Re: Decoupling between projects and app in 4-part tutorial.
this was for me also a slight trick to learn. I got more from blog posts than the docs (and I love the django docs) the trick is that your PYTHONPATH (and don't forget the python path of your deployment server) should point to the dir above your project dir and the dir above your apps dir. I have echo $PYTHONPATH /Users/crucial/Sites/gitpo.git/djapps:/Users/crucial/Sites/gitpo.git/pluggables djapps app1 app2 pluggables thirdpartyapp1 thirdpartyapp2 site1 manage.py site2 manage.py site1www images so in development when I run site1, due to PYTHONPATH I also have djapps and pluggables in my path from app1.models import * (I agree keeping the intro tutorial very simple is best. perhaps it could then link to a best practices of folder layout so that you can grow when I try out a system I am really on a first date. I don't want to know about the maintenance issues. ) On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:41 PM, dahpgjgamganwrote: > > Hi, > > In the 4-part tutorial on Django's main site, there's a lot of advice > on how to decouple apps and projects, but when I look at the import > statements in most of the tutorial's files, it's always "from > projectname.appname import ." - not very decoupled for me. Am > I missing something, is there a good reason why those imports look > like that and not simply "from appname... import ..."? > > Thanks! > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Decoupling between projects and app in 4-part tutorial.
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 08:53 -0800, dahpgjgamgan wrote: [...] > > People experienced in Python realise that import statements are > > flexible, so what's written in the tutorial is only a guide. People > > needing to follow every line of code in the tutorial and just learning > > Python don't need the extra baggage of worrying about that stuff in the > > first tutorial they do. > > So making the imports don't include project name would make them more > worried? No. It will make precisely no difference. Which is why claims about how terrible this all is are such low-value. Malcolm --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Decoupling between projects and app in 4-part tutorial.
On Jan 13, 1:51 am, Malcolm Tredinnickwrote: > [...] > > Look, if you aren't going to be moving the applications around, the > imports in the tutorial aren't horrible. It's the beginner's tutorial. That's a big if, regarding that tutorial does stress decoupling between project and apps on several occasions. > People experienced in Python realise that import statements are > flexible, so what's written in the tutorial is only a guide. People > needing to follow every line of code in the tutorial and just learning > Python don't need the extra baggage of worrying about that stuff in the > first tutorial they do. So making the imports don't include project name would make them more worried? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Decoupling between projects and app in 4-part tutorial.
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 16:53 -0800, Greg Aumann wrote: [...] > I am wondering why the tutorial teaches this bad practice when there > is so much emphasis in Django on reusable apps. When you could instead be wondering if it really is truly bad practice or just alternative practice and a reasonable compromise for an introductory process. Or, you know, just learning Django and not sweating the little stuff. Look, if you aren't going to be moving the applications around, the imports in the tutorial aren't horrible. It's the beginner's tutorial. People experienced in Python realise that import statements are flexible, so what's written in the tutorial is only a guide. People needing to follow every line of code in the tutorial and just learning Python don't need the extra baggage of worrying about that stuff in the first tutorial they do. Every single instructional document you read contains compromises. Regards, Malcolm --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Decoupling between projects and app in 4-part tutorial.
On Jan 12, 5:41 am, dahpgjgamganwrote: > In the 4-part tutorial on Django's main site, there's a lot of advice > on how to decouple apps and projects, but when I look at the import > statements in most of the tutorial's files, it's always "from > projectname.appname import ." - not very decoupled for me. You can leave the mysite off various things. So in the settings file the INSTALLED_APPS you can put polls instead of mysite.polls. The same for the import statements. This works because the code is run in the mysite directory and python automatically finds modules in the directory the code is running in. In other words python considers the current working directory to be on the python path. > Am I missing something, is there a good reason why those imports look > like that and not simply "from appname... import ..."? I am wondering why the tutorial teaches this bad practice when there is so much emphasis in Django on reusable apps. It seems to me that teaching the better way of leaving off the site directory requires no code change but only a documentation change to the tutorial. Even better would be making the backwards incompatible change of removing the project directory from the python path to encourage better practice. But I also am just learning Django so probably have failed to consider something important. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---