Re: [DMM] Planning WebEx about FPC draft update /RE: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 - update plans
Please find the WebEx information for the call on Wednesday below. This is on the agenda so far: ( ) Brief summary and confirmation of open items ( ) Missing attributes and format ( ) Revision of existing attributes ( ) Modelling vs. concrete protocol design Please let me know about further items you'd like to address. Best regards, Marco DMM - CP/DP Draft discussion Wednesday, July 1, 2015 7:00 am | Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco, GMT-07:00) | 1 hr 30 mins Join WebEx meetinghttps://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/j.php?MTID=md608133416ce2fa85e7ac5dbdd128a81 Meeting number: 201 675 355 Meeting password: dmm Join by phone +1-408-525-6800 Call-in toll number (US/Canada) +1-866-432-9903 Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada) Access code: 201 675 355 Global call-in numbershttps://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/globalcallin.php?serviceType=MCED=317850987tollFree=1 | Toll-free calling restrictionshttp://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf Add this meetinghttps://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/j.php?MTID=mbb855ecede44f9d2ebe95fe7bd2919f1 to your calendar. Can't join the meeting? Contact support.https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/mc IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please note that this WebEx service allows audio and other information sent during the session to be recorded, which may be discoverable in a legal matter. You should inform all meeting attendees prior to recording if you intend to record the meeting. From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch Sent: Freitag, 26. Juni 2015 10:48 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] Planning WebEx about FPC draft update /RE: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 - update plans Folks, the WebEx about progressing the FPC draft will be on Wednesday, 1st July 2015, Time: 16:00 CEST, Duration: 90 min. I'll send WebEx details and an agenda around in a separate eMail. marco From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch Sent: Montag, 22. Juni 2015 22:04 To: dmm@ietf.orgmailto:dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] Planning WebEx about FPC draft update /RE: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 - update plans Please find a link to a doodle below to find a suitable date for a WebEx where we can discuss and agree on the FPC draft update. Please also think about the open items I addressed in my previous eMails or any additional item you have in mind and which we need to consider for a draft update. Please use the mailing list or the issue tracker to address these items for discussion. http://doodle.com/5s9dhzcy6w8ds6ae Thanks, Marco From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch Sent: Freitag, 19. Juni 2015 15:36 To: dmm@ietf.orgmailto:dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 - update plans Folks, draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 is out since May. So far we did not receive any serious issue to address, which is good. Driving the draft towards a more mature state, I see the following main items to address: (1)Completion of properties and attributes (2)Adoption of a standard conform modelling In terms of (1), the importance to include QoS attributes has been raised from different sides. I'll make a proposal how to cover this in an update on the DMM ML using a separate eMail. Other attributes we may need to cover are about monitoring/reporting. In terms of (2) we heard different opinions about keeping this document at the level of information models or be more specific by adopting data modeling. So far the document is pretty hybrid ;-), core part is more about clear definition and description of messages and information to apply between Client and Agent. In the appendix the draft includes a (so far experimental) YANG model. Please state your opinion here to see what the WG expects from the document. If we adopt information modeling, this seems straightforward from a version which is complete in terms of messages/attributes. If we adopt data modeling, we may need to spend more cycles in agreeing formats, alignment, etc. Hope we can discuss on the ML. I'd also like to schedule a WebExt before the draft deadline. Will send a doodle around for that. marco ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] Planning WebEx about FPC draft update /RE: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 - update plans
Folks, the WebEx about progressing the FPC draft will be on Wednesday, 1st July 2015, Time: 16:00 CEST, Duration: 90 min. I'll send WebEx details and an agenda around in a separate eMail. marco From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch Sent: Montag, 22. Juni 2015 22:04 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] Planning WebEx about FPC draft update /RE: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 - update plans Please find a link to a doodle below to find a suitable date for a WebEx where we can discuss and agree on the FPC draft update. Please also think about the open items I addressed in my previous eMails or any additional item you have in mind and which we need to consider for a draft update. Please use the mailing list or the issue tracker to address these items for discussion. http://doodle.com/5s9dhzcy6w8ds6ae Thanks, Marco From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch Sent: Freitag, 19. Juni 2015 15:36 To: dmm@ietf.orgmailto:dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 - update plans Folks, draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 is out since May. So far we did not receive any serious issue to address, which is good. Driving the draft towards a more mature state, I see the following main items to address: (1)Completion of properties and attributes (2)Adoption of a standard conform modelling In terms of (1), the importance to include QoS attributes has been raised from different sides. I'll make a proposal how to cover this in an update on the DMM ML using a separate eMail. Other attributes we may need to cover are about monitoring/reporting. In terms of (2) we heard different opinions about keeping this document at the level of information models or be more specific by adopting data modeling. So far the document is pretty hybrid ;-), core part is more about clear definition and description of messages and information to apply between Client and Agent. In the appendix the draft includes a (so far experimental) YANG model. Please state your opinion here to see what the WG expects from the document. If we adopt information modeling, this seems straightforward from a version which is complete in terms of messages/attributes. If we adopt data modeling, we may need to spend more cycles in agreeing formats, alignment, etc. Hope we can discuss on the ML. I'd also like to schedule a WebExt before the draft deadline. Will send a doodle around for that. marco ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
[DMM] Planning WebEx about FPC draft update /RE: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 - update plans
Please find a link to a doodle below to find a suitable date for a WebEx where we can discuss and agree on the FPC draft update. Please also think about the open items I addressed in my previous eMails or any additional item you have in mind and which we need to consider for a draft update. Please use the mailing list or the issue tracker to address these items for discussion. http://doodle.com/5s9dhzcy6w8ds6ae Thanks, Marco From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch Sent: Freitag, 19. Juni 2015 15:36 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 - update plans Folks, draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 is out since May. So far we did not receive any serious issue to address, which is good. Driving the draft towards a more mature state, I see the following main items to address: (1)Completion of properties and attributes (2)Adoption of a standard conform modelling In terms of (1), the importance to include QoS attributes has been raised from different sides. I'll make a proposal how to cover this in an update on the DMM ML using a separate eMail. Other attributes we may need to cover are about monitoring/reporting. In terms of (2) we heard different opinions about keeping this document at the level of information models or be more specific by adopting data modeling. So far the document is pretty hybrid ;-), core part is more about clear definition and description of messages and information to apply between Client and Agent. In the appendix the draft includes a (so far experimental) YANG model. Please state your opinion here to see what the WG expects from the document. If we adopt information modeling, this seems straightforward from a version which is complete in terms of messages/attributes. If we adopt data modeling, we may need to spend more cycles in agreeing formats, alignment, etc. Hope we can discuss on the ML. I'd also like to schedule a WebExt before the draft deadline. Will send a doodle around for that. marco ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
