Re: [tdf-discuss] Shapado + Mailing list integration, was Fwd: Reporte para el grupo LibreOffice de Shapado
On 01/18/2011 07:41 PM, Fabián Rodríguez wrote: On 11-01-17 02:23 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Fabian this is a random idea, but is it possible to have users that submit to the discuss mailing list or a new support mailing list, to be able to have the questions posted there, and then any answers posted are emailed to those subscribed? Hi Jonathan, There are RSS feeds for multiple things in Shapado. For example if you click on any tag you will get a feed for the particular tag, or you can get a feed for all questions. You can also get a feed for a specific question and its answers. There are some basic hooks to Facebook apps, Twitter and another service is mentioned to further connect Shapado's data: http://dlvr.it. I haven't tried any of this yet, but if anyone's interested in playing with it just ask me and I'll provide admin access - I'll just ask to see some of your previous participation here on any of LibO's project list. I know RSS - mailing list is possible so prsumably that could happen but mailing list - shapado, I doubt it, unless someone does it - there is a RESTful API in the works but I haven't followed that part of the project. Direct questions about Shapado itself can be asked here too: http://shapado.com/ Cheers, Fabián -- LibreOffice questions ? Des questions sur LibreOffice ? Preguntas acerca de LibreOffice ? Ask LibreOffice: http://libreoffice.shapado.com/ ~ Fabián Rodríguez http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:MagicFab Fabian i would love to try out the other api's available with it such as facebook and twitter, as I feel they will be essential in helping us extend the user base and outreach. As you mentioned you would like to see other contributions to the project, at the moment i'm only starting to work on a rather large easy hack of removing extra space from code files. I submitted the patch but I do not think it has made it to the mailing list for review :( -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Features enterprises will love to have in LibreOffice
Hi I have collected some features enteprises will love to have implemented in LibreOffice and listed them in http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Features_Enterprises_Will_Love_To_Have_Implemented Some are quite easy to implement, other may require a longer time for development, but all are based on real demand from people that use LibreOffice in a enterprise production environment. That is, they are not crazy ideas at all. :-) Regards -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Steering Commitee Member - The Document Foundation Voicing the enterprise Translation Leader for Brazilian Portuguese -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Linux distros and LibO packaging
Hi Andrea, Andrea Pescetti wrote (18-01-11 21:13) The OpenOffice.org experience, and the first distribution-specific LibreOffice bugs like http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg04508.html make me think that fragmentation, while of course allowed by the license, should be discouraged when it comes to functionality; I'm not questioning desktop integration or branding, but I'd like to know why distributions feel they have to make changes to functionality... I do not expect at all that distros will have much appetite in making substantial functional changes. (And I am glad with that ;-) ) The bug you point to, does not suggest that they will make substantial changes, though? Regards, Cor -- - giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation - -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [Libreoffice] [tdf-discuss] Linux distros and LibO packaging
[ fullquoting for discuss@dfs sake. forgot the CC. Not that it matters much, but anyways. ] Hi, On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: It is a good idea to track changes, but it is probably a questionable practice to make changes. I expected LibreOffice to be consistent across Nonsense. This is OSS. it). Are there compelling reasons why distributions should ship versions of LibreOffice that have significant changes with respect to the official version? Define significant changes? Does ripping off the Mozilla address book support (implicitely, because using system-mozilla) count as that? Would you prefer Linux distros having a obsolete, patched and insecure Mozilla copy there? No, not acceptable. The OpenOffice.org experience, and the first distribution-specific LibreOffice bugs like http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg04508.html Wow. I don't think Petr added a patch here, so it might just be system differences? Petr, correct me if I am wrong. Besides that, distros will have to continue libreoffice-build, which does still contain patches. (Removing those would be a big regression about what we ship right now) make me think that fragmentation, while of course allowed by the license, should be discouraged when it comes to functionality; I'm not questioning desktop integration or branding, but I'd like to know why distributions feel they have to make changes to functionality... Because bugs should be fixed ASAP, not when you think one wants to release. What if Debian didn't backport important fixes to it's 3.2.1 from 3.3 or so? Should we release wiith known important bugs in a stable release. Living 2 years with it? No. You have to care about quality. Besides that, some distro-specific bugs are not by feature patches, but just because of other bugs, Like bugs in system-libs, new version of systen lib breaking XYZ (e.g. the ) wrapping issue, need to find out the bugnr caused by changes in the Unicode Standard and ICU 4.4), build issues etc. Those https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31271 is what I meant here. you can't foresee and neither does documenting every change help here. Get some clue. And don't speak about this if you don't, kthxbye. Noone does this intentionally. Sorry, I apologize for the first two sentences of this. But I am getting annoyed by those senseless discussions. Should we repeat the errors Oracle did again? Grüße/Regards, René -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Features enterprises will love to have in LibreOffice
Hello, I believe the best feature for the enterprise will be to port LibreOffice to HTML5, this could be also installed locally in the clients, needing just a browser to run. If LibreOffice doesn't go in direction WebBased, it will be soon irrelevant in the enterprise (as soon as Google Docs, MS Docs, Zoho, Oracle cloud Office, IBM Cloud Office, etc. are mature enough), since Enterprises want to deliver Standard Applications directly in the browser, with no need to administer on premise installations and support. Cheers! On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:23, Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Hi I have collected some features enteprises will love to have implemented in LibreOffice and listed them in http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Features_Enterprises_Will_Love_To_Have_Implemented Some are quite easy to implement, other may require a longer time for development, but all are based on real demand from people that use LibreOffice in a enterprise production environment. That is, they are not crazy ideas at all. :-) Regards -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Steering Commitee Member - The Document Foundation Voicing the enterprise Translation Leader for Brazilian Portuguese -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.orgdiscuss%2bh...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Linux distros and LibO packaging
Hi, On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:49:51PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: and, possibly, Debian might need to ship an acceptably free version by their own standards if there were any doubt as to the appropriate freeness of the LibreOffice code by the standards of the particular distribution involved. yep. In addition, Debian may need to patch heavily to meet the requirements of some of the disparate hardware architectures, for example. Well, not that heavily, and even if so I'd immediately give that back anyways. Grüße/Regards, René -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Linux distros and LibO packaging
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:07:03AM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: I am interested to see Rene's input on this as he is part of the Debian team. Thanks, answered both Andrea and Andrew. Grüße/Regards, René -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Features enterprises will love to have in LibreOffice
At 11:48 19/01/2011, Jaime R. Garza wrote: Hello, I believe the best feature for the enterprise will be to port LibreOffice to HTML5, this could be also installed locally in the clients, needing just a browser to run. If LibreOffice doesn't go in direction WebBased, it will be soon irrelevant in the enterprise (...) The enterprise is not the only (potential) user of LibreOffice. There is a significant part of the world that does not want to or cannot depend on network connections for every type of work, e.g. because not everyone is on the Internet [1] or because they have their own reasons for not using software as a service. [1] http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm, http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm Best regards, Christophe Strobbe Cheers! On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:23, Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Hi I have collected some features enteprises will love to have implemented in LibreOffice and listed them in http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Features_Enterprises_Will_Love_To_Have_Implemented Some are quite easy to implement, other may require a longer time for development, but all are based on real demand from people that use LibreOffice in a enterprise production environment. That is, they are not crazy ideas at all. :-) Regards -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Steering Commitee Member - The Document Foundation -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Twitter: @RabelaisA11y --- Better products and services through end-user empowerment www.usem-net.eu - www.stand4all.eu --- Please don't invite me to Facebook, Quechup or other social networks. You may have agreed to their privacy policy, but I haven't. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Features enterprises will love to have in LibreOffice
On 01/19/2011 12:15 PM, Christophe Strobbe wrote: At 11:48 19/01/2011, Jaime R. Garza wrote: Hello, I believe the best feature for the enterprise will be to port LibreOffice to HTML5, this could be also installed locally in the clients, needing just a browser to run. If LibreOffice doesn't go in direction WebBased, it will be soon irrelevant in the enterprise (...) The enterprise is not the only (potential) user of LibreOffice. There is a significant part of the world that does not want to or cannot depend on network connections for every type of work, e.g. because not everyone is on the Internet [1] or because they have their own reasons for not using software as a service. [1] http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm, http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm Best regards, Christophe Strobbe Cheers! On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:23, Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Hi I have collected some features enteprises will love to have implemented in LibreOffice and listed them in http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Features_Enterprises_Will_Love_To_Have_Implemented Some are quite easy to implement, other may require a longer time for development, but all are based on real demand from people that use LibreOffice in a enterprise production environment. That is, they are not crazy ideas at all. :-) Regards -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Steering Commitee Member - The Document Foundation I would have to side with Jaime. i don't think we should rule out all together having a web based version. I have used Google doc's a number of times, and in all honesty for my business i would really consider using a web based version when out of the office as it functions like a centralized storage until i get back to the office. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Spam filtering the mailing lists
Hi, Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-01-18 22.41: Removed every spam message i had. next time ill forward them to you. thanks a lot! I will then try to investigate where they come from. Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] xlsx files over 65536 rows not fully saved in Calc
On 2011-01-19 12:43 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: Fixing it the right way will be very invasive, and risks breaking the xls (not xlsx, xls the binary) import and export filters into utterly useless state (I mean, really useless). This is because so much code is shared between the xls import/export filters and the xlsx export filter, and the offending code is in the common part of the filters code, and its effect is broad. ??? I guess I'm totally missing something. Why not just duplicate the filters and separate them? Then you can manipulate the xlsx filter to your hearts content without affecting the xls filter at all. -- Best regards, Charles -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Features enterprises will love to have in LibreOffice
Hello Christoph, sorry, but an HTML5 LibreOffice could be also installed locally in a client, as I said before. And the LibreOffice Community will only have to maintain one HTLM5 version for any platform. Now there are 3 versions, Linux, Mac, Windows. So, as conclusion, a HTML5 LibreOffice has following advantages: - SaaS - HTML5 also allows offline usage, basically the Google Gears Technology is being implemented into HTML5 - Local installation is also possible in any desktop! - Platform-independent - Only one main version for all! Saving the parallel development Cheers! Jaime On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:15, Christophe Strobbe christophe.stro...@esat.kuleuven.be wrote: At 11:48 19/01/2011, Jaime R. Garza wrote: Hello, I believe the best feature for the enterprise will be to port LibreOffice to HTML5, this could be also installed locally in the clients, needing just a browser to run. If LibreOffice doesn't go in direction WebBased, it will be soon irrelevant in the enterprise (...) The enterprise is not the only (potential) user of LibreOffice. There is a significant part of the world that does not want to or cannot depend on network connections for every type of work, e.g. because not everyone is on the Internet [1] or because they have their own reasons for not using software as a service. [1] http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm, http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm Best regards, Christophe Strobbe Cheers! On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:23, Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Hi I have collected some features enteprises will love to have implemented in LibreOffice and listed them in http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Features_Enterprises_Will_Love_To_Have_Implemented Some are quite easy to implement, other may require a longer time for development, but all are based on real demand from people that use LibreOffice in a enterprise production environment. That is, they are not crazy ideas at all. :-) Regards -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Steering Commitee Member - The Document Foundation -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Twitter: @RabelaisA11y --- Better products and services through end-user empowerment www.usem-net.eu - www.stand4all.eu --- Please don't invite me to Facebook, Quechup or other social networks. You may have agreed to their privacy policy, but I haven't. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.orgdiscuss%2bh...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Features enterprises will love to have in LibreOffice
I have collected some features enteprises will love to have implemented in LibreOffice and listed them in http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Features_Enterprises_Will_Love_To_Have_Implemented Great, but why is this on the Crazy Ideas page? Those are far from crazy ideas;) --tml -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] xlsx files over 65536 rows not fully saved in Calc
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 06:52 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2011-01-19 12:43 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: Fixing it the right way will be very invasive, and risks breaking the xls (not xlsx, xls the binary) import and export filters into utterly useless state (I mean, really useless). This is because so much code is shared between the xls import/export filters and the xlsx export filter, and the offending code is in the common part of the filters code, and its effect is broad. ??? I guess I'm totally missing something. Why not just duplicate the filters and separate them? Then you can manipulate the xlsx filter to your hearts content without affecting the xls filter at all. Because that's a maintenance nightmare. We'd tried that before. Anyway, if you want to discuss technical details about this issue, let's take this to the dev list. I'm sure there are more qualified people willing to participate in the discussion, which is better than just me answering all the questions. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc kyosh...@novell.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Suggestion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/19/2011 09:17 PM, Andy Brown wrote: Why add something more to bloat the package when an extension already exist? Probably because the person wants something that works. And the extension you suggest does not work. http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/ReadabilityReport it should work just as well with LibreOffice as with OpenOffice.org. You do realize that that extension causes both LibO and OOo to crash every time it is called, don't you. jonathon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNN4fzAAoJEERA7YuLpVrVPq8H+gObkASM+FA8sJ5+1LVAwVy5 +vRsAldsvLIw1+4DHuo3/yGmqxJBG5TlrfqVgFRvZKa7o1cIN4Rx8CJqeDrabNse 7N0s1QXZRYt1NsDhIDMCho2tlDvCJVOHWpwTBvCZ/3+NCue7FrQi9XWPJ8vYMvOS AoxVp9BrToLE5Y2vZ3di5gWJsCdALv/3YWDHUGZzFS/6XSj5TYkwbidY7EhGAbeq pxIT/Yoaw5wUJuVfuyim/9irZec3KIXftuJiPgphFbF47W8ZocTVn2O759uGhRX1 olVqxilENadtW0YpEtIs5Ix8Q4JSk7scpofiry1USoVXwQrZrWU6NVJJl0t6k34= =h4XE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Suggestion
On Wed Jan 19 2011 16:55:15 GMT-0800 (PST) toki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/19/2011 09:17 PM, Andy Brown wrote: Why add something more to bloat the package when an extension already exist? Probably because the person wants something that works. And the extension you suggest does not work. http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/ReadabilityReport it should work just as well with LibreOffice as with OpenOffice.org. You do realize that that extension causes both LibO and OOo to crash every time it is called, don't you. Been a while since I used it, so no I did not realize that it was broke. But with all the changes to both programs I guess it is not surprising. Some basic features in the current RC of both are messed up as it is. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Suggestion
How to use the extension? When the report shows up? On 20 January 2011 03:05, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote: On Wed Jan 19 2011 16:55:15 GMT-0800 (PST) toki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/19/2011 09:17 PM, Andy Brown wrote: Why add something more to bloat the package when an extension already exist? Probably because the person wants something that works. And the extension you suggest does not work. http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/ReadabilityReport it should work just as well with LibreOffice as with OpenOffice.org. You do realize that that extension causes both LibO and OOo to crash every time it is called, don't you. Been a while since I used it, so no I did not realize that it was broke. But with all the changes to both programs I guess it is not surprising. Some basic features in the current RC of both are messed up as it is. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.orgdiscuss%2bh...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Shapado + Mailing list integration, was Fwd: Reporte para el grupo LibreOffice de Shapado
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/19/2011 03:04 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: On 01/18/2011 07:41 PM, Fabián Rodríguez wrote: On 11-01-17 02:23 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Fabian this is a random idea, but is it possible to have users that submit to the discuss mailing list or a new support mailing list, to be able to have the questions posted there, and then any answers posted are emailed to those subscribed? Hi Jonathan, There are RSS feeds for multiple things in Shapado. For example if you click on any tag you will get a feed for the particular tag, or you can get a feed for all questions. You can also get a feed for a specific question and its answers. There are some basic hooks to Facebook apps, Twitter and another service is mentioned to further connect Shapado's data: http://dlvr.it. I haven't tried any of this yet, but if anyone's interested in playing with it just ask me and I'll provide admin access - I'll just ask to see some of your previous participation here on any of LibO's project list. I know RSS - mailing list is possible so prsumably that could happen but mailing list - shapado, I doubt it, unless someone does it - there is a RESTful API in the works but I haven't followed that part of the project. Direct questions about Shapado itself can be asked here too: http://shapado.com/ Cheers, Fabián -- LibreOffice questions ? Des questions sur LibreOffice ? Preguntas acerca de LibreOffice ? Ask LibreOffice: http://libreoffice.shapado.com/ ~ Fabián Rodríguez http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:MagicFab Fabian i would love to try out the other api's available with it such as facebook and twitter, as I feel they will be essential in helping us extend the user base and outreach. As you mentioned you would like to see other contributions to the project, at the moment i'm only starting to work on a rather large easy hack of removing extra space from code files. I submitted the patch but I do not think it has made it to the mailing list for review :( please don't forget diaspora[1] and status.net[2] (identi.ca)[3] when looking at social media outlets. [1] http://joindiaspora.com [2] http://status.net [3] http://identi.ca - -- - -- Justin threethirty O'Brien threethi...@riseup.net threethirty on freenode.net @threethirty -twitter/identi.ca/jaiku Phone:+1 (765) 688-0723 DISCLAIMER:The opinions expressed in this email are my own, not those of any employer (past/present/future). My opinions are also not necessarily the opinions of any organization with which I have/had/will have a volunteer affiliation. Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Encouraging respectful discussion with OpenRespect (http://www.openrespect.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNN9k1AAoJELoG4uylTxXdu08IAJHxjHvw2XilcovxyDJcYnrM xEwt/WlM2/PzBa1I6XXA9IXfglkhlRq5MQ+2ygjve2XDAmqlM80lKy0eUsJpKFmf kLEbQVMr7ceYWubERchVXCqkP0d//xJc2hWRcKYjfFbCpr/leISF9xQQBvr/HZIj t3ZvCEi7ooCOs451OdnQjZJcruQvr6DtyT1zZdYCQ26+Ds2G1KN5fOTwi6ToKm32 tTZEtPo0+1Vz53itfQkOF4ctw9jd7HJ0IyL74QfXABQwKQgYpi75T+SiFsvTPHAD x7FzR7md1+7JcYD0ymq0xk0xvjqiJowHnK1as9caiQhtddWWeTQeuEoCbH5M42Y= =Rw5i -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Suggestion
Þann fim 20.jan 2011 01:05, skrifaði Andy Brown: On Wed Jan 19 2011 16:55:15 GMT-0800 (PST) toki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/19/2011 09:17 PM, Andy Brown wrote: Why add something more to bloat the package when an extension already exist? Probably because the person wants something that works. And the extension you suggest does not work. http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/ReadabilityReport it should work just as well with LibreOffice as with OpenOffice.org. You do realize that that extension causes both LibO and OOo to crash every time it is called, don't you. Been a while since I used it, so no I did not realize that it was broke. But with all the changes to both programs I guess it is not surprising. Some basic features in the current RC of both are messed up as it is. Apparently it's a Windows-only thing. Sveinn í Felli -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
