Re: [dns-operations] First new gTLD using ICANN's Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

2014-08-28 Thread Shumon Huque
A related observation: according the ICANN webinar on this topic from a
couple of weeks ago, all new gTLDs delegated on or after August 18th were
supposed to deploy these kinds of controlled interruption wildcard records.
The slides are here:


https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-framework-slides-12aug14-en.pdf

It looks like the following new gTLDs were delegated on/after that date.
But only .otsuka has the records:

business
gbiz
gmail
immo
network
otsuka
pizza
xn--vhquv

--Shumon.

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:

 The gTLD otsuka, created sometime in the last 24 hours, appears to be the
 first to use the wildcards described at

 https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-08-01-en
 https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-
 collision-framework-30jul14-en.pdf

 That is, it contains

 *.otsuka.  3600  IN  A127.0.53.53
 *.otsuka.  3600  IN  TXT  Your DNS configuration needs immediate
 attention see https://icann.org/namecollision;
 *.otsuka.  3600  IN  SRV  10 10 0 your-dns-needs-immediate-
 attention.otsuka.
 *.otsuka.  3600  IN  MX   10 your-dns-needs-immediate-attention.otsuka.

 and the corresponding RRSIGs.

 What do people think about this business? Is anyone taking specific
 precautions
 to detect attempts to connect to 127.0.53.53?

 --
 Chris Thompson   University of Cambridge Information Services,
 Email: c...@uis.cam.ac.ukRoger Needham Building, 7 JJ Thomson Avenue,
 Phone: +44 1223 334715   Cambridge CB3 0RB, United Kingdom.
 ___
 dns-operations mailing list
 dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
 dns-jobs mailing list
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Re: [dns-operations] First new gTLD using ICANN's Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

2014-08-28 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Aug 28, 2014, at 7:39 AM, Shumon Huque shu...@gmail.com wrote:

 A related observation: according the ICANN webinar on this topic from a 
 couple of weeks ago, all new gTLDs delegated on or after August 18th were 
 supposed to deploy these kinds of controlled interruption wildcard records. 
 The slides are here:
 
   
 https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-framework-slides-12aug14-en.pdf
 

Correct, but they only need to deploy it before they deploy any SLDs other than 
nic.newgtld.

 It looks like the following new gTLDs were delegated on/after that date. But 
 only .otsuka has the records:

Also correct. So, before any of those TLDs start doing anything other than I'm 
in the root zone and I have A records for nic, they have to do the 90-day 
controlled interruption.

--Paul Hoffman
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] First new gTLD using ICANN's Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

2014-08-28 Thread SM

Hi Chris,
At 05:38 28-08-2014, Chris Thompson wrote:

The gTLD otsuka, created sometime in the last 24 hours, appears to be the
first to use the wildcards described at


[snip]

What do people think about this business? Is anyone taking specific 
precautions

to detect attempts to connect to 127.0.53.53?


I presume that the people who invented this stuff know what they are doing.

Regards,
-sm 


___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] First new gTLD using ICANN's Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

2014-08-28 Thread Warren Kumari
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:50 PM, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
 Hi Chris,

 At 05:38 28-08-2014, Chris Thompson wrote:

 The gTLD otsuka, created sometime in the last 24 hours, appears to be
 the
 first to use the wildcards described at


 [snip]


 What do people think about this business? Is anyone taking specific
 precautions
 to detect attempts to connect to 127.0.53.53?


 I presume that the people who invented this stuff know what they are doing.

Mwahahahahahhah hahhhahaha teehee...

Thanks, I needed that.
W



 Regards,
 -sm
 ___
 dns-operations mailing list
 dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
 dns-jobs mailing list
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] DNSSEC strict mode useful?

2014-08-28 Thread Carsten Strotmann
Hello Holger,

Zuleger, Holger, Vodafone DE wrote:

 Hmm, what about BINDs
 
   dnssec-must-be-secure . yes;
 ?


thanks, I have been blind. That is what I'm looking for.

Problem solved.

-- Carsten
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] First new gTLD using ICANN's Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

2014-08-28 Thread Rod Rasmussen
I note that these documents speak to many of the issues being exposed here (and 
yes, full disclosure, I wrote a small portion of the text/reviewed them):

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-062-en.pdf
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-066-en.pdf

Draw your own conclusions.

Cheers,

Rod

On Aug 28, 2014, at 9:50 AM, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:

 Hi Chris,
 At 05:38 28-08-2014, Chris Thompson wrote:
 The gTLD otsuka, created sometime in the last 24 hours, appears to be the
 first to use the wildcards described at
 
 [snip]
 
 What do people think about this business? Is anyone taking specific 
 precautions
 to detect attempts to connect to 127.0.53.53?
 
 I presume that the people who invented this stuff know what they are doing.
 
 Regards,
 -sm 
 ___
 dns-operations mailing list
 dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
 dns-jobs mailing list
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Re: [dns-operations] First new gTLD using ICANN's Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

2014-08-28 Thread Jared Mauch
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:36:29PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:
  On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:50 PM, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
  Hi Chris,
 
  At 05:38 28-08-2014, Chris Thompson wrote:
 
  The gTLD otsuka, created sometime in the last 24 hours, appears to be
  the
  first to use the wildcards described at
 
 
  [snip]
 
 
  What do people think about this business? Is anyone taking specific
  precautions
  to detect attempts to connect to 127.0.53.53?
 
 
  I presume that the people who invented this stuff know what they are doing.
 
  Mwahahahahahhah hahhhahaha teehee...
 
  Thanks, I needed that.
 
 So, I just realized that this sounded like a jab specifically at JAS
 (the folk who proposed the 127.0.53.53 answer) -- this was actually
 instead supposed to be a jab at everyone :-)
 I had long discussions with the JAS folk, and have huge respect for
 them - they did, IMO,  a good job.

The really fun part (for me) is that depending on the OS you can ping
127.0.53.53.  (eg: Linux, Yes,  MacOS, No).  Linux will also give you
Connection refused for TCP connections.

- Jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++;  | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] First new gTLD using ICANN's Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

2014-08-28 Thread Warren Kumari
On Thursday, August 28, 2014, Rod Rasmussen 
rod.rasmus...@internetidentity.com wrote:

 I note that these documents speak to many of the issues being exposed here
 (and yes, full disclosure, I wrote a small portion of the text/reviewed
 them):


Yah, me too...

W


 https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-062-en.pdf
 https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-066-en.pdf

 Draw your own conclusions.

 Cheers,

 Rod

 On Aug 28, 2014, at 9:50 AM, SM s...@resistor.net javascript:; wrote:

  Hi Chris,
  At 05:38 28-08-2014, Chris Thompson wrote:
  The gTLD otsuka, created sometime in the last 24 hours, appears to be
 the
  first to use the wildcards described at
 
  [snip]
 
  What do people think about this business? Is anyone taking specific
 precautions
  to detect attempts to connect to 127.0.53.53?
 
  I presume that the people who invented this stuff know what they are
 doing.
 
  Regards,
  -sm
  ___
  dns-operations mailing list
  dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net javascript:;
  https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
  dns-jobs mailing list
  https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Re: [dns-operations] First new gTLD using ICANN's Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

2014-08-28 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 28 aug 2014, at 22:12, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:50 PM, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
 Hi Chris,
 
 At 05:38 28-08-2014, Chris Thompson wrote:
 
 The gTLD otsuka, created sometime in the last 24 hours, appears to be
 the
 first to use the wildcards described at
 
 
 [snip]
 
 
 What do people think about this business? Is anyone taking specific
 precautions
 to detect attempts to connect to 127.0.53.53?
 
 
 I presume that the people who invented this stuff know what they are doing.
 
 Mwahahahahahhah hahhhahaha teehee...
 
 Thanks, I needed that.

Thanks Warren, this made me smile... ;-)

For people not aware, the discussion inside ICANN on this matter has 
been...hmm...complicated.

What is deployed is the result of a discussion inside ICANN that you can find 
one core report here:

https://www.icann.org/public-comments/name-collision-2014-02-26-en

See for example Section 2.3 and Appendix A in SAC066:

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-066-en.pdf

   Patrik Fältström
   SSAC Chair



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Re: [dns-operations] First new gTLD using ICANN's Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

2014-08-28 Thread SM

Hi Rod, Warren,
At 14:13 28-08-2014, Rod Rasmussen wrote:
I note that these documents speak to many of the issues being 
exposed here (and yes, full disclosure, I wrote a small portion of 
the text/reviewed them):


Was there a response to those issues?

At 14:36 28-08-2014, Warren Kumari wrote:

So, I just realized that this sounded like a jab specifically at JAS
(the folk who proposed the 127.0.53.53 answer) -- this was actually
instead supposed to be a jab at everyone :-)


That is how I read it. :-)

Regards,
-sm 


___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs