Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-27 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Late to the party, as usual.

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:00:45AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
 official list from IANA, and if you feel like arguing with them,
 here's the ISO list to shut you up. :) 

It's worth noting that, unlike IANA's decision many years ago to use
an external authority (ISO's list) to determine what a valid ccTLD is,
in recent years ICANN has walked right into the trap the IANA avoided
in the last round.  For with the IDN ccTLDs, ICANN seems not to have
adopted an unambigious external authority to which it can point to
say, That's how we come up with these names.  

I would look forward to the first nasty discussion about the correct
spelling of an IDN in the root, except that, of course, it's already
happened.

Best,

A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan
a...@anvilwalrusden.com
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-22 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 06:55:44PM -0400,
 .CW Registry Curacao regis...@una.net wrote 
 a message of 187 lines which said:

 We need some help with getting our ccTLD registered worldwide.

You're in the news :-)

http://domainincite.com/11673-apple-google-and-microsoft-still-dont-understand-new-tlds
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-22 Thread .CW Registry Curacao
Dear Carlos,

Please find attached the history of some conversations (between my colleague 
Jeffrey) with Google support.
Let me know if you need anything else to help with this issue.

Rgds,
CW Registry Curacao
University of the Netherlands Antilles
Phone: +599-98442250/1
Fax: +599-98442255
E-mail: regis...@una.net
URL: www.una.cw/CW_Registry

 SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless necessary

-Original Message-
From: Carlos M. Martinez [mailto:carlosm3...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 22 January 2013 09:11 AM
To: .CW Registry Curacao
Cc: dns-operati...@mail.dns-oarc.net
Subject: Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD 
tables/databases ...

Mr. Pengel,

Is there a way for people interested in debugging this problem to get a .CW 
email address. I wonder if there is any free webmail provider in the island, or 
if your organization could provide a few test accounts under some 
special-purpose domain.

regards,

~Carlos

On 1/20/13 8:55 PM, .CW Registry Curacao wrote:
 Dear DNS Operations,
 
  
 
 I am not sure this is an issue that you can do anything about, however 
 we have been advised by our colleagues from the ccNSO (ICANN) to send 
 you this email message.
 
  
 
 We need some help with getting our ccTLD registered worldwide.
 
 Several Internet services sites cannot be used by our customers, 
 because the .CW is not recognized.
 
 In our case it prevents us as university to make use of (for instance) 
 Google Apps.
 
 Please help!
 
  
 
 Rgds,
 
 ir. Leendert J.J. Pengel
 
 /CW Registry Curacao/
 
 /University of the Netherlands Antilles/
 
 /Phone: +599-98442250/1/
 
 /Fax: +599-98442255/
 
 /E-mail: regis...@una.net mailto:lpen...@attglobal.net/
 
 /URL: www.una.cw/CW_Registry http://www.una.an/an_domreg/
 
  
 
 *P* *SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless necessary*
 
  
 
 
 
 ___
 dns-operations mailing list
 dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
 dns-jobs mailing list
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
 
---BeginMessage---
Dear Google Enterprise Support,

 

We are hereby sending this e-mail to request the registration of the .CW
ccTLD within Google Apps. Our customers have informed us that they are not
able to use your valued services since .CW country code is not registered
within Google Apps. 

As the official registrar for the .CW ccTLD, we would like to make a request
to have this added to your systems. Please refer to the following link on
the IANA website identifying us as the official registrar for the .CW ccTLD.


http://www.iana.org/reports/2011/cw-report-20111003.html

http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/cw.html

 

If for legal reasons you have the need for further identification
documentation, please do not hesitate to request these. We hope this process
can be a fast and easy one. We are also the official registrars for the .AN
ccTLD.

 

 

Best regards,

 

ing. Jeffrey A. Schmidt

IT Support Coördinator

University of the Netherlands Antilles

Phone: (+599-9) 844-2226

Fax: (+599-9) 844-2255

E-mail:  mailto:l.pen...@una.an jeffrey.schm...@una.an

URL: www.una.an/ccuna

 

This communication contains information which is confidential and may also
be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If
you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution,
copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it.

 

There's more happiness in giving than there is in receiving - (J. Kingdom)

 

P SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless necessary

 

 

 


This message is scanned for Virus and Spam by University of Netherlands
Antilles, Curacao.
---End Message---
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-22 Thread SM

At 07:54 22-01-2013, .CW Registry Curacao wrote:
Please find attached the history of some conversations (between my 
colleague Jeffrey) with Google support.


The problem is not related to email or DNS.  It related to the 
web.  It may be easier to contact web folks who can fix it.


Regards,
-sm 


___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-22 Thread .CW Registry Curacao
Dear -SM,

Thanks for your follow-up.
We are working on it!

Rgds,
--Original Message--
From: SM
To: .CW Registry Curacao
Cc: dns-operati...@mail.dns-oarc.net
Subject: Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD 
tables/databases ...
Sent: Jan 22, 2013 1:52 PM

At 07:54 22-01-2013, .CW Registry Curacao wrote:
Please find attached the history of some conversations (between my 
colleague Jeffrey) with Google support.

The problem is not related to email or DNS.  It related to the 
web.  It may be easier to contact web folks who can fix it.

Regards,
-sm 



.CW Registry Curacao
University of the Netherlands Antilles
Phone: +599-98442250/1
Fax: +599-98442255
E-mail: regis...@una.net
URL: www.una.cw/CW_DomReg

SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless necessary
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-22 Thread Intel

And you wonder why IDNs are not more mainstream... look no further.

From the end user POV - domain names that you can't use for E-mail or 
in web forms are as useful as a parachute with holes in it.




On 22-01-2013 22:47, Warren Kumari wrote:

On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:52 PM, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:


At 07:54 22-01-2013, .CW Registry Curacao wrote:

Please find attached the history of some conversations (between my colleague 
Jeffrey) with Google support.

The problem is not related to email or DNS.  It related to the web.  It may be 
easier to contact web folks who can fix it.

Oh, and just for closing the loop…

I am in contact with Jeffrey and Leendert, trying ti figure out where exactly 
we are checking this…

W



Regards,
-sm
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


--
Life is a concentration camp.  You're stuck here and there's no way out and you 
can only rage impotently against your persecutors.
 -- Woody Allen




___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs



___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-21 Thread Carlos M. Martinez
Agree, but anyways checking suffixes is a bizarre and broken way of
validating an email. Just because a suffix exists it doesn't mean that
the domain exists, and if a domain doesn't exist because the TLD is
wrong or the 2nd level, or the 3rd level labels are wrong, the net
effect on the application is the same.

Validating suffixes is less than worthless. Either validate the whole
label chain or learn to deal with bounces.

I registered the cagnazzo.name domain name some three years ago and
decided not to renew it because my email c...@cagnazzo.name was almost
unusable due be perceived as 'not valid' by many web applications. And
.name has been out for several years.

rant
It's going to be fun watching what happens with the new round of gTLDs.
I certainly hope that lousy web programmers start feeling the hot breath
of pissed off people who have just spent a gazillion dollars on their
new TLD just to have their shiny new .whatever emails be considered
'invalid' by some idiotic PHP form validation code.
/rant

cheers!

~C.

On 1/20/13 11:07 PM, Rick Wesson wrote:
 +1
 
 getting on the mozilla list effects lots of applications.
 
 -rick
 
 
 On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:55 PM, RijilV rij...@riji.lv wrote:
 My experience is many people use Mozilla's public suffix list for allowing
 folks to create resources on their app services.  This is because a large
 number of TLDs don't support creating records directly off of them, and the
 3rd parties don't want to accidentally grant ownership to a higher namespace
 to an individual.  For example, .uk is a TLD, but you shouldn't let people
 regirester apps under that because someone could cleverly take co.uk and
 create sub apps within that that they didn't own.

 http://publicsuffix.org/list/

 Incidentally, I don't see .cw in that list.  It is open to submissions...
 http://publicsuffix.org/submit/

 .r'


 On 20 January 2013 16:28, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:


 On 2013-01-21, at 11:55, .CW Registry Curacao regis...@una.net wrote:

 I am not sure this is an issue that you can do anything about, however
 we have been advised by our colleagues from the ccNSO (ICANN) to send you
 this email message.

 We need some help with getting our ccTLD registered worldwide.
 Several Internet services sites cannot be used by our customers, because
 the .CW is not recognized.
 In our case it prevents us as university to make use of (for instance)
 Google Apps.

 There are google people on this list who (if they haven't already
 contacted you about it) will no doubt be happy to help you out with that
 specific problem, in their normal efficient way.

 More generally, there are many people who make assumptions about what a
 valid domain name is. A common example (I find) can be found in web forms
 which validate e-mail addresses. I can't even remember the number of times I
 was told that jab...@ca.afilias.info was invalid when I was working for
 Afilias, which always struck me as pleasantly ironic, especially when the
 web forms in question were provided by people trying to sell us stuff.

 There's no central registry for broken human expectations of how the DNS
 works. You pretty much need to just get used to complaining to the people
 who provide individual broken services when you find them.


 Joe

 ___
 dns-operations mailing list
 dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
 dns-jobs mailing list
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs



 ___
 dns-operations mailing list
 dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
 dns-jobs mailing list
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
 ___
 dns-operations mailing list
 dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
 dns-jobs mailing list
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
 
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-21 Thread David Conrad
Hi,

On Jan 21, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Jaap Akkerhuis j...@nlnetlabs.nl wrote:
 ISO-3166-1 table which shows valid ccTLDs in green:
 http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/country_codes/iso-3166-1_decoding_table.htm
 Yellow (exceptionally reserved) code elements used for ccTLDs
 are also considered 'valid'.
 Just some of them.

I was speaking from IANA/ICANN's perspective in the sense that for a 2-letter 
TLD to be delegated, the first condition that must be met is that the 2-letter 
ISO-3166 code point must be allocated by ISO-3166/MA. At this point in time, 
IANA/ICANN considers code points marked in green and in yellow in the decoding 
table as 'allocated'.  This, of course, is not the only condition for a 
2-letter TLD to be delegated out of a 2-letter ISO-3166 code point.

Regards,
-drc

___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-21 Thread Fred Morris
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, RijilV wrote:
 My experience is many people use Mozilla's public suffix list for allowing
 folks to create resources on their app services.

I was going to suggest that. However bear in mind that this isn't really a
TLD list. What it is is a list of domains that Mozilla won't allow
cookies to be set for.

--

Fred Morris

___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-20 Thread Joe Abley

On 2013-01-21, at 11:55, .CW Registry Curacao regis...@una.net wrote:

 I am not sure this is an issue that you can do anything about, however we 
 have been advised by our colleagues from the ccNSO (ICANN) to send you this 
 email message.
  
 We need some help with getting our ccTLD registered worldwide.
 Several Internet services sites cannot be used by our customers, because the 
 .CW is not recognized.
 In our case it prevents us as university to make use of (for instance) Google 
 Apps.

There are google people on this list who (if they haven't already contacted you 
about it) will no doubt be happy to help you out with that specific problem, in 
their normal efficient way.

More generally, there are many people who make assumptions about what a valid 
domain name is. A common example (I find) can be found in web forms which 
validate e-mail addresses. I can't even remember the number of times I was told 
that jab...@ca.afilias.info was invalid when I was working for Afilias, which 
always struck me as pleasantly ironic, especially when the web forms in 
question were provided by people trying to sell us stuff.

There's no central registry for broken human expectations of how the DNS works. 
You pretty much need to just get used to complaining to the people who provide 
individual broken services when you find them.


Joe

___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-20 Thread David Conrad
A nit:

On Jan 20, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
 ISO-3166-1 table which shows valid ccTLDs in green:
 http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/country_codes/iso-3166-1_decoding_table.htm

Yellow (exceptionally reserved) code elements used for ccTLDs are also 
considered 'valid'.

 This is an uphill battle which is only going to get steeper when the next 
 round of new TLDs is released.

It might eventually improve as folks who make broken assumptions keep getting 
whined at.  And world peace might break out too.

Regards,
-drc

___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-20 Thread Rick Wesson
remind me if .info and .biz, .pro, .areo, .etc were not commercial
concerns? The organizational structure of the TLD is irrelevant to the
underlying technology in question.

your assertion is invalid.

-rick

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com wrote:
 Except that with the next round of new TLDs there will be a commercial
 (financial) interest for the new TLD to be fully and widely usable.

 Frank

 -Original Message-
 From: dns-operations-boun...@lists.dns-oarc.net
 [mailto:dns-operations-boun...@lists.dns-oarc.net] On Behalf Of Doug Barton
 Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 6:36 PM
 To: .CW Registry Curacao
 Cc: dns-operati...@mail.dns-oarc.net
 Subject: Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD
 tables/databases ...

 snip

 This is an uphill battle which is only going to get steeper when the
 next round of new TLDs is released.

 Good luck,

 Doug

 ___
 dns-operations mailing list
 dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
 dns-jobs mailing list
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs


 ___
 dns-operations mailing list
 dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
 dns-jobs mailing list
 https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs