Re: FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-27 Thread Philip Mountifield

So I've had a further look into this.

Firstly, I updated to PG 8.4, and found the the issue is still there. 
Secondly I had a look at Matthias' code on github and tries a few hacks. 
I found that clearing the caches on the opposite side of the many to 
many relationship solved the problem.


E.g. for "an_instance.a_many_to_many_field" I cleared the caches in 
"an_instance.a_many_to_many_field.model._meta"


Now I'm going to look into the creation of the dynamic models to see 
what has changed between Django 1.2 and 1.3 in how this happens and 
their sequence.


Philip

On 26/09/2011 11:37, Matthias Kestenholz wrote:

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Matthias Kestenholz  wrote:

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Philip Mountifield
  wrote:

I also have a great deal of dynamically generated models. Interestingly in
my case I find the issue when using the development server with DEBUG =
TRUE, I've not yet tried it in deployment.

I'll take a look at your github, thanks for sharing the link.

Out of interest, with respect to David's comment about postgres versions, do
you use version 8.1 or another?


(Sorry for pressing send too early.)


We don't use postgresql at all (unfortunately, but that's a different
topic) on the site in question.


Matthias


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django 
users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.



Re: FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-26 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Matthias Kestenholz  wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Philip Mountifield
>  wrote:
>> I also have a great deal of dynamically generated models. Interestingly in
>> my case I find the issue when using the development server with DEBUG =
>> TRUE, I've not yet tried it in deployment.
>>
>> I'll take a look at your github, thanks for sharing the link.
>>
>> Out of interest, with respect to David's comment about postgres versions, do
>> you use version 8.1 or another?
>>

(Sorry for pressing send too early.)


We don't use postgresql at all (unfortunately, but that's a different
topic) on the site in question.


Matthias

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.



Re: FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-26 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Philip Mountifield
 wrote:
> I also have a great deal of dynamically generated models. Interestingly in
> my case I find the issue when using the development server with DEBUG =
> TRUE, I've not yet tried it in deployment.
>
> I'll take a look at your github, thanks for sharing the link.
>
> Out of interest, with respect to David's comment about postgres versions, do
> you use version 8.1 or another?
>

We don't (unfortunately, but that's a different topic) on the site in question.


Matthias

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.



Re: FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-26 Thread David Markey
I actually haven't moved.. I'm still using django 1.2.x. :)

Although we plan to move to PG 9.1 and django 1.3 within the next few
weeks(we are already using both in testing)

I think i read something somewhere in the django 1.3 documentation that PG
8.1 was not supported any more(could have dreamt it though).





On 26 September 2011 11:30, Philip Mountifield wrote:

>  I am indeed using psycopyg2 and pg8.1, which version did you move to in
> order to solve the problem? I have just been using 8.1 since it was the
> default for CentOS 5, but I also see the 8.4 is available via yum.
>
> Philip
>
>
> On 26/09/2011 11:20, David Markey wrote:
>
> I had some problems with 1.3 and Postgres 8.1,
>
>  Are you using psycopg2 and pg 8.1?
>
> On 26 September 2011 11:16, Russell Keith-Magee 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Philip,
>>
>> I can't say I've seen the error you report.
>>
>> My immediate question when I see reports like this is "what else are
>> you doing?". Django has an extensive test suite, and things like m2m
>> fields are tested very heavily. Outside of Django's test suite, there
>> are thousands of applications out there using Django, and many of them
>> are using Django 1.3, and this is the first time that this particular
>> problem has been reported. So, you are clearly doing *something* that
>> is unusual (whether you know it's unusual or not).
>>
>> What we need is a reproducible test case -- the smallest possible
>> sample of code that works under 1.2.7, but breaks under 1.3.1. That
>> will provide us the basis on which to debug the problem, and form the
>> core of a regression test to make sure the problem doesn't occur again
>> in the future.
>>
>> Yours,
>> Russ Magee %-)
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Philip Mountifield
>>  wrote:
>> > Has anyone else experienced this error? Any help would be appreciated.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Philip
>> >
>> > On 23/09/2011 14:40, Philip wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just been updating to Django 1.3.1 and come across an odd error. I'm
>> >> getting the following error from some code which works with version
>> >> 1.2.7.
>> >>
>> >> FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
>> >> Choices are: id, name, site, type
>> >>
>> >> The odd thing being email_config_set is a related name for a
>> >> ManyToMany field. I'm not sure why django is trying to resolve it into
>> >> a field.
>> >>
>> >> To make it even more odd, this error occurs when DEBUG = TRUE and not
>> >> when DEBUG = FALSE when testing with runserver.
>> >>
>> >> I've been trying to solve this for days now with much googling/pdb/
>> >> logging, but since the exception originates deep inside django I'm not
>> >> familiar enough to find what is going wrong:
>> >>
>> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> >>   File "./core/driver.py", line 268, in run
>> >> self.init_norm()
>> >>   File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 130, in init_norm
>> >> self.load_config()
>> >>   File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 71, in load_config
>> >> events = list(config.events.select_related())
>> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> >> django/db/models/manager.py", line 168, in select_related
>> >> return self.get_query_set().select_related(*args, **kwargs)
>> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> >> django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 497, in get_query_set
>> >> return
>> >>
>> >>
>> superclass.get_query_set(self).using(db)._next_is_sticky().filter(**(self.core_filters))
>> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> >> django/db/models/query.py", line 550, in filter
>> >> return self._filter_or_exclude(False, *args, **kwargs)
>> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> >> django/db/models/query.py", line 568, in _filter_or_exclude
>> >> clone.query.add_q(Q(*args, **kwargs))
>> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> >> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1194, in add_q
>> >> can_reuse=used_aliases, force_having=force_having)
>> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> >> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1069, in add_filter
>> >> negate=negate, process_extras=process_extras)
>> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> >> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1260, in setup_joins
>> >> "Choices are: %s" % (name, ", ".join(names)))
>> >> FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
>> >> Choices are: id, name, site, type
>> >>
>> >> Any ideas/solutions/pointers/tips would be most welcome.
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> > "Django users" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
>> > To 

Re: FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-26 Thread Philip Mountifield
I also have a great deal of dynamically generated models. Interestingly 
in my case I find the issue when using the development server with DEBUG 
= TRUE, I've not yet tried it in deployment.


I'll take a look at your github, thanks for sharing the link.

Out of interest, with respect to David's comment about postgres 
versions, do you use version 8.1 or another?


Phil

On 26/09/2011 11:27, Matthias Kestenholz wrote:

Hi Philip

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Philip  wrote:

FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
Choices are: id, name, site, type

Any ideas/solutions/pointers/tips would be most welcome.

Yes, I've seen similar problems in two sites I'm running. I suspect it
has to do with dynamically created models and startup timing effects
in our case. I'm not sure when it started and it's really hard to test
because it only happens in production (mod_wsgi / DEBUG=False) and I
don't have a consistent view of when the problem happens yet.

What we are doing in FeinCMS against it is trying to remove the caches
on Model._meta when new models are being created; this works for us,
but isn't all that nice. I'm running the following code in production
and will be waiting a few hours / days for the problem to manifest
itself again, hoping it wont:
https://github.com/matthiask/feincms/commit/f2de708a09f8b6cf4fdbca6b3583747b6ebbc2e2


Matthias




--

Philip Mountifield
Formac Electronics Ltd
tel  +44 (0) 1225 837333
fax  +44 (0) 1225 430995

pmountifi...@formac.net
www.formac.net
www.telgas.net

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django 
users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.



Re: FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-26 Thread Philip Mountifield
I am indeed using psycopyg2 and pg8.1, which version did you move to in 
order to solve the problem? I have just been using 8.1 since it was the 
default for CentOS 5, but I also see the 8.4 is available via yum.


Philip

On 26/09/2011 11:20, David Markey wrote:

I had some problems with 1.3 and Postgres 8.1,

Are you using psycopg2 and pg 8.1?

On 26 September 2011 11:16, Russell Keith-Magee 
> wrote:


Hi Philip,

I can't say I've seen the error you report.

My immediate question when I see reports like this is "what else are
you doing?". Django has an extensive test suite, and things like m2m
fields are tested very heavily. Outside of Django's test suite, there
are thousands of applications out there using Django, and many of them
are using Django 1.3, and this is the first time that this particular
problem has been reported. So, you are clearly doing *something* that
is unusual (whether you know it's unusual or not).

What we need is a reproducible test case -- the smallest possible
sample of code that works under 1.2.7, but breaks under 1.3.1. That
will provide us the basis on which to debug the problem, and form the
core of a regression test to make sure the problem doesn't occur again
in the future.

Yours,
Russ Magee %-)

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Philip Mountifield
> wrote:
> Has anyone else experienced this error? Any help would be
appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Philip
>
> On 23/09/2011 14:40, Philip wrote:
>>
>> Just been updating to Django 1.3.1 and come across an odd
error. I'm
>> getting the following error from some code which works with version
>> 1.2.7.
>>
>> FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
>> Choices are: id, name, site, type
>>
>> The odd thing being email_config_set is a related name for a
>> ManyToMany field. I'm not sure why django is trying to resolve
it into
>> a field.
>>
>> To make it even more odd, this error occurs when DEBUG = TRUE
and not
>> when DEBUG = FALSE when testing with runserver.
>>
>> I've been trying to solve this for days now with much googling/pdb/
>> logging, but since the exception originates deep inside django
I'm not
>> familiar enough to find what is going wrong:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "./core/driver.py", line 268, in run
>> self.init_norm()
>>   File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 130, in init_norm
>> self.load_config()
>>   File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 71, in load_config
>> events = list(config.events.select_related())
>>   File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/manager.py", line 168, in select_related
>> return self.get_query_set().select_related(*args, **kwargs)
>>   File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 497, in get_query_set
>> return
>>
>>

superclass.get_query_set(self).using(db)._next_is_sticky().filter(**(self.core_filters))
>>   File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/query.py", line 550, in filter
>> return self._filter_or_exclude(False, *args, **kwargs)
>>   File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/query.py", line 568, in _filter_or_exclude
>> clone.query.add_q(Q(*args, **kwargs))
>>   File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1194, in add_q
>> can_reuse=used_aliases, force_having=force_having)
>>   File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1069, in add_filter
>> negate=negate, process_extras=process_extras)
>>   File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1260, in setup_joins
>> "Choices are: %s" % (name, ", ".join(names)))
>> FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
>> Choices are: id, name, site, type
>>
>> Any ideas/solutions/pointers/tips would be most welcome.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups
> "Django users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
django-users@googlegroups.com .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
> For more options, visit this group at
   

Re: FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-26 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
Hi Philip

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Philip  wrote:
> FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
> Choices are: id, name, site, type
>
> Any ideas/solutions/pointers/tips would be most welcome.

Yes, I've seen similar problems in two sites I'm running. I suspect it
has to do with dynamically created models and startup timing effects
in our case. I'm not sure when it started and it's really hard to test
because it only happens in production (mod_wsgi / DEBUG=False) and I
don't have a consistent view of when the problem happens yet.

What we are doing in FeinCMS against it is trying to remove the caches
on Model._meta when new models are being created; this works for us,
but isn't all that nice. I'm running the following code in production
and will be waiting a few hours / days for the problem to manifest
itself again, hoping it wont:
https://github.com/matthiask/feincms/commit/f2de708a09f8b6cf4fdbca6b3583747b6ebbc2e2


Matthias

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.



Re: FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-26 Thread David Markey
I had some problems with 1.3 and Postgres 8.1,

Are you using psycopg2 and pg 8.1?

On 26 September 2011 11:16, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:

> Hi Philip,
>
> I can't say I've seen the error you report.
>
> My immediate question when I see reports like this is "what else are
> you doing?". Django has an extensive test suite, and things like m2m
> fields are tested very heavily. Outside of Django's test suite, there
> are thousands of applications out there using Django, and many of them
> are using Django 1.3, and this is the first time that this particular
> problem has been reported. So, you are clearly doing *something* that
> is unusual (whether you know it's unusual or not).
>
> What we need is a reproducible test case -- the smallest possible
> sample of code that works under 1.2.7, but breaks under 1.3.1. That
> will provide us the basis on which to debug the problem, and form the
> core of a regression test to make sure the problem doesn't occur again
> in the future.
>
> Yours,
> Russ Magee %-)
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Philip Mountifield
>  wrote:
> > Has anyone else experienced this error? Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Philip
> >
> > On 23/09/2011 14:40, Philip wrote:
> >>
> >> Just been updating to Django 1.3.1 and come across an odd error. I'm
> >> getting the following error from some code which works with version
> >> 1.2.7.
> >>
> >> FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
> >> Choices are: id, name, site, type
> >>
> >> The odd thing being email_config_set is a related name for a
> >> ManyToMany field. I'm not sure why django is trying to resolve it into
> >> a field.
> >>
> >> To make it even more odd, this error occurs when DEBUG = TRUE and not
> >> when DEBUG = FALSE when testing with runserver.
> >>
> >> I've been trying to solve this for days now with much googling/pdb/
> >> logging, but since the exception originates deep inside django I'm not
> >> familiar enough to find what is going wrong:
> >>
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >>   File "./core/driver.py", line 268, in run
> >> self.init_norm()
> >>   File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 130, in init_norm
> >> self.load_config()
> >>   File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 71, in load_config
> >> events = list(config.events.select_related())
> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
> >> django/db/models/manager.py", line 168, in select_related
> >> return self.get_query_set().select_related(*args, **kwargs)
> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
> >> django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 497, in get_query_set
> >> return
> >>
> >>
> superclass.get_query_set(self).using(db)._next_is_sticky().filter(**(self.core_filters))
> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
> >> django/db/models/query.py", line 550, in filter
> >> return self._filter_or_exclude(False, *args, **kwargs)
> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
> >> django/db/models/query.py", line 568, in _filter_or_exclude
> >> clone.query.add_q(Q(*args, **kwargs))
> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
> >> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1194, in add_q
> >> can_reuse=used_aliases, force_having=force_having)
> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
> >> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1069, in add_filter
> >> negate=negate, process_extras=process_extras)
> >>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
> >> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1260, in setup_joins
> >> "Choices are: %s" % (name, ", ".join(names)))
> >> FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
> >> Choices are: id, name, site, type
> >>
> >> Any ideas/solutions/pointers/tips would be most welcome.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Django users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
> >
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 

Re: FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-26 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
Hi Philip,

I can't say I've seen the error you report.

My immediate question when I see reports like this is "what else are
you doing?". Django has an extensive test suite, and things like m2m
fields are tested very heavily. Outside of Django's test suite, there
are thousands of applications out there using Django, and many of them
are using Django 1.3, and this is the first time that this particular
problem has been reported. So, you are clearly doing *something* that
is unusual (whether you know it's unusual or not).

What we need is a reproducible test case -- the smallest possible
sample of code that works under 1.2.7, but breaks under 1.3.1. That
will provide us the basis on which to debug the problem, and form the
core of a regression test to make sure the problem doesn't occur again
in the future.

Yours,
Russ Magee %-)

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Philip Mountifield
 wrote:
> Has anyone else experienced this error? Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Philip
>
> On 23/09/2011 14:40, Philip wrote:
>>
>> Just been updating to Django 1.3.1 and come across an odd error. I'm
>> getting the following error from some code which works with version
>> 1.2.7.
>>
>> FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
>> Choices are: id, name, site, type
>>
>> The odd thing being email_config_set is a related name for a
>> ManyToMany field. I'm not sure why django is trying to resolve it into
>> a field.
>>
>> To make it even more odd, this error occurs when DEBUG = TRUE and not
>> when DEBUG = FALSE when testing with runserver.
>>
>> I've been trying to solve this for days now with much googling/pdb/
>> logging, but since the exception originates deep inside django I'm not
>> familiar enough to find what is going wrong:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "./core/driver.py", line 268, in run
>>     self.init_norm()
>>   File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 130, in init_norm
>>     self.load_config()
>>   File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 71, in load_config
>>     events = list(config.events.select_related())
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/manager.py", line 168, in select_related
>>     return self.get_query_set().select_related(*args, **kwargs)
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 497, in get_query_set
>>     return
>>
>> superclass.get_query_set(self).using(db)._next_is_sticky().filter(**(self.core_filters))
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/query.py", line 550, in filter
>>     return self._filter_or_exclude(False, *args, **kwargs)
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/query.py", line 568, in _filter_or_exclude
>>     clone.query.add_q(Q(*args, **kwargs))
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1194, in add_q
>>     can_reuse=used_aliases, force_having=force_having)
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1069, in add_filter
>>     negate=negate, process_extras=process_extras)
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
>> django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1260, in setup_joins
>>     "Choices are: %s" % (name, ", ".join(names)))
>> FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
>> Choices are: id, name, site, type
>>
>> Any ideas/solutions/pointers/tips would be most welcome.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.



Re: FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-26 Thread Philip Mountifield

Has anyone else experienced this error? Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks

Philip

On 23/09/2011 14:40, Philip wrote:

Just been updating to Django 1.3.1 and come across an odd error. I'm
getting the following error from some code which works with version
1.2.7.

FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
Choices are: id, name, site, type

The odd thing being email_config_set is a related name for a
ManyToMany field. I'm not sure why django is trying to resolve it into
a field.

To make it even more odd, this error occurs when DEBUG = TRUE and not
when DEBUG = FALSE when testing with runserver.

I've been trying to solve this for days now with much googling/pdb/
logging, but since the exception originates deep inside django I'm not
familiar enough to find what is going wrong:

Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "./core/driver.py", line 268, in run
 self.init_norm()
   File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 130, in init_norm
 self.load_config()
   File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 71, in load_config
 events = list(config.events.select_related())
   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/manager.py", line 168, in select_related
 return self.get_query_set().select_related(*args, **kwargs)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 497, in get_query_set
 return
superclass.get_query_set(self).using(db)._next_is_sticky().filter(**(self.core_filters))
   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/query.py", line 550, in filter
 return self._filter_or_exclude(False, *args, **kwargs)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/query.py", line 568, in _filter_or_exclude
 clone.query.add_q(Q(*args, **kwargs))
   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1194, in add_q
 can_reuse=used_aliases, force_having=force_having)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1069, in add_filter
 negate=negate, process_extras=process_extras)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1260, in setup_joins
 "Choices are: %s" % (name, ", ".join(names)))
FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
Choices are: id, name, site, type

Any ideas/solutions/pointers/tips would be most welcome.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django 
users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.



FieldError on ManyToMany after upgrading to Django 1.3

2011-09-23 Thread Philip
Just been updating to Django 1.3.1 and come across an odd error. I'm
getting the following error from some code which works with version
1.2.7.

FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
Choices are: id, name, site, type

The odd thing being email_config_set is a related name for a
ManyToMany field. I'm not sure why django is trying to resolve it into
a field.

To make it even more odd, this error occurs when DEBUG = TRUE and not
when DEBUG = FALSE when testing with runserver.

I've been trying to solve this for days now with much googling/pdb/
logging, but since the exception originates deep inside django I'm not
familiar enough to find what is going wrong:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./core/driver.py", line 268, in run
self.init_norm()
  File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 130, in init_norm
self.load_config()
  File "./driver/emailevent/background.py", line 71, in load_config
events = list(config.events.select_related())
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/manager.py", line 168, in select_related
return self.get_query_set().select_related(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 497, in get_query_set
return
superclass.get_query_set(self).using(db)._next_is_sticky().filter(**(self.core_filters))
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/query.py", line 550, in filter
return self._filter_or_exclude(False, *args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/query.py", line 568, in _filter_or_exclude
clone.query.add_q(Q(*args, **kwargs))
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1194, in add_q
can_reuse=used_aliases, force_having=force_having)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1069, in add_filter
negate=negate, process_extras=process_extras)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/
django/db/models/sql/query.py", line 1260, in setup_joins
"Choices are: %s" % (name, ", ".join(names)))
FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'email_config_set' into field.
Choices are: id, name, site, type

Any ideas/solutions/pointers/tips would be most welcome.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.