Re: WeMakeFedora is under attack
Hello, Am 23.02.22 um 17:19 schrieb Quiliro Ordóñez: The choice for the user is to dump either the nonfree software or to dump the hardware. The later choice is the best one because the user will think about what she buys next time. It is a way to take responsability and stop relying the abundance of choice. Oh, you want to educate the user to use his/hers freedom in a proper way. That's interesting! I hope these comments enrich the discussion. :-) Yes they do (for all, who never heard them)! Kind regards Michael OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: WeMakeFedora is under attack
Hello, the freedom no. 0 is to use software for any purpose. If you want to use software on a special computer model, you might need non-free firmware. That is bad enough. It isn't a restriction by licence but an actual one. So distributors as users have the choice: Either to use (or distribute) non-free firmware and use and run Free Software on that computer model. Or to run Free Software only on a few computers, which don't need non-free firmware. That is an important lack of choice and reduces the freedom of the user. So the question is: Which policy increases the common freedom? IMO both policies are honourable, because both are focused on the freedom of the software user. Kind reagrds Michael OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: should FSFE disclose Matthias Kirschner legal bills?
Hello, you forgot Karsten Gerloff. Is Georg your hero now? Kind regards Michael Am 06.01.21 um 10:28 schrieb Debian Community News Team: FSFE claims[1] to follow guidelines from Transparency International Should FSFE disclose how much money from donors was used to pay the lawyers defending Matthias Kirschner? Here are the questions: - how much money has gone to lawyers for staff disputes when Georg Greve was president? - how much money has gone to lawyers for staff disputes under the rule of Matthias Kirschner? - how many staff have made complaints against Greve? - how many staff have made complaints against Kirschner? - how many interns have made complaints against Greve? - how many interns have made complaints against Kirschner? 1. https://fsfe.org/about/transparency-commitment.en.html ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Matthias Kirschner in court, stalking female employee
Hello, Am 05.01.21 um 13:41 schrieb Debian Community News Team: Some people, like Matthias Kirschner and Molly de Blanc, are not developers. They can not do any technical work. There are some people like this in both FSFE and Debian, they have titles, like President in FSFE or "non-uploading Debian Developer", these are titles for imposters and girlfriends. Even normal "uploading Debian Developers" are not developers in a common meaning. They do not develop software (there are some exceptions). Their job as DD is to package software. That is a different task than developing software. Kind regards Michael OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Leaving this list
Dear Roland, it is better to stopp feeding a troll, if his or hers input are only insults. It is impossible to change his or hers poor behavior. Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: fall of Berlin Wall, rebuilt by FSFE?
Hello, Am 06.11.19 um 16:27 schrieb Daniel Pocock: > > > On 06/11/2019 15:19, br...@tracciabi.li wrote: > The published minutes contain an acid attack on a volunteer > > When somebody is assaulted 11 to 1 it is more like a gang rape than a > credible meeting. The document on fsfe.org is a crime. > Nullum crimen sine lege. Please name us the law. Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Am 18.10.19 um 12:39 schrieb ahil...@keemail.me: > We can finally plan our glorious future Please start immediately ! ASAP! It is no coincidence that 238 years ago today the Americans finally beat the British and drove them out of their country. Just as the Americans got rid of the dirty British, You forgot Canada. The British are still in North America. The rebels were able to beat Spain or the Mexicans, but not the British in Canada. Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Am 17.10.19 um 22:23 schrieb RMS Support: that there are dangerous people like Stehman > exist If you discover me "dangerous", then I obviously use my only weapon well: free speech. Thank you very much for that nice compliment. If you want to disarm me, you have to install censorship. Very bad idea! Regards Michael Stehmann signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Some facts
Hello, it is so simple: When the minutes are published, everybody can - assess, whether the "draft" is a fake or not and - check the minutes at the registration court. Than everybody, who likes to, may blame the FSFE because of the decisions on that GA. Than (s)he is able to argue with facts, not with rumors. Are you so impatient, that you can not wait? Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: fuck FSF*
Am 17.10.19 um 14:57 schrieb wiki.le...@mailo.com: > Another broken link: > > https://fsfe.org/about/legal/constitution.en.html > Try this one: https://fsfe.org/about/legal/Constitution.en.pdf (It is a PDF.) Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Some facts
Hello, who is interested will find some information about legal issues here: https://fsfe.org/about/legal/legal.html The 2019 minutes are not published yet. When they will be published, it is possible to check them at the registration court in Hamburg, Germany (Amtsgericht Hamburg VR 17030). Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: some advice from Barack Obama to Free Software communities?
Am 16.10.19 um 17:53 schrieb ahil...@keemail.me: I don't know what an E.V. is, but I'm sure the members are filling their pockets. Ignorant, but a strong opinion. A common fashion nowadays. O tempora, o mores. Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: RMS resigned, why not Matthias Kirschner too?
Am 14.10.19 um 15:39 schrieb ahil...@keemail.me: > Then FSFE did something right, if that was the result. I didn't think I'd be > in favor of ending a city, but I guess Dusseldorf was just so overrun with > censorship, corruption and unfree software that it couldn't be saved. Almost > like RMS, I can say: I am not happy that Dusseldorf is dead, but it is good > that it is gone. Oh' Düsseldorf is still alive and the domicile of the referred legal entity. So do not worry. There is an active group of freedom fighters (without any weapons - except free speech) in Düsseldorf and in the Rhine area. Do not worry. Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: RMS resigned, why not Matthias Kirschner too?
Am 14.10.19 um 15:21 schrieb ahil...@keemail.me: I didn't notice that before, but I can see from your sender that you are a doctor. If I had known that, I would have asked you something a week ago, because I was really shitty last time. I don't know if it was just physical or if it was the attacks here. I hope you feel better now. But I can not help you. I am a doctor of laws (Doctor iuris), not of medicine (MD). Sorry and kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: RMS resigned, why not Matthias Kirschner too?
Because Matthias Kirschner != RMS ;-) Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: This mailinglist
Am 08.10.19 um 11:42 schrieb ahil...@keemail.me: >> What are the topics ot be discussed here to improve the> Free Software >> movement in a productive way? > Thank you for the fact that there are still other comrades-in-arms You can call me comrade, if you like to, but not "in-arms", because I detest tools to hurt or to kill man. Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
This mailinglist
Hello, my problem with this list is, that there are no positive and productive postings on it. So it is a nice documentation of rumours and quarrels in a part of the Free Software movement, nice to enjoy with some popcorn, but not fruitfully. So it is almost all wasted energy. Ok, that was also negative. To become productive: What are the topics ot be discussed here to improve the Free Software movement in a productive way? How does the list become fruitful? Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Fellowship Council election results
Hello Garfield, Am 29.05.19 um 00:51 schrieb Garfield: > > Never trust a smiling cat > > FSF? FSFE? Fellowship? Never trust anybody who promises to fight for your > freedom. It always ends badly. > Given you a serious answer: IMO, I have to fight for my freedom, but ... I can do it together with others in solidarity. And: It's my freedom to choose who are my fellow campaigners. But you are right in the point: "There are no supreme saviours Neither God, nor Caesar, nor tribune." Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: [nomination]for Fellowship Council renewal and activism
Hello, next try for a posting: Am 08.05.19 um 19:16 schrieb Ingrid Schwarz: > "The Fellowship is an activity of FSFE, and indeed one of the primary > ways to get involved in the organisation. It is a place for community > action, collaboration, communication, fun, and recruitment that also > helps fund the other activities of FSFE, for example, the political work." > The Fellowship is not an activity of FSFE any longer. They changed their constition. The simple fact is: FSFE don't want to have "Fellowship representatives" any more. The "Fellowship of FSFE" is dead! It's history. So, if Free Software activists want to promote Free Software together, they have either to be content with being a "supporter" or to become a member of the FSFE or to establish an own organization. Perhaps this organization can collaborate with FSFE in far-off future. Regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: [Discussion] censorship in FSFE, Debian, Mozilla and other communities
Hello Daniel, I have only one question (this is not a DSGVO request yet): How and why I got this email? I'm not a subscriber of discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu. Kind reganrds Michael Stehmann signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu http://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
