Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
It seems that the "members" page (https://www.osgeo.org/community/members/) is picking it's picture up from the other pictures section not gravatar which is what the actual member page ( https://www.osgeo.org/member/ian-turton/) uses. This is probably why so many people have no picture on the members page. Ian PS I notice the page title is still in Dutch (?) and my local chapters have gone missing again. On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 19:17, Barry Rowlingson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 6:51 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > > > > Your feedback makes me think we should hide entries that don’t have a > photo. > > > > My thinking is part of the point of the website is to show that open > source is made by people. Pages and pages of placeholder photos make us > look like the faceless mob that protential adopters are told to fear to > trust. > > > > Would rather fewer people with real faces from an outreach standpoint. > > +1, or at least don't show an anonymous icon for people with no image. > > Also, I don't understand why I don't have a face on that page, but I > do on my page: https://www.osgeo.org/member/rowlingson/ - so I have to > upload a profile picture in two places? > > Barry > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:50 AM Tom Chadwin > wrote: > >> > >> Disagree with Barry - I do like it. However, I do think the > high-contrast design means the placeholders can overpower the actual > photos. I would definitely knock back the darkness of the background > colour, and probably knock back the whole thing a fair bit. I'm thinking > that the palette should reflect a disabled icon or menu item in a GUI, so > be faded. Other than that, I really like it. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Tom > >> > >> > >> > -Original Message- > >> > From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of > Barry > >> > Rowlingson > >> > Sent: 22 January 2019 08:36 > >> > To: Vicky Vergara > >> > Cc: OSGeo Discuss list > >> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:53 AM Vicky Vergara > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Hello all > >> > > I made a gender neutral default image representing an OSGeo member. > >> > > Hope you like it. > >> > > >> > Not sure I do like it! The head is so large compared to the body, and > >> > the body so devoid of feature I don't immediately read it as an > >> > abstract human representation. I'm almost reading it as a lower-case > >> > 'i'. Plus the logo is ever so slightly off-center from the circle > >> > which is triggering my OCD tendencies a bit. > >> > > >> > Maybe if the body was a bit larger and connected to the head. It is a > >> > very bold and high-contrast design, and appears very large on the page > >> > so the overall impact is quite massive. Maybe if the icons were > >> > smaller it wouldn't matter so much, but as the page is currently my > >> > browser shows only four people on a screen at once, and most of that > >> > is avatars and fairly empty squares with names in. Sorry if I've > >> > drifted off topic into the web page design now > >> > > >> > Happy to tweak it a bit if you've got an Inkscape SVG to share. > >> > > >> > Barry > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On this page > >> > > https://www.osgeo.org/community/members/ > >> > > The image is shown when the member does not have an libavatar . > (work > >> > in progress, on displaying the uploaded image on this page) > >> > > > >> > > On the profile page, the > >> > > libavatar takes precedence > >> > > if not found then uploaded image > >> > > if not found then the default image is used > >> > > > >> > > Regards > >> > > Vicky > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > > >> > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) > >> > > Salzmannstraße 44, > >> > > 81739 München, Germany > >> > > > >> > > Vicky Vergara > >> > > Operations Research > >> > > > >> > > eMail: vi...@georepublic.de > >> > > Web: https://georepublic.info > >> > > > >> > > Tel: +49
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
I am sure its possible, I just need some time to figure out how. On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:56 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > I wonder if it is worth removing the gravatar integration. If is not > sufficient for our needs? > > Note all this is a discussion, trying to balance between what is important > and what is technically possible. > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:38 PM Vicky Vergara > wrote: > >> What about names? >> "aam", "Alessandro","ander2712" >> If those are names, there is no last name. >> >> faceless, nameless, one paragraph Bio less, wiki-link less >> >> Unfortunately, I am still trying to figure out on the memeber list how to >> use the libavatar. >> In some cases, the member page has a picture because the member has an >> avatar linked to the mail >> But the member list php code is used to list many other items like >> projects, news, etc. >> and those don't have an avatar. That code use the uploaded picture, >> therefore things work like this >> On the list (list member, list projects, etc) it uses uploaded picture, >> no picture then for members its using the default member picture. >> On the member page, if user has avatar uses avatar, if no avatar use >> uploaded picture if no picture use default member picture. >> >> For the moment, I am >> -0 not listing of members without "individual image" on the list of >> members, >> +0 on not listing members with no full name >> +0 on members not having a one paragraph bio AND not having a wiki-link >> There is a button where the member can opt-out of being listed. >> But the non listing of members without "X" has to be done automatically. >> (I need to investigate for when time comes) >> >> >> Regards >> Vicky >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:50 PM Jody Garnett >> wrote: >> >>> Your feedback makes me think we should hide entries that don’t have a >>> photo. >>> >>> My thinking is part of the point of the website is to show that open >>> source is made by people. Pages and pages of placeholder photos make us >>> look like the faceless mob that protential adopters are told to fear to >>> trust. >>> >>> Would rather fewer people with real faces from an outreach standpoint. >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:50 AM Tom Chadwin >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Disagree with Barry - I do like it. However, I do think the >>>> high-contrast design means the placeholders can overpower the actual >>>> photos. I would definitely knock back the darkness of the background >>>> colour, and probably knock back the whole thing a fair bit. I'm thinking >>>> that the palette should reflect a disabled icon or menu item in a GUI, so >>>> be faded. Other than that, I really like it. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> >>>> > -Original Message- >>>> > From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of >>>> Barry >>>> > Rowlingson >>>> > Sent: 22 January 2019 08:36 >>>> > To: Vicky Vergara >>>> > Cc: OSGeo Discuss list >>>> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:53 AM Vicky Vergara >>>> > wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Hello all >>>> > > I made a gender neutral default image representing an OSGeo member. >>>> > > Hope you like it. >>>> > >>>> > Not sure I do like it! The head is so large compared to the body, and >>>> > the body so devoid of feature I don't immediately read it as an >>>> > abstract human representation. I'm almost reading it as a lower-case >>>> > 'i'. Plus the logo is ever so slightly off-center from the circle >>>> > which is triggering my OCD tendencies a bit. >>>> > >>>> > Maybe if the body was a bit larger and connected to the head. It is a >>>> > very bold and high-contrast design, and appears very large on the page >>>> > so the overall impact is quite massive. Maybe if the icons were >>>> > smaller it wouldn't matter so much, but as the page is currently my >>>> > browser shows only four people on a screen at once, and most of that >>>> > is avatars and fairly empty squares with names in. Sorry if
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
I wonder if it is worth removing the gravatar integration. If is not sufficient for our needs? Note all this is a discussion, trying to balance between what is important and what is technically possible. On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:38 PM Vicky Vergara wrote: > What about names? > "aam", "Alessandro","ander2712" > If those are names, there is no last name. > > faceless, nameless, one paragraph Bio less, wiki-link less > > Unfortunately, I am still trying to figure out on the memeber list how to > use the libavatar. > In some cases, the member page has a picture because the member has an > avatar linked to the mail > But the member list php code is used to list many other items like > projects, news, etc. > and those don't have an avatar. That code use the uploaded picture, > therefore things work like this > On the list (list member, list projects, etc) it uses uploaded picture, no > picture then for members its using the default member picture. > On the member page, if user has avatar uses avatar, if no avatar use > uploaded picture if no picture use default member picture. > > For the moment, I am > -0 not listing of members without "individual image" on the list of > members, > +0 on not listing members with no full name > +0 on members not having a one paragraph bio AND not having a wiki-link > There is a button where the member can opt-out of being listed. > But the non listing of members without "X" has to be done automatically. > (I need to investigate for when time comes) > > > Regards > Vicky > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:50 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Your feedback makes me think we should hide entries that don’t have a >> photo. >> >> My thinking is part of the point of the website is to show that open >> source is made by people. Pages and pages of placeholder photos make us >> look like the faceless mob that protential adopters are told to fear to >> trust. >> >> Would rather fewer people with real faces from an outreach standpoint. >> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:50 AM Tom Chadwin >> wrote: >> >>> Disagree with Barry - I do like it. However, I do think the >>> high-contrast design means the placeholders can overpower the actual >>> photos. I would definitely knock back the darkness of the background >>> colour, and probably knock back the whole thing a fair bit. I'm thinking >>> that the palette should reflect a disabled icon or menu item in a GUI, so >>> be faded. Other than that, I really like it. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> > -Original Message- >>> > From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of >>> Barry >>> > Rowlingson >>> > Sent: 22 January 2019 08:36 >>> > To: Vicky Vergara >>> > Cc: OSGeo Discuss list >>> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:53 AM Vicky Vergara >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Hello all >>> > > I made a gender neutral default image representing an OSGeo member. >>> > > Hope you like it. >>> > >>> > Not sure I do like it! The head is so large compared to the body, and >>> > the body so devoid of feature I don't immediately read it as an >>> > abstract human representation. I'm almost reading it as a lower-case >>> > 'i'. Plus the logo is ever so slightly off-center from the circle >>> > which is triggering my OCD tendencies a bit. >>> > >>> > Maybe if the body was a bit larger and connected to the head. It is a >>> > very bold and high-contrast design, and appears very large on the page >>> > so the overall impact is quite massive. Maybe if the icons were >>> > smaller it wouldn't matter so much, but as the page is currently my >>> > browser shows only four people on a screen at once, and most of that >>> > is avatars and fairly empty squares with names in. Sorry if I've >>> > drifted off topic into the web page design now >>> > >>> > Happy to tweak it a bit if you've got an Inkscape SVG to share. >>> > >>> > Barry >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > On this page >>> > > https://www.osgeo.org/community/members/ >>> > > The image is shown when the member does not have an libavatar . (work >>> > in progress, on displaying the uplo
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
What about names? "aam", "Alessandro","ander2712" If those are names, there is no last name. faceless, nameless, one paragraph Bio less, wiki-link less Unfortunately, I am still trying to figure out on the memeber list how to use the libavatar. In some cases, the member page has a picture because the member has an avatar linked to the mail But the member list php code is used to list many other items like projects, news, etc. and those don't have an avatar. That code use the uploaded picture, therefore things work like this On the list (list member, list projects, etc) it uses uploaded picture, no picture then for members its using the default member picture. On the member page, if user has avatar uses avatar, if no avatar use uploaded picture if no picture use default member picture. For the moment, I am -0 not listing of members without "individual image" on the list of members, +0 on not listing members with no full name +0 on members not having a one paragraph bio AND not having a wiki-link There is a button where the member can opt-out of being listed. But the non listing of members without "X" has to be done automatically. (I need to investigate for when time comes) Regards Vicky On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:50 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Your feedback makes me think we should hide entries that don’t have a > photo. > > My thinking is part of the point of the website is to show that open > source is made by people. Pages and pages of placeholder photos make us > look like the faceless mob that protential adopters are told to fear to > trust. > > Would rather fewer people with real faces from an outreach standpoint. > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:50 AM Tom Chadwin > wrote: > >> Disagree with Barry - I do like it. However, I do think the high-contrast >> design means the placeholders can overpower the actual photos. I would >> definitely knock back the darkness of the background colour, and probably >> knock back the whole thing a fair bit. I'm thinking that the palette should >> reflect a disabled icon or menu item in a GUI, so be faded. Other than >> that, I really like it. >> >> Thanks >> >> Tom >> >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of >> Barry >> > Rowlingson >> > Sent: 22 January 2019 08:36 >> > To: Vicky Vergara >> > Cc: OSGeo Discuss list >> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:53 AM Vicky Vergara >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > Hello all >> > > I made a gender neutral default image representing an OSGeo member. >> > > Hope you like it. >> > >> > Not sure I do like it! The head is so large compared to the body, and >> > the body so devoid of feature I don't immediately read it as an >> > abstract human representation. I'm almost reading it as a lower-case >> > 'i'. Plus the logo is ever so slightly off-center from the circle >> > which is triggering my OCD tendencies a bit. >> > >> > Maybe if the body was a bit larger and connected to the head. It is a >> > very bold and high-contrast design, and appears very large on the page >> > so the overall impact is quite massive. Maybe if the icons were >> > smaller it wouldn't matter so much, but as the page is currently my >> > browser shows only four people on a screen at once, and most of that >> > is avatars and fairly empty squares with names in. Sorry if I've >> > drifted off topic into the web page design now >> > >> > Happy to tweak it a bit if you've got an Inkscape SVG to share. >> > >> > Barry >> > >> > >> > >> > > On this page >> > > https://www.osgeo.org/community/members/ >> > > The image is shown when the member does not have an libavatar . (work >> > in progress, on displaying the uploaded image on this page) >> > > >> > > On the profile page, the >> > > libavatar takes precedence >> > > if not found then uploaded image >> > > if not found then the default image is used >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > Vicky >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > >> > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) >> > > Salzmannstraße 44, >> > > 81739 München, Germany >> > > >> > > Vicky Vergara >> > > Operations Research >> > > >> > > eMail: vi...@georepublic.de &g
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 6:51 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > > Your feedback makes me think we should hide entries that don’t have a photo. > > My thinking is part of the point of the website is to show that open source > is made by people. Pages and pages of placeholder photos make us look like > the faceless mob that protential adopters are told to fear to trust. > > Would rather fewer people with real faces from an outreach standpoint. +1, or at least don't show an anonymous icon for people with no image. Also, I don't understand why I don't have a face on that page, but I do on my page: https://www.osgeo.org/member/rowlingson/ - so I have to upload a profile picture in two places? Barry > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:50 AM Tom Chadwin wrote: >> >> Disagree with Barry - I do like it. However, I do think the high-contrast >> design means the placeholders can overpower the actual photos. I would >> definitely knock back the darkness of the background colour, and probably >> knock back the whole thing a fair bit. I'm thinking that the palette should >> reflect a disabled icon or menu item in a GUI, so be faded. Other than that, >> I really like it. >> >> Thanks >> >> Tom >> >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Barry >> > Rowlingson >> > Sent: 22 January 2019 08:36 >> > To: Vicky Vergara >> > Cc: OSGeo Discuss list >> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:53 AM Vicky Vergara >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > Hello all >> > > I made a gender neutral default image representing an OSGeo member. >> > > Hope you like it. >> > >> > Not sure I do like it! The head is so large compared to the body, and >> > the body so devoid of feature I don't immediately read it as an >> > abstract human representation. I'm almost reading it as a lower-case >> > 'i'. Plus the logo is ever so slightly off-center from the circle >> > which is triggering my OCD tendencies a bit. >> > >> > Maybe if the body was a bit larger and connected to the head. It is a >> > very bold and high-contrast design, and appears very large on the page >> > so the overall impact is quite massive. Maybe if the icons were >> > smaller it wouldn't matter so much, but as the page is currently my >> > browser shows only four people on a screen at once, and most of that >> > is avatars and fairly empty squares with names in. Sorry if I've >> > drifted off topic into the web page design now >> > >> > Happy to tweak it a bit if you've got an Inkscape SVG to share. >> > >> > Barry >> > >> > >> > >> > > On this page >> > > https://www.osgeo.org/community/members/ >> > > The image is shown when the member does not have an libavatar . (work >> > in progress, on displaying the uploaded image on this page) >> > > >> > > On the profile page, the >> > > libavatar takes precedence >> > > if not found then uploaded image >> > > if not found then the default image is used >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > Vicky >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > >> > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) >> > > Salzmannstraße 44, >> > > 81739 München, Germany >> > > >> > > Vicky Vergara >> > > Operations Research >> > > >> > > eMail: vi...@georepublic.de >> > > Web: https://georepublic.info >> > > >> > > Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 >> > > Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 >> > > >> > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 >> > > CEO: Daniel Kastl >> > > >> > ___ >> > Discuss mailing list >> > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> >> Tom Chadwin, ICT Manager >> Telephone: 01434 611530 Mob: >> Web: >> www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk<http://www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk/> >> >> IMPORTANT NOTICE - Disclaimer - This communication is from Northumberland >> National Park Authority (NNPA).The Authority’s head office and principal >> place of business is Eastburn, South Park, Hexham, Northumberland, NE46 1BS, >> United Kingdom. If you are not the
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
Your feedback makes me think we should hide entries that don’t have a photo. My thinking is part of the point of the website is to show that open source is made by people. Pages and pages of placeholder photos make us look like the faceless mob that protential adopters are told to fear to trust. Would rather fewer people with real faces from an outreach standpoint. On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:50 AM Tom Chadwin wrote: > Disagree with Barry - I do like it. However, I do think the high-contrast > design means the placeholders can overpower the actual photos. I would > definitely knock back the darkness of the background colour, and probably > knock back the whole thing a fair bit. I'm thinking that the palette should > reflect a disabled icon or menu item in a GUI, so be faded. Other than > that, I really like it. > > Thanks > > Tom > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of > Barry > > Rowlingson > > Sent: 22 January 2019 08:36 > > To: Vicky Vergara > > Cc: OSGeo Discuss list > > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:53 AM Vicky Vergara > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello all > > > I made a gender neutral default image representing an OSGeo member. > > > Hope you like it. > > > > Not sure I do like it! The head is so large compared to the body, and > > the body so devoid of feature I don't immediately read it as an > > abstract human representation. I'm almost reading it as a lower-case > > 'i'. Plus the logo is ever so slightly off-center from the circle > > which is triggering my OCD tendencies a bit. > > > > Maybe if the body was a bit larger and connected to the head. It is a > > very bold and high-contrast design, and appears very large on the page > > so the overall impact is quite massive. Maybe if the icons were > > smaller it wouldn't matter so much, but as the page is currently my > > browser shows only four people on a screen at once, and most of that > > is avatars and fairly empty squares with names in. Sorry if I've > > drifted off topic into the web page design now > > > > Happy to tweak it a bit if you've got an Inkscape SVG to share. > > > > Barry > > > > > > > > > On this page > > > https://www.osgeo.org/community/members/ > > > The image is shown when the member does not have an libavatar . (work > > in progress, on displaying the uploaded image on this page) > > > > > > On the profile page, the > > > libavatar takes precedence > > > if not found then uploaded image > > > if not found then the default image is used > > > > > > Regards > > > Vicky > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) > > > Salzmannstraße 44, > > > 81739 München, Germany > > > > > > Vicky Vergara > > > Operations Research > > > > > > eMail: vi...@georepublic.de > > > Web: https://georepublic.info > > > > > > Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 > > > Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 > > > > > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 > > > CEO: Daniel Kastl > > > > > ___ > > Discuss mailing list > > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > Tom Chadwin, ICT Manager > Telephone: 01434 611530 Mob: > Web: www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk< > http://www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk/> > > IMPORTANT NOTICE - Disclaimer - This communication is from Northumberland > National Park Authority (NNPA).The Authority’s head office and principal > place of business is Eastburn, South Park, Hexham, Northumberland, NE46 > 1BS, United Kingdom. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note > that any form of disclosure, distribution, copying or use of this > communication or the information in it or in any attachments is strictly > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in > error, please delete the email and destroy any copies of it. Any views or > opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of NNPA.Contractors or potential contractors are reminded > that a formal Order or Contract is needed for NNPA to be bound by any offer > or acceptance of terms for the supply of goods or services Although this > email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other &g
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
Hi all Here is the svg I am using the colors defined in the style guide On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:50 AM Tom Chadwin wrote: > Disagree with Barry - I do like it. However, I do think the high-contrast > design means the placeholders can overpower the actual photos. I would > definitely knock back the darkness of the background colour, and probably > knock back the whole thing a fair bit. I'm thinking that the palette should > reflect a disabled icon or menu item in a GUI, so be faded. Other than > that, I really like it. > > Thanks > > Tom > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of > Barry > > Rowlingson > > Sent: 22 January 2019 08:36 > > To: Vicky Vergara > > Cc: OSGeo Discuss list > > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:53 AM Vicky Vergara > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello all > > > I made a gender neutral default image representing an OSGeo member. > > > Hope you like it. > > > > Not sure I do like it! The head is so large compared to the body, and > > the body so devoid of feature I don't immediately read it as an > > abstract human representation. I'm almost reading it as a lower-case > > 'i'. Plus the logo is ever so slightly off-center from the circle > > which is triggering my OCD tendencies a bit. > > > > Maybe if the body was a bit larger and connected to the head. It is a > > very bold and high-contrast design, and appears very large on the page > > so the overall impact is quite massive. Maybe if the icons were > > smaller it wouldn't matter so much, but as the page is currently my > > browser shows only four people on a screen at once, and most of that > > is avatars and fairly empty squares with names in. Sorry if I've > > drifted off topic into the web page design now > > > > Happy to tweak it a bit if you've got an Inkscape SVG to share. > > > > Barry > > > > > > > > > On this page > > > https://www.osgeo.org/community/members/ > > > The image is shown when the member does not have an libavatar . (work > > in progress, on displaying the uploaded image on this page) > > > > > > On the profile page, the > > > libavatar takes precedence > > > if not found then uploaded image > > > if not found then the default image is used > > > > > > Regards > > > Vicky > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) > > > Salzmannstraße 44, > > > 81739 München, Germany > > > > > > Vicky Vergara > > > Operations Research > > > > > > eMail: vi...@georepublic.de > > > Web: https://georepublic.info > > > > > > Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 > > > Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 > > > > > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 > > > CEO: Daniel Kastl > > > > > ___ > > Discuss mailing list > > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > Tom Chadwin, ICT Manager > Telephone: 01434 611530 Mob: > Web: www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk< > http://www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk/> > > IMPORTANT NOTICE - Disclaimer - This communication is from Northumberland > National Park Authority (NNPA).The Authority’s head office and principal > place of business is Eastburn, South Park, Hexham, Northumberland, NE46 > 1BS, United Kingdom. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note > that any form of disclosure, distribution, copying or use of this > communication or the information in it or in any attachments is strictly > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in > error, please delete the email and destroy any copies of it. Any views or > opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of NNPA.Contractors or potential contractors are reminded > that a formal Order or Contract is needed for NNPA to be bound by any offer > or acceptance of terms for the supply of goods or services Although this > email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other > defects which might affect any computer or IT system into which they are > received, no responsibility is accepted by the NNPA for any loss or damage > arising in any way from the receipt or use thereof. Computer systems of > this Authority may be monitored and communications carried out o
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
Disagree with Barry - I do like it. However, I do think the high-contrast design means the placeholders can overpower the actual photos. I would definitely knock back the darkness of the background colour, and probably knock back the whole thing a fair bit. I'm thinking that the palette should reflect a disabled icon or menu item in a GUI, so be faded. Other than that, I really like it. Thanks Tom > -Original Message- > From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Barry > Rowlingson > Sent: 22 January 2019 08:36 > To: Vicky Vergara > Cc: OSGeo Discuss list > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:53 AM Vicky Vergara > wrote: > > > > Hello all > > I made a gender neutral default image representing an OSGeo member. > > Hope you like it. > > Not sure I do like it! The head is so large compared to the body, and > the body so devoid of feature I don't immediately read it as an > abstract human representation. I'm almost reading it as a lower-case > 'i'. Plus the logo is ever so slightly off-center from the circle > which is triggering my OCD tendencies a bit. > > Maybe if the body was a bit larger and connected to the head. It is a > very bold and high-contrast design, and appears very large on the page > so the overall impact is quite massive. Maybe if the icons were > smaller it wouldn't matter so much, but as the page is currently my > browser shows only four people on a screen at once, and most of that > is avatars and fairly empty squares with names in. Sorry if I've > drifted off topic into the web page design now > > Happy to tweak it a bit if you've got an Inkscape SVG to share. > > Barry > > > > > On this page > > https://www.osgeo.org/community/members/ > > The image is shown when the member does not have an libavatar . (work > in progress, on displaying the uploaded image on this page) > > > > On the profile page, the > > libavatar takes precedence > > if not found then uploaded image > > if not found then the default image is used > > > > Regards > > Vicky > > > > > > -- > > > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) > > Salzmannstraße 44, > > 81739 München, Germany > > > > Vicky Vergara > > Operations Research > > > > eMail: vi...@georepublic.de > > Web: https://georepublic.info > > > > Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 > > Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 > > > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 > > CEO: Daniel Kastl > > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss Tom Chadwin, ICT Manager Telephone: 01434 611530 Mob: Web: www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk<http://www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk/> IMPORTANT NOTICE - Disclaimer - This communication is from Northumberland National Park Authority (NNPA).The Authority’s head office and principal place of business is Eastburn, South Park, Hexham, Northumberland, NE46 1BS, United Kingdom. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of disclosure, distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it or in any attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please delete the email and destroy any copies of it. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NNPA.Contractors or potential contractors are reminded that a formal Order or Contract is needed for NNPA to be bound by any offer or acceptance of terms for the supply of goods or services Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defects which might affect any computer or IT system into which they are received, no responsibility is accepted by the NNPA for any loss or damage arising in any way from the receipt or use thereof. Computer systems of this Authority may be monitored and communications carried out on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purpose. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:53 AM Vicky Vergara wrote: > > Hello all > I made a gender neutral default image representing an OSGeo member. > Hope you like it. Not sure I do like it! The head is so large compared to the body, and the body so devoid of feature I don't immediately read it as an abstract human representation. I'm almost reading it as a lower-case 'i'. Plus the logo is ever so slightly off-center from the circle which is triggering my OCD tendencies a bit. Maybe if the body was a bit larger and connected to the head. It is a very bold and high-contrast design, and appears very large on the page so the overall impact is quite massive. Maybe if the icons were smaller it wouldn't matter so much, but as the page is currently my browser shows only four people on a screen at once, and most of that is avatars and fairly empty squares with names in. Sorry if I've drifted off topic into the web page design now Happy to tweak it a bit if you've got an Inkscape SVG to share. Barry > On this page > https://www.osgeo.org/community/members/ > The image is shown when the member does not have an libavatar . (work in > progress, on displaying the uploaded image on this page) > > On the profile page, the > libavatar takes precedence > if not found then uploaded image > if not found then the default image is used > > Regards > Vicky > > > -- > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) > Salzmannstraße 44, > 81739 München, Germany > > Vicky Vergara > Operations Research > > eMail: vi...@georepublic.de > Web: https://georepublic.info > > Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 > Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 > CEO: Daniel Kastl > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
