NSCalendarView
Hi there, has anyone constructed a NSCalendarView yet? Thanks Marc ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Re: NSCalendarView
Guenther Noack wrote: Hi! On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:26:06PM +0100, Marc Br?nink wrote: has anyone constructed a NSCalendarView yet? I've seen one in the application Expense.app, which is under GPL. GPL is bad. Nevertheless I will take a look. Thanks Marc ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Re: NSCalendarView
I know blackholemedia (blackholemedia.com) has released a Calendar control I use in cocoa, this is released under the BSD license. Having read the code to modify some behaviors, i suppose it should be easily ported to gnustep since i does not seem to contain Apple specific code. However, it may not be the view you're looking for, it's rather a small calendar. On Nov 13, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Marc Brünink wrote: Guenther Noack wrote: Hi! On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:26:06PM +0100, Marc Br?nink wrote: has anyone constructed a NSCalendarView yet? I've seen one in the application Expense.app, which is under GPL. GPL is bad. Nevertheless I will take a look. Thanks Marc ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
command line tools and $PATH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm going step by step through some of the learning material on line and
I'm a bit confused by some of my results.
I'm following this (A First Tool):
http://www.gnustep.it/nicola/Tutorials/WritingMakefiles/node2.html
the source code (test.m):
#import Foundation/Foundation.h
int
main (void)
{
NSLog (@This is the TEST program);
return 0;
}
when I compile and install, if I enter the full path the tool works
fine, however if I only specify the tool without the path nothing returns.
% which test
./test
% test
% ./test
2006-11-13 11:12:13.664 test[18076] This is the TEST program
why do I need to put in the full path?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFWMV1iOO2Yf3Jt4ARAkhGAJ9qcqf1AM0aWs1DREVWUdX9z8bzvgCffpDV
QOL8ijYlvH9olPN0mt4Z2HA=
=40ZV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Re: Project Center Complains About ProjectCenter.gorm
Jason Clouse jhclouse at charter.net writes: On 2006-10-30 20:38:35 -0500 lloyd.sargent at gmail.com wrote: The specific message is Cannot load the main model file: ProjectCenter.gorm I'm running Gentoo and I emerge'd it in and it is a no go. What is odd is that Gorm built (and runs) without a hitch. Anyone have a hint? Not sure. I have the same problem, however. And GWorkspace has stopped working as well. I'm also running Gentoo and I sync / update world frequently. The problem started fairly recently, so I think it might be an updated package that interacts poorly with GNUstep (though I can't for the life of me imagine what that would be). Some applications work fine, others die a horrible death. Hi I have the same problem under MinGW/XP I use only official releases : base-1.13.0 back-0.10.3 gui-0.10.3 gorm-1.0.8 Please help ! Xavier ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Re: command line tools and $PATH
On 13 Nov 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why do I need to put in the full path? NeXTStep is a bit strange (for example apps are in app bundles) . To open a tool, you should use opentool. For example: opentool test To open an app, you should use openapp. Charles -- printk(KERN_ERR scsi%d: !!BINGO!! Falcon has no lock in NCR5380_abort\n, ...) linux-2.6.6/drivers/scsi/atari_NCR5380.c pgpt2WLfto8Ui.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Re: command line tools and $PATH
--- tgate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm going step by step through some of the learning
material on line and
I'm a bit confused by some of my results.
I'm following this (A First Tool):
http://www.gnustep.it/nicola/Tutorials/WritingMakefiles/node2.html
the source code (test.m):
#import Foundation/Foundation.h
int
main (void)
{
NSLog (@This is the TEST program);
return 0;
}
when I compile and install, if I enter the full path
the tool works
fine, however if I only specify the tool without the
path nothing returns.
% which test
./test
% test
% ./test
2006-11-13 11:12:13.664 test[18076] This is the TEST
program
why do I need to put in the full path?
another executable named test exists in your path,
which is used for shell scripting and stuff
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Re: command line tools and $PATH
--- Charles philip Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13 Nov 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why do I need to put in the full path? NeXTStep is a bit strange (for example apps are in app bundles) . To open a tool, you should use opentool. For example: opentool test actually this is not true, there was no 'opentool' or equivalent, it always put tools into the PATH, GNUstep does also, so i'm not actually sure why opentool should still exist To open an app, you should use openapp. but yes, apps are another story. Charles Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Re: command line tools and $PATH
Hi, tgate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm going step by step through some of the learning material on line and I'm a bit confused by some of my results. I'm following this (A First Tool): http://www.gnustep.it/nicola/Tutorials/WritingMakefiles/node2.html when I compile and install, if I enter the full path the tool works fine, however if I only specify the tool without the path nothing returns. % which test ./test % test % ./test 2006-11-13 11:12:13.664 test[18076] This is the TEST program why do I need to put in the full path? just a guess, but I would say: man test ;) this one might be catched by the PATH environent settings before it finds the test in your directory. kind regards Sebastian ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
RE: command line tools and $PATH
On Behalf Of Stefan Bidigaray Also, generally . is not in anyone's PATH! I've seen very few distributions where this is true and is regarded to be generally unsafe... I'd say it's a prejudice. I can imagine bad things happening if you are root, but what trouble can happen for a regular user? I think . at the end of PATH for regular users is quite common. --Tima ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
RE: command line tools and $PATH
On 2006-11-13 23:35:35 +0100 Vaisburd, Haim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] but what trouble can happen for a regular user? I think . at the end [...] Then you lack imagination. -- Chris ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Re: command line tools and $PATH
On 13 Nov 2006, at 19:42, Matt Rice wrote:
--- tgate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm going step by step through some of the learning
material on line and
I'm a bit confused by some of my results.
I'm following this (A First Tool):
http://www.gnustep.it/nicola/Tutorials/WritingMakefiles/node2.html
the source code (test.m):
#import Foundation/Foundation.h
int
main (void)
{
NSLog (@This is the TEST program);
return 0;
}
when I compile and install, if I enter the full path
the tool works
fine, however if I only specify the tool without the
path nothing returns.
% which test
./test
% test
% ./test
2006-11-13 11:12:13.664 test[18076] This is the TEST
program
why do I need to put in the full path?
another executable named test exists in your path,
which is used for shell scripting and stuff
No, as 'which' shows, the test in his $PATH is ./test. However test
is a builtin in many recent shells: man builtin.
--
Graham J Lee
http://www.thaesofereode.info/
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Re: command line tools and $PATH
On 13 Nov 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: actually this is not true, there was no 'opentool' or equivalent, it always put tools into the PATH, GNUstep does also, Interesting, you are correct- the Tools directories are on the path now. I have been so used to using opentool and openapp. so i'm not actually sure why opentool should still exist Yes, it should be removed then. Charles -- printk(CARDNAME: Bad Craziness - sent packet while busy.\n ); linux-2.6.6/drivers/net/smc9194.c pgp3syiODYh9Y.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
[Ftba-devel] Nice and Tight
Wanna get (L)aid, but don't want the hassles in the morning? We have the answer, the (P)ussy without a mouth. http://rcanr.net Don't need to get (L)aid rcanr.net/r.php ___ Ftba-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ftba-devel
