Re: [DNG] URL - The importance of Devuan
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:50:56 +0100 Antony Stonewrote: > > Oh, come on. Have some sense of humour! Didn't you see the sarcasm in > > my comment? > > Email is a notoriously bad medium for conveying tone of voice. so next time use a tag. Cheers, Ron. -- The people who run the media are humanities graduates with little understanding of science, who wear their ignorance as a badge of honour. -- Dr. Ben Goldacre -- http://www.olgiati-in-paraguay.org -- ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] URL - The importance of Devuan
On Tuesday 12 December 2017 at 19:29:43, Edward Bartolo wrote: > On 12/12/2017, Ralph Ronnquistwrote: > > Edward Bartolo wrote on 12/12/17 07:30: > >> > >> Those are not "bugs" but new features. That is the reason for "wontfix". > > > > Run along, Wally. Let the grown-ups talk. > > Oh, come on. Have some sense of humour! Didn't you see the sarcasm in > my comment? Email is a notoriously bad medium for conveying tone of voice. Antony. -- A user interface is like a joke. If you have to explain it, it means it doesn't work. Please reply to the list; please *don't* CC me. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
[DNG] URL - The importance of Devuan
On 12/12/2017, Ralph Ronnquistwrote: > Edward Bartolo wrote on 12/12/17 07:30: >> On 11/12/2017, goli...@dyne.org wrote: >>> On 2017-12-11 14:06, Nate Bargmann wrote: * On 2017 11 Dec 10:13 -0600, Didier Kryn wrote: > This is the original saling argument, but it is wrong. Several persons > have already reported that Devuan's sysvinit booted faster than > Debian's systemd. It seems that as SD subsumes more and more services it would naturally slow down. Especially when one considers that the replaced services have been around for years, or even decades and are likely quite well debugged and optimized while the SD replacements are new code with a lot maturation needed. - Nate >>> >>> And since the "bugs" are often considered wontfix "features", don't >>> expect it to get any better. >>> >> >> Those are not "bugs" but new features. That is the reason for "wontfix". > > Run along, Wally. Let the grown-ups talk. > Oh, come on. Have some sense of humour! Didn't you see the sarcasm in my comment? ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
[DNG] mondoarchive
Doing a test on Devuan Jessie installing mondoarchive. Anybody got any tips or suggestions? This is on a real box not VPS. Is star package the same as staruml? Where to install start? Thanks ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] URL - The importance of Devuan
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:11:57 +0100 Didier Krynwrote: > Le 11/12/2017 à 11:48, KatolaZ a écrit : > > Related: > > > > > > https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/12/11/0049245/does-systemd-makes-linux-complex-error-prone-and-unstable > > > > Interesting: one of the comments almost suggests that Emacs > might be used as an init system :-)) While we're on the subject of systemd and Emacs, some people use the existence of Emacs as a justification for systemd. This is a false equivalence. For the equivalence to be true, Emacs would need to: 1) Install in a way that made use of Vim, and many other programs, impossible 2) Influence lots of other projects not to run without Emacs installed, so that to install those projects, you'd need to install Emacs and therefore never be able to use Vim or many other programs. You know it's funny. In 2013 I banished all KDE programs and libraries from all my computers, permanently. I did this for the same technical reason as systemd: monolithic entanglement. Yet I spend little time criticizing KDE. KDE's no threat to me: I'm free not to use it. On any distro. The fact that I have a choice is the crucial distinction. SteveT Steve Litt December 2017 featured book: Thriving in Tough Times http://www.troubleshooters.com/thrive ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] URL - The importance of Devuan
On 12/12/17 02:25 AM, Lars Noodén wrote: Yet, as is their habit, their response is to go ad hominem rather than address the points made. Money is a great motivator for company managers, especially at the C level. M$ pointed out ages, albeit inadvertently via leaked documents, that any company that can grab hold of "Linux" and make it effectively proprietary can lock up the market. Specifically I mean the Halloween Documents which have turned out to be quite accurate. So as to following the money trail, it looks like Red Hat is using the strategy and goal lined up in the first Halloween Document. So, if nothing else, Devuan is important in that it prevents Red Hat from decommoditizing Linux completely. Unfortunately that also makes Devuan very visible to opponents of general purpose computing. I read this the other day and it made me think of systemd phenomena. https://boingboing.net/2017/12/06/the-unknown-unknowns.html Clarke ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] URL - The importance of Devuan
Le 11/12/2017 à 11:48, KatolaZ a écrit : Related: https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/12/11/0049245/does-systemd-makes-linux-complex-error-prone-and-unstable Interesting: one of the comments almost suggests that Emacs might be used as an init system :-)) Note: Don't take me wrong; I use only the very basic features of Emacs and am always embarassed when I need to configure it; therefore I do not support using it as PID1; it would be an Emacs/Lisp expert's fancy, and yet be better than SD. Didier ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng