Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
7/25/2014 1:17 AM, Brian Haberman kirjoitti: On 7/24/14 6:01 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: Hi Jouni, Regarding Distributed mobility management deployment models and scenarios: As I said in the session today I am having trouble understanding the deployment models. To me it sounds like doing the last thing first, i.e. after we get the dmm solution we work on how to deploy it (of course if the deployment has not already been considered by the solution). I may be interpreting the charter incorrectly, but I think there may be a disconnect. I interpreted the the charter text as describing deployment models like: - Wi-Fi-based mobility management - Cellular (e.g., 3GPP) mobility management - Mixed technology mobility management - etc. If that above interpretation is what was intended, I think it makes sense to have that type of description available to guide solution development. The above interpretation is correct. - Jouni If the above is not correct, then I suspect the charter needs some clarification. Regards, Brian ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
I may be interpreting the charter incorrectly, but I think there may be a disconnect. I interpreted the the charter text as describing deployment models like: - Wi-Fi-based mobility management - Cellular (e.g., 3GPP) mobility management - Mixed technology mobility management - etc. If that above interpretation is what was intended, I think it makes sense to have that type of description available to guide solution development. The above interpretation is correct. Can we expand that a bit more? Are we talking about: - Describing how WiFi and 3GPP-based architectures work today? - Describing how they'd work when flattened (e.g., moving the GW to the radio edge)? - Something else? Alper - Jouni If the above is not correct, then I suspect the charter needs some clarification. Regards, Brian ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] Demo for Stateless user-plane for vEPC
I'm in demonstrating now! Please contact me if you have an interest. Thanks, Satoshi On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Satoshi Usui sat.u...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks everyone for contacting me. I'd like to show you some of our demo. Please come to the front of the registration on Friday, July 25, 2014, at 10:00am. Thank you, Satoshi On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Satoshi Usui sat.u...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am ready for presenting a demo for Stateless user-plane for vEPC, which is the same demo in London and with some updates, but I couldn't reserve a room in IETF90. [1] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-matsushima-stateless-uplane-vepc/ Does anyone have an interest on this? I'd like to consider presenting a demo or some other time. Regards, Satoshi ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Brian Haberman br...@innovationslab.net wrote: On 7/24/14 6:01 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: Hi Jouni, Regarding Distributed mobility management deployment models and scenarios: As I said in the session today I am having trouble understanding the deployment models. To me it sounds like doing the last thing first, i.e. after we get the dmm solution we work on how to deploy it (of course if the deployment has not already been considered by the solution). I may be interpreting the charter incorrectly, but I think there may be a disconnect. I interpreted the the charter text as describing deployment models like: - Wi-Fi-based mobility management - Cellular (e.g., 3GPP) mobility management - Mixed technology mobility management - etc. If that above interpretation is what was intended, I think it makes sense to have that type of description available to guide solution development. If the above is not correct, then I suspect the charter needs some clarification. If that is the case then I suggest calling it DMM usage scenarios or use cases in real networks? Use case work is done before solution work, so that I think is a good match with DMM. Regards, Behcet Regards, Brian ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
