-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-02-04 11:05 AM, emarkay wrote:
Reporting Ubuntu bugs ... via: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
As this is a multiplatform program, I can understand that the main user of
it (Ubuntu) is to have a separate bug system. Thus, the first question is:
What if a Ubuntu-reported bug also affects Windows version, for example, or
vice versa; what's the link to ensure both (or all relevant OS platform
issues) are addressed?
If an Ubuntu-specific bug is also present in other platforms, it should
be reported upstream (at freedesktop.org's bugzilla). Reporting
Ubuntu-only bugs upstream also helps expose them to other platforms in
order to determine if they are present or not. I also view it as a trail
where others may end up finding your report and confirming / rejecting
it. Some of this is from personal experience, some from online docs and
readings. The current maintainers may have more / better details about
this. I wrote a short note to Björn so he looks at it and comment back.
Second, and most important, LO is standard issue now in Ubuntu Natty,
which is still in Beta at this time. There is no Official Ubuntu LO support
for the current release (Maverick), nor the prior LTS (Long Term Support)
release, Lucid, nor prior active Ubuntu releases. There is, however a PPA
that is supported by the Document Foundation; thus while not blessed by
the Ubuntu authorities, is tested there by some official LO developers,
and is as good as we'll get for Lucid and Maverick users who want to
migrate to LO.
The PPA is as official as it gets and currently Canonical has staff
maintaining it (at least 2):
https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+members#active
As I understand it this PPA is a staging area which has the same
packages you find in Ubuntu 11.04 (so, in development) and it's also
built for Maverick and Lucid. It's convenient to use and lets you easily
remove LibO if you decide to do so.
The chances of this getting into the main repository for Maverick are
most probably none - it's only there for convenience and no official
support (in terms of commercial support by Canonical) may be offered for
that.
For Ubuntu 10.04 LTS I believe it's the same situation, but LTS releases
sometimes get some exceptions. Firefox is a notable one where current
releases of FF were rolled back into older stable Ubuntu versions. I
lack the time to gather references but it should be easy to trace back
such exceptions.
I am not sure the PPA was put together initially by TDF but regardless,
you now have Canonical staff looking into it, and Debian has LibO
packages in the experimental repository, which to me means everything is
in place to have an official release on time for Ubuntu 11.04. If you're
planning any migration from OOo to LibO, your best path (IMO) would be
to focus on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and perhaps have trials using the PPA in
10.04 LTS before that. You'll think it's a long shot until you sit and
try it :) It does take some time to make such changes.
Of course in any *production environment* migration considerations, the
only authority to speak on what is supported commercially or not on
Ubuntu by them is Canonical - just call and ask, as you would for any
other product you want to use before doing so. And no, this doesn't stop
anyone else from offering such support and go ahead with migration
before 11.04 is out anyways. But why do that when the release is 2
months away (other than wanting to stay at 10.04 LTS for its life
duration..).
So, the final question is, do Lucid and Maverick Ubuntu users submit bug
reports to the Ubuntu Launchpad, even though there is no development or
support for those 'Ubuntus', or to the Bugzilla location?
Yes, they should file bugs there. I consider it even better if they take
the time to file bugs upstream too but not everyone knows how to do so
and it may end up being considered noise - plus Ubuntu users normally
are fast on the problem = bug path. Forums and QA such as Shapado may
help alleviate that.
I hope I also cleared up the there is no development. So far Debian
packages and the PPA as I have observed them are keeping up tightly to
the current releases so there should be no need to install .debs directly.
Bernhard commented on this elsewhere, and said as he sees it, The Ubuntu
paragraph on the wiki page describes how to handle Ubuntu *specific* bugs.
This makes sense, but again doesn't differentiate between the official and
the PPA.
There fact there is a paragraph there is highlighting that difference.
If you installed manually .debs, you shouldn't. If you report an Ubuntu
bug and you installed .deb manually, you'll probably be asked to install
using the PPA to remain consistent.
However it is noted that Filing a bug report at FreeDesktop.org
as described above is also useful as such upstream reports can then be
checked (and possibly tested and fixed) for other LibreOffice versions. He
suggested
