Re: Leaving this list
On 12/09/2019 11:24 PM, ahil...@keemail.me wrote: > Nov 22, 2019, 22:16 by bus...@fsfe.org: > >> Dear Daniel >> > > > You're a miserable disciple! Dear Daniel is completely inappropriate with a > traitor like you! It is his way of being polite and my way, too, BTW. And I may leave this list soon, too. Flaming on RMS and the FSF is not a proper behavior in respect of that RMS has done to this world (and his lawyers, of course, writing the licenses). > > > >> I wanted to let you know that I am leaving this list. >> > > > Finally! Another one of Maffia's henchmen who leaves voluntarily. Then we > have even more chances to build our good future. Thank you for your insight > that we don't need dirty pigs like you here! And calling someone "dirty pig" is open-minded? Roland signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: why is this lists messages marked as bad email?
On 11/27/2019 01:14 AM, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote: > So the problem is list.dnsl.org. I guess the people who want to stop > this uncensored list from being delivered, have reported it as spam. > Maybe that means it, but maybe not when just someone else reported it without knowing the implications. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: why is this lists messages marked as bad email?
On 11/26/2019 10:43 PM, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote: > I have attached the mail message which is marked as bad email. Perhaps > you can see the headers to eliminate your server from these bad lists. > Perhaps some of the criticized people reported your server as a bad > server. > > I have also checked my bad-email settings. Thank you for the tip. > > > ___ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu > https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion And here is the report: - X-Spam-Report: * 4.5 PDS_SPF_ALL ASKDNS: SPF set to +all! * [lists.fsfellowship.eu TXT:v=spf1 mx] [+all] * 0.5 JMQ_SPF_ALL ASKDNS: SPF set to +all! * [lists.fsfellowship.eu TXT:v=spf1 mx] [+all] * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at * https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust * [195.8.117.5 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 HAS_REPLY_TO Contains reply-To header * 0.0 FORWARD_RELAY Appears to be relayed through list or forwarding * 1.0 FROM_NOT_REPLYTO From does not match Reply-To * 0.0 ENV_FROM_DIFF0 Envelope From differs from from (eg list) * 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level * mail domains are different * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * 0.5 KAM_EU RAW: Prevalent use of .eu in spam/malware * 0.0 CK_419SIZE typical 419 size - avoid matches in long text * 0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money * -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list * manager * 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD * 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD * -0.1 AM_TRUNCATED Compensate on large message for misfiring rules - It can be found in the header lines. :-) Plese check for yourself what that UPPER_CASE all means. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
On 10/17/2019 10:15 PM, Henning Thielemann wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Roland Häder wrote: > >> Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a >> specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who) >> writes. To much BS for me. > > I guess the most simple way is to configure a filter rule in your > e-mail client program. Yes, I guess so. I thought of a server-side way in my personal account. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
On 10/17/2019 10:23 PM, RMS Support wrote: > Oct 17, 2019, 20:04 by rol...@mxchange.org: >> Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a >> specific sender? Starting to become annoying what this one (you know who) >> writes. To much BS for me. > I cannot understand why people like you want to block valid opinions. > > I assume you mean A. Hilter. He says some strange things but he > rightfully pointed out that there are dangerous people like Stehman > exist who you usually don't know. You should not censor particular > people who say the truth, even if it may hurt. > > Sometimes pain is a good cleansing mechanism for body and brain. > You should try it. > > If you cannot hold the truth, you should leave this list. We don't need you > to get rid of the scum that eradicates our dear leaders. > > Here, I even help you: > https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/options/discussion > > -- > https://backtotheaugust.org/ > > > ___ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu > https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion > I like your statements a lot as I tend to speak the truth over lies out and I may include "horse and rider", means responsible persons in it. But one thing starts anoying here and that is this constant attacks on FSF/E/A (and maybe not limited to them). I'm a recurring anually donor and I keep it as long as I can effort, so I'm a FSFE member. But this "campaigning" is in some way hilarious to me simply because what the main goal of the FSF/E/A is, the spread use use free-libre open source software (FLOSS). So these attacks are really not needed while we all should be thankful to RMS, Linus Torwalds, Alan Cox and all the other great and genius people. So thank you what you did to the world. Without you, this would be a much worse place. Maybe others come up with same idiologies but maybe they won't be organizes as the FSF/E/A and others are. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Removal of A.Hitler
On 10/08/2019 06:41 PM, MBR wrote: > > Since I was the one who first pointed out that the UID portion of the > email address seemed to refer to Adolf Hitler, I feel the need to > mention that I just noticed that it doesn't. Note that the "l" in the > UID comes before the "t". So it could well be a legitimate name which > is unfortunately very easy to misread. > Very easy to misunderstand it. He/she should consider changing the email address because it"feels" like Adolf Hitler. Maybe take a pseudonym instead? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Removal of A.Hitler
On 10/08/2019 05:23 PM, David wrote: > Following the addition of this list member discussion has been > overwhelmed by disgraceful posts and gross aggravation and > aggressiveness towards other list members. This members spam level has > also been, simply, ridiculous and noxious. > > I don't see a list option for adding a poll but, in its absence, please > will other members signify their approval or disapproval with a motion > to request a permanent ban on member A.Hitler ahil...@keemail.me . I > hope that the list owner might be willing to abide by the decision of > the members. > > Approve: > > 1 > > Disapprove: > > > Many thanks to all who take part. > > David > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Feminists (was: anti-RMS / pro-RMS dichotomy)
On 10/03/2019 12:27 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > On 02/10/2019 09:04, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: >> Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> On 02/10/2019 02:44, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: >>> barely known to the agnostical to computational freedom feminist mob >>> That could be insulting to feminists. >> It _should_ be insulting to feminists. Alas, it is evidently not: I have >> not noticed any efforts from them to moderate the mob’s ardour in order to >> protect a good name of their movement, which is, unfortunately, tends to >> become more and more sullied by such incidents. Maybe, I was looking in the >> wrong direction. >> > That is like suggesting that all Americans have to run around all day > apologizing for the antics of Donald Trump. > > A real feminist, by definition, is probably doing productive work and > has no time for this nonsense. > > Have you ever tried showing one of the more oppressive videos from these > toxic people to one of the really talented female developers, engineers > or scientists you know? How do they react? How much do they watch? > > There are some really good diversity speakers too. Those who simply > want to control or humiliate men are not the same thing. No really supported by me. Feminists and masculinists are both crazy and useless. We can fix oppression and unequality by the following 3 (not limited to, but feminists/masculinists excluded) incredients: 1) A lot love!!! 2) Good tolerance/acceptance 3) A really good potion of willingness to learn (about the other gender(s)) This can all, as I hinted, done without any feminists/masculinists. And what the hell is a feministic sex shop?! Scary for me. Sure, let's remove the domimatrix (Domina) sado-maso and bondage things from the general room and move it to a separated room. Also I don't struggle my sex-partners while I fuck (with a lot love) or lick them. Just to say it straight: I'm not AGAINST feminists, I just see them as obsolete or even deprecated. So please support #NoMeTooNeeded !!! Best regards, Roland Haeder PS: I know I now cut the pony tail! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
