Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Query on "strict-order"
Hi Simon, We are using Dnsmasq v2.83 Thanks Gomathi Shankar P S ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Query on "strict-order"
What release of dnsmasq are you using? The behaviour around SERVFAIL has changed several times over the years. Simon. On 21/02/2023 10:39, Gomathi Shankar P S wrote: Hello, Sorry for asking a basic question. I was experimenting with "strict-order" and I could see that dnsmasq reaches out only top two nameservers in resolv.dnsmasq in the order. When both nameservers at top order fails with SERVFAIL , dnsmasq is giving up. Do we have any options to configure the number of nameservers it should try with "strict-order" enabled? Appreciate your help. Regards, Gomathi Shankar P S ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
[Dnsmasq-discuss] Query on "strict-order"
Hello, Sorry for asking a basic question. I was experimenting with "strict-order" and I could see that dnsmasq reaches out only top two nameservers in resolv.dnsmasq in the order. When both nameservers at top order fails with SERVFAIL , dnsmasq is giving up. Do we have any options to configure the number of nameservers it should try with "strict-order" enabled? Appreciate your help. Regards, Gomathi Shankar P S ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
