Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò
Il 20/10/2010 19:14, Petr Mladek ha scritto: Petr Mladek píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 19:04 +0200: Carlo Strata píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 18:25 +0200: Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto: You might find the first packages at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/ I'm preparing my notebook to the Italian Linux Day (on October the 23th). On my OpenSuSE 11.2 (I'm not sure to install a new 11.3 from scratch before that day, but may be I've just bought a new 2.5 7.200 rpm hd) I've just: - uninstalled OOo 3.2.1.6 Novell/Go-OO from OBS (STABLE); - unistalled vanilla Libò 3.3 beta 2; - installed vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 italian; - installed Novell/TDF Libò 3.3 beta 2 from OBS (UNSTABLE). All packages are/were x86-64. Libò 3.3b2 inherit OOo 3.2.1.6 configuration data (i.e. User Information and so on), while OOo 3.3 RC1 doesn't. All goes well, but OBS Libò 3.3b2 UI (and help too) is (are) in English and not in Italian. Vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 has Italian UI and Help. This are installed packages: -- libreoffice-help-it-3.2.99.2-4.1.noarch -- libreoffice-l10n-it-3.2.99.2-3.1.noarch Libò Writer - Tools - Options - Language Settings - Languages - Language of - User interface shows only: - Default - English (USA) - English (USA) Any setting yields English UI! What's wrong? What is my mistake? Is it a bug? I will try to install it here tomorrow if time permits. I am sorry, I am on our team workshop this week and work only when time permits. I reproduced it here. The problem is that the following files are missing in the openSUSE packages: /usr/lib64/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/registry/Langpack-it.xcd /usr/lib64/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/registry/res/fcfg_langpack_it.xcd /usr/lib64/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/registry/res/registry_it.xcd I will need to investigate it a bit more to get a fix. A temporary solution would be to copy the files from the universal LibreOffice build. I mean from /opt/libreoffice3/basis3.3/share/registry. I am sorry for the inconveniece. Best Regards, Petr We are here to improve our product all together not to judge ourselves ;-) You are the best! Sorry for my late answer but I'm just go back home! Have a nice evening, Carlo p.s. Before posting this problem I had tried to re-install -it- packages you pointed out in your previous mail, but as you can guess it doesn't help me! :-) -- E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò
Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto: Kohei Yoshida píše v St 13. 10. 2010 v 11:55 -0400: Sorry for the top-posting, but I wanted to preserve the context for Petr (CC'ed). Petr is the man you want to talk to with this sort of question. I'm sure he'll provide more details on this. Kohei On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote: 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I mean here: You might find the first packages at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/ Known bugs: + shell wrappers are still ooffice, oowriter, ...; need to discuss the new wrapper names with other distros first + only the LibreOffice branding package is available = you need to replace OpenOffice_org-branding-openSUSE with libreoffice-branding-upstream + must start the application twice for the first time; there is a problem with the automatic extension registration; need to look at it; + extensions are not registered after the update from OpenOffice_org-* packages; a workaround is to reinstall the packages once again; I plan to remove the installation during installation; it will allow users to disable the extensions by themselves + some packages were not renamed, .e.g. OpenOffice_org-thesaurus, ...; they are not built from the main LO sources = will do it later + store user configuration into ~/.libreoffice/3-suse; we might try to share the directory ~/.libreoffice/3 after we fix the incompatible BerkleyDB; I am not sure if it is enough and it is a good idea, though + packages can't be installed in parallel with the generic LibreOffice linux packages; the problem is that both builds use the libreoffice-ure package name; will be solved in beta3; workaround is to install the package using rpm -i instead of rpm -U + SLED10 build is not available; need more love See more known bugs at: + FreeDesktop.org bugzilla: http://alturl.com/dmqve + OOo issuezilla: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi + Novell bugzilla: http://alturl.com/qaq5 Best Regards, Petr Hi Petr, I'm preparing my notebook to the Italian Linux Day (on October the 23th). On my OpenSuSE 11.2 (I'm not sure to install a new 11.3 from scratch before that day, but may be I've just bought a new 2.5 7.200 rpm hd) I've just: - uninstalled OOo 3.2.1.6 Novell/Go-OO from OBS (STABLE); - unistalled vanilla Libò 3.3 beta 2; - installed vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 italian; - installed Novell/TDF Libò 3.3 beta 2 from OBS (UNSTABLE). All packages are/were x86-64. Libò 3.3b2 inherit OOo 3.2.1.6 configuration data (i.e. User Information and so on), while OOo 3.3 RC1 doesn't. All goes well, but OBS Libò 3.3b2 UI (and help too) is (are) in English and not in Italian. Vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 has Italian UI and Help. This are installed packages: libreoffice-gnome-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-help-en-US-3.2.99.2-3.1.noarch libreoffice-libs-extern-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-mailmerge-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-impress-extensions-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-icon-theme-crystal-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch libreoffice-math-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-ure-3.2.99.2-2.2.x86_64 libreoffice-branding-upstream-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch libreoffice-base-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 -- libreoffice-help-it-3.2.99.2-4.1.noarch libreoffice-filters-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-base-drivers-mysql-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-writer-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-icon-theme-oxygen-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch libreoffice-writer-extensions-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-impress-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-icon-theme-galaxy-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch libreoffice-pyuno-3.2.99.2-2.2.x86_64 libreoffice-libs-core-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-filters-optional-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-l10n-extras-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch libreoffice-base-extensions-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-components-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-calc-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-icon-theme-hicontrast-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch libreoffice-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-libs-gui-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-draw-extensions-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-draw-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 -- libreoffice-l10n-it-3.2.99.2-3.1.noarch libreoffice-calc-extensions-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64 libreoffice-icon-theme-tango-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch Libò Writer - Tools - Options - Language Settings - Languages - Language of - User interface shows only: - Default - English (USA) - English (USA) Any setting yields English UI! What's wrong? What is my mistake? Is it a bug? Thank you, Carlo -- E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò
Carlo Strata píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 18:25 +0200: Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto: You might find the first packages at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/ I'm preparing my notebook to the Italian Linux Day (on October the 23th). On my OpenSuSE 11.2 (I'm not sure to install a new 11.3 from scratch before that day, but may be I've just bought a new 2.5 7.200 rpm hd) I've just: - uninstalled OOo 3.2.1.6 Novell/Go-OO from OBS (STABLE); - unistalled vanilla Libò 3.3 beta 2; - installed vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 italian; - installed Novell/TDF Libò 3.3 beta 2 from OBS (UNSTABLE). All packages are/were x86-64. Libò 3.3b2 inherit OOo 3.2.1.6 configuration data (i.e. User Information and so on), while OOo 3.3 RC1 doesn't. All goes well, but OBS Libò 3.3b2 UI (and help too) is (are) in English and not in Italian. Vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 has Italian UI and Help. This are installed packages: -- libreoffice-help-it-3.2.99.2-4.1.noarch -- libreoffice-l10n-it-3.2.99.2-3.1.noarch Libò Writer - Tools - Options - Language Settings - Languages - Language of - User interface shows only: - Default - English (USA) - English (USA) Any setting yields English UI! What's wrong? What is my mistake? Is it a bug? Could you please try to remove the packages: libreoffice-help-it libreoffice-l10n-it ,install them once again, and try to set Italian UI in Tools - Options - Language Settings - Languages - Language of - User interface once again? The noarch packages install the stuff into /usr/share/libreoffice/. They should create compat symlinks into /usr/lib64/libreoffice in the post install script. It might have failed from some reasons. I will try to install it here tomorrow if time permits. I am sorry, I am on our team workshop this week and work only when time permits. Best Regards, Petr -- E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò
Carlo Strata píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 19:32 +0200: Il 14/10/2010 18:39, Petr Mladek ha scritto: Carlo Strata píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 17:52 +0200: Il 14/10/2010 12:12, Petr Mladek ha scritto: But after install on my OpenSuSE 11.2 x86-64, I got this message: ca...@carlobook:~ /opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice /opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory After googling I understood that this was probably due to the URE package: libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm which most install in /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure but all other packages instead install themselves in /opt/libreoffice3 Hmm, where did you get the libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm? Mine has the stuff under /opt/libreoffice3 I'm 64 bit!!! From here: http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/rpm/x86_64/ I download and install: LibO-SDK_3.3_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 14:26 8.3M This is needed only if you want to build your own extension without the complete sources. LibO-URE_1.7_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 14:27 3.8M Hmm, I am not sure why we uploaded this. The URE package is included in the main LibO_3.3.0_beta2 tarball. Thorsten, Fridrich, it seems to cause confusion. Of course, we should fix the default installation prefix but I would remove it from http://download.documentfoundation.org at all. LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 05:29 181M Normal English-speaking users need just this tarball. LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_it.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 08:40 13M The lang pack is needed for normal non-English speaking users. untarring the second file, you'll get the RPMs from which the right one yields: carlobook:/home/condivisioni/Download/OpenOffice/LibreOffice/ure/en-US/RPMS # rpm -qlp libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/LICENSE /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/README /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html This is bug. I am going to fix it. Well, in fact, Rene suggested to use /opt/libreoffice even for the main package. But in the URE package inside the main tar.gz (LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz) the URE package is ok! Look here: carlobook:/home/condivisioni/Download/OpenOffice/LibreOffice/main # rpm -qlp en-US/RPMS/libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm /opt/libreoffice3 /opt/libreoffice3/ure /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/javaldx Please ignore the standalone LibO-URE_1.7_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Thanks for help with debugging. Best Regards, Petr -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote: Hi Everyone, this is my first TDF post! :-) I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug poster, too! Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed but not released pdf bug https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812). More helping hands are always welcome. Feel free to add the fix to the package, see http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Collaboration My two questions are: 1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded Libò x86-64 beta2? LibreOffice is continuation of the OpenOffice.org project. We do not plan to provide OpenOffice.org-3.3 for openSUSE. Instead of we are going to provide libreoffice-*-3.3* packages that will replace the older OpenOffice_org packages during the system update. Note that we newer provided the plain OOo packages for openSUSE. We always added the extra patches from the Go-oo project. We are still going to use these extra changes on top of the LibreOffice code. If you want more packages in parallel, you might use the universal LibreOffice Linux packages. They might be installed in parallel with the universal OOo packages, old openSUSE OpenOffice_org packages and the upcoming openSUSE libreoffice packages. It is because they are installed into /opt/libreoffice while the others are installed below /opt/openoffice*, /usr/lib/ooo3, /usr/lib/libreoffice 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I have created the LibreOffice:Unstable project in OBS yesterday. I am running a first test build there. If it goes well, I would publish the libreoffice-3.3-beta2 packages on Friday or Monday. It means that the packages might appear at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable over the weekend or in the beginning of the following week. It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-) Sure. We do out best. There are just too many things to do. Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a nice evening Thanks for support and understanding. Best Regards, Petr PS: Please, keep me in CC if you want fater answer. I have many unread mails on the mailing list :-( -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò
Il 14/10/2010 12:12, Petr Mladek ha scritto: On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote: Hi Everyone, this is my first TDF post! :-) I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug poster, too! Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed but not released pdf bug https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812). More helping hands are always welcome. Feel free to add the fix to the package, see http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Collaboration Ciao Petr! Thank you! I'd like to make it, but I'm not sure using how much time! Sure there is a more efficient person to do that. And for 3.2.1.x branch remaining life it is convenient that is so. If you take a look to the bug history (last few comments) you could see Debian has already added (merged) and relaesed this fix: now I'm asking why the system force me repeating a task that at least one person has already done all over the world. ;-) More communication, information exchange between distros and between distros and main project portals and newer ideas are needed by XXI century social/cloud development: I'm waiting something revolutionary in this meaning from TDF!!! Efficiency means more reliable and functionality richer code!!! If you look for my Novell/OpenSuSE issues you see that, until now, I had been a bug poster and a bug documenting provider, sometime enhancement suggester too. But in the life we never know the future... ;-) Surely I'll read that collaborating page... My two questions are: 1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded Libò x86-64 beta2? LibreOffice is continuation of the OpenOffice.org project. We do not plan to provide OpenOffice.org-3.3 for openSUSE. Instead of we are going to provide libreoffice-*-3.3* packages that will replace the older OpenOffice_org packages during the system update. Note that we newer provided the plain OOo packages for openSUSE. We always added the extra patches from the Go-oo project. We are still going to use these extra changes on top of the LibreOffice code. About this there would be many things to say... wouldn't it? From the upper bug history people could see that we know Novell/OpenSuSE OOo is from Go-OO (e.g. 1 million rows in Calc...!) and with the whole features set here http://go-oo.org/discover/ Until OOo - Oracle thread is still foggy, Libò must be identical to vanilla OOo and you/we must still merge remaining Go-OO exclusive features over and in Libò... I hope we soon stop wasting human being time (developer and user too) and refuse creating regression like upper bug is. We all hope Oracle give the whole OOo world, infrastructure, rights, names, and so on to TDF so that we (OOo, Go-OO, NeoO, OOo4Kids, ... and Libò) develop only once. Deo Gratias! If you want more packages in parallel, you might use the universal LibreOffice Linux packages. They might be installed in parallel with the universal OOo packages, old openSUSE OpenOffice_org packages and the upcoming openSUSE libreoffice packages. It is because they are installed into /opt/libreoffice while the others are installed below /opt/openoffice*, /usr/lib/ooo3, /usr/lib/libreoffice You are simply the best! The clearest person all over the World! :-) Thank you! 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I have created the LibreOffice:Unstable project in OBS yesterday. I am running a first test build there. If it goes well, I would publish the libreoffice-3.3-beta2 packages on Friday or Monday. It means that the packages might appear at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable over the weekend or in the beginning of the following week. So I'll probably wait your builds instead of using the universal LibreOffice Linux packages. It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-) Sure. We do out best. There are just too many things to do. Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a nice evening Thanks for support and understanding. You are always welcome! Best Regards, Petr Sunny day, Carlo PS: Please, keep me in CC if you want fater answer. I have many unread mails on the mailing list :-( Mee too, but I'm happy with TDF time! :-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò
Il 14/10/2010 18:39, Petr Mladek ha scritto: Carlo Strata píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 17:52 +0200: Il 14/10/2010 12:12, Petr Mladek ha scritto: If you want more packages in parallel, you might use the universal LibreOffice Linux packages. They might be installed in parallel with the universal OOo packages, old openSUSE OpenOffice_org packages and the upcoming openSUSE libreoffice packages. It is because they are installed into /opt/libreoffice while the others are installed below /opt/openoffice*, /usr/lib/ooo3, /usr/lib/libreoffice I was curious and than I'll install vanilla Libò ;-) But after install on my OpenSuSE 11.2 x86-64, I got this message: ca...@carlobook:~ /opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice /opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory After googling I understood that this was probably due to the URE package: libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm which most install in /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure but all other packages instead install themselves in /opt/libreoffice3 so I tried fixing the bug with two test: 1. fails: carlobook:/opt/libreoffice3 # ln -s /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ libreoffice 2. successes: carlobook:/opt/libreoffice3 # ln -s /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure ure Great catch. Hmm, where did you get the libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm? Mine has the stuff under /opt/libreoffice3 I have just double checked the official beta2 build from http://www.documentfoundation.org/download/. It was http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/rpm/x86/LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz --- cut --- en-US/RPMS rpm -qlp libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.i586.rpm /opt/libreoffice3 /opt/libreoffice3/ure /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/javaldx /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regcomp --- cut --- I'm 64 bit!!! From here: http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/rpm/x86_64/ I download and install: LibO-SDK_3.3_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 14:26 8.3M LibO-URE_1.7_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 14:27 3.8M LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 05:29 181M LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_it.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 08:40 13M untarring the second file, you'll get the RPMs from which the right one yields: carlobook:/home/condivisioni/Download/OpenOffice/LibreOffice/ure/en-US/RPMS # rpm -qlp libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/LICENSE /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/README /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/javaldx /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/regcomp /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/regcomp.bin /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/regmerge /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/regview /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/startup.sh [...] But in the URE package inside the main tar.gz (LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz) the URE package is ok! Look here: carlobook:/home/condivisioni/Download/OpenOffice/LibreOffice/main # rpm -qlp en-US/RPMS/libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm /opt/libreoffice3 /opt/libreoffice3/ure /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/javaldx /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regcomp /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regcomp.bin /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regmerge /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regview /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/startup.sh /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/uno /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/uno.bin /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/libreoffice3/ure/lib /opt/libreoffice3/ure/lib/JREProperties.class [...] So I ask myself what does need the file LibO-URE_1.7_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz in the directory http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/rpm/x86_64/ ? ;-) Delete it! It's wrong and overwrite the right one (if you untar it next the main one)! ;-) Thank you, Carlo BTW: The package libreoffice-ure-1.7.0 will conflict with the upcoming openSUSE-specific package libreoffice-ure-3.2.99.2. We will solve it in 3.3-beta3 release, see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2010-October/000973.html It means that you will not be able to install the universal libreoffice-3.3-beta2 build and the opensuse libreoffice-*-3.2.99.2 packages at the same time. It should be possible with beta3. I am sorry for the inconvenience. Well, you could install both packages even with beta2 if you use rpm -i instead of rpm -U. Though, it might get broken if you do rpm -U later. Note that YaST/zypper uses rpm -U by default. Best Regards, Petr -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are
Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò
Sorry for the top-posting, but I wanted to preserve the context for Petr (CC'ed). Petr is the man you want to talk to with this sort of question. I'm sure he'll provide more details on this. Kohei On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote: Hi Everyone, this is my first TDF post! :-) I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug poster, too! Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed but not released pdf bug https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812). Now I want to install both: - Libò 3.3 = beta2 and - OBS (OpenSuSE Build Service, *ubuntu's Launch Pad analog) OOo 3.2.1.6 and/or becoming 3.3 This because: - on October the 23th I will participate as OOo/Libò/TDF speaker in Padua's (Italy's NE) Linux Day (in the Padua's FSUG kind People group); - I want to start my soft migration from OOo to... Libò, obviously!!! ;-) My two questions are: 1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded Libò x86-64 beta2? 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I mean here: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/ or here http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Office:/ (in a new LibreOffice directory) or here, too http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/ (in a new LibreOffice directory)? To search in the OBS you could go here (The Famous Webpin page) http://packages.opensuse-community.org/ It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-) Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a nice evening, Carlo -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc kyosh...@novell.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Carlo Strata carlo.str...@tiscali.it wrote: I love top post because when you read a message it is quite normal that you have already red the preceding ones!!! ;-) Thank you having CC'ed to the right person! I'll wait his answer! Carlo Il 13/10/2010 17:55, Kohei Yoshida ha scritto: Sorry for the top-posting, but I wanted to preserve the context for Petr (CC'ed). Petr is the man you want to talk to with this sort of question. I'm sure he'll provide more details on this. Kohei On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote: Hi Everyone, this is my first TDF post! :-) I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug poster, too! Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed but not released pdf bug https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812). Now I want to install both: - Libò 3.3= beta2 and - OBS (OpenSuSE Build Service, *ubuntu's Launch Pad analog) OOo 3.2.1.6 and/or becoming 3.3 This because: - on October the 23th I will participate as OOo/Libò/TDF speaker in Padua's (Italy's NE) Linux Day (in the Padua's FSUG kind People group); - I want to start my soft migration from OOo to... Libò, obviously!!! ;-) My two questions are: 1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded Libò x86-64 beta2? 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I mean here: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/ or here http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Office:/ (in a new LibreOffice directory) or here, too http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/ (in a new LibreOffice directory)? To search in the OBS you could go here (The Famous Webpin page) http://packages.opensuse-community.org/ It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-) Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a nice evening, Carlo Please keep us informed of what you find out, I am curious as well. -Todd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13/10/2010 17:44, Carlo Strata wrote: 1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded Libò x86-64 beta2? Yes, you can take the rpm version of beta2 and install on your openSUSE. It will not conflict (at most you will have to give it a --force for some two or three mimetype files). Install the freedesktop menus and you should be having nice working shortcuts in your Menu under Office. 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I mean here: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/ or here http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Office:/ (in a new LibreOffice directory) or here, too http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/ (in a new LibreOffice directory)? To search in the OBS you could go here (The Famous Webpin page) http://packages.opensuse-community.org/ Here, Petr Mladek will for sure tell you more It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-) Yeah, I also think that it is now hight time for Novell and openSUSE Community to get finally involved ;) Fridrich -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAky2Mq0ACgkQu9a1imXPdA/pbgCfVijhOdyCWuTWbuDDNLXUWsth MM8AnRj2MEKuZ/zuNISMHMNLP2bz2EME =p/gc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
