Re: [DNG] Bad package versions in ascii

2018-01-02 Thread KatolaZ
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 08:16:31AM +0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
> Hi,
> there are several packages in ascii with bad package versions. In later
> releases versions should NEVER be lower than in former releases. Package
> versions have to be ascending.
> 
> On my system the following packages were not upgraded because of bad
> versions:
> 
> Package   Jessie  Ascii
> 
> desktop-base  1:1.2   1:0.99
> task-laptop   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
> tasksel   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
> tasksel-data  3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
> task-laptop   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
> task-german   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3

Tasksel will be updated just before ASCII beta will be released. Same
for desktop-base.

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[ "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[   @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[ @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad package versions in ascii

2018-01-02 Thread Irrwahn
J. Fahrner wrote on 02.01.2018 08:16:
> Hi,
> there are several packages in ascii with bad package versions. In later 
> releases versions should NEVER be lower than in former releases. Package 
> versions have to be ascending.
> 
> On my system the following packages were not upgraded because of bad 
> versions:
> 
> Package   Jessie  Ascii
> 
> desktop-base  1:1.2   1:0.99
> task-laptop   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
> tasksel   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
> tasksel-data  3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
> task-laptop   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
> task-german   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3

I'm not sure (and will certainly be corrected if wrong), but 
I can only assume that the Ascii versions of these packages 
are not done yet, and that the lower version numbers actually 
mean those are in fact older packages from a time quite before 
Jessie went stable. 

IOW, you'd probably actually *downgrade*, if you were to install 
the Ascii versions!!

Best regards,
Urban

-- 
Sapere aude!
 
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] Bad package versions in ascii

2018-01-01 Thread J. Fahrner

Hi,
there are several packages in ascii with bad package versions. In later 
releases versions should NEVER be lower than in former releases. Package 
versions have to be ascending.


On my system the following packages were not upgraded because of bad 
versions:


Package   Jessie  Ascii

desktop-base  1:1.2   1:0.99
task-laptop   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
tasksel   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
tasksel-data  3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
task-laptop   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
task-german   3.33+devuan1.0  3.33+devuan0.3
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng