Re: [DNG] Clarification please

2020-10-29 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting g4sra via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):

> Can anybody suggest a suitable authoritative/recursive DNSSEC
> supporting name server for SOHO domain use on embedded systems.  What
> I am looking for is something like dnsmasq.

dnsmasq, it should be noted, is _just_ a forwarder.  It forwards
outbound queries to one or more IP-identified recursive servers you
specify.  Those recursive servers do the actual work.

Respectable recursive(-only) nameserver packages (that are open source):

o  Unbound
o  PowerDNS-recursor
o  dnscache (from the djbdns suite), if patched to modern standards
o  Deadwood
o  Knot Resolver
o  Bundy recursive portion (but it's probably scary betaware)

Respectable authoritative(-only) nameserver packages (that are open
source):

o  NSD
o  PowerDNS Authoritative Server
o  MaraDNS authoritative portion
o  rbldnsd
o  YADIFA
o  MyDNS-NG (which also does forwarding of out-of-bailiwick queries)
o  ldapdns
o  Knot DNS
o  gndsd
o  dnsjava
o  tinydns (from the djbdns suite), if patched to modern standards
o  Bundy authoritative portion (but it's probably scary betaware)

(Something that becomes apparent as one studies this field is that
writing an authoritative daemon is relatively easy and many folks have
done it.  Writing a recursive daemon without messing up is difficult,
so there are far fewer successful examples.)

I maintain a bestiary of all known DNS software for Linux, here:
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Network_Other/dns-servers.html 
The above list is extracted from it.

The page is still missing one peculiar^W innovative package, called
Ironsides.  Coverage is coming, Real Soon Now.

I _hope_ the page is reasonably clear and complete about DNSSEC support,
but:  Errare humanum est, sed perseverare autem diabolicum.

FWIW, I am no longer comfortable with the idea of a combined
authoritative/recursive server on a publicly exposed static IP.
That has been deprecated for long decades as bad security, particularly
because it increases the risk of cache poisoning of the recursive
server.  IMO, a LAN connected to public networks, even a small one,
ought to have the authoritative service on a separate, public-facing
host, and the recursive service on a protected, internal-network machine
that is as shielded from public networks as possible.

I have personal experience with:  BIND9 (and predecessors), NSD,
Unbound, PowerDNS Recursor, PowerDNS Authoritative Server, dnscache,
tinydns.  I can enthusiastically recommend NSD and PowerDNS Server.
Before a recent troubling thing with Unbound where the developers made a
dumb decision to accomodate containerising, I was a huge Unbound
cheerleader and might be again.  

Necessary disclaimer:  I'm personal friends with Deadwood/MaraDNS author
Sam Trenholme (but have yet to substantially deploy his software).


As an administrator whose experience with BIND goes all the way back to
BIND4 days, I know well that it's the path of least resistance to just
deploy a do-it-all nameserver package like BIND9, but that's been known
to be a bad idea for a long time, and it's past time to stop doing that.

-- 
Cheers,"Rand Paul being patient zero for a Senate 
Rick Moen  viral outbreak is a sign of a writers' room 
r...@linuxmafia.comdropping too much acid, late in the season."
McQ! (4x80)-- @owillis (Oliver Willis)
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] devuan ?

2020-10-29 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
Also, to manually inspect out a particular IP, e.g. 130.225.254.116, as a
resolution for deb.devuan.org, you would add temporarily a line to /etc/hosts:

130.225.254.116 deb.devuan.org

and then point your sane browser at http://deb.devuan.org/devuan/
Remove that line later,

Ralph.

radisso...@gmx.de wrote on 30/10/20 7:24 am:
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 um 20:31 Uhr
>> Von: "Antony Stone" 
>> An: dng@lists.dyne.org
>> Betreff: Re: [DNG] devuan ?
>>
>> On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 19:31:10, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:
>>
>>> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
>>> Err:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 linux-libc-dev amd64
>>> 4.19.118-2 404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80]
>>> Unable to correct missing packages.
>>> E: Failed to fetch
>>> http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux/linux-libc-dev_4.19.118
>>> -2_amd64.deb  404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80] E: Aborting install.
>>
>> I too experience this from time to time with mirrors.dotsrc.org
>>
>> I jut repeat the command, and provided I get a different IP destination, the
>> package installs.
>>
>> It seems to me that there's some problem with one of the servers
>> mirrors.dotsrc.org points at - the IP address presumably reveals which one.
>>
> 
> So far i understand it is a RR. When i tried to find it (with browser) i had 
> no success.
> Is there any way to really check it ?
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> Antony.
>>
>> --
>> In Heaven, the beer is Belgian, the chefs are Italian, the supermarkets are
>> British, the mechanics are German, the lovers are French, the entertainment 
>> is
>> American, and everything is organised by the Swiss.
>>
>> In Hell, the beer is American, the chefs are British, the supermarkets are
>> German, the mechanics are French, the lovers are Swiss, the entertainment is
>> Belgian, and everything is organised by the Italians.
>>
>>Please reply to the list;
>>  please *don't* CC 
>> me.
>> ___
>> Dng mailing list
>> Dng@lists.dyne.org
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>>
> ___
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
> 
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] devuan ?

2020-10-29 Thread golinux

On 2020-10-29 15:24, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 um 20:31 Uhr
Von: "Antony Stone" 
An: dng@lists.dyne.org
Betreff: Re: [DNG] devuan ?

On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 19:31:10, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:

> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> Err:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 linux-libc-dev amd64
> 4.19.118-2 404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80]
> Unable to correct missing packages.
> E: Failed to fetch
> http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux/linux-libc-dev_4.19.118
> -2_amd64.deb  404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80] E: Aborting install.

I too experience this from time to time with mirrors.dotsrc.org

I jut repeat the command, and provided I get a different IP 
destination, the

package installs.

It seems to me that there's some problem with one of the servers
mirrors.dotsrc.org points at - the IP address presumably reveals which 
one.




So far i understand it is a RR. When i tried to find it (with browser)
i had no success.
Is there any way to really check it ?




http://borta.devuan.dev/apt-panopticon/results/Report-web.html






Antony.

--
In Heaven, the beer is Belgian, the chefs are Italian, the 
supermarkets are
British, the mechanics are German, the lovers are French, the 
entertainment is

American, and everything is organised by the Swiss.

In Hell, the beer is American, the chefs are British, the supermarkets 
are
German, the mechanics are French, the lovers are Swiss, the 
entertainment is

Belgian, and everything is organised by the Italians.

   Please reply to the 
list;
 please 
*don't* CC me.

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] devuan ?

2020-10-29 Thread Radisson97
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 um 20:31 Uhr
> Von: "Antony Stone" 
> An: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Betreff: Re: [DNG] devuan ?
>
> On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 19:31:10, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> > Err:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 linux-libc-dev amd64
> > 4.19.118-2 404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80]
> > Unable to correct missing packages.
> > E: Failed to fetch
> > http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux/linux-libc-dev_4.19.118
> > -2_amd64.deb  404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80] E: Aborting install.
>
> I too experience this from time to time with mirrors.dotsrc.org
>
> I jut repeat the command, and provided I get a different IP destination, the
> package installs.
>
> It seems to me that there's some problem with one of the servers
> mirrors.dotsrc.org points at - the IP address presumably reveals which one.
>

So far i understand it is a RR. When i tried to find it (with browser) i had no 
success.
Is there any way to really check it ?



>
> Antony.
>
> --
> In Heaven, the beer is Belgian, the chefs are Italian, the supermarkets are
> British, the mechanics are German, the lovers are French, the entertainment is
> American, and everything is organised by the Swiss.
>
> In Hell, the beer is American, the chefs are British, the supermarkets are
> German, the mechanics are French, the lovers are Swiss, the entertainment is
> Belgian, and everything is organised by the Italians.
>
>Please reply to the list;
>  please *don't* CC me.
> ___
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] devuan ?

2020-10-29 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 19:31:10, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:

> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> Err:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 linux-libc-dev amd64
> 4.19.118-2 404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80]
> Unable to correct missing packages.
> E: Failed to fetch
> http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux/linux-libc-dev_4.19.118
> -2_amd64.deb  404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80] E: Aborting install.

I too experience this from time to time with mirrors.dotsrc.org

I jut repeat the command, and provided I get a different IP destination, the 
package installs.

It seems to me that there's some problem with one of the servers 
mirrors.dotsrc.org points at - the IP address presumably reveals which one.


Antony.

-- 
In Heaven, the beer is Belgian, the chefs are Italian, the supermarkets are 
British, the mechanics are German, the lovers are French, the entertainment is 
American, and everything is organised by the Swiss.

In Hell, the beer is American, the chefs are British, the supermarkets are 
German, the mechanics are French, the lovers are Swiss, the entertainment is 
Belgian, and everything is organised by the Italians.

   Please reply to the list;
 please *don't* CC me.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Clarification please

2020-10-29 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 29/10/2020 18:19, Bernard Rosset via Dng wrote:
>> That said, I've stopped using unbound and I'm using straight BIND as my
>> local resolver lately. It's pleasant.
> 
> From what we discovered about unbound during one of the meetings, I clearly 
> do not trust that technology. Too bad: it was on my to-test list.
> 
> However, unbound is recursive-only IIRC.
> 
> Since I am most interested in authoritative NS technology, I have yet to test 
> knot, of which I read good stuff.
> 
> BIND is ol' do-it-all grand-daddy. A bit messy & overcomplicated to properly 
> set up & manage to my taste.
Used it for ages, I like what I am used to, and after battling with Micro$oft's 
offering but it is not appropriate for my current project.

Can anybody suggest a suitable authoritative/recursive DNSSEC supporting name 
server for SOHO domain use on embedded systems.
What I am looking for is something like dnsmasq.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] devuan ?

2020-10-29 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 29/10/2020 18:31, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:
> The problem is a bit weired:
> 
> I did install Beowulf 3.0 had some problems nothing i could not fix,
> then i tried to install gcc via apt-get install gcc
> 
> 
> 
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> Err:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 linux-libc-dev amd64 
> 4.19.118-2
>   404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80]
> Unable to correct missing packages.
> E: Failed to fetch 
> http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux/linux-libc-dev_4.19.118-2_amd64.deb
>   404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80]
> E: Aborting install.
> --snip--

Have you 'apt update' and accepted the repo change from testing ?
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] devuan ?

2020-10-29 Thread Radisson97
The problem is a bit weired:

I did install Beowulf 3.0 had some problems nothing i could not fix,
then i tried to install gcc via apt-get install gcc



Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Err:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 linux-libc-dev amd64 
4.19.118-2
  404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80]
Unable to correct missing packages.
E: Failed to fetch 
http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux/linux-libc-dev_4.19.118-2_amd64.deb
  404  Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80]
E: Aborting install.

but i can install (e.g. make)


After this operation, 1327 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 make amd64 4.2.1-1.2 [341 
kB]
Fetched 341 kB in 0s (804 kB/s)
Selecting previously unselected package make.
(Reading database ... 113596 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../make_4.2.1-1.2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking make (4.2.1-1.2) ...
Setting up make (4.2.1-1.2) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.8.5-2) ...

so linux-libc-dev can not be found what is a bit basic, is this
a problem in the repo ?

i am left in limbo ...

> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 um 17:22 Uhr
> Von: "Antony Stone" 
> An: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Betreff: Re: [DNG] devuan ?
>
> On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 15:55:22, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > i am new on this list and in search for a place to
> > ask for a wired problem with a devuan installation.
> >
> > Is this the place for that kind of questions ?
>
> Yes.
>
> Did you really mean a wired problem, or is it a weird problem?
>
> Whichever, try to give us as much detail as possible, so that we could perhaps
> reproduce the problem for ourselves.
>
> Welcome :)
>
>
> Antony.
>
> --
> "640 kilobytes (of RAM) should be enough for anybody."
>
>  - Bill Gates
>
>Please reply to the list;
>  please *don't* CC me.
> ___
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Clarification please

2020-10-29 Thread Bernard Rosset via Dng

That said, I've stopped using unbound and I'm using straight BIND as my
local resolver lately. It's pleasant.


From what we discovered about unbound during one of the meetings, I 
clearly do not trust that technology. Too bad: it was on my to-test list.


However, unbound is recursive-only IIRC.

Since I am most interested in authoritative NS technology, I have yet to 
test knot, of which I read good stuff.


BIND is ol' do-it-all grand-daddy. A bit messy & overcomplicated to 
properly set up & manage to my taste.


Bernard (Beer) Rosset
https://rosset.net/
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Clarification please

2020-10-29 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 04:53:43PM +, g4sra via Dng wrote:

> Please correct me if I am mistaken, I thought 'unbound' was tied to
> 'systemd creep' nowadays and have been avoiding it for that reason alone.

No, that's systemd-resolved. Unbound is unrelated.

That said, I've stopped using unbound and I'm using straight BIND as my
local resolver lately. It's pleasant.

-- 
Mason Loring Bliss  ((   If I have not seen as far as others, it is because
 ma...@blisses.org   ))   giants were standing on my shoulders. - Hal Abelson


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Clarification please

2020-10-29 Thread Dimitris T. via Dng
You're wrong, unbound worked and still works fine without systemd.

Στις 29 Οκτωβρίου 2020 6:53:43 μ.μ. EET, ο/η g4sra via Dng  
έγραψε:
>On 29/10/2020 13:44, Michael Neuffer wrote:
>> On 10/29/20 2:27 PM, d...@d404.nl wrote:
>--snip--
>>> To ease the maintenance of those servers i intend to migrate them to
>>> docker containers. I wonder people on this list have experience on
>this
>>> subject?
>> 
>> 
>> You might want to take a look at this project:
>> 
>> https://github.com/mailserver2/mailserver
>
>Please correct me if I am mistaken, I thought 'unbound' was tied to
>'systemd creep' nowadays and have been avoiding it for that reason
>alone.
>I want to avoid creating a dependency on something I don't already have
>only to need to purge it next year ...
> 
>___
>Dng mailing list
>Dng@lists.dyne.org
>https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] devuan ?

2020-10-29 Thread Ludovic Bellière
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Yes.

Le Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:55:22 +0100,
radisso...@gmx.de a écrit :

> Hi everyone,
> i am new on this list and in search for a place to
> ask for a wired problem with a devuan installation.
> 
> Is this the place for that kind of questions ?
> 
> re
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=a3Fe
- -END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=CB11
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] TB and Enigmail

2020-10-29 Thread John Crisp via Dng
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:47:29 -0700
Rick Moen  wrote:

> Quoting John Crisp via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> 
> [snip much-appreciated picture of behind-the-scenes management
> folderol at Thunderbird Project:]
> 

Thanks ;-) I have an alter ego that is on some lists as this ego (!)
got banned some years back. I have had recent chats with one or two
there who appraised me of a few things.

> > The problem is decent alternatives are not great [...]  
> 
> Just in case people have lost track of this, the long-term nub of the
> problem is:  revenue model.
> 

Always boils down to filthy lucre.


> Firefox brought in money.  Thunderbird did not.  When all is said and
> done, Mozilla Foundation is an appendage of Mozilla, Inc., which as a
> for-profit corporation is bound to a depressing pursuit of quarterly
> earnings targets as a primary objective.  From the corporate
> perspective, Thunderbird development resources are deadweight, a
> dispensible community sponsorship that earns nothing.
> 

Yes, as a corporate project TB was a drag to them.

However, TB still receives a not insignificant income, almost
exclusively from donations.

The alleged reason for going corporate was they could "do things they
couldn't as a NfP"

Hmmm. Quite frankly the only thing I can see they can have is shares,
dividends and pay people more money. 

I guess they are trying to establish themselves as a corporate entity
to appeal more to businesses and be more 'business like' with
support contracts or whatever.

It'll probably end up as more jobs for the boys., he said cynically.

The TB council is controlled by a few loyal MZ supporters (because it
is EXTREMELY hard for anyone to actually get elected due to the
qualifying requirements, and voters qualifying requirements), and the
whole thing is tightly controlled by MZ themselves, despite them saying
TB is a separate entity.

It was MOZILLA employees that did the recent banning.

Go figure.

Note I believe there is a side story to be told about the recent
Enigmail push but am not at liberty blah blah. 

Hey ho - what do I know?

:-)



pgpN6tyFbJFUl.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] Clarification please

2020-10-29 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 29/10/2020 13:44, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> On 10/29/20 2:27 PM, d...@d404.nl wrote:
--snip--
>> To ease the maintenance of those servers i intend to migrate them to
>> docker containers. I wonder people on this list have experience on this
>> subject?
> 
> 
> You might want to take a look at this project:
> 
> https://github.com/mailserver2/mailserver

Please correct me if I am mistaken, I thought 'unbound' was tied to 'systemd 
creep' nowadays and have been avoiding it for that reason alone.
I want to avoid creating a dependency on something I don't already have only to 
need to purge it next year ...
 
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] devuan ?

2020-10-29 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 15:55:22, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> i am new on this list and in search for a place to
> ask for a wired problem with a devuan installation.
> 
> Is this the place for that kind of questions ?

Yes.

Did you really mean a wired problem, or is it a weird problem?

Whichever, try to give us as much detail as possible, so that we could perhaps 
reproduce the problem for ourselves.

Welcome :)


Antony.

-- 
"640 kilobytes (of RAM) should be enough for anybody."

 - Bill Gates

   Please reply to the list;
 please *don't* CC me.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Self-hosted SMTP (was: TB and Enigmail)

2020-10-29 Thread Michael Neuffer

On 10/29/20 2:27 PM, d...@d404.nl wrote:

I do administer 3 different mailservers from which 1 does have the full
package from spf, dkim and dmarc. In my experience dmarc does not add
much of value but spf does. Dkim is much liked by isp's with strict spam
policies. But those are still reachable without after some waiting time
as long as you are not on a spam blocklist. A reverse dns record does
help too.

To ease the maintenance of those servers i intend to migrate them to
docker containers. I wonder people on this list have experience on this
subject?



You might want to take a look at this project:

https://github.com/mailserver2/mailserver

It is a project that might provide what you want to do.

It is in the hands of a group of volunteers that took over when the 
original maintainer called it quits.


The original project was: https://github.com/hardware/mailserver

Cheers
  Mike
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] devuan ?

2020-10-29 Thread Radisson97
Hi everyone,
i am new on this list and in search for a place to
ask for a wired problem with a devuan installation.

Is this the place for that kind of questions ?

re
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] the email universe

2020-10-29 Thread marc
Hi

> Would someone be able to outline for the unknowing what all actually
> is required? (I am very much wanting to get away from outside product
> that is selling me down the road - ie like the alphabet (soup)
> company!).

If you want to host your own email server you would need:

1 - a system with a static IP and reasonable connectivity
2 - a DNS name (MX record, reverse, possibly spf, ...)
3 - a MTA (postfix, exim, ...)
4 - and your mail client MUA (mutt, thunderbird, ...)

If you want to experiment first, find a spare computer or
set up a container - that doesn't have to be on the proper
internet yet. Then do the following to achieve points 3 and 4:

  su
  apt-get install postfix mutt
  vim /etc/postfix/main.cf
  adduser a
  adduser b
  su - a
  mutt b
  exit
  tail /var/log/mail.log
  su - b
  mutt

The line editing main.cf is a large topic, but postfix has
pretty substantial documentation, and the distribution defaults
should get you going too... Once that is set up you could try
using multiple computers on a lan, or move on to points 1 and 2.

regards

marc
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] the email universe

2020-10-29 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:12:40 -0500, o1bigtenor wrote in message 
:

> Greetings
> 
> Found the list of MUA useful.
> 
> The last time I went looking though - - - it seemed to me anyway that
> much more than just a MUA is needed for a complete system.
> 
> Would someone be able to outline for the unknowing what all actually
> is required? (I am very much wanting to get away from outside product
> that is selling me down the road - ie like the alphabet (soup)
> company!).


..since you ask the above, I'll read your "a complete system" as 
MUA-with-local-storage + (Fetchmail||Getmail) + (Procmail||Sieve):
On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 23:55:46 +0200, Arnt wrote in message 
<20200919235546.4551f862@d44>:

> ..me, I use Fetchmail as an imap and pop3 client to fetch my email, 
> and Procmail to sprinkle it down my ~/Mail tree, and Claws Mail to 
> read it, and to write and to send my outgoing email, directly out 
> thru my isp's smtp servers.  That's all I really need.  

..you probably want Sieve rather than Procmail, and possibly 
Getmail rather than Fetchmail, as Sieve and Getmail(?) are 
newer and supposedly easier to set up.  
I've never used those, I simply move my /home over whenever 
I setup a new laptop, and my .fetchmailrc and .procmailrc 
still works great. :o)

..I posted message <20200919235546.4551f862@d44> as a wee hint on an
email business opportunity (search this list for "[DNG] ..devuan to 
the rescue? Easiest possible newbie email server setup, ideas?") and 
to learn more on how "complete MUA-with-local-storage systems" are 
best set up on Devuan these days.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Self-hosted SMTP (was: TB and Enigmail)

2020-10-29 Thread d...@d404.nl
On 29-10-2020 04:34, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Bernard Rosset via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
>> It seems we're drifting away from the main subject.
>> Count me in!
> Roger that!  Subject header tweaked.
>
>> ?
>> If your emails are being refused by others, including major email
>> hosters, I would kindly suggest you check you got at least correct
>> SPF + DKIM entries. You can throw DMARC into the mix if you wish so,
>> too.
> Umm...
>
> As I already mentioned upthread, my domains' e-mail continue to have
> very high deliverability.  Those domains feature strongly asserted SPF
> RRs in their auth DNS.
>
> However, by carefully considered local policy, I decline to also
> implement DKIM/DMARC, considering those extensions to have been botched
> in design and implementation by Yahoo, Inc.  (DKIM seems to be the
> keystone problem, there, particularly its hapless hostility to
> MLM-mediated forwarding.)  Empirically, I so far perceive no measurable
> loss of host reputation from declining to implement DKIM/DMARC.
>
> I _do_ publish, in each of my domains' DNS, deliberately non-compliant
> DMARC RRs, just to make my stance quite clear, e.g.:
>
> :r! dig -t txt _dmarc.linuxmafia.com @ns1.linuxmafia.com +short
> "DMARC: tragically misdesigned since 2012.  Check our SPF RR, instead."
>
>
>> It's saddening to assess how little is known by the general public
>> (including people who actually work on technical matters in IT) about
>> key technologies, like DNS (the mother/father of all) or email.
> True datum:  When I began hosting my own SMTP smarthosts, I was still a
> staff accountant (UK: chartered accountant) for a living, not a
> sysadmin.  Fortunately, nobody told me I couldn't do it, so it worked.

I do administer 3 different mailservers from which 1 does have the full
package from spf, dkim and dmarc. In my experience dmarc does not add
much of value but spf does. Dkim is much liked by isp's with strict spam
policies. But those are still reachable without after some waiting time
as long as you are not on a spam blocklist. A reverse dns record does
help too.

To ease the maintenance of those servers i intend to migrate them to
docker containers. I wonder people on this list have experience on this
subject?

Grtz.

Nick




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] the email universe

2020-10-29 Thread Simon Walter
On 2020-10-29 20:12, o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:
> Greetings
> 
> Found the list of MUA useful.
> 
> The last time I went looking though - - - it seemed to me anyway that
> much more than just a MUA is needed for a complete system.
> 
> Would someone be able to outline for the unknowing what all actually
> is required? ...

What do you mean by complete system?
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] the email universe

2020-10-29 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 12:12:40, o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:

> Greetings
> 
> Found the list of MUA useful.
> 
> The last time I went looking though - - - it seemed to me anyway that
> much more than just a MUA is needed for a complete system.

Please define "complete system".

I can't tell whether you're looking for a user agent which will run on your 
machine and interact with a mail store somewhere else, which you don't really 
care about, or whether you want to include the mail store as well, and a 
transport system to send & receive the stuff, and...

> Would someone be able to outline for the unknowing what all actually
> is required?

Tell us what you want it to do and we can suggest what might be able to do it.


Antony.

-- 
I bought a book on memory techniques, but I've forgotten where I put it.

   Please reply to the list;
 please *don't* CC me.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] the email universe

2020-10-29 Thread o1bigtenor via Dng
Greetings

Found the list of MUA useful.

The last time I went looking though - - - it seemed to me anyway that
much more than just a MUA is needed for a complete system.

Would someone be able to outline for the unknowing what all actually
is required? (I am very much wanting to get away from outside product
that is selling me down the road - ie like the alphabet (soup)
company!).

TIA
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] TB and Enigmail

2020-10-29 Thread Dimitris T. via Dng
Adam Borowski wrote:
> -- and it's exclusively the former group that uses GPG.  Thus, crap support
> in Thunderbird is not a problem for me -- I have yet to see a GPG-signed
> piece of mail.
> 

not really...
15-20 years ago while working for a bank edp/it dpt, PGP was required
almost for half the email volume. so it was/is not just a geeky thing,
industry used it also.. using it back then with locked down corp
outlook+pgp plugin.. i guess these days is even more broadly used in
that sector.. (to hide their scam mostly :D )
lately even public sector required pgp encrypted emails for some
transactions.
also, lots of activists (since pre-snowden era) required GPG for
internal coms + OTR for chats... Thunderbird+enigmail was/is the
easier/free way for non-techy people to setup gpg.. lots of guides
around, w/ https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org being most commonly known...
(TB78 broke this..)

so, maybe these are not the majority of email users, but certainly gpg
is not exclusively used by a few geeks...
just take a look at keyservers stats..: there's a few million keys
already... and those are just a fraction of keys since not everyone
uploads their keys..


2c.
d.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] TB and Enigmail

2020-10-29 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:46:37PM +0900, Simon Walter wrote:
> On 2020-10-28 07:47, Rick Moen wrote:
> > I continue to like projects that are limited in feature scope enough to
> > not live or die by corporate underwriting.  E.g., mutt continues to be
> > maintainable by a small group of motivated developers.  When I want it
> > to be graphical, I run it in an xterm.  ;->
> 
> I totally agree. That is one reason I thought TB was a good choice over
> other, at the time, popular software such as Eudora and Outlook.

That's because you're not the target audience of those three.  They're not
for hackers, but "normal" users.  Of which there are two kinds:
* business (managers, marketing, sales, ...)
* home/non-office (a gamer teenager, a plumber, ...)

The first group was (and still is) a juicy target for money-making, so
IBM/Microsoft/... targetted them with comprehensive and intentionally
incompatible with others office suites.  What we consider breakage is not
there because of stupidity, but is there by design.

The second group would be salvageable, up to early '90s.  With the diverse
set of personal machines (Atari ST/Amiga/IBM PC/...), compatibility wasn't
something that could be ignored, and despite duking out of various standards
(like, above-ASCII encodings), people went a long way towards agreeing
together (eg. in Poland the Mazovia encoding won, despite efforts by
Microsoft -- but then got steamrolled out by Windows non-support).
But then came Windows monopoly...


In the meantime, people like me and you stuck to pine/elm/mutt/..., and
RFC-compliant etiquette.

These groups of people and tools are incompatible enough that I use two
clients:
* mutt for free software work
* thunderbird[1] for contacts with people in suits[2]
-- and it's exclusively the former group that uses GPG.  Thus, crap support
in Thunderbird is not a problem for me -- I have yet to see a GPG-signed
piece of mail.


Meow!

[1]. To be honest, 99% Outlook on a locked-down company laptop.
[2]. Who at my work wear sane clothing, but it's not about clothes...
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ * ***
⠈⠳⣄
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng