[DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt
Hi, We've just submitted a revised version addressing all the comments we received during the WG adoption call. We have requested some presentation time in Montreal. It'd be awesome if you can take a look and provide comments, so we can have more fruitful discussions during the meeting. Thanks! Carlos -- Forwarded message - From: Date: vie., 29 jun. 2018 a las 19:04 Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt To: Cc: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Distributed Mobility Management WG of the IETF. Title : Proxy Mobile IPv6 extensions for Distributed Mobility Management Authors : Carlos J. Bernardos Antonio de la Oliva Fabio Giust Juan Carlos Zuniga Alain Mourad Filename: draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt Pages : 32 Date: 2018-06-29 Abstract: Distributed Mobility Management solutions allow for setting up networks so that traffic is distributed in an optimal way and does not rely on centralized deployed anchors to provide IP mobility support. There are many different approaches to address Distributed Mobility Management, as for example extending network-based mobility protocols (like Proxy Mobile IPv6), or client-based mobility protocols (as Mobile IPv6), among others. This document follows the former approach, and proposes a solution based on Proxy Mobile IPv6 in which mobility sessions are anchored at the last IP hop router (called mobility anchor and access router). The mobility anchor and access router is an enhanced access router which is also able to operate as local mobility anchor or mobility access gateway, on a per prefix basis. The document focuses on the required extensions to effectively support simultaneously anchoring several flows at different distributed gateways. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ ___ I-D-Announce mailing list i-d-annou...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
[DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Distributed Mobility Management WG of the IETF. Title : Proxy Mobile IPv6 extensions for Distributed Mobility Management Authors : Carlos J. Bernardos Antonio de la Oliva Fabio Giust Juan Carlos Zuniga Alain Mourad Filename: draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt Pages : 32 Date: 2018-06-29 Abstract: Distributed Mobility Management solutions allow for setting up networks so that traffic is distributed in an optimal way and does not rely on centralized deployed anchors to provide IP mobility support. There are many different approaches to address Distributed Mobility Management, as for example extending network-based mobility protocols (like Proxy Mobile IPv6), or client-based mobility protocols (as Mobile IPv6), among others. This document follows the former approach, and proposes a solution based on Proxy Mobile IPv6 in which mobility sessions are anchored at the last IP hop router (called mobility anchor and access router). The mobility anchor and access router is an enhanced access router which is also able to operate as local mobility anchor or mobility access gateway, on a per prefix basis. The document focuses on the required extensions to effectively support simultaneously anchoring several flows at different distributed gateways. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"
Hi Sri, There two drafts that DMM can perhaps use in the response. https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-00.txt http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01.txt Please let us know how you would like to proceed and how we can help. Arashmid > -Original Message- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli > (sgundave) > Sent: 22 June 2018 12:24 > To: dmm@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on > User Plane Protocol in 5GC" > > Folks - Back to this. > > Any feedback on this? Now that we have waited for some time, I hope we > now have a view on this LS. I tend to think we should send a response soon > before the July deadline. > > Sri > > > > > > > > On 4/16/18, 9:47 AM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" > wrote: > > >Hi Arashmid, > > > >I was not looking at their July date, but more about exchanging status > >of the work and seek feedback. > > > >I think, we now are on the same page now. > > > >Sri > > > > > > > > > >On 4/16/18, 8:37 AM, "Arashmid Akhavain" > > >wrote: > > > >>Thanks Kalyani, > >>That makes sense. The wording of the action item though sounded like > >>3GPP was trying to impose a deadline. > >>I just want to make sure that wasn't the case cause there is still a > >>lot of work to be done. > >> > >>Arashmid > >> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: Bogineni, Kalyani > >>> [mailto:kalyani.bogin...@verizonwireless.com] > >>> Sent: 16 April 2018 11:26 > >>> To: Arashmid Akhavain ; Sri > Gundavelli > >>> (sgundave) ; dmm@ietf.org > >>> Subject: RE: New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on > >>> User Plane Protocol in 5GC" > >>> > >>> Arashmid - CT4 will start their study in July 2018. So work from > >>>IETF can provide input into that study. > >>> Kalyani > >>> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Arashmid > >>>Akhavain > >>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 11:21 AM > >>> To: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) ; dmm@ietf.org > >>> Subject: [E] Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study > >>>Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC" > >>> > >>> Hi Sri, > >>> > >>> Thank you for clarification. I never suggested that IETF should > >>>single out a particular proposal. On the contrary, I believe DMM > >>>should simply conduct the study and provide 3GPP with all different > >>>options. 3GPP will decide what to do with the proposals from that > >>>point on. As you mentioned there could be several back and forth > >>>between the two SDOs. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> So, while I agree with all points, I am still puzzled by the > >>>following statement in 3GPP email. > >>> > >>> What is the significance of the July 2018 date? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ACTION: > >>> > >>> CT4 respectfully asks IETF DMM to provide any information that may > >>> be relevant to the above CT4 > >>> > >>> work by July 2018. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Arashmid > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -Original Message- > >>> > >>> > From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] > >>> > >>> > Sent: 13 April 2018 19:06 > >>> > >>> > To: Arashmid Akhavain ; > dmm@ietf.org > >>> > >>> > Subject: Re: New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on > >>>User > >>> > >>> > Plane Protocol in 5GC" > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > Hi Arashmid, > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > I am not seeing a relation to the LS Response and the July 2018 > >>>deadline > >>> that > >>> > >>> > you are referring to. I think there is some disconnect here. Lets > >>>review what > >>> > >>> > we the chairs are thinking. > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > 1. The work in IETF related to User-Plane optimizations will > >>> > continue > >>>for > >>> many > >>> > >>> > months. When there is a LS Request, we will send a LS response. We > >>>will use > >>> > >>> > LS query/response as a means to gather feedback from the SDO > >>>community, > >>> > >>> > and provide an update on the status of all the documents in DMM at > >>>this > >>> > >>> > time. The status includes update on WG documents and individual > >>> > I-D’s > >>> under > >>> > >>> > discussions. > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > 2. We are not going with the assumption that there will only be a > >>>single LS > >>> > >>> > request/response for this entire UP Study, but we will keep > >>>exchanging > >>> > >>> > information based on the progress, and whenever we need additional > >>> > >>> > clarifications. > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > 3. There are multiple proposals in IETF. As we have indicated in > >>> > the > >>>past, we > >>> > >>> > are not going to recommend THE single solution and put it on a > >>>platter for > >>> > >>> > 3GPP consumption, but rather the focus will be on characterization > >>> > of > >>>each > >>> > >>> > approach that we take up in DMM WG. > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > Now, keeping this in mind, if there is a good reason not to send > >>>
[DMM] FW: [E] New Version Notification for draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01.txt
Hi: An updated version of the optimized mobile user plane document has been posted. This could be sent to CT4 along with the reply to the LS. Best Regards, Kalyani and co-authors -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 5:12 AM To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal ; Dino Farinacci ; Tom Herbert ; Luca Muscariello ; Bogineni, Kalyani ; Giovanna Carofiglio ; Jordan Auge ; Arashmid Akhavain ; Pablo Camarillo ; Shunsuke Homma Subject: [E] New Version Notification for draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01.txt A new version of I-D, draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Luca Muscariello and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane Revision: 01 Title: Optimized Mobile User Plane Solutions for 5G Document date: 2018-06-29 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 65 URL: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01 Abstract: 3GPP CT4 has approved a study item to study different mobility management protocols for potential replacement of GTP tunnels between UPFs (N9 Interface) in the 3GPP 5G system architecture. This document provides an overview of 5G system architecture in the context of N9 Interface which is the scope of the 3GPP CT4 study item [CP-173160-1], [TS.23.501-3GPP], [TS.23.502-3GPP], [TS.23.503-3GPP], [TS.29.244-3GPP], [TS.29.281-3GPP], [TS.38.300-3GPP], and [TS.38.401-3GPP]. Architecture requirements for evaluation of candidate protocols are provided. Optimization of the user plane can be in different ways - packet overhead, transport integration, etc. Several IETF protocols are considered for comparison: SRv6, LISP, ILA and several combinations of control plane and user plane protocols. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
[DMM] FW: [E] New Version Notification for draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01.txt
-Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 5:12 AM To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal ; Dino Farinacci ; Tom Herbert ; Luca Muscariello ; Bogineni, Kalyani ; Giovanna Carofiglio ; Jordan Auge ; Arashmid Akhavain ; Pablo Camarillo ; Shunsuke Homma Subject: [E] New Version Notification for draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01.txt A new version of I-D, draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Luca Muscariello and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane Revision: 01 Title: Optimized Mobile User Plane Solutions for 5G Document date: 2018-06-29 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 65 URL: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-01.txt Status: [KB] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dbogineni-2Ddmm-2Doptimized-2Dmobile-2Duser-2Dplane_=DwICaQ=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9Mzr2tsDA8-g976yWB1sPbdMo=UciidxMh2XZ1Dlmw_mft2XPXu_mzSJipGaqlWwqiPgc=2Lq25W90_26NoOC9TwU6ubIFThgJhU8WSVpLL3S5aNY= Htmlized: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dbogineni-2Ddmm-2Doptimized-2Dmobile-2Duser-2Dplane-2D01=DwICaQ=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9Mzr2tsDA8-g976yWB1sPbdMo=UciidxMh2XZ1Dlmw_mft2XPXu_mzSJipGaqlWwqiPgc=g2EETkep5Jt11cquL6Dfi2cg1BsqDJjyFkGuwagU91U= Htmlized: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_html_draft-2Dbogineni-2Ddmm-2Doptimized-2Dmobile-2Duser-2Dplane=DwICaQ=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9Mzr2tsDA8-g976yWB1sPbdMo=UciidxMh2XZ1Dlmw_mft2XPXu_mzSJipGaqlWwqiPgc=G__A129y3f2fi2cSVYbMSxnXnqhegNEuoTUyCMoi8So= Diff: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_rfcdiff-3Furl2-3Ddraft-2Dbogineni-2Ddmm-2Doptimized-2Dmobile-2Duser-2Dplane-2D01=DwICaQ=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9Mzr2tsDA8-g976yWB1sPbdMo=UciidxMh2XZ1Dlmw_mft2XPXu_mzSJipGaqlWwqiPgc=3w6pxL4elqGo-pq49qDe04LywFE4mV6-k7I2i8b0QuI= Abstract: 3GPP CT4 has approved a study item to study different mobility management protocols for potential replacement of GTP tunnels between UPFs (N9 Interface) in the 3GPP 5G system architecture. This document provides an overview of 5G system architecture in the context of N9 Interface which is the scope of the 3GPP CT4 study item [CP-173160-1], [TS.23.501-3GPP], [TS.23.502-3GPP], [TS.23.503-3GPP], [TS.29.244-3GPP], [TS.29.281-3GPP], [TS.38.300-3GPP], and [TS.38.401-3GPP]. Architecture requirements for evaluation of candidate protocols are provided. Optimization of the user plane can be in different ways - packet overhead, transport integration, etc. Several IETF protocols are considered for comparison: SRv6, LISP, ILA and several combinations of control plane and user plane protocols. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
[DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-00.txt
Hi, We submitted a new I-D to identify GTP-U specifications and architectural aspects on the 5GS in 3GPP. It also provides evaluation aspects for studying user plane protocol in the 5GS rel.16. This work is corresponding to the User Plane Protocol Study work (Ref. CP-180116). We'd like to suggest to submit this document to 3GPP CT4 as one of replies of the LS. We are planning to share this work with 3GPP in the next 3GPP CT4 meeting which is held on right before the week of IETF102, and report the feedback from 3GPP in the IETF102. Your review and feedback would be appreciated. Best regards, Shunsuke Forwarded Message Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-00.txt Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 01:32:48 -0700 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org To: daniel.vo...@bell.ca , Daniel Voyer , Takuya Miyasaka , Satoru Matsushima , Shunsuke Homma A new version of I-D, draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Shunsuke Homma and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis Revision: 00 Title: User Plane Protocol and Architectural Analysis on 3GPP 5G System Document date: 2018-06-29 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 28 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-00 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis Abstract: This document analyzes the mobile user plane protocol and the architecture specified in 3GPP 5G documents. The analysis work is to clarify those specifications, extract protocol and architectural requirements and derive evaluation aspects for user plane protocols on IETF side. This work is corresponding to the User Plane Protocol Study work on 3GPP side. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
