Re: Problems when searching acute or tilde letters in a textfield under tiny_mce.js
I want to share the solution to my problem. I appreciate the kindness
of Malcolm for the suggestions.
After some searching in tinyMCE site, I found a note that recommends
to explicitly leave
option "entities" to empty, I show you a sample:
tinyMCE.init({
// General options
mode : "textareas",
theme : "advanced",
entities : "",
... etc.
It was then necessary for me to recover and inmediately save all
previous records which TextFields were under influence of TinyMCE and
that contained acute or tilde
characters.
I feel happy.
Regards.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Problems when searching acute or tilde letters in a textfield under tiny_mce.js
Hello: Using tiny_mce.js into django Admin (change_form.html) is nice, but when you include into a textField letters such as á or ñ and try to find them using the django search engine, no results are obtained because internally the á is represented by and ñ is represented by Is there a way to solve this? Regards. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
When to use Admin Forms and/or Generic Views and/or New Forms ?
Hello: I know that Django provides 3 ways in using Web forms: Admin Forms, Generic views and New Forms where Admin forms is the easiest one to use. What I would like to know is: 1) Which determinant aspects should force me to use Generic Views instead of Admin Forms? And 2) Which determinant aspects should force me to use new forms instead of Generic Views? Thanks!! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Stephane += Aspen 0.7 (Python webserver)
Chad: 1) I did some tests with a django project and, my web pages look ugly because the reference to .css files was lost, additionally I can not retrieve the content of static files when a click on a certain link. It seems that Aspen needs a reference to these resources. I had a similar problem using Apache but I solved with next instrucctions: Alias /media c:\django\django\contrib\admin\media Alias /attached c:\project\application\attached How can I do something like that in Aspen? Django has some indications about that in: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/static_files/ and there is a relationship with variables MEDIA_ROOT and MEDIA_URL contained in settings.py, althought Apache does not need MEDIA_ROOT. 2) The .pdf manual has a little problem in the 5.2 section (configuration file). Some words were clipped at end of the line. Your work looks nice. Regards, --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Div 'Changelist-filter' overlaps the displaying of some columns in change-list template.
Hello: I am using "list_filter" option in models.py for 3 fields. The model where the filter is, has many columns so, when showing its data in the "change-list" admin template I frequently use the horizontal bar. The problem I have is that does not locate/show its filter content at the end of the last column data, but at the end of the right portion of the screen, overlapping many data columns I have there (Hope you could understand my explanation). This problem happens in both IE7 and FireFox 2.0. May be it is a css problem or something I am doing wrong. ¿Did anybody experienced this? Best regards. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: A question about for loop in templates
Ivan: Many thanks for your attention and help. My intention in this occasion was to gain speed at the moment to show data at the web page. I thought to do something similar to what you kindly proposed, but the only idea that this recommended solution represents a double processing (accommodate the list) and double use of memory with 'table' restrained me to continue and send this message, but as you say, it is better to follow the good practices. Very best regards. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
A question about for loop in templates
I have the next big list:
row 1: ['col1','col2','col3', 'col4',..., 'col30']
row 2: ['col1','col2','col3', 'col4',..., 'col30']
row 3: ['col1','col2','col3', 'col4',..., 'col30']
.
.
.
row 4000: ['col1','col2','col3', 'col4',..., 'col30']
the variable name that contains this list is 'lst'
For each one of the 4000 rows, I want to display data in a web page in
the next column order:
col3 col1 col2 col30 col19
col3 col1 col2 col30 col19
col3 col1 col2 col30 col19
.
.
.
I made the next in views.py:
.
.
info_dict = { 'data': lst,
'poscol': ( 2,0,11,29,18,..)
return render_to_response('pres_marcaciones.html', info_dict)
and in the template I wrote:
.
.
{% for m in data %}
{% for p in poscol %}
{{ m.p }}
{% endfor %}
{% endfor %}
I don get the result I want, I know m.p is not valid. If I do not use
the second for loop I should do:
{% for m in data %}
{{ m.2 }}
{{ m.0 }}
{{ m.11 }}
{{ m.29}}
{{ m.18}}
.
.
.
{% endfor %}
Which looks repetitive. Is this the only and recommended way to do this
under django or which trick could I use?
Thanks!!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Checkboxes all come up checked (after I've initialized them unchecked)
> INSERT INTO sched_day (name) VALUES ('Eight To Five');
> INSERT INTO sched_dayslot (slot, taken, day_id) VALUES ('08:00',
> 'True', '1');
> INSERT INTO sched_dayslot (slot, taken, day_id) VALUES ('09:30',
> 'True', '1');
> INSERT INTO sched_dayslot (slot, taken, day_id) VALUES ('11:00',
> 'False', '1');
> INSERT INTO sched_dayslot (slot, taken, day_id) VALUES ('12:30',
> 'False', '1');
> INSERT INTO sched_dayslot (slot, taken, day_id) VALUES ('02:00',
> 'False', '1');
> INSERT INTO sched_dayslot (slot, taken, day_id) VALUES ('03:30',
> 'False', '1');
>
Did you try putting 1 or 0 instead of 'True' or 'False' respectively?
Regards.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Python 2.5 anyone
I have problems to get mod-python for python 2.5 (win32). Does anybody knows how to get this version. Thanks!! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
FileField in the list_display option
Hello: Into the admin I am including a FileField in the "list_display" option. Is there a way to indicate Django that when clicking this FileField, the content of the file is shown instead of the "change" page? Thanks!!! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Incorrect deletion of records in a relationship table
Russell:
The error happens using the Admin view.
I need to rectify one thing please, I beg your pardon, instead of
modifying Fredo to Frido please, modify for example Maria to Mario,
i.e. when I modify the data that has DATA3 as X and this data is
related to other record in the same table, the relation dissapears.
I send you all the files I used:
models.py
--
from django.db import models
class Tab1(models.Model):
data1 = models.CharField(maxlength=10)
data2 = models.CharField(maxlength=50)
data3 = models.BooleanField(default=False)
data4 = models.ManyToManyField('self', null=True, blank=True,
filter_interface=models.HORIZONTAL, related_name='docrel',
limit_choices_to={'data3__exact': True}) #, symmetrical=False
def __str__(self):
return (self.data2)
class Admin:
fields = (
('HEAD DATA', {'fields': ('data1', 'data2',)}),
('CONTROL', {'fields': ('data3',),}),
('RELATION', {'fields': ('data4', ),}),
)
urls.py
-
from django.conf.urls.defaults import *
urlpatterns = patterns('',
(r'^admin/', include('django.contrib.admin.urls')),
)
settings.py
MANAGERS = ADMINS
DATABASE_ENGINE = 'sqlite3' # 'postgresql', 'mysql',
'sqlite3' or 'ado_mssql'.
DATABASE_NAME = 'c:/os/django/tst/tst.db' # Or path to
database file if using sqlite3.
TIME_ZONE = 'America/Chicago'
LANGUAGE_CODE = 'en-us'
SITE_ID = 1
USE_I18N = True
ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX = '/media/'
TEMPLATE_LOADERS = (
'django.template.loaders.filesystem.load_template_source',
'django.template.loaders.app_directories.load_template_source',
# 'django.template.loaders.eggs.load_template_source',
)
ROOT_URLCONF = 'tst.urls'
INSTALLED_APPS = (
'django.contrib.auth',
'django.contrib.contenttypes',
'django.contrib.sessions',
'django.contrib.sites',
'tst.atst',
'django.contrib.admin',
)
Many, many thanks again!!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Incorrect deletion of records in a relationship table
Russel:
Thanks for your attention. I send you an example
Assuming the model:
class Tab1(models.Model):
data1 = models.CharField(maxlength=10)
data2 = models.CharField(maxlength=50)
data3 = models.BooleanField(default=False)
data4 = models.ManyToManyField('self', null=True, blank=True,
filter_interface=models.HORIZONTAL, related_name='docrel',
limit_choices_to={'data3__exact': True})
After filling data, I have next result:
--
Data1 Data2 Data3 Data4
--
BossMaria X Fredo, Pepe, Sue
BossJoseX Anthony, Carla
BossDavid X Robert,Mike
EmployeeFredo Maria
EmployeePepeMaria
EmployeeCarla Jose
EmployeeAnthony Jose
EmployeeSue Maria
EmployeeRobert David
EmployeeMikeDavid
But some steps before, Assuming I created the first five records only,
screen for creation of Carla will show:
Data2 ->: Carla
Data4 ->:Choice Maria, Jose or David (only 3 are shown in data4
because of the Data3 field condition where X is true)
After completion of data fill, If for example, instead of Fredo, I
change to Frido, the final result will be:
--
Data1 Data2 Data3 Data4
--
BossMaria X Pepe, Sue
BossJoseX Anthony, Carla
BossDavid X Robert,Mike
EmployeeFrido
EmployeePepeMaria
EmployeeCarla Jose
EmployeeAnthony Jose
EmployeeSue Maria
EmployeeRobert David
EmployeeMikeDavid
The relation of Frido to Maria and Maria to Frido (symmetrical=True by
default) dissapeared!! It is important to say that Data2 is not primary
key.
That is my problem.
Very, very best regards
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Incorrect deletion of records in a relationship table
Hello:
I have next model:
class Tab1(models.Model):
data1 = models.CharField(maxlength=1)
data2 = models.CharField(maxlength=5)
data3 = models.BooleanField(default=False)
data4 = models.ManyToManyField('self', null=True, blank=True,
filter_interface=models.HORIZONTAL, related_name='docrel',
limit_choices_to={'data3__exact': True})
I need to assume the symmetrical=True and at the same time keep the
condition limit_choices_to={'data3__exact': True}, however when, for
example, I modify data1 or data2 and the corresponding record has
data3=true and is related to another record in the same Tab1, after
saving the changes the relation disappears!!! (two records are deleted
in the relationship table because it is assumed symmetrical=true)
Only when I add "symmetrical=False" and/or I delete
limit_choices_to={'data3__exact': True} from data4, and I repeat the
previous modification action, relation keeps intact.
Why does this deletion problem occur? Is this a bug?
I tried to explain the best I could; hope it was understood.
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Filtering data in a many-to-many relation of object to itself
James Bennett wrote:
> On 9/2/06, Vizcayno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I need data4 to show me only those records whose data3 value is True.
>
> data4 = models.ManyToManyField('self', null=True, blank=True,
> filter_interface=models.HORIZONTAL, limit_choices_to={'data3__exact': True})
>
> --
> "May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house."
> -- George Carlin
Many, many, many thanks!!!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Filtering data in a many-to-many relation of object to itself
Hello:
I have next model:
from django.db import models
class Tab1(models.Model):
data1 = models.CharField(maxlength=1)
data2 = models.CharField(maxlength=5)
data3 = models.BooleanField(default=False)
data4 = models.ManyToManyField('self', null=True, blank=True,
filter_interface=models.HORIZONTAL)
def __str__(self):
return (self.data2)
class Admin:
pass
I need data4 to show me only those records whose data3 value is True.
How Can I get it using Admin?
Thanks for your help.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Looking into / previewing attached files
Hello: I have defined a FileField attribute in the model. Users can attach documents for every record they save. However, many of them asked me for looking into the file before saving the attached one; the files have .doc, .pdf, .xls or .ppt formats. Is there a way to do this using Admin? Thank you very much for your attention. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Looking into / previewing attached files
Hello: I have defined a FileField attribute in the model. Users can attach documents for every record they save. However, many of them asked me for looking into the file before saving the attached one; the files have .doc, .pdf, .xls or .ppt formats. Is there a way to do this using Admin? Thank you very much for your attention. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Can not attach a file dinamically in folders I define
Hello:
In settings.py I have:
MEDIA_ROOT = 'C:/attach/'
In models.py:
class MaeDoc(models.Model):
.
.
per_con = models.CharField('Contact person', maxlength=40)
doc_adj = models.FileField(upload_to='doc_adj', help_text='Main
doc')
.
.
.
def save(self):
self.doc_adj = '\\1996\\' + self.doc_adj
super(MaeDoc, self).save()
Data saves as expected in the Database (i.e. '\1996\{file name}'),
however, the file was physically created in c:\attach\doc_adj\{file
name} and not in c:\attach\1996\doc_adj\{file name} as I was
expecting.
Is there anything I omitted.
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How to accep only uppercase characters without using manipulators/validators?
Hello: I have a table with two columns, first column is declared as unique=True: == code = description == FI = Finance AC = Accounting office HR = Human resorces . . etc. Under "admin" if user creates another record whose code is AC, an error message appears because he is attempting to duplicate the record (unique is True in code) and that is fine, but if user types Ac or aC or ac, no error message occurs, however I need that django can issue the same error referred to duplication. I tried with this code: def save(self): self.code = self.code.upper() super(MyModel, self).save() but it seems the validation of duplication occurs before I save data and I do get the results I want, the contrary, data is saved duplicated in spite of the unique=True. Is there a way to solve my need without using manipulators/validators? Many Thanks!! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Question and a problem about FileField
Question:
===
After saving a record that includes a file attachment (in a FileField),
how can I open the the attached file directly from my django
application?
Problem:
==
Please, check next model.py:
from django.db import models
from django.db import models
class MaeDocs(models.Model):
cod_doc = models.CharField('Document code', maxlength=15)
nom_doc = models.TextField('Document name')
doc_adj =
models.FileField(upload_to='C:/os/Django/docum/doc_uploads')
def __str__(self):
return (self.cod_doc + "-" + self.nom_doc[:50])
class Admin:
pass
class OthAttachs(models.Model):
cod_doc = models.ForeignKey(MaeDocs, edit_inline=models.STACKED,
num_in_admin=3)
fil_att = models.FileField(upload_to='oattach', core=True)
def __str__(self):
return self.fil_att
class Admin:
pass
First table is for saving data about a document including its main
attachment. Second table is for attaching one or more additional
documents related to the first one.
When I save a first record including main and additional attachments
and then I verify the results of the saving, all goes well; if I change
the content of some data in the MaeDocs table (nom-doc for example) and
save the changes, when verifying the record again I can see that the
secondary attachment files disappeared. Checking the History of the
record, it indicates that the secondary attachments were effectively
replaced by ' '. How can I avoid this situation?
Thanks!!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Max datetime
It is about temporality of a record. Suppose I have a price table for each material: Material Price Valid to - material-1 $12.50 2006-01-01 material-1 $12:52 2006-05-03 material-1 $13:59 2999-12-31 material-2 $54.32 2999-12-31 . . . For material-1 I know that the price $13.59 is valid from 2006-05-04 to the infinite, until a new price is established for this material. Thanks again!! If a record has the field date/time="2999-12-31 23:59:59" it means it is in effect, but if it contains "2006-08-10 10.00:01", for example, it is an expired record however I must keep it for historical reasons. For example --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Max datetime
Adrian: Thanks for your attention and answer. You will agree however that "default=datetime.max" would have been a clean solution (not hardcoding) to establish the maximum date/time into the models.py file, unless you kindly suggest me another. Thanks again!! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Max datetime
Hi:
I have next code:
from datetime import datetime
.
.
.
end_date = models.DateTimeField('End date'', default=datetime.max)
end_time value is = -12-31 23:59:59
However Django indicates it is not a valid date when I want to save a
record.
What is wrong?
Regards
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Search Engine for Python and Django
Hello Kevin: The environment used is Windows? If yes, how did you compiled to use with python? Thanks!!! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Search Engine for Python and Django
Rik But Xapwrap depends on pyLucene to work. I really would like an integrated solution, such as Django is. I continue with my pilgrimage. Many thanks really. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Search Engine for Python and Django
Hi Wade: Thanks for the information. Do not have the sensation that nxlucene is an isolated effort? isn't it better to join forces with pyLucene? Do you think this solution would apply to Django? Thanks again!! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Search Engine for Python and Django
Nkeric: I am evaluating this option now. It seems to be the only one and good alternative for pyhton. Best regards. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Search Engine for Python and Django
It was the third I explored also, I made a question in the mailing list, it is pending of answer. I want to know if the tool can index and search over .doc files and .pdf files. By now, seems it only works on .txt, .html and other format that is characteristic of hyperestraier. Thanks for your attention. Best regards. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Search Engine for Python and Django
Hi: Do your have news about the promising MerQuery? I was looking for some good open software Search Engine API (index and search) for Python in Win32. I could see some promising ones but, as always in the open soft. community, many atomised and incomplete efforts. The last I looked was Swish-e which does not have a .dll API, its API only searches, the word documents can not be indexed with catdoc.exe because the developer hates Windows and the Python API does not seem to be active. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Problems in encryption when creating a new user with Admin
Malcom: Many thanks for your time and interest in answering and clarifying my doubts. According to this, it is now a little detail comparing with the general and nice architecture of Django. Very best regards. Vizcayno. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Problems in encryption when creating a new user with Admin
When I create a new user in the Admin with all privileges, Django asks for new user and password; When I type the password I can see what I write, I think this field should be protected from seeing password. After saving the new user I logout Admin, then I try to login with the new user, the application denies to log in because it is wrong, however I typed correctly user and password. When I see the database (table auth_user), the password saved for the new user is not encrypted such as the initial administrator is. What is wrong? Thanks!!! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
