[pfSense-discussion] porting web interface
HiI coppied the web interface (/usr/local/www/) and it sub directories to, the directory of my webserver, with the idea of seeing what breaks.All I get is a blank page and when i go to view the source I get an empty document .. The index.php referse to /config/ but I cant find it in the www dir or in the root of the pfsense file system .. Where do I find It.Currently working fom cvs.tgzmany thanks-- Gregory Machin [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]www.linuxpro.co.za www.exponent.co.zaWeb Hosting SolutionsScalable Linux Solutions www.iberry.info (support and admin)+27 72 524 8096
RE: [pfSense-discussion] porting web interface
You need all of /etc/inc And another include that I cant remember off the top of my head Check out the php.ini file for more information From: Gregory Machin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 March 2006 12:47 To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense-discussion] porting web interface Hi I coppied the web interface (/usr/local/www/) and it sub directories to, the directory of my webserver, with the idea of seeing what breaks. All I get is a blank page and when i go to view the source I get an empty document .. The index.php referse to /config/ but I cant find it in the www dir or in the root of the pfsense file system .. Where do I find It. Currently working fom cvs.tgz many thanks -- Gregory Machin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.linuxpro.co.za www.exponent.co.za Web Hosting Solutions Scalable Linux Solutions www.iberry.info (support and admin) +27 72 524 8096
Re: [pfSense-discussion] Synchronization scenario
No, its not smart enough to do that. If you loose a master node, its in your best interest to get it back up and running ASAP as it is the master of the configuration. Furthermore, if you tell a slave to sync back to the master you will end up in a never ending sync loop. On 3/6/06, Amorim, Nuno Alexandre (ext) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does the synchronization work both ways? From master to slave and slave to master? The scenario I'm thinking is the master goes down, and one changes some rules on the slave node. When the master comes up, slave sends the new configuration.
RE: [pfSense-discussion] Synchronization scenario
If you expect that the master is down for some time you can switch master/backup role simply by deleting the sync to IP at the old master and add one to the old slave with the same options. however, you should edit the advskews of the old slave too then. Holger -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 9:12 PM To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Synchronization scenario No, its not smart enough to do that. If you loose a master node, its in your best interest to get it back up and running ASAP as it is the master of the configuration. Furthermore, if you tell a slave to sync back to the master you will end up in a never ending sync loop. On 3/6/06, Amorim, Nuno Alexandre (ext) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does the synchronization work both ways? From master to slave and slave to master? The scenario I'm thinking is the master goes down, and one changes some rules on the slave node. When the master comes up, slave sends the new configuration. Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
Re: [pfSense-discussion] Small suggestion
could probably do it with a tool tip. think thats provided by some standard html tag if I remember right. something with alt text or something. On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 10:04 -0600, Bill Marquette wrote: On 3/5/06, Lawrence Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about having the ip's pop up if you hover over the interface name? Where? Care to do a mockup of what you are envisioning? Thanks --Bill
RE: [pfSense-discussion] Small suggestion
The question is rather where you hover over the interface name... -Original Message- From: Matthew Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 9:44 PM To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Small suggestion could probably do it with a tool tip. think thats provided by some standard html tag if I remember right. something with alt text or something. On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 10:04 -0600, Bill Marquette wrote: On 3/5/06, Lawrence Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about having the ip's pop up if you hover over the interface name? Where? Care to do a mockup of what you are envisioning? Thanks --Bill Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
RE: [pfSense-discussion] Small suggestion
I didn't have a clue, I just thought it was a space saving way. -Original Message- From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 March 2006 21:49 To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Small suggestion Exactly. I've got an idea how I would implement this - but this being discussion@ and it not being my idea in the first place, I'm letting it be discussed ;-P If nothing comes out of this, it's still a good idea, at some point I'll probably implement it my way unless someone comes up with a good suggestion and a mock-up so we can see what it's supposed to look like. --Bill On 3/6/06, Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The question is rather where you hover over the interface name... -Original Message- From: Matthew Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 9:44 PM To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Small suggestion could probably do it with a tool tip. think thats provided by some standard html tag if I remember right. something with alt text or something. On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 10:04 -0600, Bill Marquette wrote: On 3/5/06, Lawrence Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about having the ip's pop up if you hover over the interface name? Where? Care to do a mockup of what you are envisioning? Thanks --Bill Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
[pfSense-discussion] xorp
http://www.xorp.org This is something that just screams integrate! :) Maybe for pfSense 2.0 or so? -- Jure Pečar http://jure.pecar.org/
Re: [pfSense-discussion] xorp
You would need to start from ground 0 with this. Its meant to be a router and does not have PF, etc. Nor does it have CARP, nor does it have insert another feature here. XORP is a great project but to integrate it would mean to start over and loose 99% of the features that make pfSense great IMHO. On 3/6/06, Jure Pečar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.xorp.org This is something that just screams integrate! :) Maybe for pfSense 2.0 or so? -- Jure Pečar http://jure.pecar.org/
