[OSGeo-Discuss] “Open Standards for ICT Procurement: Saving while reducing ICT lock-in” workshop at DG CONNECT, Brussels

2015-04-22 Thread Suchith Anand
Colleagues,

Under Digital Agenda, the European Commission commits itself through Action 23 
to provide guidance on the link between ICT Standardisation and Public 
Procurement in order to help public authorities use standards to promote 
efficiency and reduce lock-in.
 
As a matter of fact, using ICT open standards results in:

- Higher savings when procuring ICT
- An increased level of competition among suppliers
- Being compliant with EU Public Procurement directives

This workshop on   “Open Standards for ICT Procurement: Saving while reducing 
ICT lock-in” workshop, taking place in Brussels - at DG CONNECT - on June 12th, 
2015 might be of interest. Details at
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/open_standards_ict/event/open-standards-ict-procurement-saving-while-reducing-ict-lock-0

This Workshop will be a great opportunity to meet MSP members, procurement 
managers, policymakers and ICT suppliers to discuss how to effectively reduce 
lock-in by using Open Standards.

Best wishes,

Suchith

PS -  Please also give your inputs to our Open Letter for the need for Open 
Standards in LiDAR before 25th April 2015. Details at  
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2015-April/001473.html



This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G North America selection process

2015-04-22 Thread Andrew Ross

Dear Everyone,

(x-posted to OSGeo  LocationTech discussion lists, please fwd to all 
interested parties)


As a fairly new conference, FOSS4G North America has lacked a formal 
selection process in terms of how to select which city/venue, who was 
organizing, and more. Until now...


A team of concerned people from the community including many past chairs 
of North American FOSS4G events have collaborated to draft a proposal 
for how FOSS4G North America will be governed.


On behalf of the team, we would like to invite you to review the draft 
and participate in the process. The review period will last until April 
29th. After which, we will enact the process for FOSS4G NA 2016.


The governance document is available publicly here 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WlgmJgtl0LaV0EO0NtDDSnloTgsIvxu9KwddPDwX1WU/edit#. 
Anyone can comment. All discussion takes place via. a Google group here 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/foss4gna_selection.


A brief summary is as follows:

The city  venue selection process will be conducted by a committee 
consisting of:


 * The 3 most recent FOSS4G NA chairs
 * One appointed representative from OSGeo
 * One appointed representative from LocationTech

The committee will select the next conference location factoring their 
votes, plus votes from attendees  sponsors from the previous 
conference. The same committee will also select the organization to run 
the logistics for the conference. The conference chair will be elected 
at the previous conference by conference attendees.


If you're interested, please do join the Google group to discuss and 
participate. Thanks in advance.


Kind regards,

Andrew
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Ica-osgeo-labs] “Open Standards for ICT Procurement: Saving while reducing ICT lock-in” workshop at DG CONNECT, Brussels

2015-04-22 Thread Cameron Shorter

Hi,
Could anyone organising or attending this event please encourage 
presenters to share this information publicly.
This sort of information is very powerful when building a business case 
to back the use of standards.


Regards, Cameron.

On 23/04/2015 3:00 am, Suchith Anand wrote:

Colleagues,

Under Digital Agenda, the European Commission commits itself through Action 23 
to provide guidance on the link between ICT Standardisation and Public 
Procurement in order to help public authorities use standards to promote 
efficiency and reduce lock-in.
  
As a matter of fact, using ICT open standards results in:


- Higher savings when procuring ICT
- An increased level of competition among suppliers
- Being compliant with EU Public Procurement directives

This workshop on   “Open Standards for ICT Procurement: Saving while reducing 
ICT lock-in” workshop, taking place in Brussels - at DG CONNECT - on June 12th, 
2015 might be of interest. Details at
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/open_standards_ict/event/open-standards-ict-procurement-saving-while-reducing-ict-lock-0

This Workshop will be a great opportunity to meet MSP members, procurement 
managers, policymakers and ICT suppliers to discuss how to effectively reduce 
lock-in by using Open Standards.

Best wishes,

Suchith

PS -  Please also give your inputs to our Open Letter for the need for Open 
Standards in LiDAR before 25th April 2015. Details at  
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2015-April/001473.html



This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.

___
ica-osgeo-labs mailing list
ica-osgeo-l...@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ica-osgeo-labs


--
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] r100 for Twin Cities

2015-04-22 Thread Munich Orientation Convention


Hi Bob in St. Paul,

r100 could consolidate the old idea of Twin Cities:
www.volksnav.de/r100TwinCities. A convenient common pole could be the Lake
street bridge.  

Henrique





-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Im Auftrag von Basques, Bob
(CI-StPaul)
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 17:54
An: Serena Coetzee; ICA-OSGeo Lab Network; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open source / open data related to
addressing/geocoding

Serena,

You should definite mention US National Grid (or from the World Perspective,
I think Universal Grid is the pertinent label).

It has already been demonstrated to work very well as an addressing method.


You can find more info at these links:


http://usngcenter.org/
http://www.usngstore.com/

bobb





-Original Message-
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Serena Coetzee
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 3:10 AM
To: ICA-OSGeo Lab Network; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open source / open data related to
addressing/geocoding

Dear all, 

on Thursday this week, I am presenting about open source and open data to
the Addressing Group of the Universal Postal Union (UPU), a UN organization
with 192 member countries [1]. If you know about interesting open source
software or open data related to addressing and/or geocoding, let me know.
Anything that I receive by Wednesday evening, I could include in the
presentation.

[1] www.upu.int

Regards,
--
Serena Coetzee

Geography Building 3-5
Centre for Geoinformation Science, Department Geography, Geoinformatics and
Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028, South
Africa
email: serena.coet...@up.ac.za Web: www.up.ac.za/cgis 
Mobile: +27 82 464 4294 * Tel: +27 12 420 3823 * Fax: +27 12 420 6385


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Belgium update

2015-04-22 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hi all,

As was previously announced on this list[1], we had a first meeting of
OSGeo Belgium last week on Wednesday.

A full report of the meeting can be found on the OSGeo wiki[2].
Our goals are in line with the goals of OSGeo:
* Community-building and networking
* Organisation of events
* Lobbying
* Networking with other OSGeos (notably OSGeo-fr and OSGeo.nl)
* Support to higher levels of OSGeo
* Possibly: OSGeo focal point for EU-related activities

Our first concrete goal is to try organising a one day event FOSS4G
Belgium in October/November, where we could officialy launch an OSGeo
Belgium chapter.

In the meantime it would be useful to have an OSGeo Belgium
mailinglist so everyone interested can join our discussions!

Kind Regards,
Johan

[1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-March/014093.html
[2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo-BE-meeting-20150415
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] [FOSS4G Seoul]Call for Presentation will Close on this Friday.

2015-04-22 Thread Sanghee Shin
Dear All,

FOSS4G Seoul team would like to remind you that Call for Presentation deadline 
is approaching. Presentation submission closes on this Friday, 24th April. If 
you haven’t yet submitted your presentation topics, please submit your topics 
through FOSS4G Seoul page[1].

Presentations are the heart of the conference. We expect many interesting 
presentations during the conference showing the uses of open-source geospatial 
solutions in various fields and benefits of open-source geospatial solutions. 
Each individual presentations will be allowed about 25 minutes and 5 minutes 
for QA.

International FOSS4G 2015 will take place from 14th to 19th in Seoul, South 
Korea for the first time in Asia. There will be Asia Special Session discussing 
past, present and future of open-source geospatial in Asia during FOSS4G Seoul. 
Also FOSS4G Seoul conference will be held in conjunction with SmartGeoExpo[2] – 
the largest geospatial event in Korea – at the same venue during the same 
period. FOSS4G Attendees can go to any talks or exhibition booth at 
SmartGeoExpo without additional cost. You can also find your research/business 
partners from Korea through SmartGeoExpo. Thus FOSS4G Seoul will be your ideal 
place to show off your brilliant recent works to more broader audiences. 
 
Academic abstracts/posters submission will be closed on 15th, May. If you want 
to know more about academic track, please pay a visit here[3]. 

Hope to see many interesting talks here in Seoul in this September. 

Best, 

Sanghee
 


[1]http://2015.foss4g.org/programme/presentations/ 
http://2015.foss4g.org/programme/presentations/
[2]http://smartgeoexpo.kr/eng/main 
[3]http://2015.foss4g.org/programme/academic-track/
---
Sanghee Shin, Chair of FOSS4G 2015 Seoul 
Toward Diversity! FOSS4G Bigbang from Seoul!
http://2015.foss4g.org
Twitter: @foss4g
Facebook: FOSS4G2015
email: foss4gch...@osgeo.org

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss