[pfSense-discussion] Antwort: Re: [pfSense-discussion] SNAT / masquerading [Virus Checked]

2007-08-05 Thread T . Brandl

ist erledigt

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
i.A. Ing. Mag. Thomas Brandl

Aon Jauch & Hübener GmbH
Versicherungsmakler
Geiselbergstraße 17
A-1110 Wien

Telefon : + 43 (0) 57800 - 193
Fax : + 43 (0) 57800 - 6193
Mail Adresse: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.aon-jh.at

Sitz: Wien
FN37374m Handelsgericht Wien
Vermittlerregister: 990 000688F01/08




Re: [pfSense-discussion] SNAT / masquerading

2007-08-03 Thread Chris Buechler

Eugen Leitl wrote:

I have a somewhat strange setup (thanks to our provider)
which looks like this:

  LAN* ->   bge0->  192.168.0.1
  WAN* ->   bge1->  10.0.2.6
  OPT1(DMZ)->   vlan0   ->  62.245.148.129

Yes, the WAN is really 10.0.2.6/30, and the gateway is 10.0.2.5
The provider rewrites the traffic so it appears to come from
their own address space. I don't see the point, but that's
what they use.

What I need to do is rewrite the traffic from LAN which
is currently exiting through WAN and is rewritten on the part
of the provider to emerge from one of the addresses from
our /26 network space. The operative words are SNAT and masquerading,
but I haven't been able to see examples of such rewriting
rules for pfsense.

Any pointers?
  


Advanced Outbound NAT.




[pfSense-discussion] SNAT / masquerading

2007-08-03 Thread Eugen Leitl

I have a somewhat strange setup (thanks to our provider)
which looks like this:

  LAN* ->   bge0->  192.168.0.1
  WAN* ->   bge1->  10.0.2.6
  OPT1(DMZ)->   vlan0   ->  62.245.148.129

Yes, the WAN is really 10.0.2.6/30, and the gateway is 10.0.2.5
The provider rewrites the traffic so it appears to come from
their own address space. I don't see the point, but that's
what they use.

What I need to do is rewrite the traffic from LAN which
is currently exiting through WAN and is rewritten on the part
of the provider to emerge from one of the addresses from
our /26 network space. The operative words are SNAT and masquerading,
but I haven't been able to see examples of such rewriting
rules for pfsense.

Any pointers?

-- 
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE