Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Possible CS-W Portal Opportunity

2014-02-06 Thread Breimyer, Paul - 0442 - MITLL
All,

Thank you for your responses and insights.  I'll try to provide some more
context - we have recently completed a new development effort that builds on
open source software.  Specifically, the UI platform is built on Liferay
(http://www.liferay.com/) with PrimeFaces and jQuery, we're using the Open
Identity Stack for ICAM/IdAM
(http://forgerock.com/products/open-identity-stack/), Postgres for the DB,
and Apache CXF for REST/SOAP web service interfaces (in addition to
GeoNetwork's services).  The system is being transitioned to an operational
partner and has been funded by The Department of Homeland Security Science
and Technology Directorate (DHS ST). 

 

There may be an opportunity to completely open source the system, which
would require some additional development to fully support the CS-W
interface.  Based upon the responses I've received so far (thanks again), it
seems like there may be some interest, but I think DHS ST may need a
stronger expression of interest from OSGeo to move forward. If there's
interest, I could try to schedule a webex meeting to show the system.

 

Thanks,

Paul

 

--

Paul Breimyer, Ph.D.

Technical Staff, Surveillance Systems

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

(781) 981-0923 (work)

(781) 879-8675 (cell)

 mailto:pbreim...@ll.mit.edu paul.breim...@ll.mit.edu

 

From: Brent Wood [mailto:pcr...@pcreso.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 2:58 PM
To: Breimyer, Paul - 0442 - MITLL
Cc: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Possible CS-W Portal Opportunity

 

Hi Paul,

 

Similar situations have occurred before - The Bluenet MEST fork created an
alternative version of Geonetwork, with some extra capabilities to meet
specific needs. Development was kept (largely) consistent with trunk
Geonetwork, and was later merged back into Geonetwork trunk, IMHO, creating
a product with the best of both. 

 

The Bluenet MEST developers are still major contributors to Geonetwork
(Thanks Simon!).

 

Assuming Geonetwork does provide a useful foundation to build on to meet
your needs, I urge you so look for common ground  pool resources to improve
the existing tool. Only consider developing a new application if this first
approach is not viable.

 

I have also come across another situation which may be relevant. While
evaluating options for such catalogues, both Geonetwork  CKAN (both Open
Source) were considered. Geonetwork was found to have better
interoperability  harvesting capability, while CKAN had front-end
capabilities that were desirable. One possible solution that went a long way
to meeting requirements was to use both - Geonetwork as the
harvesting/aggregating tool for a CKAN based catalogue. I don't know if such
a combination would be suitable in your case, but figured it was worth
mentioning.

 

I also suggest you ask your question on the Geonetwork developers list
(https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel) if you have
not already done so.

 

OSGEO generally adopts already widely used tools rather than supporting new
developments, see the incubator page for information -
http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/index.html. I note that Jeroen Ticheler, the
original developer of Geonetwork is a member of the OSGEO incubation
committee, it may be worth discussing your situation directly with him. 

 

Cheers,

 

   Brent Wood

  _  


On 2/3/14, Breimyer, Paul - 0442 - MITLL paul.breim...@ll.mit.edu wrote:
 My name is Paul Breimyer and I work for MIT Lincoln Laboratory, a
 government
 research lab (FFRDC).  We are building what is effectively a secure CS-W
 portal interface for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  I'm
 writing
 to see if OSGeo might be interested in the portal if it were open sourced
 appropriately.  As part of this work we reviewed GeoNetwork: the backend
 services were well implemented, but we found the portal to be lacking
 capabilities that were necessary (at least for our use cases).  There may
 be
 an opportunity to enhance the GeoNetwork portal to facilitate broader
 adoption of the CS-W  standard.  Please let me know if there's interest to
 learn more.



 Thanks,

 Paul
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Possible CS-W Portal Opportunity

2014-02-05 Thread Brent Wood
Hi Paul,

Similar situations have occurred before - The Bluenet MEST fork created an 
alternative version of Geonetwork, with some extra capabilities to meet 
specific needs. Development was kept (largely) consistent with trunk 
Geonetwork, and was later merged back into Geonetwork trunk, IMHO, creating a 
product with the best of both. 


The Bluenet MEST developers are still major contributors to Geonetwork (Thanks 
Simon!).

Assuming Geonetwork does provide a useful foundation to build on to meet your 
needs, I urge you so look for common ground  pool resources to improve the 
existing tool. Only consider developing a new application if this first 
approach is not viable.

I have also come across another situation which may be relevant. While 
evaluating options for such catalogues, both Geonetwork  CKAN (both Open 
Source) were considered. Geonetwork was found to have better interoperability  
harvesting capability, while CKAN had front-end capabilities that were 
desirable. One possible solution that went a long way to meeting requirements 
was to use both - Geonetwork as the harvesting/aggregating tool for a CKAN 
based catalogue. I don't know if such a combination would be suitable in your 
case, but figured it was worth mentioning.

I also suggest you ask your question on the Geonetwork developers list 
(https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel) if you have not 
already done so.

OSGEO generally adopts already widely used tools rather than supporting new 
developments, see the incubator page for information - 
http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/index.html. I note that Jeroen Ticheler, the 
original developer of Geonetwork is a member of the OSGEO incubation committee, 
it may be worth discussing your situation directly with him.

Cheers,

   Brent Wood




On 2/3/14, Breimyer, Paul - 0442 - MITLL paul.breim...@ll.mit.edu wrote:
 My name is Paul Breimyer and I work for MIT Lincoln Laboratory, a
 government
 research lab (FFRDC).  We are building what is effectively a secure CS-W
 portal interface for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  I'm
 writing
 to see if OSGeo might be interested in the portal if it were open sourced
 appropriately.  As part of this work we reviewed GeoNetwork: the backend
 services were well implemented, but we found the portal to be lacking
 capabilities that were necessary (at least for our use cases).  There may
 be
 an opportunity to enhance the GeoNetwork portal to facilitate broader
 adoption of the CS-W  standard.  Please let me know if there's interest to
 learn more.



 Thanks,

 Paul
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[OSGeo-Discuss] Possible CS-W Portal Opportunity

2014-02-03 Thread Breimyer, Paul - 0442 - MITLL
My name is Paul Breimyer and I work for MIT Lincoln Laboratory, a government
research lab (FFRDC).  We are building what is effectively a secure CS-W
portal interface for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  I'm writing
to see if OSGeo might be interested in the portal if it were open sourced
appropriately.  As part of this work we reviewed GeoNetwork: the backend
services were well implemented, but we found the portal to be lacking
capabilities that were necessary (at least for our use cases).  There may be
an opportunity to enhance the GeoNetwork portal to facilitate broader
adoption of the CS-W  standard.  Please let me know if there's interest to
learn more.

 

Thanks,

Paul

 

--

Paul Breimyer, Ph.D.

Technical Staff, Surveillance Systems

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

(781) 981-0923 (work)

(781) 879-8675 (cell)

 mailto:pbreim...@ll.mit.edu paul.breim...@ll.mit.edu

 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Possible CS-W Portal Opportunity

2014-02-03 Thread Arnie Shore
Paul, pls keep us current on LL's activities on this.  My interest is
in possible uses by local gov't public safety agencies.

(FYI, I've worked with some LL people back in the late 50's during the
Whirlwind/SAGE days.)

AS

On 2/3/14, Breimyer, Paul - 0442 - MITLL paul.breim...@ll.mit.edu wrote:
 My name is Paul Breimyer and I work for MIT Lincoln Laboratory, a
 government
 research lab (FFRDC).  We are building what is effectively a secure CS-W
 portal interface for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  I'm
 writing
 to see if OSGeo might be interested in the portal if it were open sourced
 appropriately.  As part of this work we reviewed GeoNetwork: the backend
 services were well implemented, but we found the portal to be lacking
 capabilities that were necessary (at least for our use cases).  There may
 be
 an opportunity to enhance the GeoNetwork portal to facilitate broader
 adoption of the CS-W  standard.  Please let me know if there's interest to
 learn more.



 Thanks,

 Paul
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Possible CS-W Portal Opportunity

2014-02-03 Thread María Arias de Reyna
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Breimyer, Paul - 0442 - MITLL
paul.breim...@ll.mit.edu wrote:
 My name is Paul Breimyer and I work for MIT Lincoln Laboratory, a government
 research lab (FFRDC).  We are building what is effectively a secure CS-W
 portal interface for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  I'm writing
 to see if OSGeo might be interested in the portal if it were open sourced
 appropriately.  As part of this work we reviewed GeoNetwork: the backend
 services were well implemented, but we found the portal to be lacking
 capabilities that were necessary (at least for our use cases).  There may be
 an opportunity to enhance the GeoNetwork portal to facilitate broader
 adoption of the CS-W  standard.  Please let me know if there's interest to
 learn more.


Hi Paul,

As geoNetwork developer, I assure you we are pretty interested in any
enhancement we can merge in geoNetwork. Do you think it may be
possible to tell us more about this? Right now we have identified some
things to solve (mostly spatially operations related), but an external
point of view is always welcome.

There is a developers mailing list for geoNetwork:
geonetwork-de...@lists.sourceforge.net, if you think you are going to
be too technical for a more general mailing list like this one.




 Thanks,

 Paul



 --

 Paul Breimyer, Ph.D.

 Technical Staff, Surveillance Systems

 MIT Lincoln Laboratory

 (781) 981-0923 (work)

 (781) 879-8675 (cell)

 paul.breim...@ll.mit.edu




 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Possible CS-W Portal Opportunity

2014-02-03 Thread Newcomb, Doug
Paul,
I would be very interested in whatever enhancements that you are working on
for Geonetwork. I'm on the metadata subcommittee,
http://www.ncgicc.com/Default.aspx?tabid=901, for the North Carolina
Geographic Information Coordinating Council and we are looking for
methods/software to make metadata  easier to create and maintain for Local
and State government entities in North Carolina .We looked at
Geonetwork and had similar concerns ( specifically in the area of ISO
19115-1 support).

Please let me know what you can share about this work.

Doug




On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Breimyer, Paul - 0442 - MITLL 
paul.breim...@ll.mit.edu wrote:

 My name is Paul Breimyer and I work for MIT Lincoln Laboratory, a
 government research lab (FFRDC).  We are building what is effectively a
 secure CS-W portal interface for the Department of Homeland Security
 (DHS).  I'm writing to see if OSGeo might be interested in the portal if it
 were open sourced appropriately.  As part of this work we reviewed
 GeoNetwork: the backend services were well implemented, but we found the
 portal to be lacking capabilities that were necessary (at least for our use
 cases).  There may be an opportunity to enhance the GeoNetwork portal to
 facilitate broader adoption of the CS-W  standard.  Please let me know if
 there's interest to learn more.



 Thanks,

 Paul



 --

 Paul Breimyer, Ph.D.

 Technical Staff, Surveillance Systems

 MIT Lincoln Laboratory

 (781) 981-0923 (work)

 (781) 879-8675 (cell)

 paul.breim...@ll.mit.edu pbreim...@ll.mit.edu



 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss




-- 
Doug Newcomb
USFWS
Raleigh, NC
919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newc...@fws.gov
-
The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the
official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the
Interior.   Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Possible CS-W Portal Opportunity

2014-02-03 Thread Cameron Shorter

Hi Paul,
On OSGeo-Live, we also package pycsw, which might also be worth evaluating:
http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/pycsw_overview.html

I'd suggest that extending an existing project is usually better long 
term than starting a new project and splitting sponsors/developers 
between two projects.


On 4/02/2014 1:48 AM, Breimyer, Paul - 0442 - MITLL wrote:


My name is Paul Breimyer and I work for MIT Lincoln Laboratory, a 
government research lab (FFRDC).  We are building what is effectively 
a secure CS-W portal interface for the Department of Homeland Security 
(DHS).  I'm writing to see if OSGeo might be interested in the portal 
if it were open sourced appropriately.  As part of this work we 
reviewed GeoNetwork: the backend services were well implemented, but 
we found the portal to be lacking capabilities that were necessary (at 
least for our use cases).  There may be an opportunity to enhance the 
GeoNetwork portal to facilitate broader adoption of the CS-W 
 standard.  Please let me know if there's interest to learn more.


Thanks,

Paul

--

Paul Breimyer, Ph.D.

Technical Staff, Surveillance Systems

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

(781) 981-0923 (work)

(781) 879-8675 (cell)

paul.breim...@ll.mit.edu mailto:pbreim...@ll.mit.edu



___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



--
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss