On Jul 25, 2012, at 3:36 AM, Francis Dupont wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > >> What about always using both types of DS record? Why does everyone >> publish both SHA-1 and SHA-256 digests? RFC 4509 is more than 6 >> years old. > > => in fact perhaps it is the right time to jump to SHA-256 only?
Somewhat related: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-07 Wouldn't it be nice to know who supports what, so these questions are easier to answer in the future?! W > > Regards > > francis.dup...@fdupont.fr > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > dns-jobs mailing list > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs > -- American Non-Sequitur Society; we don't make sense, but we do like pizza! _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs