Re: [jQuery] I could use help with Drag-drop
Yes, this can be done. I have used the following code in a list of items (a
html table structure) where items can be dragged to either a folder or a
trashbin.
Here is some of the code:
[code]
86 $(.dndFolder).Draggable (
87 {
88 autoSize:true,
89 ghosting:true,
90 revert:true,
91 fx: 200
92 });
93 $(.dndFolder).Droppable (
94 {
95 accept:draggable,
96 hoverclass:dropzonehover,
97 activeclass:dropzonehover,
98 onDrop:function(drag)
99 {
100 if (this.id != drag.id)
101 {
102 //moveItem (tasks, this.id.split
(_)[1], drag.id.split (_)[1],\''.session_id(
).'\');
103 moveItem (tasks, this,
drag,\''.session_id().'\');
104 }
105 }
106 });
107 $(.draggable).Draggable (
108 {
109 autoSize:true,
110 ghosting:true,
111 revert:true,
112 fx: 200,
113 onStart:function()
114 {
115 currentDrag = $(this).parent().parent();
116 currentDrag.removeClass().addClass
(selected);
117 }
118 });
119 $(#trash).Droppable (
120 {
121 accept:draggable,
122 hoverclass:dropzonehover,
123 activeclass:dropzonehover,
124 onDrop:function(drag)
125 {
126 var what = drag.id.split (_);
127 var theType =
(what[0]==folder?folder:item);
128 //animateDeleteItem ((drag.id).substring
(5));
129 //deleteItem (tasks,
(drag.id).substring (5));
130 deleteItem (tasks, theType, what[1]);
131 }
132 });
150 $(document).bind(mouseup, function ()
151 {
152 if (currentDrag)
153 {
154 zebraItems ();
155 currentDrag = null;
156 }
157 });
[/code]
The interface DnD functions are used
moveItem is the javascript function that handles the db update
This could probably be done a better way, but since I use pretty large
tables I disabled this DnD functionality since performance was pretty bad
when using it on over about 50 items
Circlefusion wrote:
Hey all,
I'm researching JQuery for a project at work. It is a recipe website that
has a recipe box feature where they want to be able to drag recipes
between folders for organization. Here is a screen shot of the basic
functionality that I'm trying to accomplish.
http://www.circlefusion.com/projects/ge/recipe_box_drag.png
A couple of rules for the drag-drop:
If the recipe is not dragged to an appropriate target (a folder) then it
stays in it's original position when the mouse is released.
After the drop is completed, an AJAX call would update the database and
reload the recipe list in whichever folder the user is located.
I couldn't find a clear example of this type of drag-drop scenario on any
of the JQuery demos. I saw similar things on the Interface website in the
demos section. http://interface.eyecon.ro/
Can someone give me some direction? Suggestions? Tips?
Or just let me know if this can be done using JQuery. I was considering
using YUI, but so far I find JQuery easier to use. I'm assuming that
Interface is what I'm looking for (for drag-drop functionality)
Thanks
Cf
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/I-could-use-help-with-Drag-drop-tf3064614.html#a8597817
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Retrieve a from iframe
How can I get all A from all IFRAMES in web? Thk. Giro. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] attr scrollHeight
$(element).attr('scrollHeight')
does not work (returns undefined)
but
$(element)[0].scrollHeight
does, is this right?
andreas
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] preceding sibling
Hello again, I have written a simple menu in the most basic way i could: just an unordered list, with only the active tab getting a class=active. I am adding the correct styles to the first and last tabs with the :first and :last selector. Works just fine. The last thing i need is to be able to identify the tab that comes before the active tab, if any. I have tried the axis selector for the preceding sibling shown in the doc : $(//div ~ form) However, that syntax is a bit foreign to me, and it unsurprisingly did not work when i adpated it like this : $(//ul#menu li ~ .actif).addClass(preactif); (To be more precise, i want to select the ul#menu li that comes right before the ul#menu li.actif). I have tried various combinations, but to no avail. Help most welcome as always. Thanks! -- Stéphane Nahmani / sholby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sholby.net/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Select Box
Consider this plugin http://www.texotela.co.uk/code/jquery/select/ You can do stuff like $(#myselect).selectOptions(Value); David Gironella wrote: I have a multiple selection select. I can use jquery to check which options are selected? Some example? Thk. Giro. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Peter Bengtsson, work www.fry-it.com home www.peterbe.com hobby www.issuetrackerproduct.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] preceding sibling
Try $(#menu li.actif ~ li) Translation: Find an element with id menu (id by itself is faster than id with tag), then find a descendent LI with class actif, and return the preceding element if it is a LI. Blair On 1/25/07, Stéphane Nahmani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello again, I have written a simple menu in the most basic way i could: just an unordered list, with only the active tab getting a class=active. I am adding the correct styles to the first and last tabs with the :first and :last selector. Works just fine. The last thing i need is to be able to identify the tab that comes before the active tab, if any. I have tried the axis selector for the preceding sibling shown in the doc : $(//div ~ form) However, that syntax is a bit foreign to me, and it unsurprisingly did not work when i adpated it like this : $(//ul#menu li ~ .actif).addClass(preactif); (To be more precise, i want to select the ul#menu li that comes right before the ul#menu li.actif). I have tried various combinations, but to no avail. Help most welcome as always. Thanks! -- Stéphane Nahmani / sholby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sholby.net/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] OT: CSS Conditional Comments
Aaron Heimlich schrieb: I don't recall whether IE Mac can read conditional comments, but it shouldn't matter much considering it's pretty much dead and gone by now. The IE Mac ignore CC's -- Viele Grüße, Olaf --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://olaf-bosch.de www.akitafreund.de --- ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] attr scrollHeight
Andreas Wahlin wrote:
$(element).attr('scrollHeight')
does not work (returns undefined)
but
$(element)[0].scrollHeight
does, is this right?
Maybe that's because scrollHeight is a property of an element and not an
attribute (that is reflected in the HTML tag's attribute list).
Try:
element.foo = 'bar';
alert( $(element).attr('foo') );
I'm pretty sure that the alert is empty.
By the way: $(element)[0].scrollHeight is the same as
element.scrollHeight of course with a little less overhead.
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] ie6 submit button error
Hi,
I found the following error,
This command is not supported,
when trying this line of code in IE6,
$(':submit').attr({ src: images/button_submit.png, type: image });
This works fine in Firefox. I have the latest update of jQuery and I'm
currently using the compressed version.
Thanks in advance,
Marie
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] How to find out if form was submitted via Ajax?
Thank you! This worked beautifully
Dr. Tarique Sani wrote:
On 1/24/07, Dmitrii 'Mamut' Dimandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I use the Form plugin, how can I find out on the server that the
form was submitted via Ajax?
if using PHP then testing env('HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH') ==
XMLHttpRequest should work
HTH
Tarique
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ie6 submit button error
My guess is that IE doesn't like you changing the type of the INPUT
element from submit to image. I'd advise doing something along
this line (untested code):
$(':submit')
.attr('disable','true')
.hide()
.before( $('input src=images/button_submit.png type=image') );
Karl Rudd
On 1/25/07, Marie du Toit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I found the following error,
This command is not supported,
when trying this line of code in IE6,
$(':submit').attr({ src: images/button_submit.png, type: image });
This works fine in Firefox. I have the latest update of jQuery and I'm
currently using the compressed version.
Thanks in advance,
Marie
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Problem with form plugin and xml
I'm trying to ajaxify my forms. I'm using the forms plugin:
$(#FindHotel).ajaxForm(
{
success: showFormSubmitResult,
dataType: 'xml'
}
);
function showFormSubmitResult(responseText, statusText)
{
alert(responseText);
}
I'm getting 'null' :(
The XML that's returned is valid XML that looks sort of like this. I
wonder what could be the problem :(
data
sort text=Sort by:
item isLast=0 link=/find/hotel/?sort=nameamp;dir=asc
textHotel name/text
image/image
/item
/sort
list
original_set text=You were looking for:
item
!--xhr--
hotel
name=test_hotel
roomdata=405E43495D1748544D4843
name=Тestoviy Otel
noofstars=5*
currency=€
minprice=10
maxprice=61.2
Description
/hotel
rooms
room
name=SNGL
id=1
hid=8
currency=€
minprice=10
maxprice=22.4 /
/rooms
/item
/original_set
/list
/data
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Some Firefox search plugins I made
Greetings all, Being new to jQuery (just implemented it yesterday), I have done quite a bit of searching for information on various jQuery topics, and to help me to that end I created some Firefox search plugins (for that little box in the upper-right corner)I hope you guys don't mind! I searched online for some before I made them but couldn't find any, so.. yeah :) I made 3: Google site:jquery.com (main, discuss, blog) Google site:docs.jquery.com (docs, plugins, tutorials) jQuery.com built-in Wiki search (rarely finds anything) Anyways, you can get them here: http://kenman.net/jQuery/ff_src/ Let me know if you have any ideas for improvements, etc. -kenneth ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ie6 submit button error
Bah. I missed a closing bracket.
$(':submit')
.attr('disable','true')
.hide()
.before( $('input src=images/button_submit.png type=image') );
Karl Rudd
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] preceding sibling
On 25/01/07, Blair McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try $(#menu li.actif ~ li) Translation: Find an element with id menu (id by itself is faster than id with tag), then find a descendent LI with class actif, and return the preceding element if it is a LI. Blair $(#menu li.actif).prev(li) should work as well. On 1/25/07, Stéphane Nahmani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello again, I have written a simple menu in the most basic way i could: just an unordered list, with only the active tab getting a class=active. I am adding the correct styles to the first and last tabs with the :first and :last selector. Works just fine. The last thing i need is to be able to identify the tab that comes before the active tab, if any. I have tried the axis selector for the preceding sibling shown in the doc : $(//div ~ form) However, that syntax is a bit foreign to me, and it unsurprisingly did not work when i adpated it like this : $(//ul#menu li ~ .actif).addClass(preactif); (To be more precise, i want to select the ul#menu li that comes right before the ul#menu li.actif). I have tried various combinations, but to no avail. Help most welcome as always. Thanks! -- Stéphane Nahmani / sholby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sholby.net/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Thickbox incompatible with jQuery 1.1
I agree. My modified thickbox.js is just 6k packed. Why break it up into separate downloads? There are features I would like to see built in (which I've been able to add with the help of the community), circular browsing for example, but it's very important to me that ThickBox stays small in file size. Quite confident you all feel the same, but thought I'd make it a point to consider anyway. Adam [-Stash-] wrote: I like this idea but for one point. If you do want everything, then you have 8 bazillion requests back and forth to the server. Not a problem for those of us on broadband, but on Dialup it becomes a a really show stopper with all the added latency. Some method of bundling up (and compressing if possible, but that's secondary) all the necessary JS files into a single download would be best. Luke Sam Collett wrote: On 24/01/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [-Stash-] wrote: Unfortunately, it looks like Cody's giving up on ThickBox. He's put out a request for someone to take it over: http://codylindley.com/thickboxforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=166page=1#Item_15 Given the improvements Klaus Hartl's already made to ThickBox 2.1, it would be nice if he took it over ;) I'd love to do that! -- Klaus We all know you are capable of doing it. One suggestion though - make it modular. So if you only want to use it for images, you don't download all the things you don't need. e.g. - Images, inline content - include thickbox.js - Gallery - thickbox.js, thickbox-gallery.js - Ajax: thickbox.js, thickbox-ajax.js - Rich media content (flash, quicktime, pdf's etc) - thickbox.js, thickbox-media.js and so on. You could use blockUI for the overlay and bgiframe for rich media. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Thickbox-incompatible-with-jQuery-1.1-tf3063738.html#a8598914 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] OT: CSS Conditional Comments
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
sure looks right! IE is disgusting, as so are conditional comments! I
prefer to kludge IE all at once in an if ($.browser.msie) block , and
even load in a different style sheet for those crazy browsers! I read
a way that IE naturally ignores some css (without conditional
comments) that a new compliant IE might obey! Perhaps an IE guru can
shed more info here.
That is true to some extend. IE 6 does not support advanced CSS 2
selectors. That means you can easily exclude rules from IE 6 by using these:
bodydiv {
/* declarations not seen by IE 6 */
}
Note that you mustn't put white space into that selector like body
div as some IE 5 versions will interpret everything after the
combinator , e.g. it would apply the declarations to all divs in this
example.
This is what I call a bad hack, because it is not future proof. Such
hacks have been used a lot, but obviously caused a lot of problems when
IE 7 came out which supports these CSS 2 selectors and suddenly applied
the styles meant to be excluded from it. *Don't do it!*
Conditional Comments may seem ugly but are the by far safest way to
serve IE specific styles. The propability that Opera will implement CC
and then let if IE evaluate to true goes against negative infinity.
I usually use one single IE style sheet included via CC and than hack a
little bit in that one if I need to address IE 7 or 6 solely.
For IE 7 I can than use advanced CSS 2 selectors like the one above. For
IE 6 you can use the underscore hack (_height: 300px) or the Star
Selector Hack, which is not understood by IE 7 running in Standards Mode.
For example to achieve automatic clearing I use:
.somethingWithFloatsInside {
display: inline-block; /* @ IE 7 */
_height: 1%; /* @ IE 6 */
}
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jQuery French chapter / groupe francophone jQuery
Salut je viens de créer la liste de discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] pour tous ceux qui souhaitent parler de jQuery, en français. A bientôt ! Pour s'inscrire il suffit d'envoyer un email à l'adresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] ou se rendre à http://listes.rezo.net/mailman/listinfo/jquery-fr à bientôt (in English: I've just created the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing-list) -- Fil ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] preceding sibling
On 25 janv. 07, at 10:24, Blair McKenzie wrote: Try $(#menu li.actif ~ li) Translation: Find an element with id menu (id by itself is faster than id with tag), then find a descendent LI with class actif, and return the preceding element if it is a LI. Yes, it works and your explanation of it is pristine. Thanks a lot. To be more accurate, i found out that it actually returned several (see below) of the preceding siblings, so i fixed it by adding :last. Maybe something is amiss: i have 5 li in my list. If i select the previous sibling(s) with your selector when the active li is the 2nd or 3rd, all the previous ones are returned. However, if the active one is #4 or #5, only the 2 first li are found (in other words li #3 and #4 are not included in the array). (This was tested on Safari) PS : Just seeing Sam's reply: yes, it works too! Great! PPS: apologies if the message isn't correctly placed in the thread, i can't reply at my workplace. -- Stéphane Nahmani / sholby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sholby.net/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] OT: CSS Conditional Comments
Olaf Bosch wrote: Aaron Heimlich schrieb: I don't recall whether IE Mac can read conditional comments, but it shouldn't matter much considering it's pretty much dead and gone by now. The IE Mac ignore CC's Yes, IE Mac is (was) a completely different browser (apart from the name). If you need to include an IE Mac specific style sheet use the IE5/Mac Band Pass Filter: http://www.stopdesign.com/examples/ie5mac-bpf/ But honestly, IE 5 for Mac is considered a dead browser. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Select Box
Yes. I see, but my question is how can check ALL options.
With classical dom, i can do this:
me=document.getElementById('subselect');
for(var i = 0;i me.length;i++) {
if(me.options[i].selected == true){
}
}
But, with jquery?
Giro.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
de Peter Bengtsson
Enviado el: jueves, 25 de enero de 2007 10:21
Para: jQuery Discussion.
Asunto: Re: [jQuery] Select Box
Consider this plugin
http://www.texotela.co.uk/code/jquery/select/
You can do stuff like
$(#myselect).selectOptions(Value);
David Gironella wrote:
I have a multiple selection select. I can use jquery to check which
options are selected?
Some example?
Thk.
Giro.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Peter Bengtsson,
work www.fry-it.com
home www.peterbe.com
hobby www.issuetrackerproduct.com
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que esta limpio.
For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] OT: CSS Conditional Comments
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
Micheal, so that only works with inline styles?
On 1/24/07, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!-- ... - is an HTML comment, not a CSS comment. So, conditional comments
go in your HTML code, not in CSS code.
div.SiteHeader{
border: 1px solid #336566; /*AA*/
width: 850px;
background-color: #E3F0D6; /*D5F0D5,CDD9E5*/
height: 60px;
text-align: left;
margin: auto;
!--[if IE 6]
line-height: 60px;
![endif]--
}
1. What we see here is completely wrong. You cannot put HTML comments
into a style sheet.
It would be correct like that:
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Thickbox incompatible with jQuery 1.1
On 25/01/07, agent2026 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree. My modified thickbox.js is just 6k packed. Why break it up into separate downloads? There are features I would like to see built in (which I've been able to add with the help of the community), circular browsing for example, but it's very important to me that ThickBox stays small in file size. Quite confident you all feel the same, but thought I'd make it a point to consider anyway. Adam If (or should I say when) Thickbox does a lot more (like transition animations between images in a gallery etc), then the code size would increase. To solve the issue of requests for multiple files, you could always have a download page that you can use to configure your download (like the one at http://interface.eyecon.ro/download). You check the features you want and then it merges those files server side (or gets a prebuilt copy) and sends you the compressed version in one file. [-Stash-] wrote: I like this idea but for one point. If you do want everything, then you have 8 bazillion requests back and forth to the server. Not a problem for those of us on broadband, but on Dialup it becomes a a really show stopper with all the added latency. Some method of bundling up (and compressing if possible, but that's secondary) all the necessary JS files into a single download would be best. Luke Sam Collett wrote: On 24/01/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [-Stash-] wrote: Unfortunately, it looks like Cody's giving up on ThickBox. He's put out a request for someone to take it over: http://codylindley.com/thickboxforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=166page=1#Item_15 Given the improvements Klaus Hartl's already made to ThickBox 2.1, it would be nice if he took it over ;) I'd love to do that! -- Klaus We all know you are capable of doing it. One suggestion though - make it modular. So if you only want to use it for images, you don't download all the things you don't need. e.g. - Images, inline content - include thickbox.js - Gallery - thickbox.js, thickbox-gallery.js - Ajax: thickbox.js, thickbox-ajax.js - Rich media content (flash, quicktime, pdf's etc) - thickbox.js, thickbox-media.js and so on. You could use blockUI for the overlay and bgiframe for rich media. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Thickbox-incompatible-with-jQuery-1.1-tf3063738.html#a8598914 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] unobtrus
John Beppu wrote: Imagine... a PHP page that makes SQL queries right before it populates a big HTML table that makes heavy use of nested tables for layout but also has some inlined CSS via the style attribute, and to top it all off the HTML is littered with onclick handlers and script tags at various places in the page. Aah, John, I can't sleep tonight... -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Select Box
On 25/01/07, David Gironella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I see, but my question is how can check ALL options.
With classical dom, i can do this:
me=document.getElementById('subselect');
for(var i = 0;i me.length;i++) {
if(me.options[i].selected == true){
}
}
But, with jquery?
Giro.
It can take a regular expression, so to select all items:
$(#myselect).selectOptions(/./i);
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
de Peter Bengtsson
Enviado el: jueves, 25 de enero de 2007 10:21
Para: jQuery Discussion.
Asunto: Re: [jQuery] Select Box
Consider this plugin
http://www.texotela.co.uk/code/jquery/select/
You can do stuff like
$(#myselect).selectOptions(Value);
David Gironella wrote:
I have a multiple selection select. I can use jquery to check which
options are selected?
Some example?
Thk.
Giro.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Peter Bengtsson,
work www.fry-it.com
home www.peterbe.com
hobby www.issuetrackerproduct.com
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que esta limpio.
For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Why am I getting this error message?
Actually he's not trying to debug in IE, he's testing in IE and getting that error. @Rick: The error you're getting may be caused by http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/843/ this bug . Basically you need to change your settings of zIndex to a string. Adam Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote: and as to why you get that message and the line number don't help much is that you are attempting to debug in IE! The players use firefox + firebug! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-am-I-getting-this-error-message--tf3095622.html#a8599073 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Form Ajax and PHP
Hi Mike, There is some good material here, just updated tonight. http://www.malsup.com/jquery/form/ Yes a very good work and material where I can learn more ... tnx 1K :) -- Massimiliano Marini - http://www.linuxtime.it/massimilianomarini/ It's easier to invent the future than to predict it. -- Alan Kay ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ie6 submit button error
t many brackets, that's why jQuery always drove me crazy. :D
On 1/25/07, Karl Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bah. I missed a closing bracket.
$(':submit')
.attr('disable','true')
.hide()
.before( $('input src=images/button_submit.png type=image') );
Karl Rudd
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
TM: 7387905
Blog: http://old9.blogsome.com
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] unobtrus
John Beppu wrote: I'd like to also add that Unobtrusive Javascript is just cleaner and easier to understand than the alternative. And here's another aspect I'd like to add: To me UOJS not also means graceful degradation plus separation of JS and HTML, it also means to not add elements to your HTML that have solely the purpose of satisfying some scripting needs, like extra ids, elements and so on (hey Jake, you should like that :-) ). I think jQuery makes UOJS possible like no other library. Prototype with Rails for example gives you the hell of obtrusive JavaScript (they don't care because of all the helpers you still don't have the maintenance nightmare). So if you're using Prototype elsewhere you might tend to stick to these habits... Rey, I think this is an important point to emphasize if not happened yet. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Thickbox incompatible with jQuery 1.1
But if you want something that does a lot more, than why would you be using ThickBox in the first place? There are plenty of other lightboxes out there with bells and whistles you can blow to your hearts content. ThickBox is the lightweight, 'One box to rule them all' solution. Keep it simple, and keep it small, http://codylindley.com/Javascript/257/thickbox-one-box-to-rule-them-all as it was intended to be . Adam Sam Collett wrote: If (or should I say when) Thickbox does a lot more (like transition animations between images in a gallery etc), then the code size would increase. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Thickbox-incompatible-with-jQuery-1.1-tf3063738.html#a8599437 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] unobtrus
To be fair to the Rails people, there is a plugin called UJS for Rails that promotes the use of Unobtrusive Javascript in Rails web applications. http://www.ujs4rails.com/ With that said, I'm not really a big fan of the helpers that Rails provides for generating obtrusive Javascript in your pages. I'm glad that UJS for Rails exists so that Rails programmers can more easily separate their Javascript from their HTML. PS: Sorry about the nightmares. ;-) On 1/25/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Beppu wrote: I'd like to also add that Unobtrusive Javascript is just cleaner and easier to understand than the alternative. And here's another aspect I'd like to add: To me UOJS not also means graceful degradation plus separation of JS and HTML, it also means to not add elements to your HTML that have solely the purpose of satisfying some scripting needs, like extra ids, elements and so on (hey Jake, you should like that :-) ). I think jQuery makes UOJS possible like no other library. Prototype with Rails for example gives you the hell of obtrusive JavaScript (they don't care because of all the helpers you still don't have the maintenance nightmare). So if you're using Prototype elsewhere you might tend to stick to these habits... Rey, I think this is an important point to emphasize if not happened yet. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Another simple JQuery example
Hi guys, Just wanted to post quick piece of code I've developed It is a replacement for js alert function I'll be using. It is a very early stage, but I thought someone may learn from it. code itself is written as plugin and hopefully comments are clear It uses dimensions and bounce plugin from interface. *Only work in FF* http://eboyreal.com/sandbox/jquery/alertBox/alertMessage.html HAPPY AUSTRALIA DAY, OY OY OY :) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Problem with form plugin and xml
anyone?
Dmitrii 'Mamut' Dimandt wrote:
I'm trying to ajaxify my forms. I'm using the forms plugin:
$(#FindHotel).ajaxForm(
{
success: showFormSubmitResult,
dataType: 'xml'
}
);
function showFormSubmitResult(responseText, statusText)
{
alert(responseText);
}
I'm getting 'null' :(
The XML that's returned is valid XML that looks sort of like this. I
wonder what could be the problem :(
data
sort text=Sort by:
item isLast=0 link=/find/hotel/?sort=nameamp;dir=asc
textHotel name/text
image/image
/item
/sort
list
original_set text=You were looking for:
item
!--xhr--
hotel
name=test_hotel
roomdata=405E43495D1748544D4843
name=Тestoviy Otel
noofstars=5*
currency=€
minprice=10
maxprice=61.2
Description
/hotel
rooms
room
name=SNGL
id=1
hid=8
currency=€
minprice=10
maxprice=22.4 /
/rooms
/item
/original_set
/list
/data
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] unobtrus
John Beppu wrote: To be fair to the Rails people, there is a plugin called UJS for Rails that promotes the use of Unobtrusive Javascript in Rails web applications. http://www.ujs4rails.com/ With that said, I'm not really a big fan of the helpers that Rails provides for generating obtrusive Javascript in your pages. I'm glad that UJS for Rails exists so that Rails programmers can more easily separate their Javascript from their HTML. Yeah, I didn't mean to bash Rails. I love it and think it's a great product. The only thing I dislike is just that obtrusive JS thing being the jQuery adopt I am... The UJS plugin is pretty cool as well but I'd prefer a full blown unobtrusive jQuery on Rails plugin of course. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ie6 submit button error
Breaking lines and indenting help.
Blair
On 1/25/07, old9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t many brackets, that's why jQuery always drove me crazy. :D
On 1/25/07, Karl Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bah. I missed a closing bracket.
$(':submit')
.attr('disable','true')
.hide()
.before( $('input src=images/button_submit.png type=image') );
Karl Rudd
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
TM: 7387905
Blog: http://old9.blogsome.com
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Retrieve a from iframe
The only way to use jQuery across frames is to include jQuery in each
frame's source. If they do, then you could do something like:
var a=$(nothing);
$(iframe).each(function(){
if (this.jQuery) a.add(this.jQuery(a));
});
Blair
On 1/25/07, David Gironella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I get all A from all IFRAMES in web?
Thk.
Giro.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Retrieve a from iframe
I cant place code inside Iframe.
Thk.
Giro.
_
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
de Blair McKenzie
Enviado el: jueves, 25 de enero de 2007 12:18
Para: jQuery Discussion.
Asunto: Re: [jQuery] Retrieve a from iframe
The only way to use jQuery across frames is to include jQuery in each
frame's source. If they do, then you could do something like:
var a=$(nothing);
$(iframe).each(function(){
if (this.jQuery ) a.add(this.jQuery(a));
});
Blair
On 1/25/07, David Gironella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I get all A from all IFRAMES in web?
Thk.
Giro.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por http://www.mailscanner.info/
MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que está limpio.
MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers http://www.transtec.co.uk/ por
su apoyo.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Imagebox doesn't work in Safari
hi everyone, i've been trying to integrate interface's imagebox into my site, using jQuery 1.1.1 and Interface 1.1.1. As soon as i'm clicking on an image, the imagebox enters the loading image phase and is stuck there. i've put some debugging code into my site, reading -- alert(jQuery(imageEl)) -- which alerts object in firefox, but no alert box in Safari has anybody already encountered this problem? best regards lukas ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] cant append() form objects
I refactored your function to use jQuery:
function appLayer(id){
//create layerbox
this.$layer = $(div id=' + id + _layer'
class='layerbox'/div).appendTo(#content);
//create form
this.$layer.append(this.$form = $(form id=' + id + _form' name=' +
id + _form' action='index.php' method='post'/form));
//create main div
this.$main = $(div id=' + id + _main'
class='morebox'/div).html(This box should get created, but it doesnt
because form didnt get created).prependTo(this.$form);
}
Interestingly, when I tryed to use this.$form.appendTo(this.$layer) it
didn't work. Is this a bug? Not sure. But this function worked for me.
Blair
On 1/25/07, Jeremy Dill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After upgrading from 1.0.4 to 1.1.1 the following code no longer works.
Please tell me if there is a solution to this issue.
---WORKING HTML TEST PAGE
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml%22%3E
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 /
titletest/title
style
.layerbox{font-size:8pt;text-align:left;padding:10px;margin:20px;border:1px
solid #B2C5EC; background-color:#FCFCFC;float:left;
clear:left;height:200px;width:200px}
/style
script type='text/javascript' src='/js/jquery111.js'/script
/head
body
div id='content'/div
script language=JavaScript
function appLayer(id){
//create layerbox
var layerbox=document.createElement('div');
layerbox.id=id+_layer;
layerbox.className=layerbox;
$(#content).prepend(layerbox);
this.divName=layerbox.id;
this.layerobj=layerbox;
//create form
var frm=document.createElement('form');
frm.id=id+_form;
frm.name=id+_form;
frm.action = index.php;
frm.method = post;
this.frm=frm.id;
//---HERE IS THE PROBLEM-///
$(#+this.divName).append(frm);
//---APPEND DOESNT WORK FOR FORM OBJECT--///
//create main div
var main=document.createElement('div');
main.id=id+_main;
main.className=morebox;
main.innerHTML=This box should get created, but it doesnt because form
didnt get created;
$(#+this.frm).prepend(main);
}
tst=new appLayer('Test');
/script
/body
/html
END PAGE-
The form object does not get created. I don't have any problems appending
other objects such as divs, but the form object won't work anymore.
It works fine in 1.0.4. Try it out.
Thanks in advance.
Jeremy
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Retrieve a from iframe
I test it but firefox 2 say me that I cant access to
HTMLDocument.getElementByTagName
Giro.
_
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
de Blair McKenzie
Enviado el: jueves, 25 de enero de 2007 12:41
Para: jQuery Discussion.
Asunto: Re: [jQuery] Retrieve a from iframe
What about:
var a=$(nothing);
$(iframe).each(function(){
a.add(this.contentDocument.getElementsByTagName(a));
});
On 1/25/07, David Gironella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't place code inside Iframe.
Thk.
Giro.
_
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Blair McKenzie
Enviado el: jueves, 25 de enero de 2007 12:18
Para: jQuery Discussion.
Asunto: Re: [jQuery] Retrieve a from iframe
The only way to use jQuery across frames is to include jQuery in each
frame's source. If they do, then you could do something like:
var a=$(nothing);
$(iframe).each(function(){
if (this.jQuery ) a.add(this.jQuery(a));
});
Blair
On 1/25/07, David Gironella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I get all A from all IFRAMES in web?
Thk.
Giro.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por http://www.mailscanner.info/
MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que está limpio.
MailScanner agradece a transtec http://www.transtec.co.uk/ Computers por
su apoyo.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por http://www.mailscanner.info/
MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que está limpio.
MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers http://www.transtec.co.uk/ por
su apoyo.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] fadeIn fadeOut on timers, elem.style empty error
Hello to you jquery fans out there, Im using innerfade to fade two areas randomly, stopping the random fading when a user hovers a link, showing the assozieated logo for the hovered link. The Problem is that after some time the random fading just stops, while an error is thrown within jquery.js. Error: elem.style has no properties Source File: ../js/jquery.js Line: 12 Its the latest pack available. You can find the Code at http://pastey.net/5487 including some explanatory Comments. Id be pleased if somebody could take a look at it, i could just discard using jquery fadeIn but im trying to learn from it :) greetings, Jonas Wolff ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Retrieve a from iframe
Ah. That was my last idea. Sorry Blair On 1/25/07, David Gironella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I test it but firefox 2 say me that I cant access to HTMLDocument.getElementByTagName Giro. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Release: Treeview plugin
I'd like to announce the release of my Treeview plugin for jQuery, which is based on the work of a href=http://be.twixt.us/jquery/;Myles Angell/a. It allows you to take nested unordered lists and convert them into a collapsable and expandable tree. It provides options to animate toggling, display the tree collapsed at first, select certain branches to start open or closed, and to create a tree controller to collapse, expand or toggle all branches at once. Documentation, a demo, downloads can all be found on the a href=http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-treeview/;Treeview plugin page/a. Have fun using the treeview, your feedback is of course appreciated. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Release: Treeview plugin
On 1/25/07, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to announce the release of my Treeview plugin for jQuery, which is based on the work of a href=http://be.twixt.us/jquery/;Myles Angell/a. It allows you to take nested unordered lists and convert them into a collapsable and expandable tree. It provides options to animate toggling, display the tree collapsed at first, select certain branches to start open or closed, and to create a tree controller to collapse, expand or toggle all branches at once. Documentation, a demo, downloads can all be found on the a href=http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-treeview/;Treeview plugin page/a. Have fun using the treeview, your feedback is of course appreciated. I tried it recently, and it's excellent. And I want to know if it can support live modify, just like : add , remove, change? And I don't know if it uses metadata plugin, because I don't see there is any invoke to metadata, and I remove metadata from demo html page, there is no bugs at all. -- I like python! UliPad The Python Editor: http://wiki.woodpecker.org.cn/moin/UliPad My Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Release: Treeview plugin
Thank you so much Jörn, it's really good although animations it's not beautiful @ my IE. Anyway, i'd like to know how the plugin detected the actions inside #treecontrol? reading textNodes inside a? 2007/1/25, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd like to announce the release of my Treeview plugin for jQuery, which is based on the work of a href=http://be.twixt.us/jquery/;Myles Angell/a. It allows you to take nested unordered lists and convert them into a collapsable and expandable tree. It provides options to animate toggling, display the tree collapsed at first, select certain branches to start open or closed, and to create a tree controller to collapse, expand or toggle all branches at once. Documentation, a demo, downloads can all be found on the a href=http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-treeview/ Treeview plugin page/a. Have fun using the treeview, your feedback is of course appreciated. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Rafael Santos Sà :: webdeveloper www.rafael-santos.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Some Firefox search plugins I made
*g funny, but i think ill use it, thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Some-Firefox-search-plugins-I-made-tf3097158.html#a8612971 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] dropdown menu with IE select fix?
It just needs to be applied to the element that *should* show up on top of a select in IE. -- Brandon Aaron On 1/24/07, rolfsf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What element would I apply bgiframe to - the select or the nested lists in the menu? I've played a bit with the lists but it's not working yet. Sure, just use the bgiframe plugin found in the plugins svn. http://jquery.com/dev/svn/trunk/plugins/bgiframe/bgiframe.js?format=txt -- Brandon Aaron -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/dropdown-menu-with-IE-select-fix--tf3084885.html#a8594257 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Select Box
me=document.getElementById('subselect');
for(var i = 0;i me.length;i++) {
if(me.options[i].selected == true){
}
}
Doesn't this work?
$(#subselect option:selected).each(function(){
// do something with selected options
});
The plugin is good if you are adding/removing options a lot.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] API-Draft Looks great!
This may have already been dicussed, but I just now noticed it. Has anyone looked at http://joern.jquery.com/api-draft/cat.xml#cat recently? It now contains the different sections of the API in a collapsible tree-view. I think this is Jörn's baby (the link contains 'joern' so I'm making that guess. I can't remember from the original thread that talked about this site), and my hat's off to you, man! I really like the Wiki docs on the main jQuery site, but often times I find myself using this particular version of the API. Very nice. :o) Cheers, Chris -- http://cjordan.info ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Thickbox incompatible with jQuery 1.1
On 25/01/07, agent2026 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But if you want something that does a lot more, than why would you be using ThickBox in the first place? There are plenty of other lightboxes out there with bells and whistles you can blow to your hearts content. ThickBox is the lightweight, 'One box to rule them all' solution. Keep it simple, and keep it small, http://codylindley.com/Javascript/257/thickbox-one-box-to-rule-them-all as it was intended to be . Adam You keep a simple core, but it would be nice if other developers could use Thickbox as a base for their 'own bells and whistles'. Get a good solid base for others to build on, rather than them needing to do their own from scratch (so they don't need to work out how to centre on the page, overlay page content, resize images etc). e.g. In your html page add thickbox: script type=text/javascript src=thickbox.js/script And add the class 'thickbox' to anything you want to show in one. Want it to look better (like adding transparency or transitions)? Just include another script: script type=text/javascript src=thickbox-addon-fancy.js/script No need to change your JavaScript (or even know JavaScript). Like you say - 'one box to rule them all'. If developers want to have something else thickbox isn't a choice. Having it modular means that they can use it without going somewhere else and needing prototype or changing a lot of code. Sam Collett wrote: If (or should I say when) Thickbox does a lot more (like transition animations between images in a gallery etc), then the code size would increase. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Thickbox-incompatible-with-jQuery-1.1-tf3063738.html#a8599437 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] cant append() form objects
Is this just in IE or in other browsers too?
--
Brandon Aaron
On 1/24/07, Jeremy Dill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After upgrading from 1.0.4 to 1.1.1 the following code no longer works.
Please tell me if there is a solution to this issue.
---WORKING HTML TEST
PAGE
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 /
titletest/title
style
.layerbox{font-size:8pt;text-align:left;padding:10px;margin:20px;border:1px
solid #B2C5EC; background-color:#FCFCFC;float:left;
clear:left;height:200px;width:200px}
/style
script type='text/javascript'
src='/js/jquery111.js'/script
/head
body
div id='content'/div
script language=JavaScript
function appLayer(id){
//create layerbox
var layerbox=document.createElement('div');
layerbox.id=id+_layer;
layerbox.className=layerbox;
$(#content).prepend(layerbox);
this.divName=layerbox.id;
this.layerobj=layerbox;
//create form
var frm=document.createElement('form');
frm.id=id+_form;
frm.name=id+_form;
frm.action = index.php;
frm.method = post;
this.frm=frm.id;
//---HERE IS THE PROBLEM-///
$(#+this.divName).append(frm);
//---APPEND DOESNT WORK FOR FORM OBJECT--///
//create main div
var main=document.createElement('div');
main.id=id+_main;
main.className=morebox;
main.innerHTML=This box should get created, but it doesnt because form
didnt get created;
$(#+this.frm).prepend(main);
}
tst=new appLayer('Test');
/script
/body
/html
END PAGE-
The form object does not get created. I don't have any problems appending
other objects such as divs, but the form object won't work anymore.
It works fine in 1.0.4. Try it out.
Thanks in advance.
Jeremy
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Giving up regular DOCTYPES
Hi !
I'm new to the list, and to jQuery too (I've played a little with
prototype, but jquery realy seems worth a try)
This is an example I think, where using your own attributes gets
useful, not to say necessary :
I'm writing a calendar where user can select a days range clicking on
the first day of the range, then on the second one.
User can only select, say, ranges from january 24th to march 15th.
When first day is selected, I want to have the days before the first
area change style when the second day is hover'ed
So this is how I would do this :
div class=calendarmonthh3January/h3
div class=calendarday1/div
div class=calendarday2/div
div class=calendarday23/div
div selectableday=1 class=calendarday24/div
div selectableday=2 class=calendarday25/div
.
div selectableday=41 class=calendarday15/div
/div
On hover of day D2, while day D1 was selected, I just have to change
style of the divs of class calendarday with selectableday attribute
lower than D1's selectableday attribute and greater than D2's
selectableday attribute.
Do you think of a better way, without using a custom attribute (I'm
not 100% sure but seems like you can't use numeric classes nor id
right ?)
Le 25 janv. 07 à 04:13, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ a écrit :
I gave up relying on custom doctypes when I realized no matter how
nice a dtd I made, the only use was at the validaters! I looked around
for syntax driven editors, and found only a few and they were schema
based!
Now I just use XHTML 1.1 and play my own tricks... with the help of
jquery!
h1 class=editable is just fine for me.
On 1/24/07, zelexir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I had a wakeup call the other day when looking for a solution
to a
problem of mine when I bumped into this:
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/own-dtd.html Creating your own
DTD for
HTML validation .
So I'm wondering, why this isn't more widespread.
Now I can write code like this: h1 editable=trueThis is a
topic/h1 and
still make validation (not for the standard but for my edited
version of
one).
So I made a few changes in a edit in place script I'm working on,
and I
gotta say it makes the source much more readable.
so instead of
h1 id=topic-5-news class=editableLineThis is the topic of news
nr5/h1
I get
h1 db=news field=topic unique=5 editable=lineThis is the
topic of
news nr5/h1
Or like I'm using it:
div db=news unique=5
h1 field=topic editable=trueThis is the topic of news
nr5/h1
div field=content editable=trueThis is a editable
paragraph/div
/div
and with jQuery I'm able to use the selectors $('h1
[editable=true]') to
generate a input field and $('div[editable=true]') to generate a
WYSIWYG
editor.
I get the current table and unique id from checking the parent div's
parameters, and the field from the current element.
Ok so this is getting a little long, but why oh why, havn't I
thought of
this before? And whats the catch?!
I'ts late and I really gotta get some sleep, but I would love to
hear some
input in this from fellow JQuery users, we do want our code to be
easy to
read, don't we? :P
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Giving-up-
regular-DOCTYPES-tf3095989.html#a8595317
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Why am I getting this error message?
Thanks, Adam... Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of agent2026 Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:55 AM To: discuss@jquery.com Subject: Re: [jQuery] Why am I getting this error message? Actually he's not trying to debug in IE, he's testing in IE and getting that error. @Rick: The error you're getting may be caused by http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/843/ this bug . Basically you need to change your settings of zIndex to a string. Adam ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Giving up regular DOCTYPES
arnaud sellenet schrieb: Do you think of a better way, without using a custom attribute (I'm not 100% sure but seems like you can't use numeric classes nor id right ?) Yes you have a way. Append a second class, so: div class=calendarmonthh3January/h3 div class=calendarday1/div div class=calendarday2/div div class=calendarday23/div div class=calendarday selectableday124/div div class=calendarday selectableday225/div . div class=calendarday selectableday4115/div /div Then strip the string selectableday from the class in the script and you have the numbers from custom attribute to do what you will. -- Viele Grüße, Olaf --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://olaf-bosch.de www.akitafreund.de --- ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] help with append
I've been toying with this backwards and forwards and I can't get
it...have tried using 'after' as well.
I'm trying to append a paragraph with an ID of 'dhtml'. In the past,
this worked, but it was not inserting the line within the paragraph...
$('div#dhtml').html(html);
My best guess has me thinking that this should work (inserting/
appending the info inside of the paragraph), but it is clearly
failing here:
$('p#dhtml').append(html(html));
Am I missing something obvious here?
Thanks...
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Effect function runs twice
This might stupid question but how do I get version 1.1.1? The one I just downloaded from jquery.org is 1.1. On 1/22/07, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: looks like twice firing clicks was fixed in 1.1.1! On 1/21/07, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is it really hiding 2 times... or a jerky hide of a tiny label? make the label much larger and try hide(1) for a very very slow hide! On 1/21/07, Jon Ege Ronnenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Uhh I forgot to tell ya that you can see it live here: http://www.postcards.dk/jon-test/newsletter.php Regards, Jon. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ -- Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Presentacular rewrite with jQuery?
I just happened onto Presentacular [1] for the S5 slideshow script this morning and was wondering if anyone has rewritten it using jQuery. Shane [1] http://labs.cavorite.com/presentacular/ -- - Bender: Amy, you like cute things so I baked you a pony. - http://www.reefs.org - Where reefkeeping begins on the internet. http://www.advancedaquarist.com - High quality, free monthly publication for the reef keeping hobbyist. http://www.aquaristcourses.org - Distance learning courses for the marine aquarist. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] help with append
On 25/01/07, Vaska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been toying with this backwards and forwards and I can't get
it...have tried using 'after' as well.
I'm trying to append a paragraph with an ID of 'dhtml'. In the past,
this worked, but it was not inserting the line within the paragraph...
$('div#dhtml').html(html);
My best guess has me thinking that this should work (inserting/
appending the info inside of the paragraph), but it is clearly
failing here:
$('p#dhtml').append(html(html));
Am I missing something obvious here?
Thanks...
That would replace the html. To append:
$('#dhtml').append(html)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] API-Draft Looks great!
This may have already been dicussed, but I just now noticed it. Has anyone looked at http://joern.jquery.com/api-draft/cat.xml#cat recently? It now contains the different sections of the API in a collapsible tree-view. I agree. It's really quite nice. And it makes great use of plugins. Great work, Jörn. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Giving up regular DOCTYPES
It is always (if not then atleast almost always) possible to do thing like you describe without using custom attributes, BUT don't you think that arnauds example makes more sense, codewise? That way you can set the attribs easily ($(something).attr(selectableday, 1)) and then get all the selectable days with $([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I've just seen to many examples of javascript tools that use custom strings in every availible attribute there is, for this to make any sense anymore. Is there any downside for using this? On 1/25/07, Olaf Bosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: arnaud sellenet schrieb: Do you think of a better way, without using a custom attribute (I'm not 100% sure but seems like you can't use numeric classes nor id right ?) Yes you have a way. Append a second class, so: div class=calendarmonthh3January/h3 div class=calendarday1/div div class=calendarday2/div div class=calendarday23/div div class=calendarday selectableday124/div div class=calendarday selectableday225/div . div class=calendarday selectableday4115/div /div Then strip the string selectableday from the class in the script and you have the numbers from custom attribute to do what you will. -- Viele Grüße, Olaf --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://olaf-bosch.de www.akitafreund.de --- ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- —— Med Vänliga Hälsningar Kristinn Kiddi Sigmundsson 0707-971938 —— ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Release: Treeview plugin
limodou schrieb: I tried it recently, and it's excellent. And I want to know if it can support live modify, just like : add , remove, change? Well, so far it's only a tree*view* plugin. But it should be a good basis for further work in that area. And I don't know if it uses metadata plugin, because I don't see there is any invoke to metadata, and I remove metadata from demo html page, there is no bugs at all. I had plans for using the metadata plugin, but dropped them. The release doesn't contain the link anymore. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Release: Treeview plugin
Rafael Santos schrieb: Thank you so much Jörn, it's really good although animations it's not beautiful @ my IE. Anyway, i'd like to know how the plugin detected the actions inside #treecontrol? reading textNodes inside a? Take a look at the treeController function inside the plugin. It simply assigns click events to the three elements inside the control. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Easy DOM Creation plugin not working as expected.
Hey guys and gals,
I am using the Dom creation plugin and when I pass the json information I
get nothing in return. Below is the function I use:
buildScenarioTableList = function(list){
$.tpl(list, function(){
return [
'tr', { 'class':MyTableRow }, [
'td', { 'class':MyTableCol2 }, [ 'nbsp;' ],
'td', { 'class':MyTableCol1 }, [ this.active ],
'td', { 'class':MyTableCol2 }, [ this.name ],
'td', { 'class':MyTableCol2 }, [ this.desc ],
'td', { 'class':MyTableCol2 }, [ this.id ],
'td', { 'class':MyTableCol2 }, [ this.id ],
'td', { 'class':MyTableCol2 }, [ this.id ]]
];
}).appendTo($('#fill-table tbody'));
}
This is the info being passed:
{[id: 2, active: 'yes', name: 'Simple', desc: 'This is the
description'],[id: 3, active: 'yes', name: 'Simple', desc: 'This is the
description']}
The url in question: http://ov.informationexperts.com/index.htm (you will
need to login, just put anything in those two fields and hit submit) or
execute this function in firebug: buildECS(); You will see a table with
active, name.
Thanks,
--
Benjamin Sterling
http://KenzoMedia.com
http://KenzoHosting.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Easy-DOM-Creation-plugin-not-working-as-expected.-tf3115987.html#a8631065
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] External or anonymous function - which is best?
PragueExpat schrieb:
My question: is it better to define this function as above and pass this
or to define an anonymous function within the .each statement? I read that
the above method only has to compile the function once, as opposed to a
re-compile each time the (anonymous) function runs. What is the recommend
way of doing this?
I'd like to quote here:
We *should* forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time:
premature optimizations is the root of all evil. - Donal E. Knuth
We follow two rules in the matter of optimization:
Rule 1. Don't do it.
Rule 2 (for experts only). Don't do it yet - that is, not until you have
perfectly clear and unoptimized solution.
In other words: Write clean and succinct code! Something like this:
$(function(){
function resizeDiv(){
var x = $(this);
if(x.height() 600){
x.css(height, 600);
}
};
$(#mydiv).each(resizeDiv);
});
And in case you don't use that function anywhere else:
$(function(){
$(#mydiv).each(function(){
var x = $(this);
if(x.height() 600){
x.css(height,600);
}
}
);
});
The cleaner your code, the easier it is to optimize later, but only
where really appropiate. Firebug's profiler is a great tool for that issue.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Getting Started with the Form Plugin
For anyone seeking information about how to manage forms with jQuery, I've just updated the Form Plugin example page at: http://malsup.com/jquery/form/ You can find a quick start guide, API docs, examples, a FAQ and more. Mike ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Getting Started with the Form Plugin
Mike Alsup schrieb: For anyone seeking information about how to manage forms with jQuery, I've just updated the Form Plugin example page at: http://malsup.com/jquery/form/ You can find a quick start guide, API docs, examples, a FAQ and more. Great work on that page, Mike! And another great example of some jQuery plugins at work, especailly tabs history and chili. Did you use a (modified) version of my docTool for the API? -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] External or anonymous function - which is best?
Thanks, that makes sense. One more thing - after this code runs, is the
resizeDiv function in the global namespace, in a persistant JQuery object,
or garbage collected?
- Original Message -
From: Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jQuery Discussion. discuss@jquery.com
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [jQuery] External or anonymous function - which is best?
PragueExpat schrieb:
My question: is it better to define this function as above and pass this
or to define an anonymous function within the .each statement? I read that
the above method only has to compile the function once, as opposed to a
re-compile each time the (anonymous) function runs. What is the recommend
way of doing this?
I'd like to quote here:
We *should* forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time:
premature optimizations is the root of all evil. - Donal E. Knuth
We follow two rules in the matter of optimization:
Rule 1. Don't do it.
Rule 2 (for experts only). Don't do it yet - that is, not until you have
perfectly clear and unoptimized solution.
In other words: Write clean and succinct code! Something like this:
$(function(){
function resizeDiv(){
var x = $(this);
if(x.height() 600){
x.css(height, 600);
}
};
$(#mydiv).each(resizeDiv);
});
And in case you don't use that function anywhere else:
$(function(){
$(#mydiv).each(function(){
var x = $(this);
if(x.height() 600){
x.css(height,600);
}
}
);
});
The cleaner your code, the easier it is to optimize later, but only
where really appropiate. Firebug's profiler is a great tool for that issue.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Getting Started with the Form Plugin
Jörn Zaefferer wrote: Mike Alsup schrieb: For anyone seeking information about how to manage forms with jQuery, I've just updated the Form Plugin example page at: http://malsup.com/jquery/form/ You can find a quick start guide, API docs, examples, a FAQ and more. Great work on that page, Mike! And another great example of some jQuery plugins at work, especailly tabs history and chili. Yeah, nice! Thanks for using... -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] External or anonymous function - which is best?
Prague Expat schrieb: Thanks, that makes sense. One more thing - after this code runs, is the resizeDiv function in the global namespace, in a persistant JQuery object, or garbage collected? The DOM ready function provides a private scope, therefore the function shouldn't be visible anywhere else, so to my knowledge, it is available for garbage collection. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Getting Started with the Form Plugin
Mike Alsup wrote: For anyone seeking information about how to manage forms with jQuery, I've just updated the Form Plugin example page at: http://malsup.com/jquery/form/ You can find a quick start guide, API docs, examples, a FAQ and more. Mike I like how you combined bookmarkable and non bookmarkable tabs and seeing that it actually works! :-) -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] External or anonymous function - which is best?
$(document).ready(function(){
function resizeDiv(that){
var x = $(that);
if(x.height() 600){
x.css(height,600px);
}
};
$(#mydiv).each(function(){resizeDiv(this)});
});
My question: is it better to define this function as above
and pass this or to define an anonymous function within
the .each statement? I read that the above method only
has to compile the function once, as opposed to a re-compile
each time the (anonymous) function runs.
Functions are compiled to bytecode once, not each time they are executed.
Maybe someone was talking about the Function constructor which takes a
string argument and does compile the function each time you execute the
constructor?
What is the recommend way of doing this?
Well, there's certainly no reason to use *two* functions here. You could
write the code either with a single anonymous function or a single named
function, as shown in Jörn's two examples, whichever you prefer.
-Mike
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] simple selector with ID doesn't work anymore
I have a somewhat similar problem with ID selectors, and I posted a message
about it and a bug but so far I haven't gotten a single response from anyone
(here's the bug: http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/881/).
My problem is IDs preceded by a class or another ID (i.e. .myClass #myId
or #firstId #secondId). It's causing an exception in the jquery code on
this line:
if ( m[1] == # ret[ret.length-1].getElementById ) {
I don't know if it's related to yours or not.
-Jennifer
Hi,
I've just upgraded from 1.0.3 to 1.1.1 and some selectors don't work
anymore.
A simple selector like $(div#tab_1) cant' find the div div id=tab_1
in v1.1.1 while there was no problem with v1.0.3 .
So unless the selecting philosophy has greatly changed between these two
versions, I guess this is a pretty important bug.
It seems to be OK on 1.0.4 though, but I have a $(document).ready is not
a function error.
Can somebody tell me if I'm wrong or if it's a bug ?
Thanks in advance
--
Vincent FUCHS
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/simple-selector-with-ID-doesn%27t-work-anymore-tf3080046.html#a8636549
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Getting Started with the Form Plugin
Did you use a (modified) version of my docTool for the API? Hi Jörn, Unfortunately I already had that part done when you posted about your docTool! When I get time I may update that page using the docTool because it provides some extra bits that I didn't include (tooltips, etc). But first I want to get some more examples out there. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Getting Started with the Form Plugin
Mike Alsup schrieb: Did you use a (modified) version of my docTool for the API? Hi Jörn, Unfortunately I already had that part done when you posted about your docTool! When I get time I may update that page using the docTool because it provides some extra bits that I didn't include (tooltips, etc). But first I want to get some more examples out there. Ok then. I'm gonna update it soon. The version I used for the treeview plugin now supports @option tags. I'd also like to use Chili for the API browser. Looks like I have the same problem that you had. What exactly did you modify to get it working? -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Why won't this code work?
The link Toggle the Box and the boxed text show up on the page,
but the boxed text is not hidden and the link does not toggle the box.
What's wrong?
Rick
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
html
head
titlejQuery Slick Box/title
script type=text/javascript src=jquery.js
$(document).ready(function() {
// hides the slickbox as soon as the DOM is ready
// (a little sooner than page load)
$('#slickbox').hide();
});
// toggles the slickbox on clicking the noted link
$('a#slick-toggle').click(function() {
$('#slickbox').toggle(400);
return false;
});
/script
/head
body
pa href=# id=slick-toggleToggle the Box/a/p
br
div id=slickbox style=background: #EEE; border: 1px solid #900; height:
15px;
This is the box that will be shown and hidden and toggled at your whim.
It has inline styles, which typically is a bad thing, but for the sake of
our demonstration, we'll let it slide, right?
/div
/body
/html
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] cant append() form objects
With Jquery 1.1.1
Firefox 1.5 - Fails
Firefox 2.0 - Fails
IE 6.0 - Fails
IE 7.0 - Fails
With Jquery 1.0.4
Firefox 1.5 - Works
Firefox 2.0 - Works
IE 6.0 - Works
IE 7.0 - Works
Seems to be fairly consistant at least across these browsers.
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] cant append() form objects
Is this just in IE or in other browsers too?
--
Brandon Aaron
On 1/24/07, Jeremy Dill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After upgrading from 1.0.4 to 1.1.1 the following code no longer works.
Please tell me if there is a solution to this issue.
---WORKING HTML TEST
PAGE
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1 / titletest/title style
.layerbox{font-size:8pt;text-align:left;padding:10px;margin:20px;borde
r:1px solid #B2C5EC; background-color:#FCFCFC;float:left;
clear:left;height:200px;width:200px}
/style
script type='text/javascript'
src='/js/jquery111.js'/script
/head
body
div id='content'/div
script language=JavaScript
function appLayer(id){
//create layerbox
var layerbox=document.createElement('div');
layerbox.id=id+_layer;
layerbox.className=layerbox;
$(#content).prepend(layerbox);
this.divName=layerbox.id;
this.layerobj=layerbox;
//create form
var frm=document.createElement('form');
frm.id=id+_form;
frm.name=id+_form;
frm.action = index.php;
frm.method = post;
this.frm=frm.id;
//---HERE IS THE PROBLEM-///
$(#+this.divName).append(frm);
//---APPEND DOESNT WORK FOR FORM OBJECT--///
//create main div
var main=document.createElement('div');
main.id=id+_main;
main.className=morebox;
main.innerHTML=This box should get created, but it doesnt because
form didnt get created; $(#+this.frm).prepend(main); } tst=new
appLayer('Test'); /script /body /html
END PAGE-
The form object does not get created. I don't have any problems
appending other objects such as divs, but the form object won't work
anymore.
It works fine in 1.0.4. Try it out.
Thanks in advance.
Jeremy
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Getting Started with the Form Plugin
I'd also like to use Chili for the API browser. Looks like I have the same problem that you had. What exactly did you modify to get it working? Yeah, I like Chili a lot. I made a couple changes for optimization because I didn't want unnecessary server calls and there were a couple minor bugs bug Andrea is rolling these changes/fixes into the next rev. Note that Opera support is still pending (I disable Chili for Opera for now). ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Getting Started with the Form Plugin
Recently I've started using the form plugin and I've noticed in firebug that the X-Requested-With header is not being sended for POSTs requests. GETs work fine. I'm using last versions for both jquery and form plugin and Firefox 2.0 is it normal behaviour or do I loosing something? Jip, I just tried both 'get' and 'post' and both are sending the proper headers. $.ajax (which is what the form plugin uses) *always* set the X-Requested-With header. Do you have a sample page? Mike ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Why won't this code work?
Hi,
$(document).ready(function() {
// hides the slickbox as soon as the DOM is ready
// (a little sooner than page load)
$('#slickbox').hide();
});
// toggles the slickbox on clicking the noted link
$('a#slick-toggle').click(function() {
$('#slickbox').toggle(400);
return false;
});
try it this way:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#slickbox').hide();
$('a#slick-toggle').click(function() {
$('#slickbox').toggle(400);
return false;
});
});
Then the Element behind $('a#slick-toggle') does exist when you try to use it.
BTW.: If you are shure, that the id slick-toggle is alway a a-element, you
will be off better with $('#slick-toggle'). In that case jQuery can simply
use document.getElementById(). I am not shure about jQuery 1.1, but older
Versions with $('a#slick-toggle') would search the whole document tree for
a-tags and check if they have the given id. That is of course a lot slower.
You can even spare another jquery query, but don't expect too much speed up
from that:
$(document).ready(function() {
var sl = $('#slickbox').hide();
$('a#slick-toggle').click(function() {
sl.toggle(400);
return false;
});
});
Since you already use an id here, the second query doesn't really take much
time.
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] unobtrus
All, Okay, I am confused by the responses and maybe it's my own fault for asking the question the way that I did. We are on board with the idea of keeping the presentation and behavior separate for both flexibility and maintainability of the application. In fact all of our client applications for both Windows and the Web are design this way to facilitate their maintenance and enhancement. We have an extensive component plug-in library that makes our development of very powerful business applications a snap. This is one of the reasons that we were drawn to JQuery when we discovered it. What my question should have been relates to the issue of graceful degradation of the Web application. Is it important for us to be concerned with our Web portal applications degrading gracefully if the user has scripting disabled in their browser? Mark D. Lincoln Mark D. Lincoln, Director of Research Development Eye On Solutions, LLC (866) 253-9366x101 www.eyeonsolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:26 AM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] unobtrus It's easy to lump 'crap html' with 'requiring javascript'... both are undesirable! Whereas the former has no merit, the latter is sometimes required for the presentation of beautiful sites! John's description of 'crap html' shows just how bad the nightmare can be! So let's all end the nightmare,with jQuery css to the rescue! On 1/24/07, John Beppu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to also add that Unobtrusive Javascript is just cleaner and easier to understand than the alternative. When I try to analyze a page that has tons of Javascript mixed with HTML, it can be very difficult see what's going on. Contrast that with the unobtrusive approach where you can use CSS selectors or XPath queries to grab the elements you care about and apply behaviours to them.If you're good at naming your CSS classes and ids, the code you end up with has the potential to be so much cleaner and so much more beautiful. I don't even think it's more work to take this approach. It's not a hassle compared to the maintenance nightmare you might face otherwise with entagled Javascript and HTML. The Separation of Concerns is a good thing. Many significant advances in the art of programming have been through people figuring out ways to separating concerns from each other. MVC separates Models, Views, and Controllers from each other -- the benefit is understandability. Using HTML for content and CSS for presentation is another form of separation where two aspects of display have been separated, and again, this makes things easier to understand and way more flexible, because now the 2 parts can vary independently. Javascript being separated from HTML is yet another step in this direction. If you're not sold on the general principles behind separating concerns, try to imagine the opposite. Imagine... a PHP page that makes SQL queries right before it populates a big HTML table that makes heavy use of nested tables for layout but also has some inlined CSS via the style attribute, and to top it all off the HTML is littered with onclick handlers and script tags at various places in the page. Now imagine a whole web site built this way. (PAIN) That's what we're trying to get away from. That's why we (as programmers) are always coming up with new ways to separate concerns. It's a trend that you ignore at your own peril. (I'm not sure what possessed me to write so much, but I gotta post that to my blog ;-) On 1/24/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote: there are a million reasons to separate js from the html! but UOJS is the ability for a page to still work without javascript. A very admirable feature! I'd say accessibility is one - obviously the most important - aspect of UOJS. You could probably code accessible without separating js and html but since the whole UOJS movement started adherers also consider separation good practice. I pretty much believe that this separation is part of UOJS, but hey, nowhere is there an official definition so in the end it's just another personal opinion. And yes of course, it is admirable :-) Everybody should be doing it! -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] unobtrus
Hi Mark, It seems that in this very 'controlled' situation, you shouldn't have to be too concerned with it. They aren't web based so you don't have to cater to every situation. You set the bar for the requirements of your portal, so it's more like software. You have to have XYZ to run it, period. -Marshall -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D. Lincoln Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:51 AM To: 'jQuery Discussion.' Subject: Re: [jQuery] unobtrus All, Okay, I am confused by the responses and maybe it's my own fault for asking the question the way that I did. We are on board with the idea of keeping the presentation and behavior separate for both flexibility and maintainability of the application. In fact all of our client applications for both Windows and the Web are design this way to facilitate their maintenance and enhancement. We have an extensive component plug-in library that makes our development of very powerful business applications a snap. This is one of the reasons that we were drawn to JQuery when we discovered it. What my question should have been relates to the issue of graceful degradation of the Web application. Is it important for us to be concerned with our Web portal applications degrading gracefully if the user has scripting disabled in their browser? Mark D. Lincoln Mark D. Lincoln, Director of Research Development Eye On Solutions, LLC (866) 253-9366x101 www.eyeonsolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:26 AM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] unobtrus It's easy to lump 'crap html' with 'requiring javascript'... both are undesirable! Whereas the former has no merit, the latter is sometimes required for the presentation of beautiful sites! John's description of 'crap html' shows just how bad the nightmare can be! So let's all end the nightmare,with jQuery css to the rescue! On 1/24/07, John Beppu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to also add that Unobtrusive Javascript is just cleaner and easier to understand than the alternative. When I try to analyze a page that has tons of Javascript mixed with HTML, it can be very difficult see what's going on. Contrast that with the unobtrusive approach where you can use CSS selectors or XPath queries to grab the elements you care about and apply behaviours to them.If you're good at naming your CSS classes and ids, the code you end up with has the potential to be so much cleaner and so much more beautiful. I don't even think it's more work to take this approach. It's not a hassle compared to the maintenance nightmare you might face otherwise with entagled Javascript and HTML. The Separation of Concerns is a good thing. Many significant advances in the art of programming have been through people figuring out ways to separating concerns from each other. MVC separates Models, Views, and Controllers from each other -- the benefit is understandability. Using HTML for content and CSS for presentation is another form of separation where two aspects of display have been separated, and again, this makes things easier to understand and way more flexible, because now the 2 parts can vary independently. Javascript being separated from HTML is yet another step in this direction. If you're not sold on the general principles behind separating concerns, try to imagine the opposite. Imagine... a PHP page that makes SQL queries right before it populates a big HTML table that makes heavy use of nested tables for layout but also has some inlined CSS via the style attribute, and to top it all off the HTML is littered with onclick handlers and script tags at various places in the page. Now imagine a whole web site built this way. (PAIN) That's what we're trying to get away from. That's why we (as programmers) are always coming up with new ways to separate concerns. It's a trend that you ignore at your own peril. (I'm not sure what possessed me to write so much, but I gotta post that to my blog ;-) On 1/24/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote: there are a million reasons to separate js from the html! but UOJS is the ability for a page to still work without javascript. A very admirable feature! I'd say accessibility is one - obviously the most important - aspect of UOJS. You could probably code accessible without separating js and html but since the whole UOJS movement started adherers also consider separation good practice. I pretty much believe that this separation is part of UOJS, but hey, nowhere is there an official definition so in the end it's just another personal opinion. And yes of course, it is admirable :-) Everybody should be doing it! -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list
Re: [jQuery] unobtrus
Mark, Having come from the corporate world, I fully understand your question and here's my perspective. If you effectively control your application's usage requirements (ie: browser, browser features, OS, hardware, etc), then you have the ultimate say in which direction to head to. It sounds like you do and you fully disclose that to your target audience. While I always recommend coding in an unobtrusive way, you can effectively develop your app without regard for that because of special needs of you application and the fact that you make the requirements mandatory. If you're web application was targeting a much broader audience where you have less controls over the requirements listed above, then I would certainly tell you that you should take graceful degradation seriously as you're more likely to encounter issues beyond your control. I would still recommend that you seriously consider the advice given by many of the folks here because you never know if you'd one day like to take your portal system to a much broader audience. Rey.. Mark D. Lincoln wrote: All, Okay, I am confused by the responses and maybe it's my own fault for asking the question the way that I did. We are on board with the idea of keeping the presentation and behavior separate for both flexibility and maintainability of the application. In fact all of our client applications for both Windows and the Web are design this way to facilitate their maintenance and enhancement. We have an extensive component plug-in library that makes our development of very powerful business applications a snap. This is one of the reasons that we were drawn to JQuery when we discovered it. What my question should have been relates to the issue of graceful degradation of the Web application. Is it important for us to be concerned with our Web portal applications degrading gracefully if the user has scripting disabled in their browser? Mark D. Lincoln Mark D. Lincoln, Director of Research Development Eye On Solutions, LLC (866) 253-9366x101 www.eyeonsolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:26 AM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] unobtrus It's easy to lump 'crap html' with 'requiring javascript'... both are undesirable! Whereas the former has no merit, the latter is sometimes required for the presentation of beautiful sites! John's description of 'crap html' shows just how bad the nightmare can be! So let's all end the nightmare,with jQuery css to the rescue! On 1/24/07, John Beppu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to also add that Unobtrusive Javascript is just cleaner and easier to understand than the alternative. When I try to analyze a page that has tons of Javascript mixed with HTML, it can be very difficult see what's going on. Contrast that with the unobtrusive approach where you can use CSS selectors or XPath queries to grab the elements you care about and apply behaviours to them.If you're good at naming your CSS classes and ids, the code you end up with has the potential to be so much cleaner and so much more beautiful. I don't even think it's more work to take this approach. It's not a hassle compared to the maintenance nightmare you might face otherwise with entagled Javascript and HTML. The Separation of Concerns is a good thing. Many significant advances in the art of programming have been through people figuring out ways to separating concerns from each other. MVC separates Models, Views, and Controllers from each other -- the benefit is understandability. Using HTML for content and CSS for presentation is another form of separation where two aspects of display have been separated, and again, this makes things easier to understand and way more flexible, because now the 2 parts can vary independently. Javascript being separated from HTML is yet another step in this direction. If you're not sold on the general principles behind separating concerns, try to imagine the opposite. Imagine... a PHP page that makes SQL queries right before it populates a big HTML table that makes heavy use of nested tables for layout but also has some inlined CSS via the style attribute, and to top it all off the HTML is littered with onclick handlers and script tags at various places in the page. Now imagine a whole web site built this way. (PAIN) That's what we're trying to get away from. That's why we (as programmers) are always coming up with new ways to separate concerns. It's a trend that you ignore at your own peril. (I'm not sure what possessed me to write so much, but I gotta post that to my blog ;-) On 1/24/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote: there are a million reasons to separate js from the html! but UOJS is the ability for a page to still work without javascript. A very
Re: [jQuery] unobtrus
Is it important for us to be concerned with our Web portal applications degrading gracefully if the user has scripting disabled in their browser? That's a question only you (and your team and your managers) can answer. But don't code yourself into a corner if you don't have to. Consider what happens next year when your sales team has a big fish on the line but the sale is contingent on portal access via mobile browser. How fast can you adapt to new requirements like that? Requirements *always* change - usually before you've even satisfied the first round of them. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Using jQuery Ajax to save PhotoNotes
Hello everyone. I am a jQuery newbie. Help! I recently found a really useful image annotation javascript code called PhotoNotes. http://www.dustyd.net/projects/PhotoNotes . Unfortunately, it did not come with an example code on saving PhotoNotes notes using any ajax library to get me started- I prefer jQuery though my javascript knowledge is very limited. If you can kindly look into PhotoNotes and give me any suggestions to get me started, that will be great. Thanks. Moises ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Why won't this code work?
Hi, Christof...
Thanks for the suggestion, but that didn't work either...same response as
before.
I wonder...on the source of the demo page showing this effect, there is
reference
to both the jquery.js file and another file, examples.js, which I don't have
access to
or reference in my code to.
script src=/scripts/jquery.js type=text/javascript/script
script src=/scripts/examples.js type=text/javascript/script
I wonder if the lack of the second src reference in my code
is preventing this example from working. I was assuming that all the
functionality needed would be contained within jquery.js, itself.
If the author of the examples for
http://www.learningjquery.com/2006/09/slicker-show-and-hide
reads this, would they please make the examples.js code available, if it's
needed?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Christof Donat
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:40 PM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Why won't this code work?
Hi,
$(document).ready(function() {
// hides the slickbox as soon as the DOM is ready
// (a little sooner than page load)
$('#slickbox').hide();
});
// toggles the slickbox on clicking the noted link
$('a#slick-toggle').click(function() {
$('#slickbox').toggle(400);
return false;
});
try it this way:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#slickbox').hide();
$('a#slick-toggle').click(function() {
$('#slickbox').toggle(400);
return false;
});
});
Then the Element behind $('a#slick-toggle') does exist when you try to use
it.
BTW.: If you are shure, that the id slick-toggle is alway a a-element,
you
will be off better with $('#slick-toggle'). In that case jQuery can simply
use document.getElementById(). I am not shure about jQuery 1.1, but older
Versions with $('a#slick-toggle') would search the whole document tree for
a-tags and check if they have the given id. That is of course a lot
slower.
You can even spare another jquery query, but don't expect too much speed up
from that:
$(document).ready(function() {
var sl = $('#slickbox').hide();
$('a#slick-toggle').click(function() {
sl.toggle(400);
return false;
});
});
Since you already use an id here, the second query doesn't really take much
time.
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] unobtrus
Reduce risk by not putting all your eggs in one basket. Eliminate risk by building a damn good basket, and putting all your eggs in it. What do you and your team consider to be a damn good basket? Reliance on a certain environment creates the risk of a single point of failure: if one of things is not there, the whole app goes to pot. Using OUJS—and, for that matter, using every other technology unobtrusively—means that if one component fails, the whole system does not necessarily fail; it degrades. How valuable is that to you? -- Tim is MrGossett ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] scroll buttons on one side in carousel plugin
Thanks for your reply. But I have played enough with the css. Infact most of the things in css do not produce any result. I don't know how but the script generated most of the style and css is not respected for so many things. I wish I could give you examples here. vik Beren wrote: Probably you can work it out with plain CSS instead of touching the code of the script. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/scroll-buttons-on-one-side-in-carousel-plugin-tf3078563.html#a8639970 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] I'm so confused...
I started getting this error message after switching to 1.1 and then 1.1.1,
but then I tried going back to older versions of jQuery, and I'm still
getting the same error! I never got it before I tried the upgrade, though.
And this error is not showing up on our production servers either. I'm
totally mystified why I would be seeing it on my own local development
server but not elsewhere.
Anyone have any ideas as to what's messed up?
By the way, I only get the error in the case where the element that the
selector is looking for is not present on the page.
Thanks for anyone who has any ideas,
Jennifer
jgrucza wrote:
So I'm getting this error message:
ret[ret.length - 1] has no properties
being thrown from this line in the jquery source:
if ( m[1] == # ret[ret.length-1].getElementById ) {
for certain selectors, namely when I have an id preceded by a class or
another id, for example:
$(.myClass #myId)
$(#firstId #secondId)
This was not a problem in previous versions.
Jennifer
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ret-ret.length---1--has-no-properties-tf3065965.html#a8639904
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Changing a browser's starting page
Looking through the docs, I'm not sure that jQuery can do this, but perhaps someone can point me in the right direction? I administer an intranet and we recently changed from intranet.something.com to staff.something.com. Getting 300 users to change their browser's start page to point to the new domain is a chore that will likely not get done for some time. So I thought, JavaScript or jQuery might be of help. If I detect the old domain name, use jQuery to force a change. We mainly use FF2, IE6, and IE7. Any help or suggestions are most welcome. Gerry Danen ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Changing a browser's starting page
So I thought, JavaScript or jQuery might be of help. If I detect the old domain name, use jQuery to force a change. We mainly use FF2, IE6, You should handle this type of redirect on the server. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] unobtrus
Tim, I guess the issue for us is that we want to give our clients as rich a UI as possible both in Windows and the Web and if we focus on degradation, we may have to compromise on the richness of the UI. If you try to use the Google word processor or the Google spreadsheet without scripting enabled, they do little if anything at all. But if you have scripting enabled, they give you a very rich UI similar to a conventional desktop application. This is the type of user interface experience we are looking for in our Web applications, however, it means that graceful degradation is probably out. Mark D. Lincoln Mark D. Lincoln, Director of Research Development Eye On Solutions, LLC (866) 253-9366x101 www.eyeonsolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Gossett Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:16 PM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] unobtrus Reduce risk by not putting all your eggs in one basket. Eliminate risk by building a damn good basket, and putting all your eggs in it. What do you and your team consider to be a damn good basket? Reliance on a certain environment creates the risk of a single point of failure: if one of things is not there, the whole app goes to pot. Using OUJS-and, for that matter, using every other technology unobtrusively-means that if one component fails, the whole system does not necessarily fail; it degrades. How valuable is that to you? -- Tim is MrGossett ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Changing a browser's starting page
Mike, I know I can do DNS forwarding, or PHP forwarding on the login page. I just want to blow the old domain away without everybody calling the help desk. I want to clean house and do for the user what they won't do themselves. Gerry On 1/25/07, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I thought, JavaScript or jQuery might be of help. If I detect the old domain name, use jQuery to force a change. We mainly use FF2, IE6, You should handle this type of redirect on the server. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Changing a browser's starting page
On 1/25/07, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I thought, JavaScript or jQuery might be of help. If I detect the old domain name, use jQuery to force a change. We mainly use FF2, IE6, You should handle this type of redirect on the server. He wants to help users change their browsers start page. It can be done in javascript but users will have to initiate the change by clicking a link: Here's the IE way... http://www.java-scripts.net/javascripts/Set-as-HomePage-Script.phtml You'll have to google for firefox/other browsers if necessairy. You can check the window.location and regex the domain to see which domain they're on and then pop up something in say thickbox (if you want to get snazzy) with a link to click that will change it in their browser. -js ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Changing a browser's starting page
Gerry Danen schrieb: Mike, I know I can do DNS forwarding, or PHP forwarding on the login page. I just want to blow the old domain away without everybody calling the help desk. I want to clean house and do for the user what they won't do themselves. I would give the old domain a static site, content: *Our domain is changed to NEWDOMAIN, please change your bookmarks* you will in 20 sec automatic going to the new domain, or click here www.newdomain.com Then a META refresh after 20 sec When you delete the old Domain then the helpdesk never cane sleep ;) -- Viele Grüße, Olaf --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://olaf-bosch.de www.akitafreund.de --- ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] simple selector with ID doesn't work anymore
Jennifer,
I am far from being an expert, but as you know an id must be
unique..therefore .myClass #myId is not necessary to target
#myId.surely you should only target the idsame with #firstId
#secondIdsimply declare the id that you wish to target
hth
On 25/01/07, jgrucza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a somewhat similar problem with ID selectors, and I posted a
message
about it and a bug but so far I haven't gotten a single response from
anyone
(here's the bug: http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/881/).
My problem is IDs preceded by a class or another ID (i.e. .myClass #myId
or #firstId #secondId). It's causing an exception in the jquery code on
this line:
if ( m[1] == # ret[ret.length-1].getElementById ) {
I don't know if it's related to yours or not.
-Jennifer
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Changing a browser's starting page
I'm pretty sure this would be a MAJOR security breach and I doubt that it's allowed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerry Danen Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:54 PM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: [jQuery] Changing a browser's starting page Looking through the docs, I'm not sure that jQuery can do this, but perhaps someone can point me in the right direction? I administer an intranet and we recently changed from intranet.something.com to staff.something.com. Getting 300 users to change their browser's start page to point to the new domain is a chore that will likely not get done for some time. So I thought, JavaScript or jQuery might be of help. If I detect the old domain name, use jQuery to force a change. We mainly use FF2, IE6, and IE7. Any help or suggestions are most welcome. Gerry Danen ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Changing a browser's starting page
That would be a nightmare if sites could willy nilly change users' start pages. I'm pretty sure there's no way to do this or all the evil spammers in the world would have already done so, right? Jennifer Gerry Danen wrote: Looking through the docs, I'm not sure that jQuery can do this, but perhaps someone can point me in the right direction? I administer an intranet and we recently changed from intranet.something.com to staff.something.com. Getting 300 users to change their browser's start page to point to the new domain is a chore that will likely not get done for some time. So I thought, JavaScript or jQuery might be of help. If I detect the old domain name, use jQuery to force a change. We mainly use FF2, IE6, and IE7. Any help or suggestions are most welcome. Gerry Danen ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Changing-a-browser%27s-starting-page-tf3118721.html#a8640197 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] simple selector with ID doesn't work anymore
Yeah I know that, but consider this situation:
Two different kinds of pages each have an element with the same ID. I want
my Javascript to only affect the element on one of those pages. So I
precede the ID with the class name I use for that page type, to target the
right one. Isn't this a reasonable use case?
Jennifer
Giuliano Marcangelo wrote:
Jennifer,
I am far from being an expert, but as you know an id must be
unique..therefore .myClass #myId is not necessary to target
#myId.surely you should only target the idsame with
#firstId
#secondIdsimply declare the id that you wish to target
hth
On 25/01/07, jgrucza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a somewhat similar problem with ID selectors, and I posted a
message
about it and a bug but so far I haven't gotten a single response from
anyone
(here's the bug: http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/881/).
My problem is IDs preceded by a class or another ID (i.e. .myClass
#myId
or #firstId #secondId). It's causing an exception in the jquery code
on
this line:
if ( m[1] == # ret[ret.length-1].getElementById ) {
I don't know if it's related to yours or not.
-Jennifer
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/simple-selector-with-ID-doesn%27t-work-anymore-tf3080046.html#a8640644
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] simple selector with ID doesn't work anymore
On 1/25/07, jgrucza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Two different kinds of pages each have an element with the same ID. I want my Javascript to only affect the element on one of those pages. So I precede the ID with the class name I use for that page type, to target the right one. Isn't this a reasonable use case? Agreed; Just because element IDs have to be unique doesn't mean that the element has to be in the same place on every page. -- Aaron Heimlich Web Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://aheimlich.freepgs.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] simple selector with ID doesn't work anymore
Hi Giuliano,
I tried to reproduce your problem, but both types of selectors worked
fine for me.
I used jQuery 1.1.1 packed (Rev. 1173).
You can see the test here:
http://test.learningjquery.com/ids.htm
Here is the relevant script and css placed in the head:
script type=text/javascript
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#main-content #first-para').addClass('test1');
$('div#second-para').addClass('test2');
});
/script
style type=text/css media=screen
.test1 {
background: #ff9;
}
.test2 {
background: #cff;
}
/style
And here is the relevant HTML:
div id=main-content
h2ID Issues?/h2
div id=wrapper
Using jQuery 1.1.1 Rev. 1173, packed.
div id=first-para
pApplied selector: code$('#main-content #first-para')/
code, should make the div's background yellow. /p
/div
/div
div id=second-para
pApplied selector: code$('div#second-para')/code, should
make the div's background light blue./p
/div
/div
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Jan 25, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Giuliano Marcangelo wrote:
Jennifer,
I am far from being an expert, but as you know an id must be
unique..therefore .myClass #myId is not necessary to target
#myId.surely you should only target the idsame with
#firstId #secondIdsimply declare the id that you wish to
target
hth
On 25/01/07, jgrucza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a somewhat similar problem with ID selectors, and I posted a
message
about it and a bug but so far I haven't gotten a single response
from anyone
(here's the bug: http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/881/).
My problem is IDs preceded by a class or another ID (i.e. .myClass
#myId
or #firstId #secondId). It's causing an exception in the jquery
code on
this line:
if ( m[1] == # ret[ret.length-1].getElementById ) {
I don't know if it's related to yours or not.
-Jennifer
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
