Re: [DNG] OpenRC: Was: Re: Dng Digest, Vol 20, Issue 138
On Thu, 26 May 2016 12:50:19 +0200 Svante Signellwrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 11:28 +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote: > > Please keep the subject, even if you are reading the mails via the > Digest service! In addition, if you respond to a digest subjected email, please change the subject back to the original, like Svante just did. If that's too much trouble, just don't reply. My opinion: if somebody isn't willing to take the time to MAKE ABSOLUTELY SURE he has the right subject, he doesn't deserve a reply. I think the "convenience" of getting email via digest implies the *responsibility* of the extra work in fixing the subject and deleting all extraneous body. That's why I never use a digest: by the time you do what's right, it's not convenient anymore. SteveT Steve Litt May 2016 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21 ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] OpenRC: Was: Re: Dng Digest, Vol 20, Issue 138
Am Thu, 26 May 2016 12:50:19 +0200 schrieb Svante Signell: > On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 11:28 +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote: > > Please keep the subject, even if you are reading the mails via the > Digest service! You're right! Sorry about that, i was too fast :-( Btw, could that be corrected ex post, by the administrator(s)? Eventually bringing back the correct subjectline or simply by bouncing back the entire mail (with a reason) giving the chance to the author to correct the subjectline? ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
[DNG] OpenRC: Was: Re: Dng Digest, Vol 20, Issue 138
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 11:28 +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote: Please keep the subject, even if you are reading the mails via the Digest service! ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng