Re: [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07: (with COMMENT)

[Wessels, Duane]

> On Sep 5, 2023, at 3:52 AM, Robert Wilton via Datatracker  
> wrote:
> 
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for working on this document - I'm not a DNS expert but it looks like 
> good advice.
> 
> A couple of minor comments for your consideration:
> 
> (1) p 2, sec 1.  Introduction
> 
>   This document updates [RFC2308] to require negative caching of DNS
>   resolution failures and provides additional examples of resolution
>   failures.
> 
> Perhaps "caching of all DNS resolution failures"?

Agreed.

> 
> 
> (2) p 2, sec 1.1.  Motivation
> 
>   RFC Editor: We'd like your thoughts on moving the Motivation and
>   Related Work sections to appendices.  Is that a preferred style?
> 
> Not the RFC editor, but I would keep the motivation here, as a subsection of 
> the introduction.

Excellent, thanks for the feedback.

DW

___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

[DNSOP] Robert Wilton's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07: (with COMMENT)

[Robert Wilton via Datatracker]

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures/



--
COMMENT:
--

Hi,

Thanks for working on this document - I'm not a DNS expert but it looks like 
good advice.

A couple of minor comments for your consideration:

(1) p 2, sec 1.  Introduction

   This document updates [RFC2308] to require negative caching of DNS
   resolution failures and provides additional examples of resolution
   failures.

Perhaps "caching of all DNS resolution failures"?


(2) p 2, sec 1.1.  Motivation

   RFC Editor: We'd like your thoughts on moving the Motivation and
   Related Work sections to appendices.  Is that a preferred style?

Not the RFC editor, but I would keep the motivation here, as a subsection of 
the introduction.

Regards,
Rob



___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop