nobody seems to be interested, nor knows anything. So that's why I'm > wondering why. I think that is the future, there will be less and less fat > client apps, and more and more browser based apps. The main reason is > interoperabilty and platform independence. With ann HTML5 Office suite, you > just need a browser, and you can even install it locally. Now LO develops > several versionsfor different platforms, which cost more resources. > > Nobody wants to start building a HUGE NEW PROJECT like it would mean to start a HTML5 before we get a consistent, fairly bug free client to work on ... Remember LiO is only in RC stage right now Now for installing the Writer / Calc / Draw / Impress separate, it is not how the Ooo works, the program starts, and THEN it goes on to see what files it is opening, so it actually is ONE BIG program that after start-up modularizes itself, that's one of the reasons it is faster than the competition. Rogerio -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Fwd: [marketing] Search at the beginning
Yes ... sort of a "wrap around" the document, that is my expectation ... Rogerio 2011/1/5 Andy Brown > On Tue Jan 04 2011 19:39:29 GMT-0800 (PST) todd rme wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Rogerio Luz Coelho >> wrote: >> >>> 2011/1/5 Augustine Souza >>> >>> So long as the search backwards is retained. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> ...Just let LibO search documents from the beginning by default. >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I think the search should be from the beggining by default, but the >>> option >>> should be configurable. And it should be a one box selection. >>> >>> . My small 2 cents >>> >> >> Personally I almost always search from the current location, so I >> would prefer it not search from the beginning by default. >> >> > What they are referring to is that the search should go back to the start > of the document when it reaches the end and search back to the starting > point. > > Andy > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to > discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Fwd: [marketing] Search at the beginning
2011/1/5 Augustine Souza > So long as the search backwards is retained. > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung >wrote: > > > ...Just let LibO search documents from the beginning by default. > > +1 > > > I think the search should be from the beggining by default, but the option should be configurable. And it should be a one box selection. . My small 2 cents Rogerio -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Just make the damn thing work! (was Re: Dictionary Syncing)
In Brazil the leading dictionary is VERO (BrOffice's - LibreOffice default) the only one that ships with most of our new orthography ... so it IS possible for FOSS to bring a BETTER thing to the table, we in Brasil are no longer running AFTER MSO , we are seing them at our rear mirror ;) Rogerio 2011/1/2 Charles Marcus > On 2011-01-01 1:50 PM, Michael Wheatland wrote: > > Zaphod, > > I totally agree with your assessment of the situation. The work > > required to implement such an integration would be much larger but the > > payoff would be worth it for coordination and integration of an open > > source language management system. > > And I guess I should have clarified as well - I absolutely agreed with > the idea, I just disagreed with the apparent characterization (which I > see was just a misinterpretation on my part) of 'LibO vs MSO'... > > -- > > Best regards, > > Charles > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to > discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] LibreOffice readme
Seems the README.odt is out of date ... how can I get a git repo of the Documentation so I can help ? Can someone point me also to the Brasilian Portuguese (pt-Br) responsible ? Rogerio -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: .deb for other languages missing in download site
Seems I have done a big mistake in the register process with Nabble I have registered 3 times with the same e-mail ... Someone please see if the e-mail I am sending (luz.roge...@gmail.com) is shared by more than 1 account ... Sorry for the mess Rogerio -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] .deb for other languages missing in download site
Hello, This is my first message to the list so please bear with me. If this has already been looked at I am trully sorry. I am trying to download the pt-br language pack for the RC2, and when I go to the link http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-rc2/deb/x86_64/ there only goes to language pack for the LO locale. Seems something got lost in the transition. Will test the RC2 for EN only for a while. Rogerio -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
