Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry
Acknowledged that Issue 130 is open for this. On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 7:21 PM Tim Wicinski wrote: > > Re-reading section 9.5, I think we should rewrite this to mention the > registry being deprecated. > > I open an issue on this > > tim > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 12:00 PM Tim Wicinski wrote: > >> >> Generally they will leave it and mark Obsolete. This should be called >> out in the RFC. >> (I have not looked right now). >> >> tim >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 11:42 AM Murray S. Kucherawy >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 6:49 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: >>> since we removed the rf= tag (format of failure reports), do we still need to tackle the IANA registry? Since we only use one format, it makes little sense. However, the registry actually exists. Is it possible to delete or obsolete it, or does it have to stay there as a relict for ever? >>> >>> I'm guessing it's possible for us to direct IANA to destroy a registry, >>> or (more likely) leave a tombstone page in its place. I'll ask. >>> >>> -MSK >>> ___ >>> dmarc mailing list >>> dmarc@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >>> >> ___ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > -- Todd Herr | Technical Director, Standards & Ecosystem Email: todd.h...@valimail.com Phone: 703-220-4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system. ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry
Re-reading section 9.5, I think we should rewrite this to mention the registry being deprecated. I open an issue on this tim On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 12:00 PM Tim Wicinski wrote: > > Generally they will leave it and mark Obsolete. This should be called out > in the RFC. > (I have not looked right now). > > tim > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 11:42 AM Murray S. Kucherawy > wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 6:49 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> >>> since we removed the rf= tag (format of failure reports), do we still >>> need to tackle the IANA registry? Since we only use one format, it >>> makes little sense. However, the registry actually exists. Is it >>> possible to delete or obsolete it, or does it have to stay there as a >>> relict for ever? >>> >> >> I'm guessing it's possible for us to direct IANA to destroy a registry, >> or (more likely) leave a tombstone page in its place. I'll ask. >> >> -MSK >> ___ >> dmarc mailing list >> dmarc@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >> > ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry
Generally they will leave it and mark Obsolete. This should be called out in the RFC. (I have not looked right now). tim On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 11:42 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 6:49 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > >> since we removed the rf= tag (format of failure reports), do we still >> need to tackle the IANA registry? Since we only use one format, it >> makes little sense. However, the registry actually exists. Is it >> possible to delete or obsolete it, or does it have to stay there as a >> relict for ever? >> > > I'm guessing it's possible for us to direct IANA to destroy a registry, or > (more likely) leave a tombstone page in its place. I'll ask. > > -MSK > ___ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 6:49 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > since we removed the rf= tag (format of failure reports), do we still > need to tackle the IANA registry? Since we only use one format, it > makes little sense. However, the registry actually exists. Is it > possible to delete or obsolete it, or does it have to stay there as a > relict for ever? > I'm guessing it's possible for us to direct IANA to destroy a registry, or (more likely) leave a tombstone page in its place. I'll ask. -MSK ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
