[dns-operations] register nameservers in different TLD's NS

2012-07-16 Thread 风河

Hello,

My domain name, say nsbeta.info, has registered the nameservers in 
info's servers.
So, the domain nsbeta.info can use the nameservers of itself as its 
auth servers.
But, a domain in other TLD, say example.com, can't use the nameservers 
of nsbeta.info as its auth servers.

How can I register a info nameserver in a com's NS?

Thank you.
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] register nameservers in different TLD's NS

2012-07-16 Thread Mark Jeftovic
I think what he means is that the other TLD ( ie .com ) does not yet have a 
glue record in place for the .info nameserver - thus it will not allow domains 
to be delegated to it.

He needs a registrar to create the glue recs - and it doesn't need to be the 
parent registrar of the .info domain

If you ( sorry, didn't get original posters name ) email me the exact hostname 
you need setup offlist we'll get it added to the global registries for you

- mark

Sent from my iPhone

On 2012-07-16, at 10:12 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote:

 On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:45:34PM +0800,
 ?? m...@nsbeta.info wrote 
 a message of 17 lines which said:
 
 But, a domain in other TLD, say example.com, can't use the
 nameservers of nsbeta.info as its auth servers.
 
 Why? It should work. For instance, the name servers of linux.com are
 under .org.
 
 How can I register a info nameserver in a com's NS?
 
 You cannot, the DNS is a tree, .com cannot have information about
 .info machines (a long time ago, it did, but it was a bad idea and,
 anyway, it is over now).
 
 ___
 dns-operations mailing list
 dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
 dns-jobs mailing list
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
 
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] register nameservers in different TLD's NS

2012-07-16 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:27:07AM -0400,
 Mark Jeftovic mar...@easydns.com wrote 
 a message of 40 lines which said:

 I think what he means is that the other TLD ( ie .com ) does not yet
 have a glue record in place for the .info nameserver 

Of course. There is no need for glue since the name server's names are
not in the same domain (not even in the same TLD).

 thus it will not allow domains to be delegated to it.

easydns.com is delegated and it has a .info name server and the .com
name servers do not have glue (and for good reasons):

% dig +short @a.gtld-servers.net DNS4.EASYDNS.INFO 
% 

___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] register nameservers in different TLD's NS

2012-07-16 Thread Joe Abley

On 2012-07-16, at 11:21, Mark Jeftovic wrote:

 Sorry, I mispoke when I said glue record. It's not a glue record that
 needs to exist, BUT there does need to be a nameserver defined for that
 hostname at the registry before you can delegate a .com or .net domain
 to it.

For even more clarity, it's perhaps worth mentioning that in gTLDs this is 
mainly an artifact of the EPP data model (which itself inherited aspects from 
earlier data models).

Registries (e.g. ccTLD registries) which take other approaches might not need 
the registration of a host object (or equivalent, in their model).


Joe
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] register nameservers in different TLD's NS

2012-07-16 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 16 jul 2012, at 21:37, Joe Abley wrote:

 On 2012-07-16, at 11:21, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
 
 Sorry, I mispoke when I said glue record. It's not a glue record that
 needs to exist, BUT there does need to be a nameserver defined for that
 hostname at the registry before you can delegate a .com or .net domain
 to it.
 
 For even more clarity, it's perhaps worth mentioning that in gTLDs this is 
 mainly an artifact of the EPP data model (which itself inherited aspects from 
 earlier data models).
 
 Registries (e.g. ccTLD registries) which take other approaches might not need 
 the registration of a host object (or equivalent, in their model).

Well, I think the policy in any epp based registry should be able to be such:

- It is for a registrar to add a domain object, and link that domain object to 
a named host object
- A host object has as a sponsoring registrar the registrar that is sponsor of 
the to the name of the host object inferior domain object
- A named host object can be created by anyone, but glue can only be added to 
the host object by the for the host object sponsoring registrar

An alternative is to allow domain objects to be created with hostnames that are 
host objects only in the case that the explicit glue is needed (that the host 
has a domain name in the delegated domain).

Sure, it might create problems if you have cross-referenced glue, but I have at 
the moment a case where a registrant due to policy in the registry can not get 
a domain name of NS to what they want because the domain name of the NS has a 
different sponsoring registrar than the sponsoring registrar of the delegated 
domain.

I.e. we have example1.com with a name server that is for example 
ns.example2.com. Now, example1.com and example2.com have different registrars, 
and the registrar for example1.com is not allowed to create the host object 
ns.example2.com that is needed for the domain example1.com.

If only example2.com did use ns.example2.com as name server, then the host 
object would exist in the registry database, and the example1.com domain object 
could reference it. But as it is now, nope.

I have no problems with registries providing rope that the registrant can hang 
themselves in, but having registries having policies that prohibit the 
registrant to do the right thing, that makes me irritated.

   Patrik

___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs